KR

Save Gaza Campaign Beaten And Arrested In Gujranwala | Eon Clips https://youtube.com/watch?v=agdG2uitXIY&si=sWvQYlnwAbBp03Ud

The reason this is so outrageous to a Marxist is that cotton should only be burned by party members when it has been grown by unauthorised individuals in violation of Comrade Fearless Leader's Five Year Plan.

I wrote over 8 years ago, on the books on Taqlid, many of which predate the inception of DU Deoband. https://t.me/KnowledgeRevival/168 Most of these were published a long time back. Some were in manuscript, but have since been published. Many other books on Taqlid since then have been published in physical and digital formats. Well over 90% of all these released works favour a relaxed model of Taqlid. I said this in private that other day but I'll say it here: Don't be disingenuous by pretending that discourses on the religion (Taqlid, for the purposes of this topic) started with your grandad. You know full well these works existed but you choose to conceal them from the masses. It won't work any longer.

This is why Deobandi discourses on Taqlid are a big joke. Citing themselves as authorities on the issue.

Contrast the responses of Haqiqatjou and FaridLeaks to the Marxist numpty LUMS professor, Dr. Taimur

لعائن الله على القتلة الفجرة https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vTPBmL3WeU

Speaking of the RAND corp… The lousy “Engineer” Mirza showing off more of his engineering. Good catch by Qaiser Raja. https://youtu.be/P8D_6pnv01k? [For Urdu speakers]

Having taught Sh. Tahhan's work to students many times, Sh Tariq decided to collect his mulahadhat on the book in one place. Given this is still a popular work to use as a textbook, many may find benefit in this work as a supplement when studying or teaching it.

Another midwit Desi Orientalist liberal kafir, Dr. Javad “Jay” Hashmi tries to weigh in on the recent nonsense spewed by Uzma Rumi and Dr Taimur Rahman. “Jay” should have remained a medical doctor but he tried to get into the religious arena. So now instead of poisoning people with medicine, he is also poisoning peoples’ iman. He’s literally both a “neem hakeem” and a “neem mulla”. (The Urdu speakers will get the reference) He thinks his PhD from Harvard makes him an expert on everything under the sun. He made a number of stupid statements in his full thread which you can see on Twitter. The crux of his stupidity can be seen here at the start of the thread. Jay says no “expert in the field” respects Shaykh MM A’zami’s work. To this day the Shaykh’s work has not been answered by a single Orientalist. This is because they have no answer. He utterly exposed them. In general the “experts” Jay looks up to are either Ismaili kuffar like Khalil Andani or other secular atheistic/non Muslims. Why is it that any Orthodox scholar who defends Islam will get labelled as an “apologist” while any kafir moron who makes dozens of blunders and is against Islam from the outset, labelled as an “academic expert”? “Jay” Hashmi needs to understand that academia is not a sacred cow nor is it objective. Rather it is full of people who have their own biases. There is no such thing as neutrality. “Jay” should also ask himself why every single one of the beliefs in his worldview happen to align with the prevailing zeitgeist and whatever is morally acceptable to the liberal secular West? “Jay” has a deep rooted inferiority complex and his own lack of knowledge of basic logic, history, and theology only magnifies it. His mind is subservient to liberalism only. Like the others mentioned above, “Jay” is a servant of liberalism only. He desires so deeply to be accepted by the West. That is their only goal in life.

ولا يمكن تمام الفهم إلا مع تمام فراغ البال. - البيان والتبيين الجاحظ 255 هـ

Nobody's understanding of the religion is strengthened by simply critiquing other viewpoints. By critiquing other viewpoints, one simply identifies what is incorrect, but that doesn't teach them what is correct nor does it mean what they stand on is true. The starting point to any learning is to first figure out what is correct, and by figuring out what is correct you can determine what is incorrect. Allah teaches us the correct approach to learning:

"It is He who revealed to you the Scripture. Some of its verses are definite in meaning (muhkamat) —these are the foundation of the Scripture—and others are ambiguous (mutashabihat). As for those in whose hearts there is perversity, they follow whatever is ambiguous in it, seeking dissension and seeking (to distort) its interpretation." (3:7)

There's much to say on this verse, but let's zoom in on one point. Allah categorises verses into two: 1) Decisive (Muhkamat) 2) Ambiguous (Mutashabihat) He then tells us that the decisive verses (muhkamat) are the foundations of the Quran, and that because they are the foundation of Scripture, to understand what is ambiguous (mutashabihat) one must read them in light of those decisive verses. It is by conflating these two categories and by making the ambiguous the foundation that one falls into error. In this regard, Aishah informs us that the Prophet (peace be upon him) recited the verse above and then said:

"So, when you see those who follow what is ambiguous from it, then it is those whom God has mentioned, so be wary of them." (Bukhari and Muslim)

Therefore, rather than focusing merely on someone else's false and ambiguous positions, it would be far superior to first understand one's own decisive foundations (muhkamat), because it is only after identifying the decisive foundations that one truly empowers themself with knowledge and can identify what is incorrect. Before that, they can only carry a false sense of conviction.

Dr Taimur Rahman has been continuing his stream of nonsense. As Muhammad Jamil writes here in Urdu “There is a lot of difference between Western liberals and Pakistani liberals. The Pakistani liberals are hypocrites of the first degree/top rank.” Recently Dr Taimur Rahman promoted Uzma Rumi’s stupid video on Imam Ghazali. As far as we know, Uzma Rumi is not related to the Pakistani secular libtard Raza Rumi. (For those wondering, she is also of no relation to everyone’s favorite Italian Deobandi Don Quixote Umar Rumi) It’s rather hilarious seeing Taimur, Uzma, and other morons promote the Mutazilah, as the Mutazilah would have had these idiots lashed. The Mutazilah were also not “free thinkers” as they actually had their opponents suppressed and killed by the state. It is equally stupid for them to allege that Sunni Asharis somehow suppressed Shaykh Ibn Sina and Ibn Rushd. The works of Ibn Sina and Ibn Rushd are still taught in many seminaries. In fact many great Orthodox Sunni ulama such as Ibn Kamal Pasha and others defended Ibn Sina from the allegations against him. This is also the position of many of our teachers, we don’t takfir Ibn Sina. Ibn Sina, Ibn Rushd, Al Farabi and co would also cringe at being cited by these Desi libtards. Perhaps Taimur and co should actually read the works of the authors they cite instead of blindly sucking up to Western Orientalist trash.

This is why it's important to beat your kids.

"لا نعرف كريما إلا من له يدان"

قَالَتْ يَا أَيُّهَا الْمَلَأُ إِنِّي أُلْقِيَ إِلَيَّ كِتَابٌ كَرِيمٌ إِنَّهُ مِنْ سُلَيْمَانَ وَإِنَّهُ بِسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ أَلَّا تَعْلُوا عَلَيَّ وَأْتُونِي مُسْلِمِينَ

جهل الشيخ المتصابي عبدالرحمن دمشقية بالقرآن الكريم #فيديوهات_قصيرة الضحكة الشريرة لوحدها حكاية - لكنها ضحكة عن جهل !

FW: This is so typical... mizaaj of akabir talk. My favourite comeback to that is Mol Isa's statement: یہ دین کسی بزرگ یا اکابر کے مزاج کے تابع نہیں ہے This mizaaj talk comes from those who have no other argument at hand. The hidden motives is the same. Everything is a saazish in the madressahs and everyone has links to Israel/Freemasons

وجه من وجوه تسمية النصارى بالضالين