Suhrob academy | Beginner Elementary

✅Passage 1 from today's real IELTS EXAM (CD British Council) https://mini-ielts.com/1027/view-solution/reading/william-gilbert-and-magnetism

A BAND 8.5 ESSAY IN THE REAL EXAM! 🥇Detailed approach 🥈Ripple-effect approach 🥉Domino effect approach 🏅Temporal comparison 🎖️Local exemplification @WRITING_T

Unda bugun bir soatdan keyin 21:00 da Reading Passage 1, Listening Part 4, va vaqt yetsa Writing Task 2 ni ham jonli ko'rib chiqamiz.

In response to urgent societal and environmental challenges, many argue that it is imperative for all individuals to contribute a certain portion of their earnings to support charitable causes. While there are valid reasons behind this proposal, I take issue with it. Proponents of mandatory donations put forth personal and social justifications for their stance. At an individual level, donating a fixed percentage of one's income to charity can cultivate a heightened sense of social responsibility and civic duty, fostering a profound connection to community well-being. Knowing that their contributions can make a big difference in terms of promoting social prosperity and environmental preservation, individuals may derive a deep sense of purpose and fulfillment, ultimately enhancing their overall quality of life. On a broader societal scale, compulsory financial contributions to charitable organisations can serve as catalysts for empowering marginalized groups, such as abused children, displaced populations, and the homeless. This turn of events not only alleviates social issues of poverty and crime but also fosters social cohesion and solidarity. Despite these arguments in favor of compulsory donations, in my view, imposing such obligations carries more drawbacks than benefits. Firstly, it goes against the fundamental ethos of charity - voluntary giving. Forcing individuals to donate a specific proportion of their salaries undermines the core values of altruism, potentially eroding the underlying principles of charitable acts. Secondly, it is crucial to acknowledge that people already fulfill their civic duties through mandatory tax payments. In a challenging economic landscape where many struggle to balance high taxes and utility bills with basic necessities, mandating charitable donations could compound financial constraints and provoke public resistance. In conclusion, while mandatory donations can benefit individuals and society as a whole, I contend that such governmental mandates run the risk of distorting the true spirit of charity and face public opposition. Only through voluntary acts of generosity and philanthropy can strides be made in transforming the world into a better place to live in. Suhrobjon Abdivaliyev @WRITING_T

“Biz ham bundan shodmiz: bundanda yuksak natijalar tilab qolamiz😁”. Bunaqa gaplarni admin qaydan topadi-ye. Men o’qimagan “ chotki natija gazini bosing” deb yuribman.

✅WRITING-7.0 💥 A reflection of our work ethic and perseverance! @WRITING_T

Endi desertga bitta WRITING 7.0 cha bo’lsa silliq ketadida😁!

✅WRITING 2 BAND IMPROVEMENT! @WRITING_T

✅IELTS WRITING TASK 2! 📝I will write and share an almost impeccable essay on this topic a little bit later: before that, you can prepare your own masterpiece to compare your structures, phrases, and ideas with mine. In this way, you can identify areas where there is room for improvement. @WRITING_T

🙏🙏 PLEASE 🙏🙏 Resist the temptation to watch nonsense YouTube videos about how to get an IELTS 8.0 in 2 days.

🔥NICE VOCAB🔥 📝Due to my ambitious personality, I always seek opportunities for personal growth and resist the temptation to stagnate at all costs. 🥇Resist the temptation to = avoid doing things that they want to do but know they shouldn’t. 🥈At all costs = no matter how much effort or price is needed. @WRITING_T

🔥NICE VOCAB🔥 📝 Whenever I become obsessed with spiraling thoughts that sap away my productivity, I pull back, slow down, and recalibrate my mindset. 🥇Sap away productivity = reduce or compromise productivity. 🥈Recalibrate one’s mind = change the way one thinks about life. @WRITING_T

🔥A BAND 5.0 PERFORMANCE🔥 With the rapid advancements in science and technology, it has become increasingly common for scientists to conduct animal research to develop new medical treatments and assess product quality, particularly in developed countries. While opinions on the ethical nature of such experiments vary, I firmly advocate for the continuation of animal experimentation for the greater good of humanity. Proponents of banning animal experimentation cite various reasons to support their stance. When animals are exploited in laboratories to produce and test medicines and vaccines, they are subjected to painful experiments, especially if equipment malfunctions and human errors take place. Given the suffering and cruelty in such scientific researches, animal rights activists argue that it is ethically wrong to cause any species of animals to suffer. Furthermore, advocates for the prohibition of animal testing point out the availability of alternative methods such as advabced computer modeling and in vitro studies that can replace animal experiments. In light of such alternatives, it seems reasonable to consider animal experimentation unnecessary. Despite these arguments against animal experimentation, in my view, it is essential to continue with research involving animals. Using different species of animals for medical and scientific purposes not only facilitates the develpment of innovative medicines but also ensures the safety and efficiency of products consumed by humans. If populations continue to benefit from animal research programs, governments might also increase wildlife conservation efforts, creating a win-win scenario. In addition, animal testing remains an intergal part of science due to its effectiveness and reliability compared to alternative methods. The biological similarities between animals and humans make them irreplaceable in developing and evaluating treatments and products for human use. A case in point is the Covid-19 pandemic when animal testing made it much easier to test the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the virus. In conclusion, while valid concerns are raised regarding the ethical implications of animal exploitation in scientific experiments, I contend that scientists should keep utilizing animals for medical research and product testing. Only through continuous and dependable animal testing programs can strides be made in developing new medicines and assessing their suitability for human consumption. Suhrobjon Abdivaliyev @WRITING_T

✅IELTS WRITING TASK 2! 🏅Animal experimentation @WRITING_T

🔥A BAND 5.5 PERFORMANCE🔥 The bar chart compares five different age groups in terms of their donation rates in Britain during the years 1990 and 2010. Overall, a higher proportion of British people were involved in charitable giving in 1990 compared to 2010. There was also a clear correlation between donation patterns and age in both years, although there is evidence of reversal among older age brackets. Beginning with the younger age groups, approximately 16% of individuals aged 18-25 contributed to charity in 1990, a figure that dropped significantly to only 7% by 2010. The decline was less pronounced among those aged 26 to 35, where the percentage of donors decreased from over 30% in 1990 to a quarter in 2010. As for individuals aged 36 to 50, the proportion of donors breached the 40% threshold in 1990 but later fell to precisely 35%. In contrast, older age groups followed rising donation patterns over the same period. The percentage of individuals aged 51 to 65 who donated money to charitable causes was 35% in 1990, which then saw a minimal increase of 5%. Likewise, the figure for donors in the oldest age category slightly rose, going from over 30% in 1990 to exactly 35% by 2010. Subrobjon Abdivaliyev @WRITING_T

✅IELTS WRITING TASK 1! 📊Bar Chart! @WRITING_T