https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p/audio-operation-lockstep-truther
I’ve not experienced this much at all, being told that Topic X ought to be an our current focus as the “Truth Community”. This is perhaps because I’m inclined to operate as a lone wolf most of the time.
There was one exception and that was when Robin Monotti insisted that Gaza was the next covid and that we should protest actively. I wasn’t interested because what I know about Gaza that didn’t come from the mainstream is close to zero. That i didn’t instantly take a very strong position on Gaza does not prove I’m controlled opposition, but instead, ignorant.
What did confirm for me that my channel partner was, was when I was very strongly guided away from talking about “No evidence for the existence of viruses”. Eventually, irreconcilable differences lead to my ending the shared channel and reappearing here, courtesy of Mr Tim West, without whom my technical digital inadequacies might have led me to curtail routine publication of my insights.
More recently, I’ve been intermittently criticised for not much more frequently covering the Scottish Covid Enquiry. I have mentioned it three or four times. I don’t take the view that it’s as obviously explosive information as others do. I also had covered the deliberate medical mismanagement and subsequent killing of many people in care homes and hospitals. I’d presented proof of inappropriate, heavy use of midazolam and morphine as well as the extraordinarily dangerous practise of sedating, intubating and mechanically ventilating especially frail, elderly people. I didn’t just write posts or give interviews which proved that these practises were well known to be effective termination methods. Murder, in other words. I was frantic about it. I didn’t insist everyone else focus on it. Parroting information is not a helpful practice. If you don’t personally understand a particular topic, in my opinion you should, if you touch on it at all, point out the experts on such a topic.
I’ve just remembered another push, though again it was to try to stay my hands on the - to me, obviously - intentional harms that was inevitable, if they were making the injections according to what we were told was happening and the prevailing understanding of the consequences of so doing. At the time, I was loosely allied to HART. It was made very clear that this organization was not supportive of my stance. It was claimed that “It’s too early, the public isn’t ready for this”. We parted company. In Year 7, that organisation has still not campaigned on intentionally toxic injections or that there’s no evidence for the existence of any virus. I expect the public remains not ready for this information.
I’m most likely not regarded by the powers that shouldn’t be as part of any movement so I don’t generally experience the phenomenon of being managed by self-appointed truther leaders. I’m not able to use Twitter or Facebook etc., so I’m unlikely to be front of mind for many “truther leaders”.
All that said, I’m selective about what I write and (rarely, these days) talk about. The tests are that I have to regard the topic as important to the perpetrators and I must either be at near expert level in the topic or to have so extensively read up on the topic that I understand what the raw data signifies (eg fake climate change crisis). I generally lean towards sharing my conclusions at the bigger picture level, with the aspiration that some who I reach will shift categorically from uneasy and aware of limited wrongdoing to knowing that we’re under severe attack.
I largely agree with Miri AF’s approach to her campaigning, though not always the details.
Best wishes
Mike
👉
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon