Path of Totality

The Babylon on the river Spree Would Be No More

Babylon Before Hitler

I belatedly found this picture of Hitler and Ribbentrop. It was perfect for this graphic.

Hail the Thunderer!

General Léon Degrelle (15.06.1906 – 31.03.1994) – Information: https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9on_Degrelle https://de.metapedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9on_Degrelle

SS-Standartenführer Otto Skorzeny (12 .06.1908 – 05.07.1975) – Information: https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Otto_Skorzeny https://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Otto_Skorzeny

Even the storm clouds hail Hitler! #OldiesButGoodies

Based German grandma heils Hitler! #OldiesButGoodies

Hitler is describing the jew-inspired Cultural-Marxist destructive mania that we see happening in our societies today. — the above quote is from Mein Kampf (1925) by Adolf Hitler [The Dual German-English translation of Mien Kampf by Dr. Thomas Dalton, Clemens & Blair, LLC, New York, London, 2017, Vol. 1, Chap. 10, p. 487]

Sound familiar?

The Importance of Honor (2 of 2) “A nation whose midpoint was represented by honor and duty, would not preserve the corrupt and criminal, but eliminate them. We also see by this example that the faceless scheme in its lust for uniformity, pairs itself with unhealthy subjectivism, while a social and state community welded together by honor and duty must out of justice eliminate material privations, and make efforts to increase the consciousness of individual value within this enforced discipline, but in such a way that, likewise through necessity, it would separate those racially and spiritually unfit for Nordic forms of life. The one or other results when honor is set up as the highest value of all actions, and the protection of the Nordic European race is given prime importance.” — from The Myth of the Twentieth Century (1930) by Alfred Rosenberg [The Pax Aryana PDF Edition, 2020, p. 101]

The Importance of Honor (1 of 2) “A Nordic people determined by the concept of honor would assert that someone in need should be supported not in the name of condescending love and mercy, but in the name of justice and of duty. This would have had as consequence not a subservient humility but an inward honesty, not the breaking of personality, but its strengthening, that is, the reawakening of the consciousness of honor. From the coercive dogma of unrestricted love and the equality of all mankind before God on the one side, from the teaching of human rights supported by democratic racelessness and without nationally rooted ideas of honor on the other, European society has virtually ‘developed’ as a protector of the inferior, the sick, crippled, criminal and rotten. Love plus humanitarianism has become a doctrine decomposing all commandments of life and the life forms of people and state, and, as a result, has come into conflict with present day avenging Nature.”