Vibe Coding Community

Ну понятно, как всегда зиро аргументов кроме дэфенса

Пока не сталкивался, но уже жду) так как во всю катаю в OpenClaw на криптовых задачах 😄

а сколько там в бесплатном тарифе?

Привет) изначально задумывалось что будем делиться опытом, кейсами, инструментами) но некоторые находят работу, партнеров, заказы)

Посмотрим

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Вчера вообще он гнал был, потом вроде подфиксили

Покажешь свой сайт который ты делал через сонет 4.5? В лс скинь, интересно стало😁😁

у меня очень много хороших проектов

Поначалу было непонятно что делать и почему, плюс все на Английском Но с переводчиком справилась 😅😹

на 48,98% пи***жь

> Enterprise уровень: Владислав Дружина Создатель промышленных AI-решений ($60K/месяц на Claude) Зарабатывает? Или тратит? 🤔

А почему не exa + tavily?

Есть возможность протестировать ваш проект?

\- Provide the relevant code snippet. \- Classify the vulnerability type (e.g., SQL Injection, XSS, Auth Bypass, CVE-ID if related to a dependency). Reference CWE or OWASP Top 10 categories where applicable. \- \*\*Prioritization:\*\* Assign a severity rating (e.g., Critical, High, Medium, Low) based on: \- \*\*Potential Impact:\*\* What could an attacker achieve? (e.g., RCE, data theft, account takeover). \- \*\*Exploitability:\*\* How easy is it for an attacker to trigger the vulnerability? (e.g., requires authentication, complex interaction, publicly accessible endpoint). \## \*\*Phase 2: Remediation Planning\*\* \- For each \*High\* and \*Critical\* priority vulnerability (and \*Medium\* where feasible): \- \*\*Explain Risk:\*\* Clearly describe the vulnerability and the specific security risk it poses in the context of this application. \- \*\*Provide Evidence/Attack Scenario:\*\* Illustrate \*how\* it could be exploited (e.g., example malicious input, sequence of requests). \- \*\*Propose Remediation:\*\* Outline specific, actionable steps to fix the vulnerability. Provide corrected code snippets where appropriate. \- \*\*Explain Fix Security:\*\* Detail \*how\* the proposed change mitigates the specific risk identified. \- \*\*Consider Alternatives:\*\* Briefly mention if alternative remediation strategies exist and why the proposed one is preferred. \- \*\*Implications:\*\* Discuss potential side effects or necessary follow-up actions related to the change (e.g., requires database migration, needs specific testing, impacts other components). \## \*\*Phase 3: Implementation Proposal & Verification Guidance\*\* \- \*\*Propose Changes:\*\* Present the code modifications clearly. Use a "before" and "after" format for easy comparison. \- \*\*IMPORTANT:\*\* You will \*propose\* these changes. Do not assume you can execute them directly unless explicitly instructed and technically feasible within the interaction model. \- \*\*Minimal Changes:\*\* Ensure proposed changes are the minimum necessary to address the identified security vulnerability effectively. \- \*\*Verification Strategy:\*\* For each proposed change, suggest how the fix should be verified: \- Specific test cases (unit, integration, or manual). \- Re-running specific security scanning tools/checks against the modified code. \- Confirming expected behavior changes (e.g., blocked input, correct permission denial). \- \*\*No New Issues:\*\* Briefly analyze if the proposed change could inadvertently introduce new vulnerabilities. \--- \## \*\*Key Focus Areas (Reiteration & Additions):\*\* \- Injection Flaws (SQLi, NoSQLi, OS Command, LDAP, XPath) \- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS - Stored, Reflected, DOM-based) \- Authentication/Authorization Bypasses & Broken Access Control \- Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) / Mass Assignment \- Security Misconfiguration (Frameworks, Servers, Cloud Services - if discernible) \- Sensitive Data Exposure (Lack of Encryption, Weak Hashing, Information Leakage) \- Vulnerable and Outdated Components (Check dependency files) \- Insufficient Input Validation & Output Encoding \- Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) - especially in non-API, session-based apps \- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) \- Insecure Deserialization \- Missing Rate Limiting / Resource Exhaustion \- Inadequate Logging & Monitoring (Sufficient detail for forensics, without logging secrets) \- Weak Cryptography / Improper Key Management \- Exposed Credentials / Secrets Management Issues \## \*\*DO NOT:\*\* \- Make purely cosmetic, stylistic, or performance-related changes. \- Refactor code extensively unless directly required for a security fix.

Ну по желанию заказчика конечно

благодарю

"Spec first" - если не затруднит, опишите пожалуйста, чем вас привлек данный подход?

*работает Я молодой еще Немного на сленге