inactive

Warning: Potential Grading Scam Alert in Java Course It has come to our attention that there may be a significant issue with the grading system in the Java course. There are reports indicating an unfair distribution of marks, which could severely impact students' CGPA. Here are some specific concerns: Continuous Assessment (CA) Marks Discrepancy: Students with higher CA marks are receiving lower overall weightage. Example: A student with 23/30 and 26/30 in both CAs received a total of 28/50. Conversely, students with lower CA marks, such as 22.8/30 and 23/30, are receiving higher total marks like 30/50. End-Term Practical Examination Anomalies: Students who successfully complete both coding questions are receiving lower marks. Example: A student who attempted both coding questions got 28/45. Meanwhile, students who only attempted one coding question are receiving higher marks, such as 34/45. This discrepancy suggests that those who performed well on coding might not have been awarded any marks for MCQs or viva. These inconsistencies suggest a potential scam or error in the grading system. Such irregularities can unjustly affect students' academic performance and overall CGPA. Action Needed: Immediate review and audit of the grading system. Transparent disclosure of the marking criteria. Re-evaluation of affected students' marks. This issue needs urgent attention to ensure fairness and integrity in the evaluation process. If you are experiencing these discrepancies, please report them to the academic administration immediately.

https://lpu.myperfectice.com/student/testSeries/home Direct link of test series of myperfectice platform.

HITBULLSEYE TEST-04 ✨