cookie

Ми використовуємо файли cookie для покращення вашого досвіду перегляду. Натиснувши «Прийняти все», ви погоджуєтеся на використання файлів cookie.

avatar

Simon's free writing lessons

📚 Elevate your IELTS Writing skills with expert guidance🖋 🚀 Follow for Daily IELTS 👇💯 https://t.me/telesman_IELTS 🧨Lizʼs FREE IELTS Lessons 👇💯 https://t.me/Liz_IELTS_lessons Contact the owner: @The_Talesman

Більше
Рекламні дописи
5 903
Підписники
+624 години
-27 днів
-9230 днів

Триває завантаження даних...

Приріст підписників

Триває завантаження даних...

Some people think that children can learn about history by visiting museums, while others feel that there are better ways to learn about history. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Показати все...
Historical education has long been a subject of contentious debate, with some stating that museum is the best avenue for learning about the past, while others contend that there are better alternatives. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the argument an present my personal stance on the matter. On one hand, museums facilitate the historical knowledge acquisition in many different ways. The historical artefacts and exhibitions take visitors to a different microcosm full of information and facts about the past. Such an immersive experience in museums enables people to easily acquire knowledge about the history and solidify their understanding of the distant past events. Moreover, almost every single museum has expert guides and professional speakers specialized in historical subjects. They can not only illustrate historical events but also ignite people's interest in and enthusiasm for learning about their ancestors, distant relatives, and historical heritages. However, opponents of museum as the best way to learn history cite technology as a more effective alternative. They argue that various websites and online communities empower people to learn history on a much deeper level than museums do, where the extent to which past knowledge can be given is usually limited due to national credibility, security, and reputation. Furthermore, unlike the internet and online platforms, museums are not accessible to everyone. People with disabilities, geographical barriers, and financial constraints might not be able to physically visit a museum and learn about ancient artefacts and monuments. However, with the aid of technology, such knowledge is widely accessible to everyone with a television, smartphone, and internet connection. Meanwhile, I believe that the history is best learned when physical presence in museums and technological potency of the modern world are implemented in tandem. While museums provide an immersive learning experience, technology can serve as a complementary tool, offering unmatched accessibility and profound knowledge about historical events. When used in combination, these two methods enable complete absorption of historical knowledge across a wider world and with in-depth critique. In conclusion, learning the history appears to be a complex issue that necessitates a careful consideration. While visiting a museum can entail an immersive educational environment and expert guides, other tools such as the internet and television ensure historical knowledge is acquired on a deeper level and accessible to a wider populace. Ultimately, while both of these methods have their own merits, I am firmly convinced that integrating them together is the best way to spread and gain knowledge about the past, as they go hand in hand with one one other. #task2 #essay #discussionessay
Показати все...
3
Фото недоступнеДивитись в Telegram
The pictures depict the changes that have taken place in the layout of a docks area since 1995. In 1995, the southern part of the area was occupied with a sea, with a fishing port right in the middle. On the central south, meanwhile, was a road running from the west to east, branching off of which was another road that extended towards the north-eastern corner. Adjacent to the former road were a fish market to the west on the seaside and shop on the other, while a café to the east, opposite to a hotel on the other side of the road. Close to the center and north-east of the dock were a residential area and a set of houses respectively, whereas the central- and north-eastern zones were allocated for a forest park and farmland also in a respective pattern. As of now, the map of the docks area has undergone significant changes, with, for example, the farmland and forest park replaced by a golf pitch and tennis court. Likewise, the fish market has been cleared to make way for apartments and the shop for a restaurant, but the fishing port has just been demolished without a replacement. Additionally, the hotel now hosts a car park on its right-hand side, and the housing area can now be accessed through a new road immediately on top of it. At the same time, while the number of houses on the northwest has been multiplied, the café, hotel, previous roads, and housing area have remained intact. In summary, over the last 29 years, the dock has gone from a scarcely populated and largely old-fashioned area to a densely residential, recreational, and modern settlement, with the construction of new apartment blocks, houses, a restaurant, car park, golf pitch, and a tennis court. Of particular note is the café, hotel, and old roads, which have stayed unchanged throughout the timeframe observed. #map 317 words
Показати все...
1
The line graph gives information about the proportion of waste recycled per household in 3 different nations from 2005 to 2015. At the beginning of the period, France, denoted with the red line in the chart, reigned supreme in terms of regional household recycling rates, accounting for 50%. The UK, represented by the blue line, claimed the second spot in respective terms, with around 37% of the waste generated in the British households recycled. Germany, highlighted by the green line, was the country with the smallest rate of recycling, at 20%. In 2015, the figure for the UK and Germany exhibited similar patterns of growth. The former, having witnessed a consistent increase, stood at 60%, whereas the latter, after exhibiting a parallel rise at lower points, hovered around 57%. In contrast, the recycling rates in France declined precipitously to 30% in 2013, prior to staging a recovery to 40% at the end of the timescale. In summary, it is clearly evident that the level of regional household recycling was on a consistent upward trajectory in all the countries cited in the question, except for that in France, which witnessed a continuous reduction till 2013 and then bounced back in 2015. Of particular note is Germany, whose figure in the chart exhibited by far the biggest rise throughout the timeframe observed. #linegraph #task1 220 words
Показати все...
👍 1
Фото недоступнеДивитись в Telegram
From head to toeAnonymous voting
  • Entirely
  • Completely
  • Ikkalasiyam
0 votes
🏆 1
FamineAnonymous voting
  • Ochlik
  • Kasallik tarqalishi
0 votes
👍 2
PoachingAnonymous voting
  • Cutting trees
  • Illegal hunting
0 votes
1
ConundrumAnonymous voting
  • A happy incidence
  • A complex problem
0 votes
😎 1
Оберіть інший тариф

На вашому тарифі доступна аналітика тільки для 5 каналів. Щоб отримати більше — оберіть інший тариф.