Covid Science Library

Your observation is odd. Why they want to jab people prior to euthanising them is strange. It seems like they feel a compulsion to give people the jab despite absolutely no medical benefit for someone who is about to die anyway. Like you surmise, the need to jab would only make sense if it affected their post-mortem state. Logic would suggest that the jab served as a bio-marker for a post-mortem outcome as yet unknown.

This may be the reason that in some countries they were euthanizeing people but insisting they have the Covid shots first. They are going to die so why would they need a Covid jab? Unless it does something to your spirit after death?

The untold story of tyranny of childhood vaccinations in India https://t.me/IndiasForgottenBabies https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VajDq007T8bQLcPxv83N https://rumble.com/c/c-2909370 https://twitter.com/AnhoneeRahasya

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4z2begqhdCU I am wondering if Bidens mental collapse is due to neuropathy caused by the jab. Brain fog, confusion and dementia are highly associated with Covid jabs. Bidens mental health has declined substantially since he took office. Is the President a living example of jab effects? The resultant simple-mindedness would allow the President to be controlled like a puppet, which would allow many agendas to be put forward that would otherwise have been resisted by a more critical mind. The other benefit of creating a President with impaired cognition is that they can take the fall if any measures backfire. Instead of mal-intent, the bad policies can be attributed to the President's idiocy, with the real players remaining untouched in the background. It is interesting to ask if the onset of the Presidents dementia coincided with his jabs. We have witnessed a singular historical event - the totalitarian push of tyrannical policy upon the free world. It is interesting that this should just happen to coincide with another singular event (never happened before) - a presidency characterised by incapacitance - by extreme cognitive impairment - the elected representative of democracy put out of the way. Its very convenient... This should be a warning to other national leaders - especially those siding with democracy.. Be aware of your medical aides - and avoid all pharmaceuticals at the moment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4z2begqhdCU I am wondering if Bidens mental collapse is due to neuropathy caused by the jab. Brain fog, confusion and dementia are highly associated with Covid jabs. Bidens mental health has declined substantially since he took office. Is the President a living example of jab effects? The resultant simple-mindedness would allow the President to be controlled like a puppet, which would allow many agendas to be put forward that would otherwise have been resisted by a more critical mind. The other benefit of creating a President with impaired cognition is that they can take the fall if any measures backfire. Instead of mal-intent, the bad policies can be attributed to the President's idiocy, with the real players remaining untouched in the background. It is interesting to ask if the onset of the Presidents dementia coincided with his jabs. We have witnessed a singular historical event - the totalitarian push of tyrannical policy. It is interesting that this should just happen to coincide with another singular event - a presidency characterised by extreme cognitive impairment. Its very convenient...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4z2begqhdCU I am wondering if Bidens mental collapse is due to neuropathy caused by the jab. Brain fog, confusion and dementia are highly associated with Covid jabs. Bidens mental health has declined substantially since he took office. Is the President a living example of jab effects? The resultant simple-mindedness would allow the President to be controlled like a puppet, which would allow many agendas to be put forward that would otherwise have been resisted by a more critical mind. The other benefit of creating a President with impaired cognition is that they can take the fall if any measures backfire. Instead of mal-intent, the bad policies can be attributed to the President's idiocy, with the real players remaining untouched in the background. It is interesting to ask if the onset of the Presidents dementia coincided with his jabs.

Addendum. - International scientists have found autism's cause. What will Americans do? https://jbhandley.substack.com/p/international-scientists-have-found "Five clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered have formed an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation." J.B. Handley - Sep 02, 2024 - What will we do ?

As bad as all this sounds, it is not the way the world ends. According to the Bible 25% of the world's population perish during the reign of the beast. A further 50% of the survivors perish later during the war of Armageddon, but this is due to armed conflict - rather than a plague. My takeaway from this is that Replicon cannot pose such an absolute threat. If it kills 2 billion people, that means 3 out of 4 survive to push back. If Replicon is as deadly as you surmise, and if it is released in October in 2024, then we will soon hear news of the outbreak. Its global transmission will be partial and most likely targeted at select countries initially. By the time it spreads to other countries it may have evolved to a less harmful variant. I wrote about self-amplifying vaccines in 2021 - https://howbadismybatch.com/selfamp.html

Dr. William Makis: "325 autopsies of Covid vaccinated people who drop dead a few hours...after taking the Covid-19 vaccine...about 74% of the cases of sudden death were caused or contributed to by the vaccine...There's going to be a tsunami of evidence of the harm of these Covid-19 vaccines, whether it's harming children, pregnant women, adults..." Subscribe for more: 👇🏻👇🏽 https://t.me/+WHg3dP6s9k9kNmRl https://t.me/+WHg3dP6s9k9kNmRl

This idea is interesting Rick. Your idea is that as social units become smaller it is less possible for the 1% to control the 99%. I agree that devolution of power back to smaller groups is the antidote to globalist centralisation . Essentially it would be a return to an extended family structure - which is what a tribe is. During 2020 they banned all local gatherings - pubs, churches, celebrations, concerts, - this wasn’t just about stopping the spread of a virus. It was about stopping the formation of local groups around shared information . I would add that the big globalist organisations are only able to exercise power if they first weaken local groupings or ban them outright . Globalists do not automatically exercise total power by virtue of being extensive- they must first destroy local organisation . So another antidote is to facilitate communications between members of existing groups - strengthen networks of local info sharing. The governments have control of mass media but alternate channels that help local organisation will be an antidote. Such local networks could be - Meet-ups Mutual aid networks Neighbourhood groups Parent groups Work colleague groups School teams School friendship networks Trading groups Shops as nexuses of information eg the newsagents becoming a literal agent of news Teacher networks - reaching out to individual teachers - supporting them and encouraging them Doctors as hubs of local info Councillors Nothing radical Need be implemented- just the encouragement of local info sharing and caring. That’s all it will take.

I disagree with this. They are masters in the management of organizations and hierarchy. The more people, the smaller the individual becomes compared to the whole. It is very easy for them to manage a lot of people, it is enough for them to add another level to the hierarchy. An illustrative example: Different cases of tyrannical dictatorship of the 1% dominating by force the 99% Population 1000 million (~China) 10 million dominating 990 million (maybe 8 or 9 million police and military) : easy. Population 10 million (~small country) 100,000 dominating 9,900,000: easy. Population 100,000 (~ small medieval kingdom) 1,000 dominating 99,000: doable. Population 1,000 (~ tribe) 10 dominating 990 : Almost impossible. Population 100 (~ small tribe) 1 dominating 99 : Totally impossible. They are trying to reduce the population for another reason. The world (or a country) has a fixed and concrete amount of natural resources (arable land, mineral deposits...) - On the one hand, these resources make it possible to support N people. - On the other hand, it takes M people to exploit those resources by working as many hours a day as possible without collapsing productivity due to exhaustion or discontent (say 8, 10, or 12 hours a day) N > M For the system , N - M = "useless eaters", they are not necessary and consume resources. In the past, the system could make these "useless eaters" useful by allocating them to put new resources into exploitation. To war so that a part of them die, and conquer new lands with the resources that are in them. To colonize and exploit virgin or conquered lands. To the mines to extract coal or iron much deeper than before. To the new factories of the industrial revolution to transform those minerals... Nowadays there are no virgin lands or profitable resources left untapped. Logically, the system hides this central concept of "I don't need so many people" by promoting narratives such as Malthusianism or anthropogenic climate change. And machines are becoming more and more effective at doing all kinds of jobs. That would be great in a world ruled by people, more free time. But the world is not ruled by people, it is ruled by another way of life: organizations. States, corporations, companies, secret societies... The Beast Or "the fallen angels," because organizations are not inevitably evil. There are also organizations that work at the service of people ("angels") That's why we created them, to serve us, not to serve them as it happens now.

Autopsies of two men who died from COVAX The study brings several key findings: 1. Presence of Spike Proteins: In both cases, pathologists detected spike proteins in the damaged tissues, which is directly related to the vaccine and not to natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. 2. Harmful Effect on the Cardiovascular System: Pathological changes, including vasculitis, myocarditis and necrosis, indicate a serious immune reaction that can lead to fatal outcomes. 3. Questions Related to Vaccine Safety: These cases raise important questions about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, especially in the context of young and otherwise healthy individuals. A new study, conducted by Dr. Robert W. Chandler, Dr. Ivana Pavić, and Dr. Michael Palmer, provides troubling insights into the pathological basis of cardiovascular disease associated with COVID-19 vaccines. The paper is based on the analysis of two autopsy cases conducted by experienced pathologists Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Dr. Walter Lang in Reutlingen, Germany, pointing to the potentially lethal effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on the cardiovascular system. You can read the study here https://bit.ly/autopsijavaxsmrt2x