Justice junction
Kanalga TelegramтАЩda oтАШtish
тАв Judiciary (PCS-J), APO тАв AIBE, UGC-NET (Law) тАвNOTES ЁЯУЪ #ballb #llb #llm #judiciary #adpo #aibe
Ko'proq ko'rsatishMamlakat belgilanmaganToif belgilanmagan
296
Obunachilar
+524 soatlar
+127 kun
+4330 kun
Postlar arxiv
Consultant (Legal) Vacancy At National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC)
https://www.verdictum.in/job-updates/national-health-systems-resource-centre-1621246
рд╢реНрд░реА рдХреГрд╖реНрдг рдЬрдиреНрдорд╛рд╖реНрдЯрдореА рдХреА рдЕрд╢реЗрд╖ рд╢реБрднрдХрд╛рдордирд╛рдПрдБ! рдЬрдп рд╢реНрд░реА рд░рд╛рдзреЗ рдХреГрд╖реНрдгрд╛!
"Absolutely Fallacious": Delhi High Court Rejects Plea Challenging Victim's Appeal Provision U/S 372 CrPC
https://www.verdictum.in/delhi-high-court/shivdhar-upadhyay-v-union-of-india-2026dhc7414-db-appeal-provision-us-372-crpc-1621222
рд╕рд┐рд╡рд┐рд▓_рдЬрдЬ,_рдП_рдкреА_рдУ_рдПрд╡рдВ_рдПрдЪ_рдЬреЗ_рдПрд╕_рдкреНрд░рд┐рд▓рд┐рдореНрд╕_рд╕реНрдкреЗрд╢рд▓_2026_2611_E.pdf
Any Elector Excluded From Electoral Roll During SIR Exercise On Account Of Demolition Or Relocation Can Fill Form 6 Issued By ECI: Delhi High Court
https://www.verdictum.in/delhi-high-court/indu-prakash-singh-v-government-2026dhc7271-db-elector-sir-exercise-eci-form-6-1621152
Muslim Law Does Not Recognise Theory Of Representation; Interest Of Each Heir Is Separate & Distinct: Gauhati High Court
https://www.verdictum.in/guwahati-high-court/nur-mohammad-legal-heirs-v-tarubala-saha-jagadish-saha-2026gau-as12126-1621081
Supreme Court Disapproves Routine Practice Of Granting Stay Of Trial While Issuing Notice In Challenges To Interlocutory Orders
https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/madhav-vidarbha-estate-pvt-ltd-v-praharsh-corporation-pvt-ltd-2026-insc-925-routine-stay-of-trial-interlocutory-revisions-1621046
рдЕрдХрдмрд░реБрджреНрджреАрди рдУрд╡реИрд╕реА рдХрд╛ рднрд╛рд╖рдг рдкреНрд░рдердо рджреГрд╖реНрдЯрдпрд╛ рднрдЧрд╡рд╛рди рд░рд╛рдо рдХрд╛ рдордЬрд╝рд╛рдХ рдЙрдбрд╝рд╛рдиреЗ рдФрд░ рдзрд╛рд░реНрдорд┐рдХ рднрд╛рд╡рдирд╛рдУрдВ рдХреЛ рдареЗрд╕ рдкрд╣реБрдВрдЪрд╛рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд▓рд╛: рд╣рд╛рдИрдХреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдХрд╛ рдХреЗрд╕ рд░рджреНрдж рдХрд░рдиреЗ рд╕реЗ рдЗрдирдХрд╛рд░
https://hindi.livelaw.in/bombay-high-court/akbaruddin-owaisis-speech-mock-lord-ram-hurt-religious-sentiments-bombay-high-court-547953
рдЫреЗрдбрд╝рдЫрд╛рдбрд╝ рдХреЗ рдорд╛рдорд▓реЗ рдореЗрдВ рд▓рдбрд╝рдХреА рдХрд╛ cross examination _
рд╕рдЪ рд╕рд╛рдордиреЗ рд▓рд╛рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП 40 рд╕рд╡рд╛рд▓
For more information follow
#crossexamination
Join WhatsApp
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb9AckzJUM2jigEft43g
https://t.me/Justicejunction1
#NeverGiveUp@lawstudyballb2
"The Supreme Court today did not allow an NIA plea seeking the cancellation of the bail granted to accused Harpreet Singh Talwar alias Kabir Talwar in the Mundra port drugs haul case, saying the agency could seek overturning of the order if he influences witnesses.
Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for the National Investigation Agency (NIA), told a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana that the alleged offences are grave and carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
The Law Officer said that the case pertained to the sensational recovery of around 3,000 kg of narcotics, which was allegedly procured from Iran and Afghanistan."
https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-refuses-to-cancel-bail-granted-to-accused-kabir-talwar-in-mundra-port-drugs-haul-case-1620265#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20today,from%20Iran%20and%20Afghanistan.
NEET-UG Exam: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Affidavit On Steps Taken On Radhakrishnan & Nilekani Committees Reforms
https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/directs-centre-file-affidavit-radhakrishnan-nilekani-committees-reforms-nta-overhaul-1620168
B-Class History Sheet CanтАЩt Be Opened Without Material Showing Professional Or Expert Criminality: Allahabad High Court
https://www.verdictum.in/allahabad-high-court/satendra-dactar-v-state-of-up-and-others-2026ahc172286-db-history-sheet-1620116
CPC NOTES by RAHUL IAS (HINDI).pdf9.82 MB
Follow the Justice Junction рдиреНрдпрд╛рдп рдорд┐рд▓рди рд╕реНрдерд▓ connect minds working for legal empowerment
Law тАв Judiciary тАв AIBE group on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb9AckzJUM2jigEft43g
frivolous statements were made nor was the said officer administratively superior to the public servant made mention of in the complaint of the second respondent.
Thus, allowing the appeal, the Bench quashed the proceedings.
Cause Title: A v. State of Himachal Pradesh (Neutral Citation: 2026 INSC 856)"
