Facts about food, money, climate change, social influence, animal - human - planet abuse on Telegram with a scientific approach

💥💥Greenpeace💥💥

Average = the most shitty useless information on this planet! ø data is saying ANYTHING, like per capita or total! This happens even related to finance / CO2 pollution and all other aspects in your life. Previously https://t.me/PollutionFacts/517 we talked about mean, mode and median, now let we go to the next step, talking about mean (= ø), total and per capita. As you can see in this picture, total CO2 pollution from China is greater than USA, but a lot of traffic is available from China to USA. In the yellow graphic we can see how GDP in China increased a lot compared to years ago. 2000 there were 1.2 bio people, now 1.4 = 4.5x than USA (+0.058 bio in 23 years, GDP +29k 1.7x compared to +11k 12x in China) Now let we check the per capita. China has a low per capita, considering the crazy population they have. Can we say that per capita pollution is a great way to measure pollution? Nope. First per capita is the same shit like ø money you own used by Credit Suisse https://t.me/FinanceFactsTelegram/302 https://t.me/FinanceFactsTelegram/314 https://t.me/FinanceFactsTelegram/324 because it's enough 3 people earn 30000000 mio, and the ø is already 💩. In such case the median is better https://t.me/FinanceFactsTelegram/332 but not perfect! ø is shit in all other topics too, because at the end is saying anything, it's just cool and nothing more. Back to the pollution per capita. Ok, China has 1.4 mio people, BUT around 5% with less than 4 years, 12% with less than 14, 5% < 19, 19% < 35, 8.5% more than 70 years, 27% more than 50 years https://perma.cc/FT2J-95AG So a baby or kid is for sure not polluting like a 50+ with tons of money .... About money, about 1.7 mio people in China have more than 1.2 mio CHF https://perma.cc/ML38-X87E Some studies are reporting "Air pollution in China is falling — but there is a long way to go". Forecast are saying a decrease too, so what US said "we do nothing, because China is doing nothing"

(Part 2) Bullshit over bullshit ... let we check facts d) Our answer about the 1.76% https://t.me/ClimateChangeTelegram/67 https://t.me/NatureFreaksDeutsch/19 https://t.me/NatureFreaksDeutsch/22 (0.04/100*4)/100*1.76 = 0.000028 First of all it's BULLSHIT, because you cannot merge the 4% "default CO2" with 1.75% and 4% by human activity ... maybe you could say that 0.04/100*1.76 = 0.0007 This way of thinking it's exact the same like https://t.me/ClimateChangeTelegram/68 https://t.me/ClimateChangeTelegram/63 https://t.me/ClimateChangeTelegram/62 preferring to find bullshit excuses, instead of making something same like this one https://t.me/NatureFreaksDeutsch/166 where our answer is available https://t.me/NatureFreaksDeutsch/181 https://t.me/PollutionFacts https://t.me/WWFFacts https://t.me/MissionWillowProject https://t.me/EnergyFactsTelegram https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram etc. Plus Germany is not 1.76%, but 1) it's depends which stats are you checking, for example per capita (check point e) or which website, just check for example https://t.me/PollutionFacts/518 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/627 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/623 2) why are you not looking to the cumulative data too, where Germany has 5.37%! https://perma.cc/5D3Y-GZ6Y As always such fake scientists (because politicians understand anything of any type of topic, doesn't matter if medicine, biology, etc.) just talk without considering all aspects ... e) More about Germany pollution https://t.me/PollutionFacts/585 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/408 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/615 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/611 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/595 Germany: CO2 Country Profile https://perma.cc/4XRE-FPY6 f) back to pollution done by nature ... Most wildwires are done by humans so humans are polluting for the nature! Plus where the fuck you got the 4% by humans ... check https://t.me/PollutionFacts/670 maybe you mean that dermal CO2 is 4% of total body CO2 emission ... ahha All in one channel answer: https://t.me/DeutschlandBullshit/2

(Part 1) Let we check now this bullshit using real facts, done by politicians, who prefer finding excuses, instead of changing .. a) 0.041197% CO2 on the atmosphere - March 2019 concentration https://perma.cc/5N7H-A2QL - Only 0.04% CO2? So probably is not important at all ... Who matter if there is 0.04% or 96% as "natural %" ... DO YOU KNOW THAT IS ENOUGH LESS THAN 300MG TO DIE!! like Slobodan Praljak did https://perma.cc/FNC3-NLH8 "The lethal oral dose of KCN and NaCN for humans is between 0.5 and 3.5 mg/kg body weight." https://perma.cc/8T38-A57M or just a small spermatozoon to make a girl pregnant! "A typical human spermatozoon has a distinct structure with an oval-shaped head (3–5 μm length and 2–3 μm width), a midpiece (7–8 μm), and a tail (45 μm)" https://perma.cc/QB4E-NLFU So WTF is this idea about thinking about the % or size ... just idiots think in such ways ... b) How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans? https://perma.cc/EQQ3-W4B5 Why not talking about atmospheric CO2 concentrations???????!!!!! See more https://t.me/PollutionFacts/509 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/585 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/535 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/547 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/555 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/565 Climate myths: Human CO2 emissions are too tiny to matter WRITTEN IN 2007!!! not 2023 ... https://perma.cc/G655-A5NH c) WTF are you talking about the "What is the carbon cycle?" https://perma.cc/VZ99-RMBS Doesn't carbon dioxide in the atmosphere come from natural sources? https://perma.cc/EA6H-2RMG https://perma.cc/Q2ZT-W9P4 The big difference is that even if nature is producing CO2, they don't increase it in crazy mode like humans just to make 💶 For comparison, humans emit about 30 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year—100–300 times more than volcanoes—by burning fossil fuels https://perma.cc/D93K-VWP9 d) So your 4% of 0.04 = 0.0016 doesn't make any sense! "Anteil Deutschland = 1.76%" Same shit this dude already said https://t.me/NatureFreaksDeutsch/1

It's time to wake up! But people still prefer to keep tomatoes on their eyes about all topics (not just climate change) ... because doing nothing and not reflect about such things is much easier. Even if you provide facts after investing weeks / months on searching such informations for them

Yesterday (....), Interior gave the Willow Project a preliminary green light. Now, President Biden has the chance to make a final call. It's not too late to stop this carbon bomb. If we don't, Willow will emit an estimated 280 million metric tons of climate pollution over the next 30 years. It's a make or break moment. @MissionWillowProject

Yes, this is exactly what the world and even Elon Musk are doing with our planet. Great work WWF, showing that in a simply epic picture! Be ready Elon Musk, our project against your pollution bullshit will be launched soon. Between all men in the world, you are one of the worse. @ElonMuskPollution @WWFFacts

Sorry, it's wrong. Rich people first trash money for shit, pollute our planet with their jets, yachts, luxury cars, buy fashion products derived from animals, giving a shit to human rights, eat or buy (to keep as toys / accessories) illegal imported animals, do space tourism by polluting a lot, die by visiting Titanic, say "poor people are the cause of pollution", try to create motivation bullshit how to live with few money (without having idea what this means), criticize poor countries that their fertility rates are too low by saying other bullshit, don't declare their money and don't pay taxes https://perma.cc/AU4N-7XRQ https://perma.cc/8LYC-HS5B, act like if they are doing all the job (when in reality they delegate all work to their employees!* and don't even take their responsibility when needed), just leave a brand as CEO if they do shit (just few of many examples https://perma.cc/S526-XNNT, https://perma.cc/8WG4-XDZQ), prefer to fire people, instead of cutting their overpaid salary for doing almost nothing, etc. AFTER THAT they invest money and use the rest for buying things, even if they don't really need to invest money, because they already own millions of dollars, that once they die, their fake 25 years old wife or their kids can get by thinking "we are so happy he died, finally i got the money" but say in the public "this was a tragic event, we will miss him a lot ..." Obviously there are few decent CEO or rich people too, one of this is Pavel Durov, other are Mack family, Roger Federer (more the mentality, less about pollution ...), etc. *except if the real CEO is still doing the same job, like when he launched the brand ... but currently big brands change CEO like whores change their clients, and when they do shit, they even get bonus or other things ... which is just a shame

This is the sad reality of our planet. Most people just want to believe the shit they want to believe, even if you prove with facts the opposite. This researcher is saying that for climate change, but in reality this happens for all aspects of their lifes, from their social network usage, to nutrition, to their behaviour when disasters happen, to their social pression behaviour changes, to their shopping behaviour to ... Almost everyone is thinking to be an expert in every field, by knowing how to use / search / etc. something, when the reality is the whole opposite, and for example stats related to social network behaviours / usage / etc. we shared multiple times in the past with various our brands confirm that, especially since we track what it's happening on all socials on almost all topics and languages, by doing various test on people social behaviour too. Even now with AI everyone is thinking to be an expert, when ... (we don't talk about that now). Their shopping behaviour is nothing better, just impulsive without using the brain and proper shopping strategies. Stats show such impulsive behaviour too. Would be time that people start to think to the future (even when they buy something ...) by looking things from various perspectives, so like researchers and pro users are doing, instead of checking all that with a tube in front of their eyes. Obviously by comparing things properly or using that with properly strategies. And yes, even by verifying informations before they get shared to someone other.

Sorry USA, do you have still something to say, after checking such images and all previous posts / images? Instead of just looking to picture 2, look at the other pictures, where China is still lower than USA! Yes, China need to improve, but don't take it as excuse! Check previous post for pictures https://t.me/PollutionFacts/476 Additional comment: https://t.me/PollutionFacts/408 Images: https://t.me/PollutionFacts/398 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/388 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/349 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/339 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/330 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/320 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/310 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/300 https://t.me/PollutionFacts/295 Backup: https://perma.cc/6X32-ZFY9