Australia First Party

More vintage Griffin. They silence him on every medium and yet YT keeps spitting these at me. Heh. Talk about a sympathetic audience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4xJVwAbQdE&ab_channel=theworldvideos1

Patriot FED are BAAACCCCKKK!

On The French Election Of the 3 electoral blocs, only one is out of place, that of the national camp. While the left and the globalists fight for their ideas with the clear designation of the enemy, the National Rally (NR) is bogged down in a useless and disastrous policy of de-demonization. Marine Le Pen has renounced the defense of the family by formalizing abortion, the defense of work allows no rupture with the Oligarchy which dominates in the West and the defense of the Fatherland is second to submitting to the European Union and the dominant script on Ukraine and Gaza. The NR gets stuck in supporting the repressive and liberticidal policy of the system instead of fighting it. In short, Marine Le Pen is paying for it this evening, while the general situation in our country has never been so favorable to a truly nationalist policy of national recovery. We only fight and win by imposing ourselves with clear and solid ideas, and not by relying only on the electoral magic wand. The center of gravity of a true national gathering must be nationalist. This is what we have always defended since our ouster from the National Front. Nationalism or defeat: the choice is simple and clear. Yvan Benedetti. President, The Nationalists, Paris.

FRANCE ELECTION PROVES IT: THERE IS NO PARLIAMENTARY ROAD (Jim Saleam) I expect that there will be those in our own (sic) ‘far right’ and ‘right’ moaning and groaning about yesterday’s electoral defeat of the French National Rally party of Marine Le Pen. For Nationalists it is all really very simple: there is no parliamentary road. That means two things. First that a system founded upon globalism and liberalism will use all mechanisms to defeat any ‘far right’ (let alone Nationalist) party from having parliamentary power. Second, that even if it got parliamentary power, the state power would bring it down. Nationalists will always contest elections: for profile, general publicity, to build organization, to recruit. It would be ideal to have Nationalist representatives who could use parliament’s resources against the system. Yet, they would reject the illusion of parliament. Power does not lie there and that is parliament’s essential trick. The French Nationalists are outnumbered by the far right. Eventually, they will prevail over it and convert its cadres and supporters – and radicalize them. The example of National Rally may tame those Aussies beguiled by electoralism and make them too see the truth. https://www.politico.eu/article/france-legislative-election-2024-second-round-front-populaire-jean-luc-melenchon-raphael-glucksmann-shock-victory/

Certain 'far right' people in Australia are talking again of a bloc with conservatives and other rightists (sic) to construct a new front to take Australia back - and so on and so on. They seem to forget that foul alliance on St. Kilda Beach five plus years ago when then-Senator Fraser Anning allied with the usual Melbourne suspects to build support for his 'Conservative Nationals'. Remember: Fraser Anning said he was the number one Zionist in the Federal Parliament. Remember: Fraser Anning's party was multiracialist in tone. All this, despite his initial support (he said) for the old White Australia Policy. Did anything really come of that alliance? We think not. Australia First rejected Fraser Anning. We were right to do so. As ever, nationalists are not the far right! Read the article link for the usual far right bulldust. Essentially, Nationalists refuse to sell themselves to pseudo politicians and seek to build a party of their own. (Jim Saleam) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6561607/Fraser-Anning-admits-taxpayers-funded-trip-St-Kilda-picnic-protest-African-gangs-crime.html

How very interesting. [My] feed keeps serving up rare Nick Griffin. This is the latest to come out of left (sic) field. On this day of all days when the conservatives have been obliterated and, just like in Australia, a rejection vote has resulted in a Labour (Labor in AUS) Government. Which won't end well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iKfrY9l2kY&ab_channel=VH1tunes

Since we are dealing with some matters 'British' tonight, I would put a link here to Nick Griffin's 'Alt Right Not Right' long pamphlet published in 2017. It is a masterpiece which looks into the tangled world of this 'far right', giving examples of its toxicity in a few countries. I would go further. Today, the Australian newspaper published a piece on the far right, albeit focusing on the neo-nazis. In Australianese journalism, these things are basically the same. I note the nationalists are not mentioned there, although given the neo-nazis will even say they are nationalists, it is inevitable Australia First and some friends will end up mentioned in a future article. I will say for now that the piece shows certain people breaking the race-hate-laws, which means inevitable prosecutions and the piece implies the easy access the journalists have to the private (sic) world of the neo-nazis. No doubt their private communications have been breached. For whatever reason, the article also talks of a leading influencer having "resources" to do propaganda work and quotes from the Director General of ASIO talking of terrorism and so forth. Do I smell more than provocation? Are we now dealing with agents-provocateurs? It is my belief all this silliness plus provocation needs to be upgraded into an ideological question and addressed. More soon. (Jim Saleam) https://altrightnotright.com/