Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel

Suavek picked this post out from 2022. In it, using an unofficial view of VAERS data, we see a large increase in miscarriage/stillbirth & other symptoms reported post-c19 injection. I wasn’t by then surprised, having pointed out before that pregnant women should definitely not have been exposed to this novel medical intervention. Please remember that it is understood that rates of adverse events greatly exceed those actually reported to VAERS. Best wishes Mike

This is the cleanest signal of reproductive harms after c19 vaccination I’ve seen to date. This is directly pulled from VAERS with no manipulation. Therefore it can & MUST be shared widely. The minimum benefit I anticipate flowing from this is that individual women will decline any further injections if they’ve had any to date. Best case is that people begin to draw conclusions that I think are starkly obvious: 1. Young women were never in the at elevated risk category, so administration of these so-called vaccines was never indicated. 2. In any case, for 60 years, since Thalidomide, we’ve never administered novel medical procedures to pregnant women. 3. The manufacturers hadn’t even completed basic, required reproductive toxicology studies. They might have argued that, by convention, these studies have never been required by regulators for injected vaccines. Perhaps, but these agents are in no way related to old style products. 4. Third parties had publicly warned about potentially toxic mechanisms built into the very design of these agents, warnings which triggered attacks & censorship. 5. VAERS has many flaws but it cannot even be pretended that the truly enormous increase in stillbirths & miscarriages after c19 injections compared to the track records of all other vaccines since VAERS was founded, 30 years ago. Please share. Best wishes Mike https://openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health

https://off-guardian.org/2024/05/21/2024-the-inevitable-rise-of-biometrics/ Unfortunately, yes, I’ve noticed all this & can see where it’s all destined. Digital ID. No thanks. If you give in to it, you’ll exchange yourself for a completely controlled avatar, or number. The circumstances of its use and anticipated ubiquity means users can be made to do anything & have no recourse. Remember the social engineering Little Britain Line? “Computer says no”. Best wishes Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/suavek1/p/some-people-say-this-and-some-say We’ve all experienced the phenomenon of trying to explain something of what’s gone on, only to be closed down completely. I often ask “If only I could find better ways to draw people into thinking about all this. It’s not so difficult to reach the conclusion that we’re being lied to, and without this first level of knowledge, action isn’t going to start”. If anyone has had successes in prompting such conversations or even found ways to prompt others, in their own time to begin thinking, please do share it in the comments. I know that this can feel an impossible task. I refuse to accept it’s literally impossible. There’s the famous *remark that “People go mad in crowds but recover their senses, one by one” Best wishes Mike (*a version found online is: “Or as argued Mr. Charles Mackay, author of the 1841 classic Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds: Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one”.)

https://x.com/annaban86699170/status/1628563287439773697 I am unable to authenticate the speakers words as genuine or to know when the alleged statement was made. He could be saying anything. Best wishes Mike

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/former-pfizer-vp-why-are-we-being-lied-to-about-covid-theres-no-good-reason/ I wince at how readily I bought the virus line for so long. That aside, this stands up well, three years after it was first published. The lies are so obvious to anyone who spends just a few minutes contemplating what the official position is and how easy it is to pull great holes in the pretence that “no one is safe unless everyone is vaccinated”. Best wishes Mike

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/moderna-trial-mrna-cancer-vaccine/ I don’t often browse to see if I can find anything I’ve said or written appearing in some form online. In truth, I occasionally check “Dr Mike Yeadon” using Google or Safari, finding it remarkable that the hits are dominated by smears and “hit pieces”. When I use a small search engine to look for the same search term, like Yandex, Mojeek etc, I find a very different profile of hits. These are mostly of interviews or of articles in which I’m quoted (not always correctly….for example, I’ve never said that most of those injected with the gene-based covid injections are mostly doomed to die. I don’t know what fraction will die prematurely. But I would like to emphasise again a couple of points, because I think they’re decisive. 1. If a person is censored and smeared, the authorities are frightened by what you might say about them. Good. 2. The stark differences between major and minor browsers is not accidental. The perpetrators have good control of mainstream media including on the web, but only if you use their browsers / search engines. Of course, most people do, most of time. The obvious distortions of search tell us not only that government is concerned about what the public might stumble onto, and they’ve invested effort to distort your everyday search results. 3. That this is happening now and has been like this for years confirms a great deal of what I’ve been saying. Otherwise they’d let me be torn apart by critics, paid or otherwise, online. Best wishes Mike

https://www.eugenics.news/2024-02-09-globalists-peacefully-depopulate-six-billion-mass-euthanasia.html That I’m concerned about the intentions of those who planned & executed the global coup d’etat aka the fake pandemic & schemed to inject 6 billion people with intentionally harmful materials masquerading as vaccines isn’t exactly groundless. Others too have similar concerns, coming at recent events from non-technical perspectives. For many people, this is unbelievable. So they refuse to believe it. I am unable to concoct a benign interpretation of what’s gone on over merely the last 4.5 years. Of course, it’s not just the last 4.5 years that we’ve been lied to, but that’s a whole other story. Best wishes Mike

Interesting to think about the role of “science” in detaching humanity from a sense of the divine. Once you look into some of the characters leading that charge & their beliefs, you feel a lot less content about science. Best wishes Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/margaretannaalice/p/dialogue-with-mike-yeadon-about-early I have had several very helpful exchanges with Margaret Anna Alice and this was particularly useful. Best wishes Mike