IELTS Stellar

"Sentence completion da, nuqtadan otib ketsa maylimi" deb savol berdi bir o'quvchin. Men ularga word limit haqida 30 minute tushuntirib o'tiribmaneee. Mayli , sabr .......... Asabim buzildi deyolmiman, chunki uni tugatishgani ancha bo'lgan

Reading = one love 🙂‍↕️🧠 Nasib shu gal 🚀9.0 qilamiz

Language acquisition has been widely discussed in recent years. According to some, there is a significant impact of how small the classrooms are to the quality of the lessons, at the same time, the next group of people think that student’s number cannot be sole major factor. While some may agree with the former idea on account of a closer interaction of language learners and teachers together with a calm atmosphere of the class, I think the number of students is not more reasonable than other factors. There are several advantages that can be attributed to the smaller number of students who are learning a language. First and foremost, this number can facilitate students to interact with their instructors far more closely, mainly to ask for feedbacks for their performances, and guidance to deal with their studies problems. To fulfil their students’ enthusiasm and determination, teachers also find it easy to concentrate and give proper advice, unless there are too many of pupils in the room. This, in turn, may help them to be fluent users of studying language in a shorter period of time. Another major upside of small groups is the calmness of classes’ atmosphere. This silence can positively affect both students and teachers. While children are able to concentrate on either individual exercise or group works, their teachers could suffer less from traditional teaching stress, which comes from too noisy classrooms. Having said that, I would largely agree with the suggestion that student’s quantity cannot solely be accepted as main factor while assessing how beneficial a language course is. One reason is purely is learners’ ability. Scientific papers and countless researches theorized a child’s learning ability always stand at the core of their educational performances, both for achievements and failures. Hardly ever may students learn a language in a small group, if there is a lack of learning ability. To clarify, mastering a language has its own barriers ranging from adapting to new grammar structures and pronunciation rules, to differences in lexicology. Additionally, the qualifications of teachers can be ranked first above students’ number. Tutors’ huge experience together with their better language skills may allow them to have a great number of students in the class, since they can work with nearly all of learners relaying on that past experience. In contrast, even If the number of students is strictly limited, language teachers and lectors with little qualification and work experience cannot help them. In conclusion, having considered from both sides, I am now more convinced that the number of learners in language classes cannot entirely justify their good education. There are other main contributors which may include their individual aptitude and instructors’ eligibility. word: 447 P.s: long time no practice) xatolari bo'lsa uzurasiz

Language acquisition has been widely discussed in recent years. According to some, there is a significant impact of how small the classrooms are, at the same time, the next group of people think that student’s number cannot be a crucial factor. While I agree with the former idea on account of a closer interaction of language learners and teachers together with calm atmosphere within the class, I think the number of students is not as reasonable as other factors including their learning ability and teachers’ qualification. (to be continued )

TASK 2: Some people believe that it is better language students in small classes. Others think the number of people in the classes doesn't matter. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

1 marta IELTS topshirishimdan oldin, esimda ustozimning etgan maslahatlarini olib mockga kirganman adashmasam imithon kunimgacha 7-8 marotaba. Men topgan benefits : 🤯✅ Hayajoni ustida hukmron bo’lishni o’rgatgan. Dastlabki 2 ta mock 6,5 va 7.0 chiqqanidan keyin, o’zimda hayajoning qanchalik tasiri borligini bilib oldim.Negaki desangiz, uyda, 🎧 naushnikda LISTENING im 7,5-8.0 chiqardi, lekin mockda esa 6,5-7.0-7,5(bir-bir). Shunda muntazam qatnashish orqali bir nechta usullarni Hayajoni sindirish uchun qilin ko’rdim, va oxirida peak level ga chiqdim. 🚀😎 Confidence Siz mockdagi result bilan siqilishga shoshilmang, eng muhimi sizda bo’lgan kamchilikni, misol uchun Readingda Time management , yokida Listeningda Multiple Choice , shu kabi muammolarimni yanada o’zim uchun qaytadan kashf qilgan edim, va ularning ustida ko’proq ishlashga harakat qilgan edim. Ishoning mockdagi qilgan va qilayotgan xatolarizni qaytadan takrorlamalikga harakat qilasiz, o’z o’zidan sidagi Confidence (o’zizga bo’lgan ishonch) oshadi. 😳☠️ Eye-opening Oxirgi mockda 6,5 chiqqan overall, dahshato Listening 6.0/ Reading 6,5 chiqqan edi. Ishoning dahshat depressiyaga tushganman. Va usha mockdan keyingi 2-3 soat, o’zim uchun juda muhim bo’lgan, ishlashim kerakligini, ota onam bekorgan manga va sertifikatim uchun pul berishmayotganini, yana bir bor anglagan edim.

Bir yaqin tanishim shuni menga jo’natibdi. Qisqacha tarjimasi: uyqusizlik bora-bora o’limga olib keladi. Uxlash kerakmi diman a ?

The bar graph below juxtaposes the percentages of females and melas with 3 different reasons to have a teleworking schedule, while the table provides information on their weekly working hours in 2019. Overall, it is clear that saving up money was the main factor for both genders to work from home. Moreover, the smallest percentage of males showed easier childcare as their reasons, whereas their gender counterparts argued less to have higher productivity. On the other hand, in terms of working hours in a week, women were more interested in working no more than 30 hours. Contrastingly, men preferred to spend over 30 hours of work at home. Focusing firstly on the first graph, roughly a half of employees regardless of their gender presented saving money as their main argument to have a distant job. 24% of males showed willingness to work from home on account of higher productivity, while a tenth of women had this reason. More than a quarter of women had an online job in view of straightforward childcare. Males had by far lower percentage regarding the last excuse. As for the second graph, women had considerably less hours of work than men. 74% of them worked under 10 hours per a week staying at home, while only 3% of men had this very shift. A 6% difference was witnessed between females and males who worked averagely for 10-30 hours with the dominance of the former at 22%.Over 80% of males spent more than 30 hours for their work-related duties without going outside, while the smallest percentage of females worked on this time scale. words: 268