Jerm Warfare
📈 Аналітичний огляд Telegram-каналу Jerm Warfare
Канал Jerm Warfare (@jermwarfare) у мовному сегменті Англійська є активним учасником. На даний момент спільнота об'єднує 23 064 підписників, посідаючи 2 567 місце в категорії Політика та 1 739 місце у регіоні США.
📊 Показники аудиторії та динаміка
З моменту свого створення невідомо, проект продемонстрував стрімке зростання, зібравши аудиторію у 23 064 підписників.
За останніми даними від 14 липня, 2026, канал демонструє стабільну активність. Хоча за останні 30 днів спостерігається зміна кількості учасників на -303, а за останні 24 години на -8, загальне охоплення залишається високим.
- Статус верифікації: Не верифікований
- Рівень залученості (ER): Середній показник залученості аудиторії становить 12.69%. Протягом перших 24 годин після публікації контент зазвичай збирає 6.93% реакцій від загальної кількості підписників.
- Охоплення публікацій: В середньому кожен допис отримує 2 927 переглядів. Протягом першої доби публікація в середньому набирає 1 598 переглядів.
- Реакції та взаємодія: Аудиторія активно підтримує контент: середня кількість реакцій на один пост – 56.
- Тематичні інтереси: Контент зосереджений навколо ключових тем, таких як ukcolumn.org, venezuela, narrative, drug, conspiracy.
📝 Опис та контентна політика
Автор описує ресурс як майданчик для висловлення суб'єктивної думки:
“Please visit jermwarfare.com for the real deal.”
Завдяки високій частоті оновлень (останні дані отримано 15 липня, 2026), канал підтримує актуальність та високий рівень охоплення публікацій. Аналітика показує, що аудиторія активно взаємодіє з контентом, що робить його важливою точкою впливу в категорії Політика.
Триває завантаження даних...
| Дата | Залучення підписників | Згадування | Канали | |
| 15 липня | 0 | |||
| 14 липня | 0 | |||
| 13 липня | +1 | |||
| 12 липня | 0 | |||
| 11 липня | 0 | |||
| 10 липня | 0 | |||
| 09 липня | +2 | |||
| 08 липня | 0 | |||
| 07 липня | 0 | |||
| 06 липня | +4 | |||
| 05 липня | 0 | |||
| 04 липня | 0 | |||
| 03 липня | +2 | |||
| 02 липня | 0 | |||
| 01 липня | 0 |
| 2 | I want to reiterate something I’ve done since I started my podcast in 2019.
It’s something that many obviously struggle to grapple with.
It’s something many in both the mainstream and non-mainstream refuse to understand.
It’s something that has helped me gain a better idea of how the puzzle pieces fit.
It’s something that has humbled me.
And that is something Bruce Lee said:
‘Take that which is valuable, discard what is not, create what is uniquely yours.’
The world is nuanced and made up of complex systems.
The world isn’t binary. It’s not a zero sum game.
Nobody is a mirror image of you. Nobody is on the same journey as you. Nobody has a monopoly on truth.
If someone believes he has a monopoly on truth, he must be treated with contempt.
I will have anybody on my podcast.
Even Fauci.
And even Fauci can say valuable things, believe it or not. Most of what he says, mind you, I will probably discard.
Take that which is valuable., discard that which is not.
Create what is uniquely yours. | 409 |
| 3 | My friend Matt, who has been on my podcast many times, recently appeared on Danny Jones’ podcast.
What a corker!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VydV9b_sn5o | 706 |
| 4 | Being opposed to cash here in South Africa is about pragmatism, not ideology.
In theory, using cash is great because it means less control and less surveillance. But in reality, it’s bad idea
Last Sunday, the grocery store I frequent, was robbed by six armed gangsters just before closing time. Thankfully, there was a cop inside, who called for backup, but there was a shootout. Our house is nearby and we heard the gun shots. The robbers were looking for the safe.
Where there is no cash, there are fewer armed robberies.
As much as I hate admitting this, I prefer not carrying and using cash.
It’s simply safer, and I like my family being alive. | 1 531 |
| 5 | The difference between a Jehovah's Witness and a climate change alarmist is that the one gets every doomsday prediction wrong,
and the other is a Jehovah's Witness. | 1 524 |
| 6 | Немає тексту... | 2 329 |
| 7 | 😂😂😂 | 1 879 |
| 8 | We’re away for the weekend, in a part of the country known as the Cederberg.
I can’t believe they’re spraying us out here! | 2 088 |
| 9 | Erika Kirk arrives at the Charlie Kirk hearing.
Don’t judge her.
Everybody grieves differently. | 3 895 |
| 10 | Немає тексту... | 3 342 |
| 11 | The Islamic Republic of Japan. 🇯🇵
I knew it! | 3 082 |
| 12 | https://www.jermwarfare.com/its-not-the-jews/ | 2 841 |
| 13 | Discuss. | 2 711 |
| 14 | It’s a tragedy that the US government is diluting and thinning out Afrikaners.
Those who left South Africa will not be Afrikaners a generation from now; they will be American.
Afrikanerdom is under attack and losing.
Making matters worse, Afrikaners are choosing this. Nobody is forcing them to accept the offer.
Once feared by the British, building a first-world country at the bottom tip of Africa, now running to a British colony with their rails between their legs, labelled ‘refugees’.
Defeated.
A great nation dying out. | 2 670 |
| 15 | Trump made a phone call to try alter the game and the US still lost badly.
There’s a metaphor in there somewhere. | 2 824 |
| 16 | 1940 New York Times article about Britain pledging to start a New World Order based on the Jews. | 3 171 |
| 17 | The American Empire, summarised. | 3 205 |
| 18 | Former South African prime minister Hendrik Verwoerd was ahead of this time and deliberately misrepresented in the mainstream.
His own stated vision wasn't 'Whites on top, Blacks on the bottom'; it was actually separate nations, each with their own territory, parliament, and self-rule, eventually meeting as equals and trading partners.
This is a hard sell because South Africans have been propagandised for decades. But the truth is still the truth, no matter how offensive.
Verwoerd explicitly rejected the term 'apartheid'. He thought it was morally indefensible and also strategically doomed. He argued that South Africa isn't one nation, and that it's many nations, and each of those nations deserves its own self-determination, just like any other people on earth.
He said the following:
'There cannot be domination by Whites over Blacks where there are two neighbouring states, the White state and the Black state. The eventual outcome of this policy will be no discrimination and no domination. Each group will look after its own interests. Discrimination must be eliminated by carrying separation far enough.'
His argument was that the only way to get rid of racial domination was to split the country, and that integration wouldn't solve the problem of domination; it would just decide who gets to dominate.
In January 1962, Verwoerd announced a plan to grant independence to the Transkei. It would get its own Parliament, its own Cabinet, its own citizenship, and control over agriculture, education, health, social services and roads. Self-government was formally granted in 1963.
He was assassinated (which is a topic on its own) in 1966 before the full vision could unfold, and his vision was then corrupted by those who took over from him
Journalist Daniel Gross has pointed out that pinning everything on Verwoerd as the 'Architect of Apartheid' is 'too convenient'. The architects were actually Britain, going back to Rhodes in 1894 with the Glen Grey Act, then the British Parliament with the South Africa Act (1909), then Louis Botha with both the Mines and Works Act (1911) and the Natives Land Act (1913), all decades before Verwoerd.
Looking at South Africa today, was Verwoerd misguided? | 3 699 |
| 19 | The mother is responsible for making the decision to have her kids injected with a toxin.
Similarly, she could have been responsible for not letting her kids get a toxin injection in the arm. | 4 042 |
| 20 | Немає тексту... | 1 |
