JESUSisLORD Validator
Kanalga Telegram’da o‘tish
787
Obunachilar
+124 soatlar
+17 kun
+130 kun
Ma'lumotlar yuklanmoqda
O'xshash kanallar
Taglar buluti
Kirish va chiqish esdaliklari
---
---
---
---
---
---
Obunachilarni jalb qilish
Oktabr '26Okt '26
Oktabr '26
+2
0 kanalda
Sentabr '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '260
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '250
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '25
+5
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '25
+54
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '25
+22
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '25
+3
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '25
+6
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '25
+12
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '24
+11
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '24
+12
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '24
+12
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '24
+17
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '24
+31
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '24
+25
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '24
+26
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '24
+27
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '24
+28
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Mart '24
+40
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Fevral '24
+90
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Yanvar '24
+71
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Dekabr '23
+80
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Noyabr '23
+34
1 kanalda
Get PRO
Oktabr '23
+18
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Sentabr '23
+16
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Avgust '23
+45
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyul '23
+16
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Iyun '23
+43
0 kanalda
Get PRO
May '23
+30
0 kanalda
Get PRO
Aprel '23
+402
0 kanalda
| Sana | Obunachilarni jalb qilish | Esdaliklar | Kanallar | |
| 16 Oktabr | 0 | |||
| 15 Oktabr | +1 | |||
| 14 Oktabr | 0 |
Kanal postlari
I have voted yes for LUNC governance proposal #12233, which is for a chain upgrade to fix a bug involving stuck transactions, and some minor preventative fixes.
I have voted no on LUNC governance proposal #12232 which is for payment for the implementation of Hyperlane. I opposed every proposal relating to the approval and implementation of Hyperlane, so I also oppose payment for its implementation.
| 2 | I have voted no on LUNC governance proposals #12229 and #12230 which are for transfer of Hyperlane contracts, including to community control (and responsibility). I did not support the Hyperlane proposal when it was first voted on, as I do not support making fake LUNC on other chains (wrapped LUNC) https://t.me/JESUSisLORDValidator/386. Bridges of LUNC to other chains are also a security risk which can cause minting with exploits that have occurred on other chains. None of these contracts have been audited. I also do not trust the proposer, among other important reasons for my vote. | 359 |
| 3 | I have voted yes for LUNC governance proposal #12228 for a Terra Classic security audit by SolidProof, with implementation of fixes by OrbitLabs. This will be a great opportunity to enhance the security of the chain and limit potential delisting risk. You can track the vote for this proposal at this link: https://validator.info/terra-classic/governance/12228 | 557 |
| 4 | I have voted yes on LUNC governance proposal #12227, which is to upgrade and patch the chain with an important security fix to address a vulnerability disclosed by Cosmos. | 696 |
| 5 | I have prepared a proposal for a Terra Classic security audit with implementation of fixes you can read over here https://discourse.luncgoblins.com/t/proposal-terra-classic-security-audit-by-solidproof-fixes-by-orbitlabs/536 | 658 |
| 6 | I have voted yes on LUNC proposal #12226 which is to move the USDC from the LUNC/USDC pools through IBC to Injective, then back on the chain into the same kind of pools. The reason is that Noble USDC will no longer be supported on Cosmos, so the stablecoin will become unbacked soon, and it needs to be replaced with USDC which is issued on Injective. Essentially the proposal is required to keep the value of the USDC which the community funded in proposal #12171 https://t.me/JESUSisLORDValidator/346. | 649 |
| 7 | I have voted no on LUNC governance proposal #12225, which is to fund Frag to supply IBC relaying services for Osmosis, Noble and Axelar for around $14,100 USD for 6 months. I don't believe this is worthwhile investment for the chain to fund from the community pool. IBC transactions do not incur fees or tax for the chain, and Noble is ending support for USDC. You can see my vote on the prior similar proposal here https://t.me/JESUSisLORDValidator/367. | 799 |
| 8 | https://x.com/ForTheCross_CH/status/2088810728832827421 | 959 |
| 9 | I have voted yes on LUNC governance proposal #12224, which would set a cap for the community pool of 7B LUNC and 60M USTC, with the additional amounts to be transferred to the oracle pool in two stages, and the process for further amounts above the cap to be transferred to the oracle pool automatically by means of a later chain upgrade proposal.
I support creating this additional source of funding for the oracle pool, resulting in better staking rewards for LUNC investors and improving the sustainability of the chain.
The community pool is rarely used and the cap suggested is generous. The way the cap mechanism would work is that if there are any spend proposals the community pool will fill as normal up to the cap, before overflowing to the oracle pool. I have supported this concept for some time.
You can see the proposal and details of the ongoing vote here: https://validator.info/terra-classic/governance/12224. | 837 |
| 10 | https://x.com/ForTheCross_CH/status/2087115967797288985 | 719 |
| 11 | https://x.com/ForTheCross_CH/status/2084985370924679599 | 903 |
| 12 | https://x.com/ForTheCross_CH/status/2084974003870216534 | 837 |
| 13 | https://x.com/ForTheCross_CH/status/2083891250508206492 | 862 |
| 14 | Thank you everyone who supported my validators and the 1.5% tax proposal. The proposal passed and has been officially implemented on-chain. Praise God! 🙏 | 853 |
| 15 | I have voted yes on LUNC governance proposal #12223, which a community member brought to vote to try to implement the 1.5% on-chain tax. | 990 |
| 16 | I have voted no on LUNC proposal #12222 which is for funding to set-up Hyperlane, which would allow wrapped LUNC to be traded on other chains. I was not in support of the original proposal, as I don't support making fake LUNC on other chains. Also note there is a false validator low on the list with the name JESUSisLORD 3, which is not my validator. | 1 238 |
| 17 | I have voted yes for LUNC proposal #12221, which is a further chain upgrade from Orbit Labs to fix some issues which came up from the recent upgrade to Cosmos SDK 53. | 1 582 |
| 18 | I have voted no on LUNC governance proposal #12219 for a USTC staking system. This proposal says that there will be no minting (unlike the one that came recently), but it still has the issue of when Vegas brought this proposal earlier, that there is no suitable source of funding for staking rewards for USTC. We already need to focus on improving LUNC staking APR, we don't also need a seperate staking system for USTC which needs its own funding. I am opposed to using half or more of the USTC in the community pool for staking rewards for USTC as we should use those funds for development or other useful initiatives, rather than for a new staking system. | 1 778 |
| 19 | I have voted yes for LUNC governance proposal #12218 for the chain upgrade to Cosmos SDK 53 by Orbit Labs. This has been long in the works and the chain halt and upgrade will take place around 17 April. | 1 590 |
| 20 | Thank the Lord our God Jesus Christ for His great salvation! God bless you all my brothers and sisters in Christ. I hope you are doing well. Christopher. | 1 624 |
