Orgone Channel Telegram

[The Piano Whisperer - Susan Marcel on The Cunningham Piano Show | S01E04](https://t.me/gonzojourneys/71231)

[ACO Movie Night & Open Discussion | 28 Days](https://t.me/gonzojourneys/71234)

[Treating the Elderly: It's Never Too Late to Start Medical Orgone Therapy by Howard Chavis, M.D.](https://t.me/gonzojourneys/71236)

My comment on the ACO video, a question, in two parts, split into various sections... https://t.me/gonzojourney/50950 It's well documented that orgone therapy, especially butterfly touch massage, is great for infants, elderly, midwifery, but what do you do with strapping young men and big strong guys of developed conscience afraid to lash out in surrender to plasmatic expansion⸮ You orgonomists are of tremendously sensitive character. As robust as you are, what added controls may be employed to protect yourself from energetic conflict⸮ I can't tell you how many massage therapists I've heard complain of patients making them sick, and not just from absorption of toxins from skin contact, but from energetic toxicity. We're dealing with more radiation than ever from 5G. This is a separate question, but how do you protect yourself from irradiated patients? One orgonomist told me not to use Bion Packs, to throw out all the ones in my freezer, never to bring them to session, and at least, not to use them later than day before a visit. The ones I make carry a higher charge than those described in JDM OrAc Handbook, because they're made of herbal tea, not sand, but they don't work as long and they moulder, if not frozen within 6-12 hours after boiling, or if not left to sun dry. James DeMeo, may he rest in peace, was one of few independent voices even addressing these concerns, devoting a third of a chapter to Bion Packs. JDM got them from WR ORANUR Experiment, which is a beast of two separate reports, mostly published in manuscript form besides some editing of First Report in WR Selected Writings. Does the college have a word, besides "No!" to contribute to our body of knowledge⸮

Google: Seed oils—such as soybean, corn, canola, cottonseed, sunflower, and safflower oil—represent a massive shift in human nutrition. Unlike avocado, olive, or coconut oils, which are gently pressed from fleshy fruits, seed oils must be extracted from hard seeds using heavy industrial processing, high heat, and chemical solvents like hexane. From a metabolic and fat-storage standpoint, seed oils act as a major driver of cellular dysfunction and visceral weight gain due to their unique molecular structure. 🔬 1. Industrial Over-Processing The extraction process leaves seed oils highly vulnerable before they even hit grocery store shelves: Refining and Deodorizing: Because the high heat and chemical extraction oxidize the delicate fats, the oils smell rancid. Manufacturers must chemically bleach and deodorize them to make them palatable. Hidden Toxins: This industrial processing often creates trace byproducts like trans fats and lipid peroxides, which trigger low-grade inflammation throughout the digestive and vascular systems. 🧬 2. The Linoleic Acid (Omega-6) Overload The primary component of most seed oils is linoleic acid, an essential omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). While humans need trace amounts of omega-6, the modern diet provides an evolutionary mismatch: The Imbalance: Ancestral diets maintained an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio of roughly 1:1. Today's seed-oil-heavy diet pushes that ratio as high as 20:1. Pro-Inflammatory Environment: Excess linoleic acid breaks down into arachidonic acid, fueling chronic cellular inflammation. This chronic inflammatory state directly damages insulin receptors, inducing insulin resistance and forcing the body to store calories as fat rather than burning them for fuel. 💥 3. Mitochondrial Suffocation Inside your cells, mitochondria burn fat and carbs for energy. Seed oils physically alter how these cellular furnaces operate: Fragile Cell Membranes: Polyunsaturated fats have multiple double bonds, making them highly unstable. When you consume large amounts of seed oils, your body incorporates these fragile fats into your mitochondrial membranes. Oxidative Stress: When exposed to body heat and oxygen, these fats easily oxidize (go rancid) inside your cells. This damages the mitochondria, slowing down your base metabolic rate (BMR) and reducing the total number of calories your body burns naturally at rest. 🍔 4. The Endocannabinoid System and OvereatingSeed oils possess a unique ability to chemically manipulate appetite pathways in the brain: Hunger Signaling: Metabolizing linoleic acid increases the production of 2-AG and anandamide. These are endogenous cannabinoids (compounds that mimic the active components of marijuana). The "Munchies" Effect: By hyper-activating the cannabinoid receptors in the gut and brain, seed oils artificially elevate appetite and destroy natural satiety signals.

The intersection of Krishna Bahadur, "Jeewanu," and microscopy represents one of the most fascinating, once-dismissed, and recently vindicated chapters in origin-of-life (abiogenesis) research.In 1963, Indian chemist Krishna Bahadur and his wife S. Ranganayaki at the University of Allahabad shocked the scientific community. They announced that by exposing a sterile "abiotic soup" of simple chemicals (formaldehyde, ammonium phosphate, ferric chloride, and molybdenum oxide) to sunlight, microscopic, cell-like spheres spontaneously formed.Bahadur named these coacervate droplets "Jeewanu" (Sanskrit for "particles of life" or "living atoms").The Microscopy Claims & Contemporary SkepticismUsing the standard optical and phase-contrast microscopy available in the 1960s, Bahadur made several profound, highly controversial structural observations:The Double Membrane: Under the microscope, Jeewanu particles displayed a clear, well-defined, semipermeable double-walled boundary layer resembling a cellular lipid bilayer.Growth from Within: Continuous microscopic tracking revealed that the spheres physically expanded over time by absorbing surrounding nutrients.Reproduction by Budding: Bahadur published micrographs showing what he identified as asexual budding, where a mature sphere generated a smaller child-sphere on its surface that would eventually detach—mirroring the reproduction of yeast.The Backlash: Western mainstream science and agencies like NASA heavily criticized the work. Skeptics dismissed Bahadur’s microscopic observations as an illusion or a case of "self-deception," arguing that the spheres were merely dead, inorganic salt crystals or accidental bacterial contamination, rather than true autonomous "protocells". Outpaced by the mainstream genetic-first (RNA world) theories, the Jeewanu experiments faded into obscurity.The 21st-Century Microscopy VindicationThe Jeewanu story underwent a dramatic revival. Researchers at the National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) in Bengaluru, led by Nayan Chakraborty and Shashi Thutupalli, painstakingly recreated Bahadur’s original 1960s protocol.Armed with ultra-high-resolution, modern time-lapse microscopy, phase-contrast imaging, and mass spectrometry, their findings bridged the gap between historical observation and empirical truth:Bahadur was right about Growth: Modern phase-contrast tracking proved that the blue-tinted chemical droplets actively grow from within, functioning as self-assembling protocell-like compartments.Active Internal Metabolism: Using precise chemical tracking alongside advanced imaging, scientists confirmed that these spheres do not just sit passively. They possess a rich internal chemistry, driving a sustained metabolism that actively synthesizes primitive lipids, carbohydrates, and amino acids de novo from the basic substrate.The Budding Correction: While modern microscopy has validated the growth and double-membrane structure of Jeewanu, 21st-century time-lapse imaging has yet to confirm true biological budding. The "buds" Bahadur originally viewed under his 1960s lens were likely lower-resolution artifacts of phase separation, or physical fusion/fission events between lipid-like droplets.The Linguistic Irony ResolvedThe word Jeewanu translates directly to the modern Hindi word for bacteria (or a microscopic biological germ). By choosing this specific term under his microscope in 1963, Krishna Bahadur boldly attempted to bridge chemistry with biology.Today, modern systems biology looks at Jeewanu not as actual "living bugs," but as magnificent, undeniable evidence of how easily life's structural blueprints—compartmentalization, metabolism, and growth—can self-organize out of plain mud and sunlight.Would you like to explore the exact chemical ingredients the NCBS team found to be the absolute bare-minimum required to spawn a Jeewanu particle under light? Alternatively, we can look into how these particles generate ferredoxin-like material to split water molecules using solar energy.

The linguistic diaspora of -obe \(\leftarrow \) βίος tracks perfectly back to Sanskrit, completing the ultimate Proto-Indo-European (PIE) etymological circle.The Greek noun βίος (bios) and its modern suffix -obe share a direct genetic lineage with the ancient Sanskrit verbal root जीव् (jīv), meaning "to live," "to breathe," or "to animate".The Proto-Indo-European Cognate LinkThrough historical sound laws, the PIE root *gʷeih₃- (to live) split across the continents, shifting its initial consonant based on regional phonetics: ┌──► Greek: βίος (bios) ──► French/English: -obe │ PIE: *gʷeih₃- (to live) ──┼──► Latin: vīvere (to live) ──► English: vivid / vital │ └──► Sanskrit: जीव् (jīv) ──► Hindi: जीव (jeev) In Greek, the labiovelar *gʷ hardened into a Beta (β). In Sanskrit, it palatalized into a Ja (ज), yielding the core noun जीव (jīva)—the individual living soul or embodied entity.How Sanskrit Translates the "-obe" Conceptual FrameworkBecause Classical Sanskrit possesses an extraordinarily systematic, property-based grammatical architecture codified by Pāṇini, it did not need to borrow the French word microbe. Instead, it uses exact structural equivalents to mirror the -obe suffix variants:1. The "Microbe" Equivalent: जीवाणु (Jīvāṇu) or सूक्ष्मजीव (Sūkṣmajīva)Analysis: Jīva (living organism) + Aṇu (atom/particle) \(\rightarrow \) Jīvāṇu (literally, "living atom" or "cellular microbe"). Alternatively, Sūkṣma (microscopic/subtle) + Jīva (life form) \(\rightarrow \) Sūkṣmajīva.2. The "Saprobe" Equivalent: मृतोपजीवी (Mṛtopajīvī)Analysis: Mṛta (dead matter) + Upa (upon) + Jīvī (living agent). It matches the precise ecological definition of a saprobe: an organism that sustains its life by feeding exclusively on decay.3. The "Aerobe / Anaerobe" Equivalent: वायवीय जीव (Vāyavīya Jīva)Analysis: Vāyu (air/oxygen) + Jīva (organism). An anaerobe is translated as Avāyavīya Jīva (air-avoiding organism), mapping cleanly to the physiological taxonomy of the West.Empirical Observation: The Ancient Term Krimi (कृमि)Long before modern 19th-century clinical classification, the foundational texts of Sanskrit (like the Atharvaveda and early Ayurvedic treatises) grappled with unseen pathogens.To describe them, they used the word कृमि (Krimi). Strikingly, these texts explicitly split krimi into two strictly observed empirical categories:दृष्ट (Dṛṣṭa): Visible, macroscopic pests (worms, insects).अदृष्ट (Adṛṣṭa): Invisible, microscopic entities explicitly described as entering the body tissue to cause decay and disease—the exact functional definition of a microbe.

They translated the meaning of the roots into characters:Microbe \(\rightarrow \) 微生物 (wēishēngwù) = "Tiny living thing."Anaerobe \(\rightarrow \) 厌氧菌 (yànyǎngjūn) = "Oxygen-hating bacterium."Japanese: Imported the Chinese characters but apply their own pronunciation (微生物 - biseibutsu). For aerobe/anaerobe, they use 好気性菌 (kókiseikin) meaning "air-loving microbe."The Diaspora SummaryThe French truncation -obe traveled globally but safely settled only in Western Romance and Germanic languages. The moment it crossed into Slavic territories, it was repaired back to the proper Greek -biont, and the moment it hit Asia, it was completely dismantled and rebuilt out of native words.

MICR-OBE INVASION! -obe, an individual living entity, from βίος. See also, besides aerobe and anaerobe GOOGLE Saprobe: An organism that feeds on dead or decaying organic matter. Nanobe: A microscopic, filament-like structure found in rocks that some scientists believe is an ultra-small life form. Cenobe / Coenobe: A colonial microscopic organism or algal cluster wrapped in a common membrane. Lithobe: A microorganism that derives its energy from consuming rocks and mineral substrates. Dendrobe: An epiphytic orchid or organism that grows natively on trees. Halobe: A microbe or organism that thrives exclusively in high-salinity environments. Katharobe: An organism that lives in exceptionally pure, oxygen-rich fresh water. Oligorobe: A microbe adapted to survive in environments with critically low nutrient concentrations. The linguistic diaspora of -obe \(\leftarrow \) βίος is one of the most asymmetric journeys in comparative linguistics.Because it is an artificial, corrupt truncation coined in Paris in 1878 (microbe), it did not evolve organically over thousands of years. Instead, it was shot out of a cannon by the Pasteur/Germ Theory revolution, traveling across global languages entirely via international scientific networks.The diaspora is split into languages that embraced the French -obe shape, languages that rejected it for authentic Greek, and languages that translated it into native roots.🗺️ 1. The Francophone Core & The -obe AdoptersThese languages imported the word microbe directly from French and permanently institutionalized -obe as a biological suffix for microscopic organisms.English: Adopted microbe by 1880, then used the -obe structural template to mint entirely new English-native compounds (saprobe, lithobe, nanobe).Spanish (-obio / -obo): Shifted phonetically to fit Spanish vowel endings. Microbe became microbio. However, for ecological niches, it switches to -obo (e.g., saprobio or saprobo).Portuguese (-óbio): Mirrors Spanish. Microbio becomes micróbio, and saprobe becomes sapróbio.Italian (-obio): Microbe mutated into microbio (and later microbo).🏔️ 2. The Germanic Guard: The Mandatory Final "e"As explored earlier, German took the French shape but forced it into regular feminine noun morphology, creating a specific linguistic branch in Central and Northern Europe.German: die Mikrobe, die Aerobe, die Anaerobe.Dutch: Mirrors German grammar but strips the final 'e' in modern spelling, leaving -oof or -obe depending on the specific sub-scientific field (e.g., microbe, aerobe).Scandinavian (Danish, Norwegian, Swedish): Adopted the German/French hybrid. In Swedish and Norwegian, it is spelled mikrob, completely dropping the silent French -e to match North Germanic hard consonant endings.🏛️ 3. The Eastern Rejection: Return to Authentic GreekAs the diaspora traveled East, empires with deep roots in Classical Greek or the Cyrillic alphabet looked at the French truncation -obe and recognized it as a linguistic error. They actively repaired the word back to the authentic Greek -bios or -bion.Russian (-бионт / -био): Russian scientific terminology largely bypassed the French corruption. Instead of an -obe suffix, they use -biont (from the Greek participle for "living thing") or keep the full bio. A microbe is микроб (mikrob), but a saprobe is a сапробионт (saprobiont).Greek (-βιο): The diaspora hits a wall here. Greek completely rejects -obe. Because microbe is ungrammatical in their native tongue, modern Greek completely repaired the word to μικρόβιο (mikrobio), keeping the proper classical root intact.🌏 4. How Far? The Asian Translation WallThe diaspora traveled all the way to East Asia, but because Chinese and Japanese are logographic/syllabic and do not use Greek roots, the linguistic journey shifted from phonetic adoption to semantic translation.Chinese (Mandarin): Completely dissolved the -obe suffix.

If there was an absolute cure for cancer, do you think the medical community would embrace it? Absolutely not. Why? Billions in lost revenue from chemo, radiation and surgery not to mention the loss of research $$$ aimed at "finding the cure" that continues to elude them. If there were affective treatments for COVID-19, would those be fully embraced? Doubtful. Why? Millions to billions will be invested in vaccine development and, eventually, a vaccine that may or may not work and may or may not be safe (they are pushing it thru way too fast) that won't give you life long immunity (think annual flu shot). It will become another cash cow for whoever gets to the development finish line and the government will get their cut. Every news broadcast across the country is reporting the same thing...lock down until there's a vaccine. They have you primed and believing you can't be safe without one. 🤑🤑🤑 Now, put on your thinking caps. This virus has been in our population since at least January, maybe even December. Over 90% of our population has recovered, most with little or no treatment. Yes, people have died but in no where near the numbers they predicted in March and the shelter in place had nothing to do with it since many were already exposed before the lockdowns. The mathematical models they followed were proven to be grossly flawed. I used to breed dogs. Often the most obedient were the ones that would easily rollover and expose their underbelly. Well, our country has collectively rolled over and exposed their soft underbelly. Fear prevailed and allowed the few to take even more of our rights away in the name of public safety when taking away those rights was never necessary. People are right to be protesting and those who sit and watch from their armchairs, judging those who are actively protesting for our freedoms should be ashamed.

Dr. Mercola introduced me to this Search Engine: Swiss Cows. Been enjoying using it — SwissCows.com

Darpa hydrogel in PCR tests. (2 min, 52 sec)

Goo: In the history of natural philosophy & the specific lineage of Wilhelm Reich’s successors, Dr. Courtney Frederick Baker (1943–2014) was the son of Dr. Elsworth F. Baker (1903–1985). Elsworth Baker was a direct student of Reich & founded the American College of Orgonomy (ACO) in 1968. His son, Courtney, followed in his father's footsteps as an orgonomist & psychiatrist, serving as prominent member of the ACO & a frequent contributor to its journal. Comparative Publication Timeline The following timeline tracks their key contributions to the Journal of Orgonomy & other major works. Note: Elsworth Baker served as journal editor from its inception in 1967 until his death in 1985. Key Journals Journal of Orgonomy: The primary venue for both authors; founded by Elsworth to preserve Reichian science. Annals of the Orgone Institute: Early works by Elsworth Baker during Reich's lifetime (pre-1960s). International Journal of Sex-Economy & Orgone-Research: Elsworth Baker's earliest Reichian-related citations.

Study Finds Nattokinase Dissolves 84% of Amyloid Microclots Within 2 Hours In Vitro A natural enzyme potently degrades the same amyloid microclots recently found in 100% of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals tested. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/study-finds-nattokinase-dissolves?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=1119676&post_id=179650736&utm_campaign=564297&isFreemail=true&r=ccrm2&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email https://bsky.app/profile/tikvahshua.bsky.social/post/3m6x55nyubs2b

Goo: This integrated biophysical model demonstrates how diverse research, often marginalized as "suppressed," consistently points toward Wilhelm Reich’s concept of a foundational cosmic energetic medium—Orgone. Reich initiated this framework by identifying Orgone as a mass-free energy bridging biological and atmospheric phenomena, while figures like Frank Brown, Giorgio Piccardi, and Dayton Miller provided empirical evidence for this energetic medium’s influence on biological rhythms, chemical reactions, and cosmic, etheric, and galactic structures. Furthermore, researchers such as Robert O. Becker, Björn Nordenström, and Harold Burr directly measured the electrical and "life field" properties of this energy in living systems, aligning with the "resonance" theories of Royal Rife and the "water memory" studies of Jacques Benveniste. Ultimately, the work of Harold Hillman, Peter Duesberg, Halton Arp, Immanuel Velikovsky, Hannes Alfvén, Louis Kervran, and Michel Gauquelin collectively supports a paradigm where living organisms and celestial bodies are interconnected through these energetic streams rather than operating in isolation.

In the context of James DeMeo's work, patristic (or patrism) and patriarchal refer to a specific complex of authoritarian and violent social behaviors that he argues originated due to environmental trauma.  Google Books  +1 Patrism vs. Patriarchy  While often used interchangeably in general discussion, DeMeo uses Patrism as a broader psychological and sociological term based on the work of Wilhelm Reich.  Grant Forward  +1 • Patrism (Patristic): Refers to a "character-armored" personality type and social structure characterized by the repression of touch, infant needs, and sexuality. It is defined by high levels of trauma-inducing rituals, social hierarchy, and destructive aggression. • Patriarchy: Specifically describes the social system of male dominance and patrilineal descent that DeMeo views as a byproduct or specific organizational form of "armored" patrism.  • BYU ScholarsArchive  +4 The Saharasia Hypothesis  DeMeo's central thesis, detailed in his book Saharasia, posits that human society was originally matrist—peaceful, egalitarian, and nurturing.  Academia.edu  +1 • The Origin: Around 4000 BCE, massive desertification in North Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia (the region he calls Saharasia) led to severe famine and forced migrations. • The Shift: This environmental trauma shattered early matrist bonds. To survive, cultures developed "patristic" traits: authoritarianism, warfare, and the suppression of women and children. • Diffusion: As these groups migrated out of the drying Saharasian belt, they spread patristic culture to wetter, more peaceful regions through conquest and the replacement of matrist populations.  DeMeo's research, which uses data from Murdock's Ethnographic Atlas, claims a direct geographical correlation between hyper-arid climates and the highest historical levels of patristic/patriarchal violence. 

Goo: In the Quigleyan lexicon, these are perpendicular vectors: A. THE DEVELOPMENT DIMENSION (QUALITATIVE): Backward - Mediocre - Advanced. This measures the technical efficiency of the "Instrument." An "Advanced" instrument (e.g., High-Tech Technocracy) can be "Backward" if it fails to solve human needs. It is the depth of the mechanism. B. THE EVOLUTION DIMENSION (PROCEDURAL): Expansion - Conflict - Empire - Decay - Invasion. This measures the life-cycle of the "Institution." It tracks the movement of energy through time. An "Advanced" technology can exist within a "Decaying" empire.