Thuletide

Does geriatric pregnancy producer higher IQ children? No, obviously not. This association is genetically confounded. More intelligent mothers currently delay pregnancy for cultural reasons. As per this study's results, advanced maternal age may be more harmful to children's intelligence than advanced paternal age, which is commonly associated with decreased offspring IQ. This is likely because older mothers are less healthy; they have degraded uteruses and diminished placental function, resulting in insufficient blood flow and poor oxygen/nutrient delivery. They also have higher rates of inflammation and metabolic stress, and significantly higher rates of preterm deliveries and low birth weights. Numerous studies cover these topics, but here are a couple of examples: T2* Mapping of Placental Oxygenation to Estimate Fetal Cortical and Subcortical Maturation Prenatal maternal inflammation and cognitive performance in offspring during late midlife

To clarify: the type of axis scaling (logarithmic) that was dishonestly used on this graph is intended for data that has a colossal range in values, e.g. exponential growth. A magnitude 10 earthquake releases 1 trillion times more energy than a magnitude 2 earthquake. Obviously, you can't plot that on a linear scale. Somebody would only use logarithmic scaling for data with a low range of values if they wanted to warp the results and bamboozle people who didn't know any better. In this case, it was used to minimize the criminal overrepresentation of third world migrants.

The more severe the sex crime, the more Third World migrants are overrepresented: Crime statistics published by the Danish and British governments show that racial groups commit 'sexual offenses' (a broad category encompassing many crimes of varying severity) at similar rates in both countries. The British government does not publish rape statistics separately from general 'sexual offenses', which is almost certainly an attempt to downplay the extent of non-White criminality. For this information, we must turn to our friends in the Danish government, who produce the highest quality and most transparent data in Europe. Sub-Saharan overrepresentation jumps from 2.8x for 'sexual offenses' to 9.6x for rape, MENA from 2.1x to 5.4x, and South Asia from 1.3x to 2.7x. Afghans in Britain are already overrepresented by 7.0x for sexual offenses, so their rape rate may be as high as 20-30x. Graph source

Sex crimes in Britain displayed with a linear scale. Unfortunately, this doesn't include the confidence intervals from the original graph, but it's still a far more honest presentation of the data.

Indisputably true summary of women's fiction.

European politicians are significantly more left-wing than voters on cultural issues. Democracy is a farce. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4230288

Unfortunately, Bolsonaro "lost" in Brazil. Lula appointed his former personal lawyer to the supreme court, and that judge extended voting by two hours on election day, resulting in miraculous victory for Lula, who was trailing behind and predicted to lose by every poll. Libs are now gloating about imprisoning their political opponent and rigging an election against his heir. Bolsonaro will challenge the results.

The Economist's graph of sex crime data for Britain is a crime against data visualization. Look at that distorted axis. Typical dishonest libtards. https://www.economist.com/britain/2026/10/25/do-immigrants-from-some-countries-commit-more-sex-crimes

French cops seem to have given French nationalists free rein to beat up rioting libtards and immigrants. The cops are also treating rioters more brutally (but not brutally enough imo).

I'm skeptical of the trope that women become sluts because they "enjoy sex" and have an unquenchable thirst for cock. Maybe this is true for a minority of sluts, but I doubt it applies to the average slut. Women have very low rates of orgasm during "hookups" (which is evidence that they aren't even good at what they do) and they always complain that one-night stand sex is bad. If they really "enjoyed sex," they would get married or at least find a stable long-term relationship, since this results in higher sexual satisfaction than random hookups and flings. This isn't arcane wisdom accessible only through obscure scientific research; it's pretty intuitive. I think it's more likely that they become sluts because they're dumb and impulsive, and/or because they're conformist and easily influenced by noxious cultural trends, and/or because they're mentally ill for whatever reason (e.g. trauma stemming from childhood abuse). Perhaps these negative traits prevent them from holding down a long-term relationship?

Being a whore is ~50% heritable, and the remaining influence is mostly nonshared environment. "Nonshared environment" encompasses many things, since it just means "non-genetic influences that make an individual different from their twin," but I suspect the strongest non-genetic influences on whoredom today are cultural: Feminism, Tinder, etc.

Unrestricted sociosexuality belongs to the Fast Life History genetic package; it is influenced by and clusters with heritable traits such as psychopathy, narcissism, impulsivity, and lower executive function. However, it is also mediated by cultural influences. For example, in our era, the influence of feminism (promoting female "liberation" through unrestricted sex) or Tinder (facilitating "hookups") can tip people toward unrestricted sociosexuality who otherwise may not have been predisposed to such behavior. From this, we get the phenomenon of women who have a brief "hoe phase" and then decide that they hate all men or make false rape accusations. In actuality, many of these women hate themselves for engaging in such disgusting acts, but women are never responsible for their own poor decisions. They could blame feminism for convincing them that promiscuity is "empowering", but that would undermine their own political power and influence within the female collective. "How could feminism, the ideology of girl power, be wrong? Something else must be to blame!" Thus, they retcon their consensual whorish acts as "rape" and — in line with feminist ideology — blame men, "the patriarchy," etc.

The correlation between body count and sex drive is confounded by unrestricted sociosexuality (being a whore). Sex drive as an independent variable does not predict body count. Being a whore [SOI-R B in Table 4] barely predicts frequency of intercourse with current partner; it's a much stronger predictor of infidelity. So, basically: Sex drive has no influence on whether or not somebody becomes a whore, and dating a whore is unlikely to result in more sex, but it is quite likely to result in being cheated on.

🇫🇷 A tale in three acts: 1. French nationalists approach ANTIFA & brown rioters. 2. French nationalists fight ANTIFA & brown rioters until disrupted by police. 3. ANTIFA & brown rioters flee while screaming.

EU president Ursula von der Leyen admits the Great Replacement is real, but blames it all on Russia and Belarus. Russia and Belarus do ship migrants into neighboring Eastern European countries, but this pales in comparison to the number of migrants imported by the European Union.

Re. Nofap etc., somebody recently asked for my thoughts (I quote below): Semen retention is definitely beneficial; try it for two weeks and you'll notice the change in your mental state, no studies required: increased clarity, more motivation, discipline, focus, etc. The problem is that it isn't sustainable. 99% of people can't do it indefinitely without losing their minds, especially with pornographic imagery blaring out of every media source, half-naked women walking down the street everywhere you look. There's a reason athletes and fighters only do it for a few weeks before competitions and fights. Indefinite semen retention isn't even biologically possible; a healthy guy is just going to coom in his sleep if he goes too long without release. Plus, retaining semen leaves your balls full of degraded old retard sperm, which does eventually get broken down and reabsorbed over time, but not quickly enough to prevent a backlog of dysgenic swimmers. You're supposed to clear the tubes out every two weeks or so to retain healthy sperm, or something like that... I forget the exact timeframe. People who are really sexually screwed up -- they suffer from erectile dysfunction or have brainwashed themselves into developing bizarre sexual fixations that would impede a real relationship or whatever -- would definitely benefit from nofap, as it helps to reset sexual preferences. After a couple of months of nofap, you could probably fap to something as innocent as a cute girl's face. Porn consumption in general is not great for you, but some types of porn are obviously much worse than others, given that it can rewire your brain. If you can only get off to very bizarre stuff, then you've got a problem. Anything that features another man is inherently gay and cucked; you're training yourself to be attracted to dick and balls and watching other people having sex. Another issue is that nofap can become an unhealthy obsession; people traumatize themselves because they've failed their heckin nofap streak and "relapsed." The nofap reddit is an insane asylum. People often treat it as a cure-all, as if nofap will magically fix all of their problems. What good is a 90-day nofap streak if you don't eat healthily, don't exercise, don't socialize, don't learn anything, etc.? If your life is a total mess, it can be a good starting point, but that's all it should be. The extent to which somebody should nofap depends entirely on their circumstances. For a healthy guy without a girlfriend, limited fap of every week or two seems optimal. People with low libido could abstain for longer, but that in itself is indicative of serious health issues. People in relationships should also do nofap, for obvious reasons, unless you don't see your partner for a few weeks. --- Additional thoughts: In the past, I have advised indefinite nofap, but I rescind this advice, given that 1 in 3 young men are getting zero sex and have poor prospects for getting any sex. (Not that sex is what young men truly desire; it's intimacy and love). And relating to my previous post, couples with mismatched libidos should discuss the issue openly, but delicately, to ensure the sexual needs of the higher libido person are met to a reasonable degree. Maybe this will require somefap, but I don't think that's optimal.

Men's Porn Use: Someone from the Institute of Family studies published this article, stating that women "should not tolerate porn." "This standard is one young women should not lower. Yes, they might hurt their chances of love and happiness by having high material expectations. But they should have high moral expectations that they hold themselves and others to. Not watching porn is one of them." The article is framed as motherly advice to young women, but omits the advice they need to hear most: 1) Don't be a whore. 2) Have lots of sex with your man, including when you feel "too tired" or whatever (this should be reciprocal). Men's porn consumption is a response to female behavior; withholding sex increases porn use and vice versa. This is well established. Moreover, women in relationships are often frigid, having destroyed their ability to pairbond via "hoe phases." Fix the whore problem and men's porn use will plummet. In fact, men's porn use isn't really worth addressing until this issue is resolved.