Reformed Theology

Kinism: Knox & Nationalism John Knox (1514-1572) was a Scottish minister and Reformed theologian. He led the Scottish Reformation and laid the foundation of the Presbyterian tradition, one of the largest Reformed traditions on the planet. In 1560, Knox and his associates compiled their faith into a confession, the Scots Confession, which in its preface clearly shows their understanding of what nationhood is:

"The Estates of Scotland, with the inhabitants of the same, professing Christ Jesus' holy evangel: to their natural countrymen, and unto all other realms and nations, professing the same Lord Jesus with them, wish grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, with the spirit of righteous judgement" ¹

Notice the use of "natural countrymen" and the direct contrast to "other ... nations"; this clearly implies that these men saw a nation as synonymous with "natural countrymen". When the confession addresses "their natural countrymen," it expresses a sense of kinship and solidarity with fellow Scots. These are individuals who belong to the same nation, share a common ethnic/ancestral heritage, and are united by their profession of "Christ Jesus' holy evangel," or the Christian gospel. Simply put, it undoubtedly sees ethnicity and nation as one and the same. @Kinism

Kinism: Nobody Else is Coming It is easy to feel disheartened by the state of the world and the uncertainty of our folk's future, leading some of us to convince ourselves that everything will be okay, as if someone else will fix it. As Christians, we must recognise that God has commanded each and every one of us to fight evil, to fight wrong, and to fight for our family and kindred. You are here, you are conscious, you must do whatever you can to the utmost of your strength to secure a place for your folk. Here you are. The Lord has sent you. Find love, start a large family. Demographics is destiny.

8 Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me.

— Isaiah 6:8 @Kinism

Kinism: This Is How We Win Our folk and our lands will only be blessed again if we repent and humbly seek God. We need a return to biblical teachings, not an abandonment. If our movements to fight for our folk aren't founded upon the word of God, then we have nothing. We are then no better than those who oppose us with meaningless subjectively changing morality. We need Christ. We need Kinism.

"If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."

— 2 Chronicles 7:14 @Kinism

Kinism: Nationalism & Agnosticism Previously, we outlined the necessity of Christianity for nationalism by exposing the error of atheism. In addition to atheism, however, agnosticism is equally popular among nationalists, and this too is foolish. Agnosticism is the view or belief that the reality or unreality of God is unknown or unknowable. However, for an Agnostic Nationalist, this creates a paradoxical error. If you cannot or don't know of an objective standard, such as God, then you are left with only subjectivity. In simple terms, objectivity means having a fixed and universal standard that doesn't change, while subjectivity suggests that meaning depends on individual perspectives. The absence of a known unchanging external standard implies that there is no knowable set meaning to anything; hence, meaning must vary from person to person, becoming mere subjective opinion. In short, there is no standard beyond oneself. Therefore, a consistent agnostic is necessarily a skeptic and cannot hold any dogmatic position on true morality. This is the fatal error of an agnostic nationalist, for if you assert one cannot know true morality, the moral assertion of nationalism—that your folk truly do have special meaning—is contradictory. For how could it possibly be that true morality is unknowable, yet at the same time, you claim to know it is truly moral to support one's nation? This is illogical. An illogical movement is a foolish one. Nationalism needs Christianity; you need Christianity. You need Kinism. @Kinism

Orania is a town in South Africa consisting exclusively of White Protestants. Their leadership adheres to Kinism.

Continuationism leads straight to cultism.

Kinism: John Calvin John Calvin (1509 – 1564) was a French theologian, pastor, and reformer in Geneva during the Protestant Reformation. He was instrumental in the establishment of the Reformed tradition. His commentary on Acts 17:26 clearly expounds on Kinism.

"Now, we see, as in a camp, every troop and band hath his appointed place, so men are placed upon earth, that every people may be content with their bounds, and that among these people every particular person may have his mansion. But though ambition have, oftentimes raged, and many, being incensed with wicked lust, have past their bounds, yet the lust of men hath never brought to pass, but that God hath governed all events from out of his holy sanctuary."

— John Calvin's Commentary @Kinism

Kinism: Simplified Kinism is the Christian doctrine that advocates for ethno-nationalism and, consequently, segregation along ethnic lines, suggesting that different ethnic groups, composed of varying ancestral/racial backgrounds, should live separately. This doctrine is derived through simple logical inference from Scripture. Consider the following argument:

Premise 1: The Scriptures inform us about the reality of Nations (Genesis 10). Premise 2: The Scriptures indicate that Biblical nations are defined by common or shared ancestry, not solely beliefs/ideology — Ethnonations, ethnicities (Genesis 10, 'after their families'). Premise 3: God intentionally instituted and set bounds for where these nations are to dwell or inhabit, purposefully separating them perpetually (Deuteronomy 32:8 & Acts 17:26). Conclusion: It is God's will and intention that nations/ethnicities remain separate/segregated. Therefore, we must submit to His will and follow this directive (James 4:17).

@Kinism

Demonic possession is no longer around.

Judgment in Christianity: Examining 'Judge Not' "Judge not" or "don't judge a book by its cover" is anti-Christian and unbiblical. In fact, these statements are contradictory to Christ's own command. To judge means to form an opinion about something. Saying you are not to judge anybody for doing anything is the same as saying you are not to form an opinion about anything anyone does. Applying this consistently would mean that you cannot have any opinion on any human event or action, as they all involve individuals and their actions. How, then, could you be a Christian in the first place? Are you not judging, forming an opinion, that Christ is a saviour and God incarnate as opposed to just a man? "But what about Matthew 1:1, 'Judge not, that ye be not judged'?" Taking this verse to be a prohibition of any judgment of character or person would result in you being opposed to any civil court or law enforcement. After all, do they not also rely on judgment to apprehend a suspect or to sentence a suspect? In fact, Christ commands us to exercise righteous judgment and also instructs the church to enact church discipline, including excommunication if somebody is judged to be unrepentant. Does Christ, God incarnate, contradict Himself? Matthew 1:1 is just talking about not being a hypocrite, as seen in verse 5: "Thou hypocrite ... ". @ReformedTheology