Nativist Concern

It can be emotional at times in Japan because they appreciate British culture more than the scum that run our country. For some reason Land of Hope and Glory is quite a popular melody in restaurants and Auld Lang Syne is often played at street crossings. But when Elgar came on in the sauna tonight, it killed me.

“We’re largely supportive of many of the nationalist movements we see in Europe, and believe strongly in the right of our brother nations to pursue their own national sovereignty and self determination. Cultural movements and aspects of political ideals have always made their way back and forth across the Atlantic. While we do our best to source all of our core ideological tenets domestically, that doesn’t stop us from getting artistic, tactical, or organizational inspiration from Europe. The more organized we all are, the more we have to inspire one another to succeed.” Thomas Rousseau

Anglos will ban absolutely everything apart from Jews and their pets

Investing in vending machines in a society with increasing crime and decreasing social trust isn't a good idea. Incidentally they're absolutely everywhere in Japan. https://t.me/TraditionalBritainGroup/25799

Anti-Elon stuff is so cringe, I'm almost certain it helps him

Socrates, Jesus and Marx were penniless. This man must be an Anglo

I'm overwhelmed by Judaism so we're going to have to resolve this

29 years ago today, a paedophile Thomas Hamilton walked into a Scottish school and shot 16 children and their teacher. Britons lost all gun ownership rights and the files were closed for 100 years.

Interesting update to the Wyatt Stagg 28 Days Later Analysis: https://youtu.be/h3qxr6VVqtM?si=tZ1VgnnjorMJFd24 A screenwriting assistant agrees with the anti-White replacement narratives but says it was never his (or mixed race Alex Garland's) intent, citing Fox (Murdoch owned at the time) meddled in the creative process pushing "certain tropes" for commercial success. A case of subconscious anti-Whiteism or capitalism profit maximising?

The regime uses the term "democracy" in a confusing way—they categorically reject majoritarianism which is what most people think of when they think "democracy". But what they actually mean is protection of minorities from the majority. This is what they call "liberal" democracy, and it opens up a space for "illiberal" democracy, AKA "populism", which doesn't care about minorities. This is how they differentiate populism from democracy. This all sounds really stupid; it sounds like just a way to say that democracy isn't the will of the majority, but this is actually quite traditional. In fact, it goes back to "enlightenment" classical liberalism. Understanding this is essential for establishing a dissident minimum which requires that we reject liberalism (yes, including classical liberalism) in order to meaningfully dissent against a system that is destroying our folk. Early liberals were extremely concerned about the "tyranny of the majority". Montesquieu, Madison, and Mill all emphasized the need for institutional checks—like upper houses, courts, and property qualifications—to prevent majorities from governing minorities. Except in their case it was a class minority instead of an ethnic minority. But classical liberalism methodologically recognizes only the individual abstracted away from all context, so it was inevitable that the minority thus protected would eventually come to include the ethnic minority. Federalist No. 10 (James Madison) explicitly discusses how factions, especially majority factions, must be controlled to protect "the rights of property"—i.e., the minority. Countless other primary sources can be cited supporting this fact: classical liberalism favours the minority. In colonial America, Jews and Protestants were protected in Catholic states and Jews and Catholics were protected in Protestant states, all in the name of protecting individual rights over collective rights. "Liberal" "democracy" is the worst of both worlds. It marries the minoritarianism of liberal philosophy to the retarded fever dreams of democracy, such as popular sovereignty, consensual governance, rule of law, etc. Either one is a threat to ethnic solidarity, but the two together are fatal to it. Minoritarianism is at the heart of classical liberalism, to say nothing of modern liberalism. If you want to protect majorities—especially ethnic majorities—rejecting liberalism of any kind whatsoever is an absolute minimum.

Trump is so Zionist he's falling Chuck Schumer Palestinian. Schumer "My name, as you know, comes from the word 'shomer,' guardian, watcher. And I believe Hashem, actually, gave me that name as one of my roles that is very important in the United States Senate to be a shomer for Israel and I will continue to be that with every bone in my body."

Paris has the best cuisine and high fashion in all of Europe

Can confirm that anything above 3.8* is top class in Japan

Which way Polak?

I'll consider it if you start tweeting about the Jewish problem. (She has a weekly tweet defending them).

I'm now on Substack. Subscribe for writings on nationalism. https://nativistconcern.substack.com/p/interview-with-nativist-concern

Libtards I met in mid February were laughing at me for saying the S&P500 is going to crash this year and blindly indexing is retarded. If you bought Nvidia and Tesla at the highs, I have some magic beans to sell you.

Farageism https://x.com/PsycheRespector/status/1899199329157644621?t=YBb-Ng-oJSHkTUrxskLAIw&s=19