Election Data Analyzer
Yopiq kanal
Without election integrity we do not have a nation.
Ko'proq ko'rsatishMamlakat belgilanmaganToif belgilanmagan
997
Obunachilar
Ma'lumot yo'q24 soatlar
Ma'lumot yo'q7 kun
Ma'lumot yo'q30 kun
Postlar arxiv
Party Togglers: A Case Study - I have wrapped up the world's first case study on "Party Togglers". In the post which will follow, I will layout what I did and how you can do this at home. Don't believe me, try it for yourself. The whole point of this is NOT to just produce a bunch of interesting charts, it is to inform a canvass effort. I am working on that now. This is not Project Veritas, so I will not get into specifics of where or when the canvass happens. These efforts take time and are all voluteer. I will report back on if the Party Toggler data anamoly actually generates a high percentage of affadavits.
While continuing to process my Party Togglers Study (almost done, I think it will be the first in the history of the world), I had a hunch. Are there any Registration Date Togglers out there, or "Date Togglers" for short. Yes there are, not as many in this same population. 73 to be exact in a population of about ~ 250,000. Each line is a voter. The strange part is that there are "Date Togglers" who change their Date 3 times in 5 periods and 1 time in 5 periods, but NEVER 2 times in 5 Periods. I don't know what it means, if anything at this point. Are these a special subset of the "Party Togglers" who really like to Toggle and took it to the next level? Kind of like "Super Party-Date Togglers"? "Graduate Level Togglers"? If I compared all of the registration properties from 5 periods, maybe I could find the creme de la creme of Togglers, those who go all in every 45 days for about 6 months and make a trek down to the Clerks Office to update ALL their Voter Information? To be continued...
WATCH: Two decades of Democrats questioning the legitimacy of election results and voting machines.
https://rumble.com/vt2xvy-democrats-questioning-the-legitimacy-of-election-results-and-voting-machine.html
@KanekoaTheGreat
The BBC have withdrawn this guy’s hall-pass and vowed to NEVER to have him on again.
Watch this, and find out why!
Join ➣ @The_StormQ17
I am continuing to map the "Party Togglers" and classify the address by TYPE which also allows a correlation to the registration date. This group of Togglers actually registered in 2020, most of them in 4th quarter, and then they decide to start toggling in Dec of 2020 and continue toggling through June 21. I don't have an explanation for this for those of you who have asked. It could be a database clerical error, it could be some arcane roll adjustment that occurs, it could be nefarious, who knows. That is why you need to bypass the bueracracy and ask the person themselves.
It appears this is going to be a series about Devolution....only one has been released so far. It is worth a listen. https://rumble.com/vrjghs-devolved-vol-1-a-fortified-election.html
On the Joe Rogan latest podcast #1767, he interviews a guy named James Lindsay who is a CRT expert and critic. At about the 1:01 mark, Lindsay brings up Mike Lindell, the cyber symposium, election fraud, machines etc., and they go on for about 10 minutes....now it ain't pretty folks. Rogan is coarse and seems to be completely unaware of anything we are working on here, just clueless (or so he makes it seem, I don't take much at face value these days). He makes fun of Mike and the tin foil hats, etc....but in the end, agrees with Lindsay that deplatforming people is wrong. So, there was a break through. Millions of people may have just heard about election fraud for the first time. Maybe only 10,000 actually do some research and maybe only 2,000 are converts. It is a win, just breaking through the stonewall of media silence and denials. Progress.
I am about 20% complete mapping out every one of the 984 "Party Togglers" and classifying the locations by TYPE using the EDA MapIt tab. That would be 203 total virtual inspections so far in about 3 hours. You can see how much time savings this might provide by doing some intial research before pounding the pavement or driving the neighborhood. Here is how the TYPES are starting to segment. From a CANVASS perspective, I think it is important to know ahead of time which locations are a stand alone "Residence" versus an "Apartment Block". How are you going to get into an Apartment Block? Not very easily if at all. How do you overcome having 25% of the "Party Togglers" living in locked up apartment blocks that are impossible to Canvass?
So back before the 2020 General Election......https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/13/election-voting-machine-misleading-claims-394891
Why do we need to canvass everywhere 100% and audit everything 100% when we have a situation like this? Get rid of these machines. If nothing else, the counties could save alot of money I have been told. This was written 10 months prior to 2020 election and was posted by NBC News, when it was convenient for them to promote the idea. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/online-vulnerable-experts-find-nearly-three-dozen-u-s-voting-n1112436
I want to make a philisophical point on this "data analyzer" channel. As the world starts to change direction and return to "normal" we should not just be happy with getting back the Freedom they took. Those who took it under false pretenses need to repent and be held accountable. Then we need to push beyond the Freedom we had before 2020 and secure more Freedom since we now see what these agencies are capable of doing. We can start by getting rid of the machines and demanding that the 2020 fraud be rectified. And then keep pushing....(I have replied to a number of posts on other channels in this way but wanted to state it here as well.)
Given all that I have said above about "Party Togglers", do you have the registration rolls in hand to make use of this type of analysis if the algorithim were added to the Time Period Data Analyzer (TPDA)?
These are scrambled address, but you get the idea. I call this a "Party Toggler Cluster". This Cluster of Togglers get together every 30-45 days for about 6 months and trek down to the Clerks office, reregister as a different party and then Toggle back to the same party they were before. Maybe they car pool since it is a big Local Cluster? How did I find this? Once you identify your subset of high count Party Togglers (meaning they really like to Toggle over time) with the associated address, sort the address in ascending order. I suppose I could strip off the leading number to make sure I did not miss any, but I have seen enough of the Togglers for now. By the way, I went back to my source data and reproduced the entire algorithim from scratch to make sure I had not screwed up somehow, but, I reproduced the same results. So this is for sure, we have a real Cluster on our hands to clean up....with a Canvass.
I am happy to report that the "Party Toggler Couples" I describe above living together don't experience much strife about political matters because they Toggle together, same values every time in lock step. Imagine that? Couples who Toggle together stay together I guess. But wait, there is more....
Homework: Take your reg roll and copy out the street part of the address. Create a table out of it. Then create a pivot table from it. Then make a copy of the original list of street address and create a second table. In Excel, run a Find & Replace on _APT_ and _UNIT_ and _SUITE_ and _STE_ (where _ designates a space, you HAVE to use the space in the find part). Replace these strings with just _ (meaning one space). Then replace "&", "#" and "-" with null (no space). Then take that data set and create another pivot table. SUPRISE!!! You will find the number of address in the second pivot is less than the first pivot. What does that mean? That there are two registrants listed in the roll like this : 1000 Smith Rd APT 123, 1000 Smith Rd Unit 123. In the second pivot, that address will just show up as 1000 Smith Rd 123. Now what if those two "different address" have different names on them? Well then you have found something really interesting. Ya think that might be a good one to CANVASS? My data above.
Another "funny" thing happens when you put all of the "Party Toggler Domiciles" address on the same map. You sometimes get clusters, like this sample of a suburban street. The blue pins are party toggler locations. Gee, maybe they can coordinate their efforts every 45 days when they want to toggle the registration and just have one of them drop off the forms? Is that allowed? Maybe they got together and had a "party toggling block party", kind of like a Tupperware party, only better. Funny (not so funny).
I am going to go out on a limb into pure speculation. I have inspected 1000s of address using EDA MapIt feature over the past 7 months. I have NEVER, until today, come across images that are deliberately "fuzzed out" like this on the street view. I am about 10% done inspecting the 985 "Party Toggler Domiciles" and have found 3 of these.....really strange. Coincidence I guess....?
