5 572
المشتركون
لا توجد بيانات24 ساعات
-37 أيام
-930 أيام
أرشيف المشاركات
Repost from N/a
Latest Reports of Nightmare Symptoms from V-Safe.pdf3.41 KB
Repost from N/a
Latest analysis of Depression symptoms following Covid jab.
Repost from Child Covid Vaccine Injuries UK
I have created a zip file containing a report for each drug that causes bone fractures
Repost from How Bad is My Batch
How the EU Safety Signal Dataset was created, with code.
Includes an identification of drugs that cause fracture
Repost from How Bad is My Batch
EU Safety Signal has now been updated so you can enter any symptom and see the drugs ordered by Incidence for that symptom.
Or you can enter a drug name, and see all the symptoms for that drug. You can also filter to see all the similar symptoms for that drug.
A PDF report can be printed off so you have a permanent record of the results for sharing.
https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadIsMyBatch/SymptomsCausedByDrugs/
https://x.com/Fa21519230/status/1832055825067565139?t=En4WRb1WbNnvBYsVyOv6LQ&s=09
I saw this video a long time ago. I now know exactly what she is suffering from. If you know her, please ask her to get in touch.
Its an autoimmune disease called lupus - https://x.com/Fa21519230/status/1832055825067565139?t=En4WRb1WbNnvBYsVyOv6LQ&s=09
Knowing the disease is the first step in curing it.
https://x.com/Fa21519230/status/1832055825067565139?t=En4WRb1WbNnvBYsVyOv6LQ&s=09
I saw this video a long time ago. I now know exactly what she is suffering from. If you know her, please ask her to get in touch.
Repost from LauraAboli
Robert F. Kennedy Jr:
“Bill Gates Uses 'Philanthrocapitalism' to Enrich Himself”
https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel
... let me introduce the "Patent":
-
United States Patent - Issa et al . - Patent No . : US 10,077,439 B2
REMOVAL OF DNA FRAGMENTS IN MRNA PRODUCTION PROCESS
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10077439B2/en
Applicant : Moderna TX , Inc . , Cambridge , MA ( US )
Inventors : William Joseph Issa , Roslindale , MA ( US ) ; Yuxun Wang , Cambridge , MA ( US ) ; Stephane Bancel , Cambridge , MA ( US )
Assignee : ModernaTX , Inc . , Cambridge , MA ( US )
2014-03-13 (!) Application filed by ModernaTx Inc
2018-09-18 Date of Patent
-
" ... Following the enzymatic synthesis of mRNA , it is important to remove the DNA template .
The DNA template used in the mRNA manufacturing process must be removed to ensure the efficacy of therapeutics and safety, because residual DNA in drug products may induce activation of the innate response and has the potential to be oncogenic in patient populations. Regulatory guidelines may also require the quantification, control, and removal of the DNA template in RNA products. Currently available or reported methods do not address this deficiency. ..."
——
And these findings:
DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.
https://osf.io/mjc97/
David J Speicher, Jessica Rose, L. Maria Gutschi, David M Wiseman PhD, and Kevin McKernan
10.31219/osf.io/mjc97
Created: October 19, 2023 | Last edited: October 27, 2023
"Conclusion:
These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188–509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfectionand cumulative dosing."
-
Keywords: COVID-19, vaccines, DNA contamination, impurity, residual DNA, modRNA, mRNA, adverse events
-
This is not a medicine.
Repost from Vivian Kubrick: Chat Group😁👍
https://x.com/davidwolfe/status/1832167940134703178?s=67&t=tp_G-xWzoyMOT0AIZmW9dw
“Severe disability, permanent neurological sequelae, and/or death may occur.
Death of unvaccinated individuals who have contact with vaccinated individuals.”
WATCH VIDEO ON X - the new mPox vaccine can kill an unvaccinated person if they have contact with a vaccinated person. Or so says the document enclosed with the mpox injection.
IS THIS A WAY TO TRY AND CONVINCE MORE PEOPLE TO TAKE THIS GODDAMN POISON!!?????
I JUST ASKED CHATGTP SEVERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS MATTER - here’s what it answered.
“The concern that the mpox vaccine (particularly ACAM2000) could potentially cause harm, such as severe illness or death, to unvaccinated individuals who have contact with vaccinated individuals stems from the nature of the ACAM2000 vaccine. ACAM2000 is a live vaccinia virus vaccine, which means it contains a live virus that is closely related to the virus that causes smallpox but does not cause smallpox itself.
Here’s the reasoning behind these concerns:
1. Live Virus Shedding: After being vaccinated with ACAM2000, the vaccine site on the skin forms a lesion, which contains live vaccinia virus. Until the lesion heals completely, there is a risk of shedding the virus to other people. If the lesion comes into direct contact with others or if contaminated materials (like bandages or towels) touch others, the live virus can potentially spread to them.
2. Risk to Certain Populations: Individuals with weakened immune systems (e.g., those with HIV, cancer, or on immunosuppressive medications), pregnant women, infants, and people with certain skin conditions (like eczema or atopic dermatitis) are particularly at risk if they come into contact with the vaccinia virus. In these cases, the virus can potentially cause severe complications, such as generalized vaccinia, progressive vaccinia, or even death.
3. Precautions and Public Concerns: Due to these risks, people who receive the ACAM2000 vaccine are advised to cover the vaccination site with a bandage and practice good hygiene to prevent the spread of the virus. Concerns arise in public discussions when these safety guidelines are not well understood or followed.
It's important to note that the JYNNEOS vaccine, another mpox vaccine, uses a non-replicating live virus, meaning it does not carry the same risk of spreading the virus to others.
For more detailed information, you can check sources like the [FDA](https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/jynneos) and the [CDC](https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/vaccines.html) websites, which provide guidance and details on both vaccines and their associated risks.”
Why they want to jab people prior to euthanising them seems strange. They feel a compulsion to give people the jab despite absolutely no medical benefit for someone who is about to die anyway. This is probably because for each jab given , they receive a handsome commission - so jabbing a soon-to-be-dead body is as rewarding as jabbing another.
As bad as it sounds, if this is their motive, then its likely they will give euthanasia candidates as many jabs as possible prior to their demise in order to reap a bumper profit. It is possible they would also get them to sign to donate organs - which would also be profitable. For these reasons, once a person signs up for euthanasia they can't change their mind later.
Because donated organs must be fresh from a living body, it may be the case that their body is kept alive for a prolonged period until all possible donations are complete. Corporate euthanasia may not be as merciful as it seems.
Repost from Child Covid Vaccine Injuries UK
Why they want to jab people prior to euthanising them seems strange. They feel a compulsion to give people the jab despite absolutely no medical benefit for someone who is about to die anyway. This is probably because for each jab given , they receive a handsome commission - so jabbing a soon-to-be-dead body is as rewarding as jabbing another.
As bad as it sounds, if this is their motive, then its likely they will give euthanasia candidates as many jabs as possible prior to their demise in order to reap a bumper profit. It is possible they would also get them to sign to donate organs - which would also be profitable. For these reasons, once a person signs up for euthanasia they can't change their mind later.
Because donated organs must be fresh from a living body, it may be the case that their body is kept alive for a prolonged period until all possible donations are complete. Corporate euthanasia may not be as merciful as it seems.
I have cleaned the data for the EU Safety Signal, by combining similar drug names. This condenses down the number of drugs to only 4110. Please use this dataset in place of the previous one.
