𝙸𝚂𝙺𝙰𝙽'𝚂 | 𝙴𝙽𝙶𝙻𝙸𝚂𝙷 🇺🇸 | 🇬🇧

The question of whether it is beneficial for a country if a small number of citizens make a fortune as opposed to a large number of those who earn significantly less in several countries has always been a topic of debate. Although supporters say that the idea might benefit countries, critics, including myself argue for limits on extremely high salaries and governments control over incomes for several reasons. On the one hand, the presence of individuals earning significantly high salaries in a country can be seen as beneficial for two clear reasons. One of the most noticeable ones is that high earners can often invest their wealth in business, startups and real estates, fueling the economic growth. Their investments in businesses and startups can ,for example, serve as a solution to such common issues as high unemployment rate as the establishments of companies mean the creation of new vacancies for job-seekers. This all can contribute to the overall economic development. Additionally, individuals with high incomes typically pay a significant amount in taxes, which can provide the governments with substantial revenue. This generated revenue can , in turn, be invested in improving healthcare and education, which might result in an increase in general well-being of citizens and in better quality of life thanks to education. These are the obvious reasons why the presence of a few extremely high earners can be considered as positive for a country. On the other hand, it is suggested by critics, and I agree that the government introduce a limit on individuals’ significantly high incomes with strict regulations over them. First, excessively high salaries for a few individuals can exacerbate income inequality, leading to a significant gap between the richest and the rest of population. This disparity can ,I believe, contribute to the creation of social tensions and can promote a sense of unfairness in a society. Secondly, high income inequality can undermine economic stability. When wealth is concentrated in the hand of a few, I think it can lead to lower overall consumption because high income earners tend to save more as opposed to those who earn less and spend higher proportions of their earnings. This tend will, in effect, slow down overall growth of economy in a country. Last but not least, many critics including myself view extreme income disparities as morally and ethically problematic, arguing that such power and wealth should be given to no one person especially when others struggle to meet their basic needs. These are the causes why I advocate for income equality among people. In conclusion, while some people believe that significantly a few high income earners might benefit a country they live in, I am of the opinion that there should be a limit on extremely high salaries, and it is the government that should control it. 478 Words. @iskanielts.

#task2day5again Let’s try to write for this task Huh, I have just completed and I think it was great to have a strong and an abundance and of arguments I came up with, with the help of AI powered tools. @iskanielts.

The first graph provides information on how many thousands of people worked in UK steel industry while the second graph illustrates the changes in the amount of steel produced and imported, as well as variations in the total demand for steel from 1970 to 2000. It is clear that the employment rate in steel industry saw a gradual fall over a 30-year period, reaching their lowest level eventually. It is also worth mentioning although there was a decrease in overall demand for steel, domestic producers couldn’t still meet this demand, leading to an increasing reliance on imports over the timeframe shown. Turning to employment patterns in steel industry, In 1970, 50.000 were employed in the industry, which was the highest figure throughout the first graph. Following next two decades, this number declined significantly to around 20.000, and remained almost stable until 2000. Regarding the second chart, it is noticeable that the total demand for steel was so high that domestic producers consistently failed to meet it. In 1970, the overall demand for steel stood at 200.000, which was nearly twice as high as the amount of steel that was imported. Meanwhile, the production of steel was notably lower than the figure for demand at 160.000. In the next three decades, both its demand and production of steel fell by around half, while the amount of steel imported experienced a rapid growth, reaching a high of 75.000 in 2000. 238 Words @iskanielts.

#task1day4again Let’s start writing I will share my version soon. P.S: What is hard tastes pleasant eventually) @iskanielts.

🚀

#examtask1 Huh, I found the task I was given during the last exam I took (13.04.24) I think I did everything well except for the introduction where I failed. @iskanielts.

#onemoregraduationgroup Congratulations on your graduation! 🚀 Your hard work, dedication, and perseverance have brought you to this incredible milestone🔥. As you celebrate this achievement, take pride in all you've accomplished and the bright future ahead. 🚀 Good luck with your upcoming exams—your commitment and effort will surely lead to success.🔥 Remember, this is just the beginning of your journey. Embrace the challenges, stay curious, and continue to strive for excellence. Wishing you all the best in your future endeavors and may you achieve everything you aspire to.🚀 The greatest so far🔥 @iskanielts.

There is a continuous increase in global demand for food. The reasons driving behind are ,I think, population growth and food waste. Steps can ,however, be taken to change this situation for the better. The two factors contributing to the rise in demand for food globally are obvious. One of these is a non-stop growth in population. The global population is continually increasing, adding more mouths to feed. For example, as of 2024, the estimated number of people living on Earth is over 8 billion, and it is projected to keep growing. This, in effect, leads to the shortage of food available to people since the amount of food produced is not rising in line with the global demand for food. Additionally, a significant amount of food is wasted globally - roughly a third of the world’s food, both at a consumer level and throughout supply chain. This waste often contributes to higher demand because more food needs to be produced to meet actual consumer demands. However, it is still possible to alleviate this problematic situation around the entire globe. First and foremost, it is important to understand that there can not be any limit introduced to reduce the number of people living across the world instead the governments should invest significant amount of money in food production, strengthening the ways to cope with crop yield failures that can mainly be caused by pests, diseases and poor soil health. This can, in turn, help governments to meet demands for food in their countries. Another viable solution can , I think, be the introduction of a new system focusing on up-cycling food instead of wasting. For example, turning tomatoes into tomato sauce that can be canned and stored for a long-time is one of the main targets of the system. As a result, there can be a decline in food waste, which can help countries to deal with global food demands. To conclude, While the reasons behind the growth in food demands across the world are continues rise of the population and the waste of food, I think aforementioned workable solutions could help to alleviate this concerning situation. Not edited yet❗️ 357 words @iskanielts.

#task2day3again The demand for food is increasing worldwide. Why has it happened ? What measures could the international community take to improve situation ? Let’s start writing I will share my version soon. P.S: What is hard tastes pleasant eventually) @iskanielts.

People’s views differ as to whether students should be given a courage to work part-time in several counties. Although having students work as a part-timer might seem logical to some, I firmly believe that students should prioritize their academic performance and consider low quality of job. On the one hand, having a part-time job for students can be justifiable for two reasons. First, students can easily gain a sense of financial independence by earning their own money, reducing the financial burden on their families. This, in turn, helps parents feel less stressed, not thinking about how to cover family expenses. Secondly, holding a job while studying teaches students to manage their time effectively and efficiently, balancing work, academics and personal life. This ,as a result, helps students become mature faster in life, resulting in a bright future. On the other hand, it is suggested by some, and I agree that students shouldn’t have part-time work for the following two clear reasons. One of the notable ones is a decline in academic performance. Working part-time while studying is, I think, challenging for most students, leading to a decline in their academic achievement. This low quality of knowledge might then affect their future career and life as whole. Aside from this, many part-time jobs available to students are low-skill and low-paying, offering limited opportunities for meaningful skill development and future career. By doing so, students can just waste their time that can be better invested in education, which is considered as an investment in yourself to unlock a world of opportunities. In conclusion, while some think that working as a part-time employee for students might be beneficial, I strongly oppose this view as this can negatively affect students’ academic performance and can only be offered limited skills in part-time jobs. 298 words @iskanielts.