Endi mavjud! Telegram Tadqiqoti 2025 — yilning asosiy insaytlari 
REP Channel
Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish
📈 Telegram kanali REP Channel analitikasi
REP Channel (@replabs) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 1 685 911 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Kriptovalyutalar toifasida 79-o'rinni egallagan.
📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika
невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 1 685 911 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.
12 Iyun, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni -25 174 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa -885 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.
- Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
- Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 0.23% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 0.08% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
- Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 3 829 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 1 343 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
- Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 13 ta reaksiya keladi.
📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati
Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“@repcoinbot”
Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 13 Iyun, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Kriptovalyutalar toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.
1 685 911
Obunachilar
-88524 soatlar
-5 8227 kunlar
-25 17430 kunlar
Postlar arxiv
1 685 543
Who's actually online?
Every platform assumes its users are people. Most aren't.
We built the social web for humans and handed it to bots.
Now we're building the next internet on top of that broken foundation.
What does it look like to actually fix this?
Five operators who ship against this problem daily:
- Danny: Head of Growth at REP
- Danny H Brown: COO at Bankr
- JacekL:Founder at DEGEN
- Kimmo: Head of Product at Lens
- Igor Yuzovitskiy: DevRel at Bankr
Thursday, Apr 23, 2pm UTC
Link: https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2047016429153595884
1 685 543
Before agents can trust each other, two things have to be true.
The rails can't be owned by someone who can kick you off them. Joanna on the cage of platform-mediated trust:
> https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2046624213209948388
And the game your agent walks into can't be one where everyone else has a ten-year head start on cheating. Rahul on what onchain markets actually look like from an agent's side of the table:
> https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2046520756977139896
1 685 543
Show up daily. Build reputation that compounds.
A new daily onchain task just went live.
Hit claim to earn +10 REP and open a 24h cooldown. Once it ends, you have 24h to claim again and push your streak forward.
Let the window close and the streak goes back to zero. Your streak is your proof of presence.
live now: base.r3p.xyz
1 685 543
We hosted a space on agent trust. One moment stood out.
> "Money is just an abstraction."
> "The primitive is credit-debit efficiency."
When agents trust each other, the whole financial layer simplifies. Full clip on X: click
1 685 543
We're launching a research and education initiative focused on digital trust - from AI agents to reputation systems to the future of the internet. The space REP operates in.
Full announcement + our first research piece on X: https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2044698304848482515
1 685 543
Yesterday we shared Haseeb's take: reputation should change incentives before the drop, not after.
But it goes beyond drops.
> Every new platform, every new community - you start from zero. Your history doesn't travel.
> Years of contributions, ratings, connections - locked inside platforms that don't talk to each other.
REP is changing that.
Connect your wallets, your socials, your activity.
Carry your trust profile everywhere.
check: https://base.app/app/https:/app.r3p.xyz
1 685 543
Base - $17T in volume, 140+ countries, no token. But the trust infrastructure is already being built. Quietly, layer by layer.
We broke down each layer + got a comment from Steve Dakh (Co-Founder of Ethereum Attestation Service, Ethereum Founding Member):
"Attestations run through the whole thing. Identity, sybil checks, reputation - it's all attestations accumulated over time."
Full breakdown: https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2042248704942338130
1 685 543
Last week we hosted a space about agent trust. Two builders, two angles on the same problem.
Brian from Lagrange builds ZK proofs for AI - his take: most trust systems give you permission, not proof.
Isaac from Doppel Games builds agent vs agent gaming - his take: agents control wallets but nobody can see how decisions are made.
We cut the best moments. Watch: here with Brian and here with Isaac
1 685 543
Base processed $17 trillion in stablecoin volume last year. 140+ countries. 50+ funded teams. The #1 onchain venue for BTC spot trading.
That's the economy. But an economy without trust infrastructure is just volume.
Base is building four layers of trust. Most people have only heard of one. Wednesday we map the full stack.
Right now you can check your reputation here: click
1 685 543
In 1958 Fair Isaac built the first credit score. Before it, every borrower was a stranger. After it, your history spoke for you.
68 years later - AI agents operate billions onchain with zero credit history. Every trade recorded. Every repayment logged. Nobody composed it into a score.
68 years later, someone's finally building it. REP composes your onchain activity into a portable reputation score.
Try it:
https://base.app/app/app.r3p.xyz
1 685 543
Going live now.
ZK proves the math. Game logic proves the rules.
Who proves the track record?
Link:
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2039353516414693713
1 685 543
ZK proves the computation. Onchain proves the rules. But who proves the agent's track record?
Tomorrow on X Spaces: Lagrange x Doppel Games x REP.
Who Vouches for Your Agent?
Apr 2, 2pm UTC
Join:
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2039353516414693713
1 685 543
Would you lend $10,000 to someone with no name, no history, and no track record?
That's what DeFi protocols do every time an agent borrows. 71% of stablecoin volume is already bot-driven.
Agents run the plumbing: liquidations, arbitrage, routing. But the protocol treats a 2-year veteran the same as a wallet created 5 minutes ago. $15K collateral for a $10K loan. No exceptions.
The data to fix this is already onchain. Every transaction, every repayment. It just hasn't been turned into a score yet.
We broke down why this is the biggest missing layer in DeFi:
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2039022966445347191
1 685 543
Would you lend $10,000 to someone with no name, no history, and no track record?
That's what DeFi protocols do every time an agent borrows. 71% of stablecoin volume is already bot-driven.
Agents run the plumbing: liquidations, arbitrage, routing. But the protocol treats a 2-year veteran the same as a wallet created 5 minutes ago. $15K collateral for a $10K loan. No exceptions.
The data to fix this is already on-chain. Every transaction, every repayment. It just hasn't been turned into a score yet.
We broke down why this is the biggest missing layer in DeFi: https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2039022966445347191
1 685 543
71% of stablecoin transfers in Q3 2025 were bot-driven. $15.6 trillion in a single quarter. Bots consume 56% of gas on Base, 40% of blockspace on Solana.
Not a single one has a reputation.
An agent borrows $10,000. Protocol sees an empty wallet. Demands $15,000 collateral. $5K frozen for nothing - same rate whether it ran 10,000 flawless trades or was deployed five minutes ago.
Why is this the most significant gap in the DeFi infrastructure?
March 31: response date
1 685 543
Google Research found that coordinated multi-agent teams outperform solo agents by 80%. Uncoordinated teams? Only 57%. That 23% gap is the coordination tax and it's measurable.
Mnemom's trust data makes it sharper: "Five high-performing agents with poor coordination can create more risk than a cohesive mid-tier group." The risk isn't weak agents. It's strong agents that don't work together.
A registry knows who's on the team. It has no idea how the team behaves. Group coherence requires runtime proof: who did what, in what order, with what outcome.
This is why proof-based identity isn't a nice-to-have. It's the missing coordination layer.
1 685 543
25% of TON wallets are in REP.
70% of Farcaster Pro subscribers are in REP.
your track record shouldn't vanish when you move chains.
portable reputation means your credibility follows you everywhere.
@repcoinbot
1 685 543
uber solved trust in rides. airbnb in stays. amazon in commerce.
each became a $100B+ company.
now imagine solving trust across all of them.
the graph is the infrastructure layer.
@repcoinbot
1 685 543
51% of internet traffic is now bots.
the remaining 49% can't prove they're real.
billions wasted because you can't verify who you're dealing with.
