Stephen Wells

Had this not come to light, you can expect that the boy would eventually be given a gun licence, encouraged to go on a trip overseas for training and only arrested after a massacre just before the next law is passed to punish whites for what muslims do.

Social Cohesion status: “Shut your bitch ass up.” "Canberra is full of pedos" "There is no stopping the masses from waking up, have a nice day you evil bitch!" Lmao, online netizens putting in work https://t.me/ausvstheagenda/3999

I dont know about you, but I would be happy to say any of these comments to the face of Jacqui "blow job face" Lambi. If you cant stand the heat go back to the kitchen. Your crying over people not liking you is one of the main reasons we dont want women in politics. Parliaments are a substitute and alternative to war. But if saying nasty things becomes impossible for ordinary people, then dont be suprised if they one day revert to showing their displeasure with uprisings again.

White Australia Party’s high court case must’ve gone too smoothly for some 😬

This already proves that the White Australia Party has the capacity to keep Pauline honest. Someone in her cohort has clearly brought to her attention the boys engaging in the High Court this week, and she has felt pressured by the idea of those further to the right of holding her accountable on immigration. This is a prime example of what the White Australia Party and those of similar positions will be able to accomplish when the use of these tyrannical laws is overturned.

ONE NATION PLANS TO CUT IMMIGRATION BY 750,000 This press release demonstrates that activism and the presence of parties to the right of One Nation is working, so turn up the volume. https://xyz.net.au/2026/09/one-nation-plans-to-cut-immigration-by-750000/

I had a good chat with Chazza in the UK. Give his channel a like and enjoy the interview

No Nazis because we need to "protect muh democracy". Its worth noting that the first full male and female whites and non whites democracy only came into existence in 1893 (New Zealand). Australia allowed all women to vote in 1902 but Abos didnt get the right to vote until 1962. The UK didnt have full universal suffrage until 1928, less than 100 years ago. Even full male suffrage didnt start becoming a thing until the mid 19th century. Democracy is not part of the long term culture of any nation on earth. It is a modern novelty and still an experiment. The Anglosphere adopted it quickly and it has had the least problems in English speaking whites dominated countries, but then, the Anglosphere had the least problems before it adopted democracy too. It could be our legal system or it could be our race, not democracy that made our countries so harmoneous in comparison to others. I work with democracy because it is the system we have, not because I am a defender of its claimed virtues. The current rulers have shown that they care even less about democracy, so dont be surprised if democracy doesnt last. But as long as I am told by my rulers that I still live in one, I will fight for my right to participate in it.

In Christianity the most central debate is are we saved through faith or works or a combination? But if one is to be truly "christian" why should we be focused on our own salvation rather than that of our brother, family, community, nation, etc? Isnt the real point of life the choice between selfishness and living for something or someone beyond ourselves? What does "believe in the Lord Jesus" (Acts 16:31) actually mean anyway? Have faith in what specificly in relation to Him? And how does that change anything if the only reason to do so is to save our own soul? How many cowards have you met over your lifetime who will confess and believe anything if they think it will stop them from being punished for their wrong doings? Jesus lived his life as a servant to His people and sacrificed himself for the salvation of everyone who believes in Him. Again, what does believing in Him, mean? What is He? A man. God. The Son of God. A life. A way of living. A way of being. All of the law about how to treat everyone and everything around you and how to prioritise them. "The way, the truth, the life." For me, that last is the essence of what "believe in the Lord Jesus" means. Which is why salvation through faith or works is a red herring. Personal salvation a paradox. Its a hook to draw in the selfish, lost soul. Have faith in a life of service to others and sacrifice for others. For your family, for your community, for your nation, for your race. Perhaps this is the reason Jesus tells his followers "Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you workers of lawlessness!’" Matthew 7:22-23. Perhaps such people only care about how doing these things would benefit them. How they can be saved, and thus they miss the point of believing in Christ. So if believing in Christ in practice boils down to having faith in living a life of truth, love, service and sacrifice, rather than waving ones arms about and shouting "I believe in you" in hopes of escaping eternal punishment for being a selfish swine, then what do the theological arguments between religious spergs even matter? Do you have faith that living for love of your family and kin rather than your personal pleasure will provide its own rewards? Then your works will reflect this. "By their fruits you will know them" Matthew 7:20. In the CS Lewis Narnia book The Last Battle an honourable enemy warrior who sought to serve his God Tash, discovers after death that his God was actually a demon, but goes to heaven anyway. He asks why, for now he knows he has been serving a false God all of his life. Aslan (Jesus in the form of a lion in a fantasy world) replies "Child, all service thou hast done to Tash, I account as service done to me". In other words this man had faith in a life of service to others and his works naturally reflected this. It did not matter what name he called his God or what religion he lived under. Now loads of Christians will be up in arms at this theology but quite frankly I dont care whether it is true or false. Its about priorities in life and the purpose of life and of having faith in Christ. So calling onesself Pagan or Christian is of lessor importance to me than the fundamental question of whether you have the faith to live a life in service and of sacrifice, or not.

Moreover, 30% of the country support One Nation, which is something like one in two White people. Coming out too aggressively against One Nation will turn a lot of these Australian patriots against you. The smarter play is forcing One Nation to bleed votes to the right of them, and therefore move to the right, trying to play catch up. Australians are in the mindset of wanting to give One Nation “a go” first. If/when ON let them down, patriots will beg for true leadership to do it right.

The preferential voting system in Australia is our biggest asset in regards to elections, and likely another reason why the uniparty were so obssessed with banning the WAP outright. The "dont waste your vote" hazzards that right wing groups in other countries have to deal with is ineffective in Australia. Restore suppprters vote Reform in fear that "vote splitting" enables the Labour Party, but vote 1 WAP still preferences to PHON if your first choice hasnt enough support. The Australian Democrats in the 1970's and 80's had constant representation in the Senate with little more than a "keep the bastards honest" slogan. The next step is simply to get a foot in the door. In the meantime, we dont sell slogans, we paint a vision of what Australia was, what it can be again and how mass deportations of non whites will achieve it.

This is an historic debrief and everyone who wants to be an active part of the movement going forward, if the High Court challenge is successful, should listen to it.

Deep inside we know in our souls, in the very cells of our bodies, that we were meant to live predominently with our own race and kin. That we find the same instruction in religious texts (if you read them for yourself, rather than just trust what preachers say about them) only confirms and strengthens what is an innate knowledge within anyone who pays attention to their conscience. But most people are too burdened with the daily task of making a living to think much about why they are alive and so we must begin our communication with them where they are at, not where they should be. But that is OK, because long term physical prosperity and lifestyle are a natural consequence of creating a government that bases its policies on universal principles. The people of each Nation are distinct from every other Nation and each Nation must prioritise its own people. The ecconomy of each Nation exists to serve the people, the people do not exist to serve the ecconomy. Sell the sizzle to the Australian public, not the sausage. A vision of life where a man can go to do an honest day's work, own a house, raise a family with a stay at home mum with enough time off each week and enough vacations during the year to enjoy their company. Their wives and children safe from harm in their homes and in the streets. That's the sizzle. How the sausage smells and sounds and looks when cooking and how it's going to taste. Meanwhile learn how the sausage is made. Its not pretty. Most people dont care to know. But someone still has to make them so everyone can enjoy them. Study National Socialism. What we will need to do to achieve this end goal. Its no good selling a dream if we cant deliver when we get the chance to govern. We have a lot of work to do between now and then. The public will need a positive vision of what a White Australia will mean for them that is more than just "deport blacks yellows and browns because they are not the same as us", but they wont care to hear more than basic information about how mass deportations of non whites will improve their lives. But we will need to know, because we will be responsible for ensuring that things do get better, not worse, once we take power. If the High Court challenge is successful then we will be educated via the direction of the Party leadership in order that our solutions are constistent and not at odds with each other. If the High Court challenge fails then it will be up to each individual to educate himself and work within the law to sell the revolutionairy vision person by person. "Nothing can stop an idea whose time has come". The activism phase was about showing the problems to the public. The next phase will be selling them the solutions to those problems, whilst we increase our skills in order to be able to deliver on it. The foundation of our movement remains: Community, underpinned by healthy and productive activity. But it now needs to expand and this will mean presenting a different side of ourselves to the public. Hail victory!

A big issue in the US movement is too many guys live in a bubble and only interact with other movement people. None of us do that, in fact we interact with more non-movement than movement on purpose. You want to know the public perception of the movement among those 30 and under in the US? It's not that we're Evil Nazi Racists, that's just a system/journo talking point. It's that we're seen as dead enders with no viable future to our movement. Many find some of our talking points, especially on immigration and jews, interesting and even agreeable. Beyond that, they look at the US movement and they see nothing really that groundbreaking with it. One young person we spoke with IRL put it best. "How will making the US All White help me pay my bills and improve my life? You guys don't really have much in the way of policies for that other stuff. You guys seem more like a political fad than anything real." Which after thinking about that, they were correct in criticism. It's that we don't really have much to publicly offer broadly as a movement here besides "Browns and Jews Out!" with nothing much deeper than that. Which is a real problem that needs fixing. https://t.me/totallyawesomefriends

Assuming that we have some kind of favourable outcome in the High Court and that we will be able to participate in the next election, then the task will be to translate what our activism will mean to the average Aussie if we get to implement our policies on immigration. After that will be educating the public on how National Socialism as an ecconomic ideology translates to restoration of a standard of living where people can afford to buy a house and raise a family on a single wage and where people are rewarded by the State for doing so.

People shouldn't blame the organisation that used a tool, when the system then bans the tool. It is the system that is acting tyrannically by enacting bans in order to maintain power and to quell rightful dissent, and that should be the propagandised point. We see this in the UK with people blaming the organisation that used balaclavas, and resulted in them being banned by the state. "You got masks banned, great!". Supposed freedoms don’t exist if they’re just on paper. They exist when someone actually can use them and they can be deployed without repercussion. It was untested and they were just the first to test it. Attacking them for using this highly advantageous tool is retarded logic, and a waste of energy when you could be attacking the legitimacy of the system. As Mason said, all propaganda attacks must be directed at the system. It is the system that is our enemy, and you should never waste an opportunity to blame the system.

To put this another way to all the armchair critics out there. If they ever had the guts to implement their own alternative strategy to defeat the system and it turned out to be effective, then just like balaclavas that would be banned too.

The Stranger within my gate, He may be true or kind, But he does not talk my talk— I cannot feel his mind. I see the face and the eyes and the mouth, But not the soul behind. The men of my own stock They may do ill or well, But they tell the lies I am wonted to, They are used to the lies I tell. And we do not need interpreters When we go to buy and sell. The Stranger within my gates, He may be evil or good, But I cannot tell what powers control— What reasons sway his mood; Nor when the Gods of his far-off land Shall repossess his blood. The men of my own stock, Bitter bad they may be, But, at least, they hear the things I hear, And see the things I see; And whatever I think of them and their likes They think of the likes of me. This was my father's belief And this is also mine: Let the corn be all one sheaf— And the grapes be all one vine, Ere our children's teeth are set on edge By bitter bread and wine. Rudyard Kipling Born to India to British immigrants to India and grew up there. But for some strange reason Wikipedia calls him British and not Indian.