Tech Crunch™
Your ultimate source for the latest tech news, trends, and innovations. Stay informed and ahead of the curve with in-depth coverage of startups, gadgets, AI, cybersecurity, and more. 📥: @Rasbrook
Ko'proq ko'rsatish📈 Telegram kanali Tech Crunch™ analitikasi
Tech Crunch™ (@techcrunchtg) Ingliz til segmentidagi kanali faol ishtirokchi. Hozirda hamjamiyat 11 545 obunachidan iborat bo'lib, Texnologiyalar & Aralashmalar toifasida 10 378-o'rinni va Rossiya mintaqasida 55 284-o'rinni egallagan.
📊 Auditoriya ko‘rsatkichlari va dinamika
невідомо sanasidan buyon loyiha tez o‘sib, 11 545 obunachiga ega bo‘ldi.
15 Sentabr, 2026 dagi oxirgi ma’lumotlarga ko‘ra kanal barqaror faollikka ega. Oxirgi 30 kunda obunachilar soni -280 ga, so‘nggi 24 soatda esa -4 ga o‘zgardi va umumiy qamrov yuqori darajada qolmoqda.
- Tasdiqlash holati: Tasdiqlanmagan
- Jalb etish (ER): Auditoriya o‘rtacha 2.75% darajada jalb etiladi. Nashrdan keyingi dastlabki 24 soatda kontent odatda umumiy obunachilar sonining 0.70% ini tashkil etuvchi reaksiyalarni to‘playdi.
- Post qamrovi: Har bir post o‘rtacha 318 marta ko‘riladi; birinchi sutkada odatda 81 ta ko‘rish yig‘iladi.
- Reaksiyalar va o‘zaro ta’sir: Auditoriya faol: har bir postga o‘rtacha 3 ta reaksiya keladi.
- Tematik yo‘nalishlar: Kontent iran, european, techtip, mixer, economy kabi asosiy mavzularga jamlangan.
📝 Tavsif va kontent siyosati
Muallif resursni shaxsiy fikrni ifoda etish maydoni sifatida ta’riflaydi:
“Your ultimate source for the latest tech news, trends, and innovations. Stay informed and ahead of the curve with in-depth coverage of startups, gadgets, AI, cybersecurity, and more.
📥: @Rasbrook”
Yuqori yangilanish chastotasi (oxirgi ma’lumot 16 Sentabr, 2026 da olingan) sababli kanal doimo dolzarb va katta qamrovli bo‘lib qoladi. Analitika auditoriya kontent bilan faol hamkorlik qilishini, uni Texnologiyalar & Aralashmalar toifasidagi muhim ta’sir nuqtasiga aylantirishini ko‘rsatadi.
"answer like a struggling student" wasn't enough to make them play the role convincingly.
✏️ Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, Claude Haiku 4.5, and GPT-5.4-mini were given 379 algebra problems and assigned five different student personas. Yet they failed at the task: whether the model was an "A student" or a "poor student," its accuracy stayed between 96.8% and 100%.
The issue is that the model already knows the correct answer and struggles to suppress its own capabilities. So the authors split the task into two stages: first, a separate algorithm models what a student knows and where they are likely to make mistakes; then, an LLM explains the student's answer. This produced more plausible performance differences: the "near-expert" student scored 85.2% accuracy, the average student 57.8%, and the struggling student 44.1%.
👨 The authors acknowledge that they have not yet compared their virtual "students" with real ones. So for now, this is more a method for teaching AI to make believable mistakes than an accurate model of how humans learn.
🔥 — yes, AI can be better than a human
😱 — no, it's just "special effects"
@TechCrunchTg 🌐