nessnote

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

aur SAUMYA

SHADI

ye gharwale toh hai hi pagal 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

lmfao

shadi

cute but 🔔 mai isse shadi kar rhi hu 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

btw, i met the guy my family’s trying to get me married to today-

love the concept of हसीन ladke (मिथ है)

i'm still thinking bout this movie, it’s really that good. the dance sequences are so magical and beautiful + the visuals + michael b jordan ofc

a good lipstick really changes the whole look man

sinners is a generational film just like babylon and challengers

ab mai chaddi vale memes dekhti hu toh mujhe raj ki yaad aa jati h

mere study hours se zyada amir khan ki biwiyan h

i've been thinking about this a lot lately, and i keep coming back to the same question that can we really separate the art from the artist? i don't think we can. every artist leaves parts of themselves in their work. their beliefs, their fears, their politics, their biases, the way they see the world is all there in their art. art is an extension of the person who made it. that's why i've always felt conflicted about arundhati roy. i'm aware of the things she's said over the years, and i don't agree with all of them. i understand why so many people take issue with her politics, and i don't think those criticisms should simply be dismissed. but at the same time, i can't pretend she isn't an exceptional writer. the god of small things (haven’t read mother mary yet) is one of the finest pieces of contemporary literature i've read, and whenever i listen to her interviews, i find myself agreeing with so much of what she says about inequality, power, capitalism, and the ways institutions shape our lives. she has a way of articulating ideas that's incredibly sharp. i think we've become too comfortable expecting people to fit neatly into categories of "good" or "bad".

In 2023, the Delhi Lieutenant Governor approved prosecution under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, such as: Section 153A (promoting enmity), Section 153B (assertions prejudicial to national integration), Section 505 (statements causing public mischief). However, those offences generally carry a maximum punishment of up to three years. Because more than a decade had passed, legal experts noted that limitation rules created complications for pursuing those charges.

she gave an Anti-India statement in 2010 she was not found guilty by court , kyuki hearing 2023 me hui thhi , more than a decade was passed since she said it At a seminar in Delhi in 2010, Roy said:

"Kashmir has never been an integral part of India. It is a historical fact."

is the hate against arundhati roy a propaganda?

but data kon dega?