D MAN LOVES ME!

Further, I think this was a wrong move by Trump to attack Iran. 1. It involved US in the war, and did not achieve anything. HIGH likelihood that Iran will get nukes. It has uranium, and China, Russia, etc are open to even give to Iran nukes. Problem is, I don't know enough about Iranians or Iran, but from what my propaganda-fueled news tells me, they are kinda highest likelihood of fucking actually using it. And I do not want a nuke war. Counter note: IF this is wrong, and Iran is indeed stopped from obtaining nukes (enriching further the Uranium they have, that is enough for 10 nukes... from 60% to 90% that they need for a bomb...) then this action by the US was good. Because having an extra player with nukes is not a good thing. Especially at ultra volatile middle east. Just my opinion, form your own, I can be wrong or misinformed, don't take it for intentional.

Yes, I see the disagreeing smileys. I think they want to warn me, yes, I know if they close the passage, oil will pump, I know all that, but I also don't think it will happen, and I don't think the oil can stay above 80 for long time in the coming 30 days or so timeframe. It is odds, but very well researched odds. This morning I spent cleaning up my digital life... unsubscribed from all paid and free sources that didn't prove valuable to me over the past year. Emphasized and setup alerts so I timely read and receive those that DID prove valuable.

I am shorting some crude oil here. I don't think there will be much of that war, the US knows it doesn't want a war with Iran. Iran knows it cannot afford a war with the US when they have Israel in prime focus. I expect that retaliation to be more symbolic and then for oil to start dropping.

I don't respect this. Because I do this for free, and I get offered things for 'salary' in a friendly, non-professional tone. If you'd be good analyst, you'd deliver me high quality, literate, well formatted text, and offer me the same service. Also I'd get more info about you, success and fail record, etc. For now, I will continue sticking to my vetted sources, as in war propaganda times it is hard to find sources that are actually not part of the clutter. Also, a kind reminder, I am doing this service for free here. I don't even know when I earned something from this or main chan besides my macro report which is also struggling to cover even the costs of sources I engage to get you this market edge. I don't know if you noticed, but NOBODY, not this guy in screenshot or anbody public knew the US will attack over the weekend. The D Man's macro report buyers got high confidence that the US will attack Iran and the nature of that attack. That is edge. That comes from having many top sources, waiting and eventually some of them delivers something you find valuable for your audience. I followed that source for almost a year now, and this is the first time something of for me actual market value was said and I shared it with you. Cheers!

I don't understand. Ukraine cannot have as a country worse intelligence than what I manage to gather online: they will lose the war, and it is inevitable. Why are they dragging it? First, they would already lost without the US and other countries help. Now, Trump got elected on base to stop the war, so there is LOW likelihood he will ask congress for more funding in Ukraine. He needs two war-mongering congressmen to vote for his Big Beautiful Bill before he can piss them off, as he needs their votes. But after that, he will likely ask to stop supporting the war in Ukraine. In the meantime he can divert the military equipent with the excuse of middle east crisis. That is possibly already underway. Even with the US support Ukraine is losing, and the Russia is winning. Just dragging the war. The question is WHY Ukrainians allow it to happen. They clearly know there is no win on the horizon, what is the actual play here, and is it all maybe in coordination. The West has crossed the red-line for Russia by attacking strategic bombers that are capable of carrying nukes. It was masterful Ukrainian operation, but at what expense. Russia will likely respond brutally to this. However, I don't know if that response will include west in some way. Because Ukraine used primitive drones for the operation, the west has perfect deniability for the assistance, although high likelihood is they did know, the Ukr obviously stated it's their own op, which also might be true. Ukrainians are smart people and resourceful. Though, risking losing important partners by keeping them in the dark over this is unlikely, so I think the West did know it and that Russia also knows it and paritally blames the west. The whole point is, to keep each side accountable, Russia, most people don't know it, did NOT hide its planes, so that the other side can check on sattelites the count etc. Now they will all be hidden. This is same like the US now is doing, hiding its planes. Their treaty... SALT I think called, yes, SALT... called for each side keeping another in check. And now this is very big nuclear escalation. The response will be sudden and huge. And again at cost of what? Most likely Ukraine and civilians. Let me tell you one thing brother: MOST civilians in MOST countries in the world want PEACE. Trust me, many Ukrainians know some Russians they like to call friends and other way around. Destroying on both sides, creates tensions and hate... for what? For border and bs. However this is the state we are now in. Informing you because surely CNN won't. Cheers! D Man

fuck, any discounts?

this one is kinda true hahaha

I would rather stay single FOREVER jerking off than date that stupidity. I should mute crap on my feed it pisses me off even acknowledging the existence of such morons

on the other hand... maybe it's all the same

I think they cheat a bit less on Billionaires than other categories..

I deleted war commentary because people are IRRATIONAL readers. No matter what is said, if they are for one side heavily, they will find ways to bitch to your comment no matter how truthful or factful.

I see weird smileys, I suspect it is because you disagree with some 'politics'. But again, you should learn to read. I stated only about nukes. For the world, it is almost DEFINITELY better that no new nuke countries exist than that they do. And now... you mix in politics and your emotions into it. Why bad smiley? You want nukes? Or you enter your israel-iran bias into the text you read? Learn to read. (ofc not majority of you, but some)

This is STILL not big conflict. Otherwise, smart people on the markets would tank the markets not keep em near ATH

As I see it, Iran had 60 days to accept Trump's nuclear dismantling program. Why not accept if you are not building a nuke? I do not want another country with nuke, so I support all the efforts to get rid of new nukes. Nuke war = there is no one left. There are plenty already, don't want it in hands of someone trigger happy.

Sometimes slow and steady wins the race!

I think most logical is for the up move to wait a couple more days to see the Israel Iran action, and then it can kick off unless tension leads to more uncertainty

Markets have decent liquidity, up moves are possible.

Putin likely doesn't want to end Ukr war during the summer... as they have the momentum. Everything stated as "waiting for proper processes to be negotiated" is BS.

Decent chance Israel attacks Iran in the near future.

Yup!