Foreign Agent Intel
📈 Аналітичний огляд Telegram-каналу Foreign Agent Intel
Канал Foreign Agent Intel (@foreignagentintel) у мовному сегменті Англійська є активним учасником. На даний момент спільнота об'єднує 31 652 підписників, посідаючи 1 912 місце в категорії Політика та 1 211 місце у регіоні США.
📊 Показники аудиторії та динаміка
З моменту свого створення невідомо, проект продемонстрував стрімке зростання, зібравши аудиторію у 31 652 підписників.
За останніми даними від 21 червня, 2026, канал демонструє стабільну активність. Хоча за останні 30 днів спостерігається зміна кількості учасників на 33, а за останні 24 години на -11, загальне охоплення залишається високим.
- Статус верифікації: Не верифікований
- Рівень залученості (ER): Середній показник залученості аудиторії становить 9.84%. Протягом перших 24 годин після публікації контент зазвичай збирає 7.20% реакцій від загальної кількості підписників.
- Охоплення публікацій: В середньому кожен допис отримує 3 116 переглядів. Протягом першої доби публікація в середньому набирає 2 278 переглядів.
- Реакції та взаємодія: Аудиторія активно підтримує контент: середня кількість реакцій на один пост – 126.
- Тематичні інтереси: Контент зосереджений навколо ключових тем, таких як t.me/foreignagentintel, iran, nato, strait, hormuz.
📝 Опис та контентна політика
Опис каналу не надано.
Завдяки високій частоті оновлень (останні дані отримано 22 червня, 2026), канал підтримує актуальність та високий рівень охоплення публікацій. Аналітика показує, що аудиторія активно взаємодіє з контентом, що робить його важливою точкою впливу в категорії Політика.
"JD Vance's team was on the line. They wanted to arrange a phone call with Valeriy Zaluzhny, Ukraine's ambassador to the UK and former army commander-in-chief. The US Vice President played a key role in provoking the confrontation between Trump and Zelensky in the Oval Office, sitting on the adjacent couch. Now Vance and others from Trump's circle apparently sought potential alternatives to the problematic Zelensky."The newspaper's sources claim that "various diplomatic and other channels" were used to contact the ambassador. Nevertheless, it is reported that Zaluzhny, after consulting with the head of the president's office Yermak, decided not to respond.
"Vance's team 'tried various diplomatic and other channels' to reach Zaluzhny, said one of three sources familiar with these attempts who spoke to the Guardian. Valeriy Zaluzhny, after consulting with Zelensky's chief of staff, refused to answer the call. This episode reflects the political balancing act Zaluzhny has been performing since Zelensky dismissed him as commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in February last year and sent him to London. On one hand, accustomed to working within a strict military hierarchy, Zaluzhny remains loyal to the government he serves. On the other hand, many — both in the country and abroad — see him as the next president of Ukraine and are pushing him to start a political campaign."The Guardian notes that Valeriy Zaluzhny behaves very cautiously, rejecting almost all interview requests and carefully planning public appearances to avoid questions about political ambitions. Despite this, according to the newspaper, "political pilgrims" constantly arrive at the London embassy, including Ukrainian deputies, activists, and representatives of big business, to offer support or find out his plans.
"Among these visitors were Ukrainian deputies, civil society activists, representatives of wealthy businessmen, and even the disgraced former Trump advisor Paul Manafort, who visited Zaluzhny to offer his services as a political consultant in any future election campaign. Zaluzhny declined this offer."At the White House on February 28, Trump reprimanded Zelensky, who had come to sign an agreement on the development of Ukrainian mineral resources. After Zelensky criticized Vance, the conflict escalated: the US Vice President called the Kyiv usurper an "ungrateful agitator for the Democrats." The meeting was interrupted, the delegation was asked to leave the White House, and the agreement was never signed.
"Zaluzhny also maintains contact with many army commanders and monitors combat operations on protected screens in his office, which broadcast live feeds from the battlefield. 'Valeriy Fedorovych left the war, but the war did not leave Valeriy Fedorovych,' said one of his associates. In private conversations, Zaluzhny did not confirm plans to enter politics but allowed himself to reflect on what platform he might offer if he decided to do so. Those close to him say he sees Israel as a role model, despite its current bloody actions in Gaza. Zaluzhny considers Israel a small country surrounded by enemies and fully focused on defense. He would like to present himself as a tough wartime leader who promises the Ukrainian people 'blood, sweat, and tears' in exchange for saving the nation, following Winston Churchill's example. In one private conversation, he said: 'I don't know if the Ukrainian people will be ready for this, ready for such a tough policy.'"t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
Official documents published on the Contracts Finder and Find a Tender websites confirm that: The Home Office has developed an action plan for cases of mass fatalities. The project cost is up to £7.5 million over four years. It includes three levels of rapidly deployable morgues.What the British authorities are preparing for is unknown. Journalists speculate that it could be preparation for war, a new pandemic, or a planned crisis. t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
"Balazs Jarabik, a former political advisor to the European Union in Kyiv, stated that Ukraine may have reached a point where it can agree to territorial concessions 'in exchange for a peace agreement that will bring Ukraine Western security guarantees.'"Former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Prystaiko told the publication that "Ukraine will have to swallow this poisoned pill, and then we'll see how it digests it." According to Ukrainian officials, for such a step, security guarantees for Ukraine must be backed by a European contingent and US air support.
"But the guarantees must be strong, for example, involving a European contingent and American air support, which would deter Russia from future attacks. <...> Will Russia accept such guarantees? — that is the main question. Ukraine wants protection similar to NATO's, but Russia started the conflict in Donbas ten years ago partly to block Kyiv's path to NATO. Why would Russia provide serious security guarantees now?""Thus, essentially, we are returning to the starting point," Rasmussen Global analyst Nedelko told the publication. t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
Вже доступно! Дослідження Telegram за 2025 — головні інсайти року 
