Crest Learning UPSC

➡️Old Alliances, New Markets: Two-Path Formula for Export Growth Why in News • Despite higher U.S. tariffs in 2025, India’s exports remained resilient, as exporters diversified markets and deepened ties with existing partners, according to data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. India compensated for export losses to the United States by strengthening old alliances (EU, China) and entering new markets, creating a two-path export growth strategy. 1. Exports to the U.S.: Mixed Picture, Not a Collapse • Non-tariffed items surged: • Telecom instruments (incl. smartphones): +230%+ • Electrical machinery: ~+15% • Tariff-hit sectors declined sharply: • Pearls & precious stones: ~-78% • Gold jewellery: ~-39% • Cotton fabrics & made-ups: ~-23% • Marine products: ~-17% 📌 Inference: Tariffs did not uniformly hit all exports—impact was sector-specific. 2. Total Exports Still Grew — Why? Because exporters re-routed trade. • Marine exports (overall): +16–17% • Even though U.S. demand fell, exports rose by diverting shipments to: • China: +20%+ • European Union markets: • Belgium (+120%+) • Netherlands (+55%+) • Germany (+65%+) • Italy (+23%) 📌Trade diversion cushioned the tariff shock. The Two-Path Formula Path 1: Deepening Existing Trade Relationships • EU & China absorbed export spillovers from the U.S. Path 2: Entering New / Under-penetrated Markets • Notable expansion to: • Spain • Belgium • Malaysia • South Korea • Select West Asian & African markets • Example: • Marine exports to Spain crossed $50 million (Sept–Nov 2025) Sector-Wise Behaviour (Why Some Gained, Some Lost) Gainers • Telecom & electronics → Not tariffed + global demand • Industrial machinery → EU infrastructure demand • Drugs & biologicals → Non-discretionary goods Losers • Gems & jewellery → High tariffs + discretionary demand • Cotton textiles → Price sensitivity • Marine products (U.S. only) → Tariff + compliance costs 📌 Inference: Export success depends on tariff structure + demand elasticity.

➡️Stepping in with Maoism in Rapid Retreat Why in News • Since 2024–25, Left Wing Extremism (LWE) has witnessed mass surrenders, leadership decapitation, and territorial contraction, especially in Chhattisgarh, indicating that Maoism is structurally weakening. • The article argues that security success must now be followed by governance and development intervention, or else vacuum may re-emerge. What Has Happened: Decline of Maoism 1. Organisational Collapse • CPI (Maoist) split into smaller units (2024) to avoid security force encirclement. • Central leadership weakened: • General Secretary Basavaraju killed (2025) • PLGA commanders neutralised • Mass surrenders in Dandakaranya region (DK). 🔹Maoism has moved from offensive insurgency → defensive survival mode. What the Government Must Do Now (Intervention Strategy) 1. Health Infrastructure (Immediate Priority) • Extend medical facilities deep into interior tribal areas. Because they are lacking Heath facilities and facing various diseases 🔹Health is the first visible face of the State 2. Livelihood & Economic Security • Tribals depend on: • Agriculture • Forest produce • Government must: • Ensure fair MSP for MFP • Set up local processing units • Improve irrigation via check dams • Supply quality seeds (including fish seeds) 📌 Earlier Maoist tactic: Won trust by helping agriculture → now State must replace that role. 3. Education & De-radicalisation • Establish educational ashrams instead of scattered schools. • Undo ideological indoctrination from Maoist-run “schools”. 4. Rehabilitation with Dignity (Surrender & Rehabilitation Policy) • Financial support, housing, jobs. • Medical correction: • Reproductive health support for families. • Skill mapping of surrendered cadres. ⚖️ Ethical dimension: Rehabilitation is also restorative justice. 5. Social Reform & Women Empowerment • Many women joined Maoists to escape: • Forced marriages • Patriarchal customs 📌 linkage: Tribal society, gender justice, governance. 6. Governance Outreach – Nijad Nellar Scheme • Nijad Nellar (“Your Good Village”) scheme: • Covers villages within 5 km of security camps • Provides ~25 government schemes • Security camps (~50) act as anchors of governance. 🔹Scheme must expand to previously affected villages, not only current hotspots.

📌 linkage: Technology + national security + supply chains. 4. Quad & Regional Infrastructure Dimension (Elaborated) Quad Ports of the Future Conference (Mumbai, Nov 2025) Key Features • Participation from 24 Indo-Pacific partners. • Focus areas: • Resilient port infrastructure • Secure maritime supply chains • Quality infrastructure standards Why Infrastructure is Strategic • Ports are dual-use: commercial + strategic. • Counters debt-heavy, opaque infrastructure models. • Strengthens Indo-Pacific connectivity without coercion. 📌 Infrastructure as a tool of geoeconomics and geopolitics. Conclusion India–US defence, technology, and infrastructure cooperation function as institutional shock-absorbers, ensuring strategic continuity even during political turbulence.

➡️The Parallel Track That Keeps India–United States Ties Going Why in News • In 2025, despite political strains, trade frictions, and postponement of the Quad Leaders’ Summit, India–US institutional cooperation—especially in defence and technology—remains resilient. Why defence cooperation remains strong despite political strains • India–US defence ties are institution-driven, not personality-driven. • Defence agreements create legal, technical, and procedural obligations, which continue even when political engagement slows. • This makes defence cooperation the most resilient pillar of the bilateral relationship. 👉Major Institutional Agreements 1. LEMOA (2016) – Logistics Exchange • Enables reciprocal access to military bases for refuelling, repair, and replenishment. • Improves operational reach of Indian Navy in the Indo-Pacific. • Reduces response time during HADR (Humanitarian Assistance & Disaster Relief) operations. 📌 Strategic value: Converts strategic convergence into operational capability. 2. COMCASA (2018) – Secure Communications • Allows installation of encrypted US communication systems on Indian platforms. • Enables real-time data sharing during joint operations. • Critical for using advanced US platforms like P-8I, C-17, Apache helicopters. 📌 Strategic value: Enhances battlefield awareness and coordination. 3. BECA (2020) – Geospatial Intelligence • Provides India access to high-accuracy geospatial, satellite, and topographical data. • Improves precision of missiles, drones, and surveillance systems. • Particularly useful along LAC and maritime domain awareness. 📌 Strategic value: Strengthens deterrence through precision. 4. iCET (2023) – Critical & Emerging Technologies • Focus areas: AI, semiconductors, quantum, cyber, defence innovation. • Shifts cooperation from buyer–seller model to co-development & co-production. • Supports India’s Atmanirbhar Bharat in defence. 📌 Strategic value: Aligns defence cooperation with future warfare domains. 5. SOSA (2024) – Security of Supply Arrangement • Ensures priority access to defence supplies during emergencies or conflicts. • Reduces India’s vulnerability to supply chain disruptions. • Builds trust in defence industrial ecosystems. 📌 Strategic value: Enhances strategic autonomy without isolation. 6. 10-Year Defence Framework Agreement (2025) • Institutionalises cooperation till 2035. • Covers joint exercises, intelligence sharing, defence industry, R&D. • Signals long-term US commitment to India’s role in the Indo-Pacific. 📌 Strategic value: Provides continuity and predictability. 👉Operational Dimension (Why It Matters More Than Agreements) Joint Military Exercises • Yudh Abhyas → Army-to-Army coordination (land warfare). • Tiger Claw → Special forces & expeditionary operations. • Malabar → Naval interoperability in the Indo-Pacific. Impact: • Enhances interoperability (common procedures, communication). • Builds mutual trust at troop level, not just leadership level. • Demonstrates credible deterrence to adversaries. Insight Defence agreements convert diplomatic intent into institutionalised, enforceable, and operational cooperation, making them resilient to political fluctuations. 3. Technology & Industrial Cooperation GE–HAL Fighter Jet Engine Deal (2025) • Enables manufacture of advanced jet engines in India. • Addresses a long-standing weakness in India’s defence ecosystem. • Supports Make in India + strategic trust. 📌 Exam angle: Example of technology transfer overcoming historical US hesitations. NASA–ISRO NISAR Satellite (2025) • Joint Earth-observation mission. • Applications: • Disaster management (floods, earthquakes) • Agriculture & crop assessment • Climate change monitoring • Symbol of civil–strategic technology convergence. 📌 Value addition: Space cooperation as a non-controversial trust-builder. Trusted Technology Ecosystem • India seen as a reliable alternative to China-centric supply chains. • Supports secure semiconductors, defence electronics, AI governance.

6 jan……..👇

Iran is witnessing renewed public protests due to acute economic hardship, which have led to clashes with security forces and loss of lives. The situation raises concerns about human rights, state response to dissent, and internal stability. • Inflation rate: Above 36% • Currency crisis: Iranian rial has lost ~50% of its value against the US dollar • Economic sanctions: Long-standing US-led sanctions have restricted: • Oil exports • Banking & financial access 📌 insight: Economic stress has become a primary driver of political unrest, not ideology alone. INDIA’S PERSPECTIVE • India maintains: • Balanced engagement with Iran • Focus on energy security and regional connectivity (e.g., Chabahar port) • India traditionally: • Avoids interference in internal affairs • Emphasises dialogue and stability 🔹India balances strategic interests with respect for sovereignty and stability. • Similar protest triggers seen in: • Sri Lanka (economic collapse) • Lebanon (currency crisis) 🔹Shows how economic distress translates into political unrest. CONCLUSION The protests in Iran underline how persistent economic crises can spill over into social unrest and human rights challenges. Addressing inflation, currency instability, and governance issues is essential for long-term internal stability.

WHY IN NEWS The Indian Psychiatric Society (IPS) has highlighted that nearly 80–85% of psychiatric patients in India do not receive timely or appropriate mental healthcare, pointing to a severe mental health treatment gap. ISSUE India faces a large mental health treatment gap, where the majority of people suffering from mental illnesses are unable to access timely diagnosis and care. This undermines public health outcomes, productivity, and social well-being. • Treatment gap: 80–85% (Indian Psychiatric Society) • Burden of mental disorders: • ~15% of India’s population needs active mental health intervention (National Mental Health Survey, NIMHANS) • Human resources gap: • Psychiatrists: ~0.75 per 1 lakh population • WHO norm: 3 per 1 lakh • Economic cost: • Mental health conditions could cost India $1.03 trillion (2012–2030) in lost economic output (WHO estimate) 📌 insight: The problem is not low prevalence, but low access and delayed care. GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES 🏛️ National Mental Health Programme (NMHP) • Focus on community-based care 🏥 District Mental Health Programme (DMHP) • Mental health services at district level 📞 Tele-MANAS (2022) • 24×7 mental health helpline • Toll-free: 14416 / 1-800-891-4416 📌 Limitation: Coverage and manpower remain inadequate.

➡️The Jammu and Kashmir Administration has issued stringent directions to courier and parcel services in Jammu to curb the use of logistics networks for drug trafficking. ISSUE Jammu & Kashmir has emerged as a transit and consumption zone for narcotic drugs, aided by misuse of courier and parcel services. The administration’s action aims to break the drug supply chain at the logistics level, not merely at street distribution. CONTEXT (WHY THIS MATTERS) • J&K lies close to the “Golden Crescent” (Afghanistan–Pakistan–Iran), a major global opium-producing region. • Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) data show a sharp rise in heroin seizures in northern India post-2019. • Drug abuse among youth has increased, with synthetic drugs and pharmaceutical narcotics becoming common. insight: Modern drug trafficking increasingly uses formal logistics channels to avoid physical border interception. Targets the Supply Chain, Not Just End-Users • Earlier focus: addicts and peddlers • Current focus: logistics and movement networks Disrupting supply chains yields higher returns than reactive policing. What is the “Golden Crescent”? The Golden Crescent is one of the world’s largest illicit opium and heroin-producing regions, comprising: • Afghanistan • Pakistan • Iran It lies west of India, making it strategically significant for South Asian drug trafficking routes. Why is the Golden Crescent Important? 1️⃣ Global Opium Production Hub • Afghanistan alone accounts for 80–85% of global illicit opium production (UNODC – United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) • Opium is refined into heroin, which is trafficked globally. 🔹The Golden Crescent is the epicentre of the global heroin supply chain. 2️⃣ Well-Established Trafficking Routes From the Golden Crescent, drugs move through: • Pakistan → Jammu & Kashmir / Punjab → rest of India • Pakistan → sea routes → West Asia / Africa • Iran → Turkey → Europe 🔹India is affected as both a transit country and consumer market. Link with Jammu & Kashmir 3️⃣ Geographical Vulnerability of J&K • Proximity to Pakistan • Porous borders and difficult terrain • Use of: • Cross-border tunnels • Drones • Courier & parcel services 📌insight: J&K has shifted from being only a transit corridor to also a consumption zone. 4️⃣ Narcotics–Terror Nexus • Drug money is used to: • Fund terror groups • Pay overground workers • Finance arms procurement 📊 Data point: • Multiple NIA and NCB investigations have established drug trafficking as a funding source for terrorism in J&K. 🔹Narcotics trafficking has become a tool of hybrid warfare. Why Courier & Parcel Services Became Relevant 5️⃣ Change in Trafficking Modus Operandi Earlier: • Smuggling through borders and mule carriers Now: • Use of: • Courier parcels • Pharmaceutical consignments • E-commerce logistics 🔹This is why administrative control over courier services is crucial.

➡️WHY VENEZUELA CRISIS IS UNLIKELY TO HIT INDIA India–Venezuela Oil Trade • Venezuelan crude share in India’s oil imports (FY 2025–26 till Nov): ~0.3% • Value of imports (FY till Nov 2025): ~$255 million • Peak imports (2013): ~$13 billion • Since 2019, India has systematically reduced imports due to U.S. sanctions 📌 Source: Ministry of Commerce & Industry (India) 📊 Venezuela in Global Oil Market • Venezuela’s share: • ~3.5% of OPEC oil exports • ~1% of global oil supply • Majority of Venezuelan crude exports go to China India’s Diversified Import Basket • India imports crude from: • Russia • Middle East (Saudi Arabia, Iraq, UAE) • Africa (Nigeria) • U.S. 📊 Fact: India sources oil from 30+ countries, reducing single-country risk. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) • India has ~5.3 million tonnes of SPR capacity (Visakhapatnam, Mangaluru, Padur) • Covers ~9–10 days of consumption (Phase-I) 🔹Acts as a short-term shock absorber.

• Integrate DRR into urban planning 5️⃣ Align with Global Frameworks • Sendai Framework (2015–2030) • SDGs • Climate adaptation plans CONCLUSION India’s annual loss of 0.4% of GDP shows that disasters are no longer occasional shocks but a permanent economic drain. Only a shift towards resilience, risk financing, and preparedness can protect growth and development.

WHY IN NEWS Recent OECD data shows that India loses about 0.4% of its GDP every year due to natural disasters, highlighting the growing economic cost of climate change and extreme events. ISSUE India is increasingly exposed to frequent and intense natural disasters, which cause recurring economic losses and fiscal stress. This reveals the inadequacy of a relief-centric approach and the need for risk reduction and disaster risk financing. 📊 How big is the loss? • Average annual loss: ~0.4% of GDP → Means: For every ₹100 earned, ₹0.40 is lost to disasters every year (OECD Development Centre, 2025) 📊 Regional context • Asia faces ~100 disasters annually • ~80 million people affected each year 📊 India’s disaster profile • Most damaging hazards: • Floods & landslides (hydrological) • Cyclones & heatwaves (meteorological) • World Risk Index 2025: • India ranks high-risk due to: • High population exposure • Moderate coping capacity 📌 Key understanding: India’s problem is not only strong disasters, but too many people and assets exposed to them. WHY DISASTER LOSSES ARE RISING (STEP-BY-STEP CLARITY) 1️⃣ Climate Change is Intensifying Extremes • More intense rainfall → floods • Warmer oceans → stronger cyclones • Rising temperatures → heatwaves 📌 Example: • Cyclone Amphan (2020): Economic loss > ₹1 lakh crore • Heatwaves (2023–24): Reduced labour productivity in agriculture & construction 🔹Result: Same regions suffer damage repeatedly. 2️⃣ High Exposure of People & Infrastructure • 40% of population lives in flood-prone river basins • 7,500 km coastline exposed to cyclones • Rapid urbanisation in: • Floodplains • Coastal zones • Hill slopes 📌 Cause–effect: More assets in risky areas = higher economic loss even from moderate disasters. 3️⃣ Low Insurance & Risk Transfer • Disaster insurance penetration < 5% • Most losses are: • Paid by governments (SDRF/NDRF) • Borne by households 🔹Effect: • Repeated pressure on government finances • Slow recovery for poor households WHY THIS IS A SERIOUS ECONOMIC PROBLEM (IMPLICATIONS) 1️⃣ Fiscal Stress • Disaster spending diverts money from: • Education • Health • Infrastructure 🔹States struggle to balance development & relief. 2️⃣ Development Reversal • Crops destroyed • MSMEs damaged • People pushed back into poverty 📊 World Bank: • Climate shocks could push 45 million Indians into poverty by 2030 without resilience measures. 3️⃣ Long-Term Growth Risk • Repeated shocks reduce: • Investment confidence • Human capital formation 🔹Climate risk is now a macroeconomic risk. EXISTING SYSTEM: WHAT INDIA DOES TODAY (AND WHY IT IS LIMITED) Institutions • National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) • State Disaster Response Funds (SDRF) • National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) • Early warnings by IMD Limitation • Focus is mainly on after-disaster relief • Limited focus on: • Risk prevention • Risk financing • Resilient infrastructure 🔹Problem: We pay after damage, not before risk. WHAT IS DISASTER RISK FINANCING? Meaning Using financial tools in advance to: • Prepare for disasters • Spread losses • Ensure fast recovery Global evidence • World Bank: Every ₹1 spent on disaster risk reduction saves ₹4–7 in future losses. 📌 Examples: • Mexico → Catastrophe bonds • Caribbean → Parametric insurance • Japan → Disaster-resilient infrastructure INDIAN SUCCESS STORY (POSITIVE EXAMPLE) 🌊 Odisha Cyclone Management • 1999 Super Cyclone: ~10,000 deaths • Recent cyclones: near-zero mass fatalities Why? • Early warning systems • Cyclone shelters • Community preparedness 📌 Lesson: Preparedness works better than relief. WAY FORWARD 1️⃣ Shift from Relief to Risk Reduction • Invest before disasters, not after 2️⃣ Expand Disaster Insurance • Risk pooling • Parametric insurance • Support for farmers & MSMEs 3️⃣ Build Climate-Resilient Infrastructure • Flood-resistant roads • Cyclone-resilient housing • Nature-based solutions (mangroves, wetlands) 4️⃣ Use Data & Planning • Hazard mapping • Climate risk budgeting

• Globally, women perform 2.8 times more unpaid care work than men • In India, women spend ~5 hours/day, men ~1.5 hours/day (Time Use Survey, NSO) • OECD estimates unpaid care work equals 20–50% of GDP if monetised • GDP growth figures therefore systematically undervalue women’s work Low Female Labour Force Participation • India’s FLFP ~37% (PLFS 2022–23) • Heavy unpaid care burden constrains women’s entry into formal employment Intergenerational Gender Inequality • Girls absorb care responsibilities early • Reinforces: • Education dropouts • Skill gaps • Informal employment cycles LEGAL & JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS (INDIA) ⚖️ Judicial Recognition • Madras High Court in Kanniammal (Kannaian Naidu) v. V. Kamsala Ammal (2023): • Recognised unpaid household work as economic contribution • Held wife entitled to equal share in family property 📌 Significance: First strong judicial acknowledgment of unpaid care labour as value-creating. ⚖️ Supreme Court Observations (Value Addition) • Supreme Court of India (2021, motor accident compensation cases): • Recognised economic value of homemakers’ work • Assigned notional income for compensation purposes GLOBAL BEST PRACTICES (ENRICHMENT) 🌍 Comparative Examples • Bolivia (Art. 338, Constitution): Recognises unpaid domestic work as economic activity • Trinidad & Tobago: Mandates statistical valuation of unpaid work • Argentina: Pension credits for women for unpaid care work • ILO: Advocates “care economy” as a growth driver WHAT INDIA LACKS (CRITICAL GAPS) • No law recognising unpaid care as work • No: • Pension credits • Social security linkage • Time-bound care support • Emotional & mental labour completely invisible in policy

WHY IN NEWS Recent assessments show a sharp decline in Left Wing Extremism (LWE), with security camps in remote areas emerging as a key operational game-changer, especially in Bastar division of Chhattisgarh. ISSUE Despite decades of counter-insurgency, Maoist influence persisted in remote tribal areas due to governance vacuum and terrain advantages. The recent expansion of forward security camps has altered the security–development balance, weakening Maoist operational space. BACKGROUND • Violent incidents down by ~90% (2010–2025) (Ministry of Home Affairs – LWE Division) • LWE-affected districts reduced: • 126 (2018) → 90 (2021) → 38 (2024) → ~11 districts (2025) • Most affected districts now limited to: • Bijapur, Narayanpur, Sukma (South Bastar) • Maoist stronghold historically: • Dandakaranya Region (DKR) spanning Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Maharashtra, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh 📌 insight: The conflict has shifted from pan-regional insurgency to isolated pockets. WHY SECURITY CAMPS ARE A GAME-CHANGER 1️⃣ Permanent Security Presence • Camps deny Maoists “liberated zones” • Ends insurgents’ ability to operate with impunity 📌 Example: Forward camps in interior Bastar restricted Maoist movement corridors. 2️⃣ Reduced Response Time • Faster response to attacks and emergencies • Maoists forced into defensive posture 🔹Post-camp deployment, successful Maoist ambushes declined sharply (MHA). 3️⃣ Psychological Impact • Visible state presence boosts civilian confidence • Undermines Maoist narrative of state absence 🔹Restoration of the state’s monopoly over violence. 4️⃣ Improved Human Intelligence (HUMINT) • Local cooperation increased • Flow of actionable intelligence improved 📌 Example: Increased surrenders of cadres and leaders (2023–25). 5️⃣ Catalyst for Development Infrastructure • Camps enabled: • Road construction • Mobile towers • Health & ration delivery 📊 Fact: Over 4,000 km of roads built in LWE areas under RCPLWEA. 6️⃣ Administrative Reach • Civil administration followed security: • Collector • Tehsildar • Patwari • Governance replaced Maoist “parallel administration”. IMPACT ON MAOISTS (Outcome-Based) • Recruitment base shrunk • Weapons & funding channels disrupted • Large-scale surrenders & neutralisation of leadership • Maoist appeal waning among tribals 🔹Security dominance preceded developmental legitimacy. LIMITATIONS & CAUTIONS (Balanced View) • Security success alone is not sufficient • Risk of: • Alienation if rights ignored • Over-militarisation • Mid- to long-term peace depends on justice + development WAY FORWARD 1️⃣ Implement Constitutional Guarantees • PESA Act • Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2️⃣ Rights-Based Tribal Governance • Land rights • Livelihood security • Local self-governance 3️⃣ Institutionalise Development • Health, education, nutrition • Skill & employment for tribal youth 4️⃣ Rehabilitation over Repression • Strengthen surrender & rehabilitation policy • Integrate former cadres into mainstream economy 5️⃣ Long-Term Vision • Region-specific development plan aligned with Viksit Bharat 2047 CONCLUSION Security camps have decisively broken the Maoist operational backbone by restoring state presence in remote areas. However, sustainable peace requires converting security gains into governance, rights, and development outcomes. ⸻ One-Line UPSC Enrichment In LWE areas, security camps succeeded because they enabled governance—not because they replaced it.

➡️ISSUE Despite rapid growth of the gig economy, social security for gig and platform workers in India remains weak, fragmented, and difficult to access in practice. Recent draft Rules under labour codes highlight gaps between legal intent and on-ground protection. CONTEXT • India has ~7.7 million gig and platform workers (2020–21), projected to rise to 23.5 million by 2029–30 (NITI Aayog, “India’s Booming Gig and Platform Economy”). • Gig work contributes ~1.25% of India’s GDP and is expanding rapidly in: • Ride-hailing • Food delivery • E-commerce logistics • Yet, gig workers remain outside traditional employer–employee frameworks, limiting labour protections. LEGAL & POLICY FRAMEWORK 1️⃣ Social Security Code, 2020 • First law to recognise gig and platform workers as a separate category • Provides for: • Life & disability cover • Health & maternity benefits • Old-age protection • Funding via: • Central & State Governments • Aggregators’ contribution (1–2% of turnover, capped at 5% of worker payouts) 📌 Status: Benefits depend on Rules + implementation, not automatic entitlement. 2️⃣ Draft Social Security Rules (Current Issue) • Mandatory registration of gig workers on a portal • Eligibility conditions: • 90 days with one aggregator or • 120 cumulative days across aggregators in a year • Aggregators must upload worker data quarterly 😔Concern: Eligibility thresholds may exclude care workers, part-timers, and workers during demand slumps. KEY PROBLEMS 1️⃣ Social Security Without Wage Protection • Gig workers are covered only for social security, not: • Minimum wages • Working hours • Overtime • Code on Wages, 2019 excludes gig work from employer–employee wage relations. 📌 Example: Algorithmic rate cuts by platforms are not legally contestable. 2️⃣ Algorithmic & Income Insecurity • Platforms use opaque algorithms for: • Task allocation • Incentives • De-activation • Workers lack: • Transparency • Grievance redress 🔹Studies show gig incomes fluctuate 30–50% month-to-month, increasing vulnerability. 3️⃣ Access Barriers in Draft Rules • Calendar-day counting can: • Penalise illness, maternity, caregiving • Exclude workers during economic downturns • Benefits may lapse due to factors beyond worker control 📌Insight: Formal inclusion does not guarantee effective access. 4️⃣ Weak Enforcement Architecture • Compliance relies on Shram Suvidha Portal, designed for factory-based work • App-mediated labour remains under-regulated • Dispute resolution and benefit delivery remain unclear. GLOBAL & COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES • EU (2023): Platform Work Directive → presumption of employment • UK: Gig workers recognised as “workers” with minimum wage rights • ILO: Advocates portable social security for non-standard work 📌 Lesson: Social security must be portable, unconditional, and enforceable. IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIA • Rising urban informalisation • Increased labour unrest (nationwide gig strikes) • Risk of creating a “formal-informal hybrid” workforce without protections WAY FORWARD 1️⃣ Make benefits rights-based, not eligibility-threshold dependent 2️⃣ Include explicit protections for illness, maternity, caregiving & demand shocks 3️⃣ Define: • Minimum benefits • Time-bound claims & appeals 4️⃣ Ensure algorithmic transparency & data access 5️⃣ Enable portable social security accounts across platforms 6️⃣ Strengthen tripartite oversight (State–Platform–Workers) CONCLUSION Without robust design and enforcement, gig-worker social security risks remaining symbolic rather than substantive. Bridging the gap between legal recognition and lived security is essential for inclusive labour reform. Social security for gig workers must shift from platform goodwill to enforceable rights in a rapidly informalising digital economy.

• Preserve strategic autonomy amid U.S.–China rivalry CONCLUSION China’s 2026 posture reflects a strategic paradox of economic fragility and external assertiveness, challenging the rules-based global order. For India, this necessitates resilience, calibrated engagement, and long-term strategic patience. China’s inward economic stress has not reduced its outward assertiveness, underscoring the global shift from rule-based restraint to power-managed competition.

As 2026 begins, China displays a paradox of economic slowdown alongside heightened strategic and military assertiveness. This raises concerns for the rules-based international order, regional stability, and India–China relations. CONTEXT China’s economy has entered a phase of structural deceleration, yet Beijing continues to project external confidence through military modernisation, diplomatic outreach, and grey-zone tactics. • IMF (World Economic Outlook 2025): China’s medium-term growth expected to decline below 4% by the end of the decade • World Bank: China’s growth potential has fallen due to demographics, debt, and productivity slowdown KEY DIMENSIONS 1️⃣ Economic Strain beneath Strategic Confidence • GDP Growth: • Official 2025 growth: ~5% • IMF estimates China’s trend growth is structurally declining • Deflationary Pressures: • Producer Price Index (PPI) remained negative for over 3 consecutive years (2022–2025) → reflects weak domestic demand • Property Sector Stress: • Real estate once contributed ~25–30% of GDP (direct + indirect) (IMF) • Major developers faced defaults, weakening household confidence • Local Government Debt: • Estimated at >100% of GDP (explicit + implicit) (IMF estimates) Insight: Economic slowdown has not reduced China’s strategic ambition; instead, it has reshaped priorities toward security and self-reliance. 2️⃣ Trade Surplus & Export-Led Resilience • China’s trade surplus crossed $1 trillion in 2024–25 (UNCTAD) • China dominates: • >60% of global EV battery manufacturing • ~80% of global solar panel supply chains • Result: • Rising trade frictions with US, EU, Japan 📌 Example: EU investigations into Chinese EV overcapacity (2024–25) 3️⃣ Turn Inward: State-Led Industrial Strategy • 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–30) priorities: • Semiconductors • Artificial Intelligence • Green technologies • Dual-use & critical minerals • R&D Spending: • China spends ~2.6% of GDP on R&D (OECD data) 🔹China is insulating its economy through technological self-reliance and supply-chain control. 4️⃣ Military Expansion & Risk Tolerance (Authentic Defence Data) • Defence Spending: • China’s official defence budget (2025): ~$230 billion • Second largest globally (SIPRI) • Nuclear Forces: • China’s nuclear warheads estimated at 500+, projected to exceed 1,000 by 2030 (SIPRI) • PLA Navy: • World’s largest navy by number of vessels 📌 Example: Regular PLA Navy deployments in the Indian Ocean Region under the “two-ocean” operational concept. 5️⃣ U.S.–China & Global Power Dynamics • IMF MD Kristalina Georgieva (2024): “China is now too large to export its way out of a slowdown.” • Despite tactical engagement, strategic rivalry persists • Limited accommodation increases pressure on middle powers like India 6️⃣ Global South Outreach • Belt and Road Initiative: • Over 150 countries associated • BRICS expansion (2024): • Enhanced China’s diplomatic influence • However: • Debt distress in multiple BRI countries (World Bank, UNDP) Insight: Economic leverage increasingly complements strategic influence. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE WORLD ORDER 🔴 Erosion of Rule-Based Norms • Strategic assertiveness despite economic stress reflects power-centric behaviour • Grey-zone tactics avoid war but undermine predictability 🔴 Normalisation of Managed Competition • De-escalation without resolution leads to long-term instability • Encourages selective compliance with international norms INDIA–CHINA RELATIONS (FACT-BASED) • Trade Deficit: • India–China trade deficit exceeded $85 billion (2024) (MoCI) • Border Situation: • Disengagement at some friction points, but no full de-escalation • Supply Chain Leverage: • China controls ~70% of rare earth processing globally (USGS) 📌 Example: Delays in rare-earth magnet exports affected Indian electronics & renewables. WAY FORWARD FOR INDIA • Accelerate domestic manufacturing (PLI schemes) • Diversify critical mineral sourcing (Australia, Africa) • Strengthen deterrence while keeping diplomatic channels open

The issue relates to the unilateral use of military and economic coercion by a major power to influence or alter the political order of a sovereign state, bypassing collective decision-making. It questions the credibility of international law, multilateral institutions, and the rules-based world order. WHY IT UNDERMINES / VIOLATES THE WORLD ORDER 1️⃣ Violation of Sovereign Equality • The UN system is founded on sovereign equality of states, irrespective of power. • Unilateral interventions undermine this norm by treating weaker states as objects of policy, not equal actors. 📌 Example: • Iraq (2003) – Regime change without UNSC approval led to prolonged instability. 2️⃣ Erosion of Multilateralism • Use of force is meant to be regulated through collective mechanisms under the United Nations. • Bypassing the UN weakens collective security and institutional legitimacy. 📊 Fact: • Since 1945, UNSC-authorised military actions are a minority compared to unilateral interventions, highlighting growing institutional bypassing. 3️⃣ Shift from Rule-based to Power-based Order • When strategic interests override international norms, law is replaced by coercion. • This marks a transition from rules-based governance to might-is-right politics. 📌 Examples: • Libya (2011) – R2P mandate allegedly exceeded, leading to state collapse. • Ukraine (2022) – Unilateral use of force undermining territorial integrity. 4️⃣ Economic Coercion as a New Tool of Intervention • Modern interventions increasingly use: • Sanctions • Financial exclusion • Trade restrictions 📊 Data: • According to UN estimates, over 30% of countries face some form of unilateral sanctions, often without UNSC approval. 📌 Example: • Venezuela – Sanctions contributed to: • GDP contraction of over 70% (2013–2021) • Severe humanitarian stress (UNDP/UN data) 5️⃣ Dangerous Precedent Effect • Selective interventions create precedent for other powers to act similarly. • Leads to: • Fragmentation of global norms • Reduced trust in institutions • Increased global instability 📌 Exam Phrase: Selective adherence to international law weakens its universality. BALANCED VIEW • Governance failures and human rights concerns in many states are real and serious. • However, evidence from Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan shows that unilateral force often worsens humanitarian outcomes rather than resolving them. 📊 Fact: • Post-intervention states account for a disproportionate share of refugees and internal displacement globally (UNHCR). INDIA’S POSITION India consistently advocates: • Sovereignty and non-intervention • Strategic autonomy • Multilateral solutions through the UN • Dialogue over coercion 📌 Example: • India’s stance on Iraq (2003), Libya (2011), and Ukraine reflects preference for diplomacy and international law. CONCLUSION Unilateral interventions without multilateral legitimacy erode sovereignty, weaken global institutions, and accelerate the shift from a rule-based to a power-centric international order, threatening long-term global peace. ⸻ One-line UPSC Enrichment Quote “International law loses authority when power decides compliance.”

➡️The Tapovan controversy in Nashik highlights the conflict between urban-religious infrastructure development and environmental conservation, compounded by electoral politics and coalition dynamics. 1️⃣ What Is the Issue? • Authorities proposed clearing ~1,800 trees in Tapovan to build Sadhugram and a MICE facility. • Tapovan is regarded as Nashik’s key green and religious space, linked to the Simhastha Kumbh Mela. • Strong resistance from local residents, environmental activists, and civil society. • NGT and Bombay High Court granted a temporary stay ⚖️ Governance Insight: Courts act as guardians of sustainable development, especially when executive actions are contested. Nashik – Key Facts • Location: On the banks of River Godavari • Nickname: Wine Capital of India • One of the four sacred Kumbh cities 🕉️ Simhastha Kumbh Mela Frequency & Cycle • Held once every 12 years • Timing based on Jupiter (Guru) entering Leo (Simha Rashi) → hence the name Simhastha Locations • Nashik (Ramkund, Godavari) • Trimbakeshwar (Kushavarta Kund) Next / Previous Editions • Last held: 2015–16 • Next expected: ~2027 (subject to astrological calculation) 🧘 Akharas & Rituals • Three major Akhara groups participate: • Shaiva • Vaishnava • Udaseen • Shahi Snan (Royal Bath) is the most important ritual • Strict Akhara hierarchy & bathing order followed 🌊 Godavari River (Nashik Context) • Origin: Trimbakeshwar (near Nashik) • Godavari is called: Dakshin Ganga • Sacred stretch: Ramkund–Panchavati–Tapovan • High religious sensitivity to land-use change near riverbanks

➡️India’s imports of Russian crude oil rose to a six-month high in November 2025, even as trade tensions with the U.S. persist over tariffs linked to Russian oil purchases. Key Data (November 2025) • Russian crude imports: 7.7 million tonnes • Share in India’s total oil imports: ~35–35.1% • Value of Russian oil imports: $3.7 billion • Contribution to oil import bill: ~34% 😎import from Russia consistently increasing Comparative Import Data • U.S. oil imports: • Volume: ~2.8 million tonnes (7-month high) • Value: $1.4 billion • Share rose to 12.6% (from ~4–5% earlier) Static Prelims Pointers • Russia + U.S. together account for ~50% of India’s oil imports • India follows a source-diversification strategy to ensure energy security • Oil imports form ~85% of India’s crude requirement (static fact) 2️⃣ Why Did Imports Rise? (a) Economic Advantage • Russian oil available at discounted prices • Helped contain import bill and inflationary pressures (b) Energy Security • Stable long-term supply amid West Asian volatility • Reduced over-dependence on Gulf producers (c) Refinery Compatibility • Indian refineries adapted to Russian crude blends 4️⃣ India’s Balancing Strategy (Russia + U.S.) • U.S. share increased sharply to 12.6% from 4/5% • Indicates strategic hedging, not alignment with any single bloc “Foreign policy must serve national interest, not ideological camps.” – Strategic realism principle 5️⃣ Implications for India Positive • Lower crude cost → inflation control • Energy supply stability • Bargaining power via diversification Challenges • Trade friction with U.S. • Risk of secondary sanctions • Export competitiveness affected by higher tariffs 6️⃣ Way Forward • De-link trade from geopolitical coercion in bilateral negotiations • Push for tariff rollback citing market-based decisions • Accelerate: • Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) • Renewable energy transition • Long-term diversified oil contracts • Strengthen India-U.S. trade dialogue mechanisms 🏛️ Institutional Logic: Energy decisions fall under economic sovereignty, not alliance politics. Conclusion India’s Russian oil imports highlight a pragmatic energy strategy, where national interest, affordability, and supply security guide decisions amid global geopolitical churn.