CHRISTOPHER HAUSER STUDY GROUP 🏦
Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish
Remember, this is more than just a financial opportunity. This is a movement, a reclaiming of what is rightfully ours. Together, we will overcome any obstacle, defy the odds, and rise as victors. Send me an email via: ChristopherAHauser@protonmail.com
Ko'proq ko'rsatish📈 Telegram kanali CHRISTOPHER HAUSER STUDY GROUP 🏦 analitikasi
CHRISTOPHER HAUSER STUDY GROUP 🏦 (@christopherhauser1) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 108 263 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Taʼlim toifasida 1 235-o'rinni va AQSH mintaqasida 214-o'rinni egallagan.
📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika
невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 108 263 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.
02 Sentabr, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni 1 718 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa -253 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.
- Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
- Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 0.32% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 0.14% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
- Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 352 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 156 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
- Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 0 ta reaksiya keladi.
- Tematik yo‘nalishlar: Kontent debt, property, exclusion, loan, irs kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.
📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati
Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“Remember, this is more than just a financial opportunity. This is a movement, a reclaiming of what is rightfully ours. Together, we will overcome any obstacle, defy the odds, and rise as victors.
Send me an email via: ChristopherAHauser@protonmail.c...”
Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 03 Sentabr, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Taʼlim toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.
108 263
Obunachilar
-25324 soatlar
-3 4097 kun
+1 71830 kun
Ma'lumot yuklanmoqda...
O'xshash kanallar
Ma'lumot yo'q
Muammo bormi? Iltimos, sahifani yangilang yoki bizning qo'llab-quvvatlash boshqaruvchimizga murojaat qiling>.
Taglar buluti
Kirish va chiqish esdaliklari
---
---
---
---
---
---
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Sentabr '26
Sentabr '260
0 kanalda
Avgust '26
+32 905
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '26
+33 725
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '26
+30 925
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '26
+23 342
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '26
+24 688
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '26
+37 688
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '26
+34 687
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '26
+21 286
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '25
+27 312
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '25
+16 764
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '25
+13 944
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '25
+81 221
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '25
+42 905
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '25
+35 838
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '25
+38 605
1 kanalda
Get PRO
May '25
+97 581
2 kanalda
| Sana | Obunachilarni jalb qilish | Esdaliklar | Kanallar | |
| 03 Sentabr | 0 | |||
| 02 Sentabr | 0 | |||
| 01 Sentabr | 0 |
Kanal postlari
Contact me to get your access code.
If you’ve submitted the grant application.
T.me/RealChristopherhauser
| 2 | Here are the amounts you can file for:
- Grant Amount: $100,000,000
- Prepayment Service Charge: $70,000
- Grant Amount: $200,000,000
- Prepayment Service Charge: $100,000
- Grant Amount: $500,000,000
- Prepayment Service Charge: $150,000
Here are the fees and the amount to be paid upfront using Bitcoin:
- T.me/RealChristopherhauser
Note: Fees are paid upfront. | 93 |
| 3 | After 9 years in family court, my case comes down to one simple issue:
Possession and Access.
Texas courts issue possession orders signed by district court judges.
But an order means very little if nobody will enforce it.
Police say, “It’s a civil matter.”🥴
Prosecutors may decline criminal charges.
🚨🚨Family courts can require parents to return again and again seeking enforcement of orders the courts already issued.
So I have a simple question for the State of Texas:
❓❓Why issue a court order if the citizen has to spend thousands of dollars and years in litigation just to make that order mean something?
🙈🙈Parents should not have to repeatedly hire attorneys to convince the government to give effect to an existing judicial order.
🤷🏻♂️A court order is not a suggestion.
🤷🏻♂️If Texas is going to establish legal rights to possession and access, Texas needs an effective mechanism to enforce them.
🥴Otherwise, possession and access exist on paper but can become meaningless in practice.
This is not merely a family-court problem.
This is a matter of statewide public concern, and the Texas Legislature needs to address it. | 205 |
| 4 | This document is a conditional acceptance letter responding to a legal complaint. It acknowledges receipt of a security instrument regarding a case. It notes that the recipients are trustees of involved trusts and taxpayers. It establishes a common law contract between the parties using the postal rule for offer and acceptance. | 168 |
| 5 | EVIDENCE & PROOF
Just because something is attached to a complaint, written in a police report, printed from a computer system, or repeated by an attorney does not automatically make it admissible evidence.
Before a court may lawfully rely upon it, it must pass the evidentiary gates:
1. Relevance — Does it make a fact of consequence more or less probable?
2. Materiality — Does that fact help prove a required element of the claim, charge, or defense?
3. Competency — Is the witness or source legally capable of proving that fact and speaking from personal knowledge?
4. Authentication — Has the item been shown to be what the party claims it is?
5. Foundation — Have the necessary facts been established connecting the evidence to the case and supporting the purpose for which it is offered?
6. Admissibility — Does it comply with the governing rules concerning hearsay, privilege, opinion testimony, original documents, and other limitations?
7. Probative Value — Is its value not substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion, or the danger of misleading the fact-finder?
8. Proper Admission — Was it lawfully offered and admitted for the correct purpose?
Relevant does not automatically mean admissible.
Official does not mean authenticated.
Filed does not mean admitted.
Repeated does not mean proven.
An allegation is not evidence.
The question is not simply, “Is it true?”
The proper question is, “Can this fact be lawfully proven through evidence the court is permitted to consider?”
That is the difference between an allegation and proof.
📚 Want to learn more Join In God We Trust Academy 15 day training on civil procedure.
Check comments | 163 |
| 6 | IGNORANCE OF LAW, IS NO EXCUSE - Maxim of law
The Lieber Code of April 24, 1863, issued as General Orders No. 100, Adjutant General's Office, 1863,[1][2] was an instruction signed by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln
Article 10 Martial law affects chiefly the police and collection of public revenue and taxes weather imposed by The expelled government or by the invader, and refers mainly to support the efficiency of the army, it's safety, and the safety of its operation.
Art. 44. All wanton violence committed against persons in the invaded country, all destruction of property not commanded by the authorized officer, all robbery, all pillage or sacking, even after taking a place by main force, all rape, wounding, maiming, or killing of such inhabitants, are prohibited under the penalty of death, or such other severe punishment as may seem adequate for the gravity of the offense.
A soldier, officer or private, in the act of committing such violence, and disobeying a superior ordering him to abstain from it, MAY BE LAWFULLY KILLED ON THE SPOT BY SUCH SUPERIOR.
Article 157 armed or unarmed resistant by citizens of the United States against the lawful movement of their troops is Levy and war against the United states, and is therefore treason. A soldier, officer or private, in the act of committing such violence, and disobeying a superior ordering him to abstain from it, maybe lawfully killed on the spot by such Superior.
Mark 35
And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing. 36 Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. 37 For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned among the transgressors: for the things concerning me have an end. 38 And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, It is enough. | 145 |
| 7 |  The founders knew and told that the Supreme Court were just trustees, having only expressly delegated power, and ZERO power “in relation to the rights of the parties to the constitutional compact” which are the people.
They, like the legis and exec, are to ONLY serve and obey the rights of the people as servants.
Pcaps: | 157 |
| 8 |  Matn yo'q... | 237 |
| 9 | Interested in a grant?
Upfront fees apply.
Disbursement takes 48 hours.
Grant can be filed Twice in a year
Also available: assistance with clearing inheritance bonds.
Cash delivery and tracking available
Direct contact ::: T.me/RealChristopherhauser | 236 |
| 10 | Many are taught to believe a living trust is something you create because you scared to die 😭 whole time one of the biggest reasons to have one is because you’re STILL ALIVE.
Imagine this… you’re 42 years old, got a house, two kids, a business bringing money in, a couple bank accounts and a car. You healthy, handling your business, ain’t thinking about death whatsoever. Then one random Tuesday you get into a serious accident and you’re unconscious for three weeks.
Now what? 🫣
Your mortgage didn’t become unconscious with you. Your business payroll ain’t in a coma. Your children still need money. Insurance still gotta be handled. Somebody still needs access to certain accounts and somebody needs actual AUTHORITY to manage the property.
And this is where folks learn the difference between having assets and having an ESTATE PLAN.
Because your mama saying “that’s my daughter, I handle everything for her” doesn’t automatically give mama legal authority over everything you own. Your boyfriend knowing every password doesn’t make him trustee. Your oldest child knowing exactly what you wanted doesn’t automatically give them authority either. Depending on what documents exist, your family may end up needing powers of attorney, court involvement, guardianship or conservatorship proceedings just to handle things you would’ve gladly let them handle yourself.
Now imagine the same woman already established her living trust, properly transferred the appropriate assets into it and named a successor trustee with clear instructions for incapacity.
Completely different risings. 💯
She wakes up three weeks later and finds out the house stayed handled, trust property stayed administered, the person SHE selected stepped into the role SHE created and there wasn’t a family group chat trying to figure out who was supposed to be in charge 😭
THAT is what started making trusts hit different for me.
A living trust isn’t merely a death document. It creates an actual structure for property while you’re living. You’re essentially saying, “If I cannot administer this estate myself, THIS is who steps in, THIS is what they have authority over and THESE are the instructions.”
And baby when you start studying scripture beside estate planning it gets even deeper. 👀
We spend every Sunday talking about wills, testaments, heirs, inheritance, stewardship and being faithful over what we’ve been given… then come home with absolutely NOTHING written down concerning our own estate 😭😭😭
How you claiming inheritance but refusing administration?
How you praying for increase but haven’t created structure for what increases?
How you asking the Most High to make you ruler over many things when the few things already in your possession would be thrown into confusion if you couldn’t speak tomorrow?
THAT part convicted me. 💯
“Moreover it is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful.” 1 Corinthians 4:2 📖
Sometimes stewardship ain’t another prayer. Sometimes stewardship is sitting your a$$ down, inventorying what you actually have, naming who can act, documenting your instructions and making sure the people you love don’t have to reconstruct your wishes during the worst week of their lives.
On earth as it is in heaven hits a lil different when you understand ORDER. 🫣
Maybe establishing your trust isn’t preparing to die at all.
Maybe it’s finally learning how to properly administer what you’ve been trusted with while you LIVE. 💯 | 304 |
| 11 | The people making decisions about immigration never impose these decisions on their own neighborhoods. Look up the 15 richest ZIP codes in the United States—they're also the most stable ZIP codes, because they are not subjected to mass migration.
That tells you the whole story right there. Martha's Vineyard looks a lot like it did 50 years ago. So does Nantucket, so does Brookline, Massachusetts. So does Aspen.
If it's so great, then why don't they have 10,000 Haitians living in Martha's Vineyard?
Because it's not great, that's why.
It's not an attack on the Haitians. It's the nature of mass migration, of taking people from a completely different culture, with no education, limited skills, and no money, and dropping them into what was formerly a pretty prosperous, stable community.
Who benefits? Not the formerly prosperous community. | 232 |
| 12 |  William Blackstone in his Commentaries identified the private rights to life, liberty, and property as the three “absolute” rights—so called because they “appertain[ed] and belong[ed] to particular men . . . merely as individuals,” not “to them as members of society [or] standing in various relations to each other”—that is, not dependent upon the will of the government. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 119 (1765) (Commentaries); see also Nelson, supra, at 567.[3 The protection of private rights in the Anglo-American tradition goes back to at least Magna Carta. The original 1215 charter is replete with restrictions on the King’s ability to proceed against private rights, including most notably the provision that “[n]o free man shall be taken, imprisoned, disseised, outlawed, banished, or in any way destroyed, . . . except by the lawful judgment of his peers and by the law of the land.” A. Howard, Magna Carta: Text and Commentary 43 (1964).] (this is cited by thomas in his concurring opinion in axon v ftc 2023:
Justice THOMAS, concurring:..As I have explained, when private rights are at stake, full Article III adjudication is likely required. Private rights encompass "the three `absolute' rights," life, liberty, and property, "so called because they `appertain and belong to particular men merely as individuals,' not `to them as members of society or standing in various relations to each other'—that is, not dependent upon the will of the government." Wellness Int'l Network, 575 U.S. at 713-714, 135 S.Ct. 1932 (dissenting opinion) (quoting 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 119 (1765); alterations omitted). Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC, 143 S.Ct. 890 (2023)) | 247 |
| 13 | T.me/RealChristopherhauser
Contact me | 251 |
| 14 |  +6This evenings dinner will be slow smoke prime rib perfectly cooked to a core temp of 130 before being pulled of the smoker and wrapped to rest. | 308 |
| 15 | Regulation Does Not Automatically Equal Constitutionality
Another important distinction is between the existence of a regulation and the constitutionality of that regulation.
Government can establish laws addressing public safety. Some regulatory violations can also constitute criminal offenses.
But government cannot establish unlimited authority simply by declaring conduct unlawful.
A person accused of an offense remains protected by constitutional due-process guarantees. The government must establish the elements required for conviction under the applicable law.
The Constitution remains the higher authority.
Article VI, Clause 2—the Supremacy Clause—provides that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
Therefore, the question cannot simply be:
“Did the legislature pass a law?”
The constitutional question is:
“Does the law remain within constitutional authority?”
The Question I Put to Government
I am not arguing that government should have no authority.
I am arguing that government authority has limits.
If government restricts liberty, identify the constitutional authority and the limit of that authority.
If government regulates property, identify the authority and the constitutional protections that remain.
If government requires identification, identify the authority and the limits on the collection and use of that information.
If government imposes a tax or financial obligation, identify the constitutional authority and the applicable limitations.
If government makes violation of a regulation criminal, establish the elements of the offense and the constitutional validity of the underlying law.
And if the justification is public safety, I recognize that public safety is a legitimate governmental purpose. But the existence of a legitimate purpose does not mean every method of achieving that purpose is automatically constitutional.
The Constitution requires both government authority and constitutional limits.
So my position can be reduced to one question:
Show me the constitutional authority.
Not merely the statute.
Not merely the regulation.
Not merely the government's assertion of power.
Show me the constitutional authority, the right affected, the limits on governmental power, and the process required by the Constitution.
Because “We the People” means that government exists under the Constitution.
Government exercises power.
The Constitution defines the boundaries of that power. | 279 |
| 16 | A brilliant explanation and example from one of the many who drop in and share knowledge with us all on this face book page ....
Constitutional Limits on Government Authority
My argument begins with the foundation of our government:
“We the People.”
The Constitution does not establish government as the owner of individual rights. It establishes a government whose powers and limitations are defined by the Constitution.
The Ninth Amendment states that the listing of certain rights in the Constitution shall not be interpreted to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people.
The Tenth Amendment provides that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the people.
The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
The Fourteenth Amendment applies that protection against state governments, stating that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
And the Fourth Amendment protects the people in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
These provisions establish an important principle:
Government power is not unlimited simply because government has enacted a statute.
Liberty and Personal Transportation
Consider personal transportation.
A person purchases an automobile with their own labor and money. The automobile is personal property. The person uses it to travel from one place to another, rather than transporting passengers or merchandise for compensation.
Government nevertheless requires licensing, registration, identification, financial responsibility, and other requirements before that person may lawfully operate the vehicle on public highways.
I recognize the existing legal precedent: courts have upheld the authority of states to regulate the operation of motor vehicles on public highways, including vehicles used for personal, noncommercial transportation.
So the argument is not that a person can simply declare a vehicle “private” and automatically become exempt from every traffic law.
The constitutional question is broader:
When government restricts conduct involving liberty or property, what constitutional authority permits that restriction, and what limits apply to that authority?
The fact that a legislature passed a law establishes that a law exists. It does not eliminate the Constitution's limitations on government.
Property
The same constitutional principle applies to property.
The Fifth Amendment protects property through due process and provides that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.
Government also possesses recognized taxation powers. Therefore, the existence of taxation itself is not the constitutional question.
The question is:
What authority permits the particular tax or property restriction, and what constitutional limitations apply to that power?
Ownership does not mean that property is completely immune from regulation or taxation. But neither does government ownership of the lawmaking power mean that constitutional property protections disappear.
Privacy and Government Identification
The Fourth Amendment establishes another boundary.
Government-required identification systems can allow authorities to identify vehicles and connect them with government-held information.
Courts have recognized that license plates are publicly displayed and generally carry a limited expectation of privacy. That precedent must be acknowledged.
But constitutional analysis does not end there.
The Fourth Amendment raises questions about the reasonableness of government searches and seizures and the circumstances under which government may obtain and use information.
The question becomes:
How far may government go in identifying, tracking, collecting, retaining, and accessing information concerning people who have not been accused of a crime?
The answer must remain within constitutional boundaries. | 252 |
| 17 |  Matn yo'q... | 265 |
| 18 |  Matn yo'q... | 279 |
| 19 | GRANT TUTORIAL CH trustee access .mp4 | 313 |
| 20 | Interested in a grant?
Upfront fees apply.
Disbursement takes 48 hours.
Grant can be filed Twice in a year
Also available: assistance with clearing inheritance bonds.
Cash delivery and tracking available
Direct contact ::: T.me/RealChristopherhauser | 320 |
