uz
Feedback
Supreme Court CaseCiter

Supreme Court CaseCiter

Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish

Supreme Court Judgment Updates

Ko'proq ko'rsatish
4 904
Obunachilar
Ma'lumot yo'q24 soatlar
-87 kun
-1330 kun
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Sen '26
Sentabr '26
+44
0 kanalda
Avgust '26
+137
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '26
+105
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '26
+29
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '26
+33
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '26
+33
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '26
+27
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '26
+35
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '26
+37
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '25
+56
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '25
+75
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '25
+28
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '25
+77
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '25
+112
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '25
+87
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '25
+63
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '25
+100
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '25
+93
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '25
+107
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '25
+36
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '25
+78
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '24
+193
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '24
+199
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '24
+286
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '24
+427
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '24
+439
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '24
+433
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '24
+232
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '24
+269
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '24
+250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '24
+289
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '24
+265
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '24
+244
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '23
+297
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '23
+125
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '23
+166
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '23
+933
0 kanalda
Sana
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Esdaliklar
Kanallar
25 Sentabr+1
24 Sentabr0
23 Sentabr0
22 Sentabr0
21 Sentabr+1
20 Sentabr+2
19 Sentabr+1
18 Sentabr+1
17 Sentabr+1
16 Sentabr+5
15 Sentabr0
14 Sentabr+1
13 Sentabr0
12 Sentabr+2
11 Sentabr+2
10 Sentabr+4
09 Sentabr+2
08 Sentabr0
07 Sentabr+6
06 Sentabr+1
05 Sentabr+1
04 Sentabr+3
03 Sentabr+3
02 Sentabr+4
01 Sentabr+3
Kanal postlari
📢 New Post by @CiteCase It is unfortunate that the #SupremeCourt website team is not complying with its order to hide name of the parties in a matrimonial-POCSO-Child Custody case. In Judgment, the name is hidden. But these names are shown in the SCI portal home-page. 🤦 🔗 View on X

2
📢 New Post by @CiteCase These observations by #SupremeCourt made in this case might affect many child-custody cases in which a father is facing criminal charges (especially POCSO) . x.com/CiteCase/statu… 🔗 View on X
33
3
📢 New Post by @CiteCase A great relief for Fathers facing fake POCSO allegations while also fighting for Child Custody ! #SupremeCourt has endorsed the Kerala High Court view that the mere registration of POCSO case should not by itself give rise to an inference that the allegation is true, and should x.com/CiteCase/statu… 🔗 View on X
35
4
📢 New Post by @CiteCase These are observations from two #SupremeCourt judgments (2 different 2J Benches) delivered this week. The yellow one makes it easy to defeat child custody claims by filing a fake POCSO case against a father. The green one has a solution to offer. As a judge, which one will you follow? 🔗 View on X
33
5
📢 New Post by @CiteCase If you are a man who is fighting child custody case and then you faced a fake POCSO case, this #SupremeCourt judgment is for you. 🔗 View on X
90
6
📢 New Post by @CiteCase Trial Courts cannot direct that the convict in murder cases shall “remain in prison till rest of their life”, reiterates #SupremeCourt 🔗 View on X
88
7
📢 New Post by @CiteCase NAVAL KISHORE & ANR. v. STATE OF PUNJAB https:// caseciter.in/sci-judgments/ documents/ent_GtPQ8LxX4BZ9?src=x … 🔗 View on X
72
8
📢 New Post by @CiteCase If you are a judge hearing a death sentence matter, these are the three questions you must ask and find answer before you proceed: 🔗 View on X
72
9
📢 New Post by @CiteCase Possibility of his reformation ! #SupremeCourt commutes death sentence awarded to man accused of rape and murder of his own six-year old step-daughter ! 🔗 View on X
56
10
📢 New Post by @CiteCase WARIS v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 🔗 View on X
47
11
📢 New Post by @CiteCase An Arbitral Tribunal exercising powers under Section 17 does not exercise appellate jurisdiction over an order passed by a competent Court under Section 9, holds #SupremeCourt 🔗 View on X
48
12
📢 New Post by @CiteCase UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS v. HARIOM PROJECTS PVT. LTD. https:// caseciter.in/sci-judgments/ documents/ent_4acDS7ZSztNh?src=x … 🔗 View on X
44
13
📢 New Post by @CiteCase Interestingly, yesterday #SupremeCourt, in another case, held thus: 🔗 View on X
52
14
📢 New Post by @CiteCase A great relief for Fathers facing fake POCSO allegations while also fighting for Child Custody ! #SupremeCourt has endorsed the Kerala High Court view that the mere registration of POCSO case should not by itself give rise to an inference that the allegation is true, and should 🔗 View on X
50
15
📢 New Post by @CiteCase Recalcitrant legal professionals, who in their pursuit of the motto of “win at any cost”, end up fuelling the fire, says #SupremeCourt while noticing that tendency of making false accusations in matrimonial disputes is on the rise ! 🔗 View on X
50
16
📢 New Post by @CiteCase Very important #SupremeCourt Judgment Which Lays Down Strict Safeguards to Prevent Misuse of POCSO Act in Child Custody Battles: 🔗 View on X
59
17
📢 New Post by @CiteCase ‘R’ v. ‘E’ & Anr. https:// caseciter.in/sci-judgments/ documents/ent_RSFFecCNjt2U?src=x … 🔗 View on X
58
18
📢 New Post by @CiteCase It is free to try https:// caseciter.in. Just try and subscribe if possible. Good night 😍 🔗 View on X
86
19
📢 New Post by @CiteCase Also the issue before the bench was simply this: Refer or not to refer to CB? Justice Sharma squarely addressed this issue and has not made any comments on the merits. Justice Datta made a prima facie view. 🔗 View on X
82
20
📢 New Post by @CiteCase Dear @pbhushan1 Where has Justice Dipankar Datta held that the impugned law is unconstitutional ? Kindly enlighten. In fact, he himself in his opinion says that he has only expressed prima facie opinion and has not gone into merits. 🔗 View on X
71