ENGLISH SPEECHES

Yo, so the recent Iranian elections really put a spotlight on two big players in the political game - Dr. Pezeshkian and Dr. Jalili. These dudes have totally different vibes when it comes to talking about important stuff. Dr. Pezeshkian, he's all laid-back and doesn't really have a solid game plan when he talks. He's quick to throw shade without offering any real solutions or getting into deep convos. Some peeps see him as causing drama and not really helping to move things forward. On the flip side, Dr. Jalili is all about that intellectual hustle. He's super smart and knows his stuff, always diving deep into complex issues and coming up with fresh ideas. Dr. Jalili's got that academic swag and isn't afraid to tackle tough topics with a critical eye. The diff between Dr. Pezeshkian and Dr. Jalili shows how important it is to have meaningful convos in politics. With Iran facing some serious challenges, it's key for leaders to get real and have open discussions to find solutions and make things better for everyone. In the context of the recent Iranian elections, these differences really matter. The outcome of the elections will shape Iran's future, so it's crucial for leaders to talk it out and work together to tackle the big issues. By keeping it real and having honest convos, Iranian leaders can aim for a brighter tomorrow for all their peeps.

Yo, like, imagine letting a protester dude become President, nah man, that's a big no-no! Like, in a 3-hour debate, this guy: - Talks smack about the leadership - Calls martyr Soleimani a whack nickname - Disses martyr Raisi - Spouts off wrong stats - Has zero plan - Says Dr. Jalili should be executed - Can't even make up his mind on anything Bro, what kind of President would that be? That's just straight-up ridiculous, right?