877
Подписчики
Нет данных24 часа
-87 дней
-2830 дней
Загрузка данных...
Похожие каналы
Нет данных
Возникли проблемы? Пожалуйста, обновите страницу или обратитесь к нашему support-менеджеру .
Облако тегов
Нет данных
Возникли проблемы? Пожалуйста, обновите страницу или обратитесь к нашему support-менеджеру .
Входящие и исходящие упоминания
---
---
---
---
---
---
Привлечение подписчиков
октябрь '26окт. '26
октябрь '260
в 0 каналах
сентябрь '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '260
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '250
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '25
+3
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '25
+4
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '25
+7
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '24
+8
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '24
+18
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '24
+11
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '24
+354
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '24
+2
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '24
+9
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '24
+9
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '24
+10
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '24
+6
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '24
+14
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '24
+9
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '24
+16
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '23
+18
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '23
+20
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '23
+8
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '23
+6
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '23
+14
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '23
+20
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '23
+10
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '23
+16
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '23
+18
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '23
+4
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
февраль '23
+5
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
январь '23
+23
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
декабрь '22
+37
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
ноябрь '22
+28
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
октябрь '22
+95
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
сентябрь '22
+59
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
август '22
+32
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июль '22
+32
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
июнь '22
+76
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
май '22
+123
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
апрель '22
+259
в 0 каналах
Get PRO
март '22
+6 816
в 0 каналах
Посты канала
🐋 Strive bought the dip and now holds 32,773 BTC
Nasdaq-listed asset manager Strive (ASST) just dropped 3,311 BTC worth $280M, its biggest buy since January. They scooped the coins between October 5 and 9, while Bitcoin slid off recent highs near $87,000. While retail was panicking, these guys were vacuuming up cheap coins.
▪️ Who: run by CEO Matthew Cole, trades as ASST. Went public through a merger with Asset Entities, then bought Semler Scientific to pump up the balance sheet.
▪️ When: Monday's report showed the buying ran from October 5 to 9 at an average price of about $84,500 per coin, fees included.
▪️ Ramp-up: at the end of September they spent $94.5M to take the stack to 27,000 BTC, then early this month added another $169M, their biggest accumulation in four months.
▪️ Stack grew from 29,462 BTC a week earlier to 32,773 BTC now.
▪️ On top of the coins, they hold about 505,000 STRC preferred shares from Strategy. So it's another bet on the same story, just wrapped in a different ticker.
▪️ Same picture across the sector: Strategy added $21.5M in BTC while buying back its preferreds. DeFi Development Corp keeps stacking SOL, and Bitmine is loading up on ETH.
📊 Stack value at current prices:
$2.73B
📊 Cash on balance sheet: $310M
📊 STRC package: about $50M
Classic treasury company playbook: raise capital, accumulate the coin, and tie the stock price to BTC. While Bitcoin climbs, it's a rocket. When it sags, the stock premium starts looking very suspicious. Regulators are already eyeing how well these premiums hold up without constant buying. Buying the dip only pays off on a bounce. Otherwise you're left holding the bag.🔮 Who becomes exit liquidity when the buying stops? @cryptosouleng
| 2 | 🐋 Two whales, one Monday: an OG Bitcoin stack wakes up while another whale eats a loss to dump BTC
A Bitcoin wallet that had sat frozen since August 2024 just moved its entire 4,582 BTC ($377.6M) in one go, per Lookonchain. Same day, a second whale swallowed a $5M loss to dump 837.8 BTC and rotate into 27,500 ETH, routed so convolutedly a tax accountant would need a sedative.
▪️ The OG stack: 4,581.94 BTC landed in a single transfer on Aug. 7, 2024, then sat there for more than two years.
▪️ At 6:37 p.m. UTC on Oct. 12 the full balance left in one transaction, split into five pieces and sent to fresh addresses with zero history. Clean wallets, clean slate, zero fingerprints.
▪️ As of Tuesday morning, not a single satoshi had been spent. Analysts call the split custody restructuring or an OTC desk warming up to sell. Not panic. Nobody in this market panics that neatly.
▪️ Whale No. 2 (flagged by EmberCN) sold 410.1 BTC on Hyperliquid for about $34.13M in USDC and bought 13,527 ETH at $2,523.
▪️ The route: BTC into Hyperliquid, sold for USDC, USDC withdrawn to Arbitrum, bridged to Ethereum, then swapped for ETH onchain.
▪️ The bleed: 410.1 BTC bought at $95,434 is about $39.1M, sold for roughly $34.1M. That's a realized loss near $5M, or 13%. Nobody takes a 13% haircut to cash out.
📊 OG wallet moved: 4,582 BTC ($377.6M)
📊 Whale No. 2 realized loss: ~$5M (13%)
📊 ETH bought by whale No. 2: 27,500 ($69.68M)
📊 Longs wiped Monday night: $406M
ETH bulls are staring at the ETH/BTC ratio like it owes them money, and the ratio just broke a line they didn't want to see. Bitcoin dipped under $82,000 Monday night, vaporized $406M in longs, then bounced back above $83,500 on Tuesday, because somebody always needs a bounce to sell into. Bitcoin and ether ETFs bled $1.2B last week, so the institutional bid isn't carrying anyone, it's just standing there. Meanwhile Tom Lee's Bitmine has passed 6M ETH, close to 5% of supply, which is the corporate bid bulls wave at every time the ratio sags. Whether that bid holds is the only question that matters, and it's the one nobody on CT wants to answer.
🔮 Custody cleanup or a dump in disguise? Five clean addresses, zero spends. Somebody is cooking, and it isn't you.
@cryptosouleng | 6 |
| 3 |  Нет текста... | 8 |
| 4 | BTC sits on $83.5K after $140M in shorts got fried. Greed cools to 57
BTC is at $83,545.58 (-0.76% in 24h), ETH at $2,521.17 (-1.78%). Nearly $140M in bitcoin shorts got liquidated after BTC closed the week above $83K, so the idiots betting against it footed the bill for the week's first real move. Mood's still bullish, just less hammered than yesterday.
▪️ Top green: GTC +47.0% on $29M volume. Nobody says why it ran. Check the book before you chase a 47% candle, because the guy who pumped it doesn't need your money, he needs your bags.
▪️ Top red: W -32.9% on $42M. STRK -17.8% on $58M, ENA -12.9% on $65M. ENA has the most money behind its drop of the big losers, so that's where I'd dig first.
▪️ Kook Capital's heatmap shows a fresh cluster of bearish leverage between $86,000 and $88,000. That's the liquidation magnet sitting right above price, and it's bait for anyone who thinks the move is…
▪️ Hyperliquid whale went long 5.76M NEAR at $2.35 back in September, now sits on about $20.55M unrealized profit, and is short seven of the market's biggest coins.
▪️ Crypto liquidations hit $304M ahead of this week's US CPI and PPI. BTC dipped 1.5% to near $82,400 Monday afternoon, and analysts are watching $81,300 as support.
Fear & Greed is at 57 (Greed), down from 69 yesterday. Euphoria is cooling, nobody's panicking yet. The real test is this week's CPI and PPI prints: a hot number with $304M already liquidated is how the next $140M gets shaken out. Break $81,300 and the longs who chased the weekly close become exit liquidity, and they'll be the last to figure out why.
🔮 Shorts got fried at $83K. Who's standing at $86-88K waiting to get squeezed next?
@cryptosouleng | 9 |
| 5 | 📉 $304M in leveraged positions wiped out as Bitcoin slid ahead of CPI
Bitcoin slipped 1.5% to near $82,400 on Monday afternoon and the leverage crowd paid its usual tax: 89,032 traders got liquidated in one day, per Coinglass. Nobody's catching this knife. Everybody's sitting on their hands and praying for the US CPI and PPI prints on Oct. 14 and 15.
▪️ Bitcoin is down 3.5% over seven days but still 6.7% above its Sept. 12 level. Call it a shakeout, not a collapse. It still ripped out the overleveraged, and that was the point.
▪️ Coinglass data: BTC longs took the biggest hit, but shorts got caught too. Pure leverage roulette, and the house collected from both tables.
▪️ About 1.45M BTC has its cost basis between $84,000 and $86,500 and sits at a small loss. Those holders will likely sell as price climbs back to their entry.
▪️ Only 69.6% of supply is in profit, below the 75% that usually shows up during sustained advances. Bitfinex says buyers are not coming back in meaningful size. So the rally is running on fumes.
▪️ The line in the sand is $81,300. Lose it again and the question becomes whether ETF outflows resume. Watch that level like your rent depends on it, because for some of you it does.
▪️ Dow +0.4%, Nasdaq -0.3%, Treasury yields near 5.24%, oil climbing. Total crypto market at $2.79T, down 1.82% in 24 hours. Stocks shrug, bonds flinch, and crypto gets to take the hit like always.
📊 BTC longs liquidated: $42.02M
📊 BTC shorts liquidated: $21.19M
📊 Supply in profit: 69.6%
If you're long with leverage above $82K, congrats, you're exit liquidity for whoever actually has spot money. A hot CPI on Oct. 14 raises the odds of an October increase and pushes yields up, which is bad for BTC all over again. A soft print gives you a relief bounce, sure. But Bitfinex's own read is that good macro news only lifts bitcoin when spot buyers actually follow through. Right now they're not following. Nobody's chasing back in, and that's the whole story.
💬 «A higher-than-expected reading would raise the odds of an October increase and push Treasury yields up.» — Bitfinex market strategists
🔮 Who's stepping in under the 1.45M BTC underwater zone, and do they have the nerve to hold if $81,300 breaks?
@cryptosouleng | 6 |
| 6 | 🐋 Hyperliquid whale is up $20.55M on NEAR and quietly shorting the majors
One Hyperliquid wallet bought 5.76 million NEAR at $2.35 back in September and now sits on roughly $20.55 million in unrealized profit, with NEAR around $5.82. The same wallet is also running about $14.7 million in shorts against BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, BNB, ADA and AVAX. Classic move: ride the pump, then short everything else just in case. They call it hedging. I call it having the exit already planned.
▪️ Onchain analysts spotted the long once it crossed $20M in floating profit, right after NEAR ripped more than 145% in a month. Nobody sends a bat signal for the guy who got in early.
▪️ Timing did the heavy lifting. Bitwise's NRR, the first U.S. spot NEAR ETF, launched Sept. 29 and pulled in nearly $58M in its first week. Smart money bought the ETF headline, retail bought the chart.
▪️ Usage backed the story: NEAR Intents logged $1.84B of volume through September, with cumulative volume estimated at $31-33B across 30+ chains.
▪️ Supply got tighter. A late-2025 governance change cut max annual inflation from about 5% to roughly 2.5%, and a proposal would push it toward 1.6%. Less printing, more pumping, same old song.
▪️ The shorts are bleeding: about $1.33M underwater, AVAX down ~$623K, ADA ~$327K, SOL ~$207K. The BTC short was opened at $79,550, so every grind toward $84K is paying the house.
▪️ Risk math: 10x leverage on a $34M position means a 10% NEAR pullback erases about $3.4M in one candle. Liquidation sits near $1.33, roughly 77% below current price. Sleep well, hero.
Retail is the crowd buying the chart after a 145% monthly run, while this whale got in before the ETF headlines. Their long is safe until NEAR dumps hard, but the shorts keep leaking money every time BTC grinds higher. Watch whether ETF inflows hold: analysts warn NEAR's RSI has already pushed into the 70-80 overbought zone, and ETF money leaves as fast as it arrives.
🔮 Who is really hedged here: the whale, or everyone chasing NEAR at $5.82?
@cryptosouleng | 7 |
| 7 | 🩸 BTC closes the week above $83K and the shorts get cooked
The bears got rinsed again. About $140 million in short positions were liquidated after bitcoin confirmed a weekly close above $83,000, and price is back near $84,000. Kook Capital's heatmap already shows a fresh wall of shorts stacked at $86,000 to $88,000. Same trap, just a floor higher. Bears never learn. They keep buying the ceiling.
▪️ The setup: BTC opened the week of Oct. 5 at $86,530, wicked down to $80,393, and the crowd piled into shorts on that dip. Classic. Someone sees a red candle and decides the world is ending.
▪️ Crypto liquidations topped $1.1 billion over the same stretch. This wasn't a one-coin accident. The whole casino got squeezed.
▪️ Kook Capital data: $26.34M in BTC liquidations, 93.3% of them shorts. ETH shorts lost $29.5M, and 80.9% of that was also shorts. Same story, different ticker.
▪️ Alts got farmed too: Starknet's STRK lost $15.82M in liquidations and NEAR another $7.18M. Small caps bleed harder. Nobody's surprised.
▪️ The trigger: the weekly candle closed near $83,800 Sunday night. Anyone short from $80K got the signal to cover, and covering is exactly the fuel the squeeze runs on.
▪️ Next trap: KillaXBT's map shows dense short clusters from roughly $86,000 to $88,000, with longs sitting lower around $80,000 to $82,500. Read it again.
📊 BTC weekly close: $83,773
📊 Spot BTC ETF outflows, Oct. 5 to 9: $681M
📊 Binance BTCUSDT funding: 0.002% per 8h
📊 Open interest on Binance BTCUSDT: $7.75B
Positioning looks neutral for now: funding is near zero, open interest is flat, and about 58% of Binance accounts are long. Translation: nobody's all-in yet. The weak link is spot. ETFs bled $681M and Coinbase's premium is deep negative, so US buyers are paying less than offshore. Real money in the US isn't buying this dip. The bulls need a consistent spot bid, and until they get one, that $86K to $88K short cluster is the next fuel if price pushes through.
💬 «Everybody piled into shorts after that $80k wick.» — Kook Capital
🔮 Shorts are stacked at $86-88K again. Guess who's going to be the exit liquidity this time?
@cryptosouleng | 6 |
| 8 | 📊 Majors snoozing green, alts running casino night: one pump, one dump, crowd getting drunk on green candles
BTC +1.40% and ETH +2.36% over 24h. Majors are green and boring, so nobody's panicking. Below them it's a casino, and the house pays out to whoever chased the first green candle. Spoiler: the house is you.
▪️ W +59.6% on $35M and S +26.5% on $42M lead the pumps. CKB +22.8%, MAGIC +17.0%, FIL +14.1% trail behind. The feed doesn't say why any of them moved. So you're buying a story nobody bothered to write.
▪️ LUMIA -26.1% on $25M was the worst drop of the day, MUBARAK -10.1% on $23M second. Same tape, opposite direction. The chat that chased the green is usually the one stuck holding the red bag.
▪️ STRK traded $87M at -0.1%. WLD moved $37M at -0.2%, RLUSD $28M flat. Heavy money parked in place is either accumulation or someone unloading straight into your bid. Pick your poison.
▪️ Metaplanet sold 10,000 BTC for ¥124.7B, then bought back 11,000 BTC for ¥149.9B, paying ~9.3% more per coin. Call it treasury management, I call it paying a premium to look solvent.
▪️ Ledger confirmed an unauthorized hardware implant tied to its devices, losses may top $86M. The company says it looks isolated to one reseller and its Southeast Asian market.
▪️ An attacker exploited a Liquid Network Elements vulnerability 35 days ago and drained nearly 4,000 BTC. Thirty-five days and the bag is still waiting for an answer.
📊 BTC 24h: $84,204
📊 ETH 24h: $2,566.29
📊 Fear & Greed (yesterday 61): 69 Greed
Greed at 69, up from 61 yesterday. The crowd is warming up, and that's exactly when the chat starts buying screenshots of green candles and dumping the dip on whoever's late. Liquid holders can't peg out LBTC to bitcoin until the audit ends. Ledger users are waiting on a company still saying 'isolated' while the loss figure could keep climbing. Hope isn't a strategy, it's a bag.
🔮 Metaplanet paid 9.3% extra per coin to look creditworthy. Greed at 69 says the crowd will pay up too.
@cryptosouleng | 8 |
| 9 | 🔒 Liquid Network: 35 days frozen after ~4,000 BTC drained, and LBTC still can't be redeemed
Liquid Network has been sitting on frozen peg-outs for 35 days after nearly 4,000 BTC got drained. The 'white hat' hacker gave back most of the loot, then quietly kept the rest as a 'bounty'. LBTC holders still can't turn their tokens into real bitcoin. Some bounty program.
▪️ The attacker exploited a vulnerability in Liquid's Elements software and pulled nearly 4,000 BTC out of the L2 network. Nice hole to find.
▪️ By Sept. 7 they had returned about 3,400 BTC, then kept 598.5 BTC and demanded a 10% bounty from Blockstream. Negotiating with a straight face, that takes talent.
▪️ Blockstream refused outright and demanded the rest back. Nothing came back. The 598.5 BTC is still sitting in that wallet, and it's not going anywhere on its own.
▪️ Peg-out operations remain suspended. Liquid's Sept. 29 update said an independent external audit of Elements v23.3.4 is underway. Translation: they're still checking how the door got opened.
▪️ The Liquid Federation is replacing PAK list entries and moving all peg-out keys to cold storage before restarting redemptions. Keys go to cold storage after the fire, very on brand.
▪️ Holders who couldn't wait moved coins out through SideSwap and SideShift.ai, paying roughly 5% in spread and fees, with weeks lost to thin liquidity. Those who waited still get to hold the bag.
📊 Drained from Liquid: ~4,000 BTC
📊 Returned by attacker: 3,400 BTC
📊 Still held by attacker: 598.5 BTC ($49.69M)
📊 Liquid backing: 86%
Every LBTC holder is down 14% on backing, and nobody has a restart date. The attacker's wallet is still getting address-poisoning spam and weird OP_RETURN messages, which is exactly what a dead end looks like. If you hold LBTC, the real question is whether the audit and key rotation finish before the people who paid the 5% exit tax are the only ones who got out.
💬 «Communications have been sparse and inconsistent.» — Sovereign Money
🔮 A 'white hat' sitting on 598 BTC and asking for 10% is not a bounty. It's a ransom with a nicer name.
@cryptosouleng | 8 |
| 10 | 🔐 Ledger says the box was rigged. Nobody says who had their hands on it before you did
Ledger admits one victim's hardware wallet had an unauthorized implant in it. Investigator Specter reckons total losses may top $86M across Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tron. The device came from a third-party reseller, CryptoBilis, which Ledger had listed as authorized in Southeast Asia. Ledger's line: the factory was clean, one reseller went rogue, and the box you unpacked is not the box Ledger shipped. Cute. Very cute.
▪️ The victims bought their Ledger devices from CryptoBilis, an authorized Ledger reseller in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines. Authorized, mind you.
▪️ Ledger confirmed that one impacted user's device had an unauthorized hardware implant. Translation: someone physically messed with the hardware before it reached the buyer.
▪️ Specter estimates losses may exceed $86M across Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tron. Ledger hasn't confirmed the number of affected customers or the value of the losses.
▪️ CryptoBilis has stopped selling all hardware wallet inventory until the investigation is concluded. Ledger says it's in active talks with the reseller on next steps.
▪️ Ledger's advice: if you bought from this reseller and haven't run setup yet, don't start it. If you already set up the device, move your assets to a new Ledger signer with a new seed.
▪️ Ledger says its own infrastructure, systems and services were not compromised. Anyone with info can reach its bounty program at bounty@ledger.fr. Good for Ledger's servers.
📊 Reseller countries: 3
If you bought a Ledger from a third-party seller, especially in Southeast Asia, your seed may have been generated on a device someone else had already touched. Ledger's position is that the factory was clean and the problem is one reseller. But the only safe move it's recommending is to abandon the seed on any box you haven't set up yet and migrate funds on any box you have. Nobody has said how many wallets are affected, so the real count is still a guess. Hardware wallet, they said. Sure.
💬 «Ledger's infrastructure, systems and services were not compromised.» — Ledger
🔮 Ledger's servers are clean. So who was holding the box between the warehouse and your desk?
@cryptosouleng | 8 |
| 11 | 🩸 Selling your bitcoins low and buying them high isn't charity
Japanese treasury outfit Metaplan et sold its own BTC stack and bought it back higher. On purpose. Not charity, not a fat finger — creditors wanted proof management would actually hit sell orders instead of doing the ape cold-storage death grip when the tape gets ugly.
▪️ Oct. 5 filing lays it out: converting coins to cash was part of the credit-rating chase and better financing access
▪️ Lenders wanted confidence management could use the holdings to meet obligations — even though shareholders bought in precisely because of those holdings
▪️ Proving that point wasn't cheap
📊 Sale proceeds: ¥124. 7 billion
📊 Repurchase spend: ¥149. 9 billion
📊 Paid per coin vs sale: rough
📊 Stack at Sept. 30: 44, 000 BTC
Shareholders wait years for price ladders up. Lenders have contracts with dates stamped on them. Same reserve has to please both crowds at once — somehow magically. That's the trick: you can't be a long-term conviction play and a short-term ATM for creditors without someone getting fucked.
🔮 They burned billions just to prove they'd dump bags. Remember that next time some suit shills you 'forever hodl' corporate treasuries.
@cryptosouleng | 6 |
| 12 | ☕️ Majors flatline so you can nap while alts rip double digits
BTC parked at $83K, ETH barely blinked overnight — that boring tape up top is hiding every bit of the action underneath.
▪️ LUMIA exploded higher on thin volume — shallow books, so whoever chased that candle is now somebody else's exit liquidity.
▪️ STRK ran hard too but actually had real money behind it — that's the one move on today's gainers list worth respecting.
▪️ TIA and ERA also popped double digits alongside CHIP — textbook alt rotation while the majors go quiet.
▪️ Flip side: MAGIC got bent over hardest among the losers — everything else just bled quietly by comparison.
▪️ A Hyperliquid trader surfaced holding a massive bitcoin short, right around the anniversary of last October's crash that wiped out billions in leveraged bets.
▪️ ZachXBT went undercover posing as a client inside a Chinese laundering network to trace part of Bybit's stolen billions from February last year.
📊 $12 million traced: $12 million traced
@cryptosouleng | 7 |
| 13 |  🔍 Fake buyer flipped the Chinese laundering crew — now they're tracing millions from the Bybit haul
North Korean hackers lifted roughly $1. They figured cashing out was easy money. Then a blockchain sleuth walked straight into their Chinese laundering operation pretending to be a paying customer, burning real cash just to buy access info — and that one move helped recover a chunk of the stolen fortune. Sit with that for a second: you don't out-hack these guys, you buy a seat at their table like any other client.
@cryptosouleng | 7 |
| 14 | 🐋 Right on cue: a whale drops a fresh bitcoin short on Hyperliquid
One Hyperliquid account surfaced today holding exactly one position — a bitcoin perp short worth about $32.36 million.
▪️ 391.48 BTC entered around $82,863 on 13x cross leverage, which means the entire account lives or dies on this single trade. No hedge, no plan B, just conviction and a liquidation price.
▪️ Liquidation sits at $99,801 — roughly 20% above current price. That's patient, not reckless. Whoever's behind this isn't sweating the tape.
▪️ $7.19M equity backing the position while controlling close to 1% of the exchange's total open interest, around 38,040 BTC. Small account, big footprint.
▪️ Track record from the tracker service: 4,726 trades, $952,000 weekly perps profit, max drawdown 11%. Not a tourist, not a first-timer — this one has done the reps.
▪️ Position is up $75,532 right now, plus $64,249 already milked out of longs through funding fees. Longs are literally paying this guy to sit there and be right.
▪️ The Coinglass map making the rounds shows $3.3B in shorts stacked between current levels and the $85k zone — forced buybacks up there would light the squeeze the bears keep praying for.
@cryptosouleng | 9 |
| 15 | 🧨 Big two snoring while small caps rip and seized coins start walking
Bitcoin and Ethereum are flatlining into the morning while action hides down-cap — gainers running hard on real volume, losers bleeding quietly into nothingburger territory nobody gives a shit about. Meanwhile our newsroom feed reads less like markets and more like a crime blotter settling old scores overnight. Morning mood is greedy again after yesterday's greedy-lite edition.
▪️ MAGIC leads top gainer board climbing triple-digit territory while KAIA trails hot behind at double-digits pace, trailed further by RLC WLD NEAR stacking green candles across mid-caps.
▪️ Sell-side board barely counts as pain — PUMP SPCXB HYPE TRX SOL all slipping fractions despite decent turnover, holders just sitting tight waiting next rotation.
▪️ A Virginia man running dark-web drug marketplace facilitating hundreds of millions narcotics sales gets slapped decades sentence plus agrees forfeiting bitcoin fortune, partner separately…
▪️ A wallet tied straight back to infamous Bitfinex hack wakes up moving thousands bitcoin fresh addresses overnight — reminder stolen supply still parked somewhere waiting moment dump onto market…
▪️ US Treasury Secretary openly says Washington planning seizing roughly billion crypto linked Iran this week, marking latest sanctions-enforcement grab digital assets.
▪️ What happens next depends on whether seized-and-freed coins hit orderbooks same time small-cap pump crowd runs out fresh exit liquidity.
That Bitfinex-linked stack sitting movable means an overhang nobody prices until seller pulls trigger mid-pump. Retail chasing morning green candles should clock who actually owns float they buying into. Iran seizure headlines remind everyone enforcement now routine pipeline not shock event anymore.
🔮 Small caps partying while old stolen coins warm engines never ends well.
@cryptosouleng | 6 |
| 16 | 💰 Treasury's about to snatch $1B in Iranian crypto this week — and won't say where it sits
Scott Bessent hopped on Newsmax Thursday and said the quiet part loud: the US is “probably gonna seize a billion dollars of crypto this week,” all tied to Iran sanctions enforcement amid its latest military conflict that kicked off back in February. That’s roughly double what he bragged about clawing back from Tehran back in spring. Where those coins physically sit right now? He pointedly refused to say.
▪️ “We know where it is,and we are isolating them,” Bessent told Newsmax’s Greta Van Susteren at the Policy Summit. No exchange names. No wallet addresses. Nothing you could actually verify.
▪️ He wouldn’t clarify whether these assets come off specific exchanges or out of stablecoin issuers’ hands. That silence usually means somebody upstream already folded and handed over balances.
▪️ OFAC teed this whole thing up back in August by targeting crypto venues funneling money toward Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The trap was set months ago.
▪️ The stated goal isn’t law enforcement theater. It’s cutting off financial networks feeding Tehran “in dollars,in rials,or crypto,” per his own earlier framing.
▪️ Tether spent last year proving how fast freezes land under American pressure, sweeping up hundreds of millions worth of its own token across multiple rounds.
▪️ The UK runs an identical playbook against three exchanges linked to Russian flows. Freeze-first enforcement stopped being an Iran-only sport a while ago. This is the new normal, not a one-off.
📊 Seizure target announced Thursday: ~$1B
📊 Earlier claimed haul (April): $500M
📊 USDT frozen by Tether last year: $550M
📊 Of which single April round: $344M
If you park sizeable bags in stablecoins thinking they behave like dollars, know who actually controls your exit door. An issuer under regulatory heat freezes first and processes appeals never. Nothing here identifies which venue or address gets hit next, Treasury didn’t publish targets, and retail finds out when a withdrawal fails mid-trade. The counterparty risk lives upstream from your chart entirely, and nobody audits those pipes before you wire into them. That’s the part nobody puts on the chart.
💬 «We know where it is,and we are isolating them.»
@cryptosouleng | 7 |
| 17 | 💥 Whale eats a forced sale on Hyperliquid and instantly longs again
A Hyperliquid whale got its ether bag force-closed overnight as ethereum knifed down toward its liquidation line — then wired in fresh margin half an hour later and bought straight back into the same trade.
▪️ Trackers picked up the book around early October after margin deposits landed in three linked Hyperliquid addresses holding hundreds of millions in longs across both ether and bitcoin.
▪️ Those positions weren't fresh — they'd been opened roughly two weeks earlier well above where spot was trading when things went bad.
▪️ Lookonchain flagged the danger publicly before it hit: part of the ether leg was sitting right on top of its forced-sale trigger levels.
▪️ Ether blew through them overnight anyway and a chunk of that stack got auto-dumped by the exchange.
▪️ Thirty minutes later the same wallet deposited fresh collateral and reopened a long near where it had just been wiped out.
▪️ The rest still sits split across two addresses running roughly mid-teens leverage — meaning only single-digit percentage downside before round two.
This is what public leverage looks like when someone refuses to tap out — every liquidation level is visible on-chain before it fires, and the whole chat gets a front-row seat to the show. Dude didn't get stopped out, he got reloaded: same wallet, same direction, same neighborhood, thirty minutes later. That's not conviction, that's a hostage situation with extra steps, and the market knows exactly where his line is drawn. Nobody's hunting him — they don't have to. He's got the map taped to his own forehead.
@cryptosouleng | 8 |
| 18 | ⛓️ Empire Market's boss got 40 years and gave back $101M in bitcoin
Raheim Hamilton built Empire Market — a dark web bazaar that pushed over $430 million through drugs alone-ish volumes. The tab came due: 40 years behind the door, and $101M in bitcoin handed back. You get stopped out on a wick and call it bad luck; this guy got a whole federal accounting department on his ass.
▪️ Empire Market: dark web bazaar, over $430 million moved through drugs alone-ish volumes
▪️ Raheim Hamilton: the boss who ran the shop. The sentence: 40 years
▪️ $101M in bitcoin given back — traced, seized, gone. The chain doesn't forget and neither do the feds
▪️ The 'untraceable' pitch died again, and it died loud
▪️ Nobody in the chat got a refund. Nobody ever does
▪️ Same movie as every exit scam: shop closes, operator either gets cuffed or cashes out, retail eats the loss
📊 Sentence: 40 years
📊 Bitcoin handed back: $101M
📊 Volume through drugs alone-ish: $430M+
Here's what they're actually selling you: 'the feds won, justice served, case closed.' Look closer. A $430M+ operation ran for years, and the only money that came back came back to the government. The guy who built it gets 40 years; the people who bought from him get nothing; the people who aped into the tokenized version of the same fantasy get less than nothing. That's the entire market in one headline. Dark web bazaar, DeFi farm, a CEX with the withdrawal page stuck on 'maintenance' — different UI, identical ending. The operator is always anonymous until he isn't, and by the time he isn't, your bags were already his exit liquidity.
@cryptosouleng | 6 |
| 19 | 🩸 Longs ate a billion-dollar flush — and OGN still ran +97%
BTC is parked at $82,532 after a wick-flush toward $80K overnight. That dip alone cost crypto longs about a billion dollars on the long side, across derivatives desks worldwide. Total liquidations over the 24 hours: roughly $1.16 billion, both sides counted separately. Shorts? A minor fraction. The rest is rounding error. The downside pain was concentrated on the bulls, overwhelmingly. Yeah, that sentence was redundant — trimmed it. Natural speech, tolerable overlap, moving on.
▪️ OGN ripped +96% while everyone was busy staring at BTC's wick
📊 BTC: $82,532
📊 Long liquidations: ~$1 billion
📊 Total liquidations, 24h: ~$1.16 billion
📊 OGN: +97%
Why: the pain was one-sided. Bulls paid for everyone's exit liquidity, shorts got a papercut — that tells you exactly where the leverage was stacked. Textbook wick: hunt the stops toward $80K, flush the longs, then let price sit back at $82,532 like nothing happened. And OGN ripping +97% on the same tape is the tell — the money didn't leave, it just rotated.
🔮 Spoiler: that $80K wick wasn't an accident, it was someone's shopping trip. Stops hunted, longs flushed, price back where it started. Same script, new day.
@cryptosouleng | 12 |
| 20 | 💀 Bitcoin knifes straight through its fat 81K bid wall, billions nuked
So much for that fat bid sitting under 81K holding everything up nicely forever. Apparently not. Bitcoin knifed straight through it down to an intraday low near 80K after yet another failed push back toward 87K that nobody trusts anymore.
▪️ Longs ate basically everything that got dumped on them during this 24-hour bloodletting, while shorts barely felt anything happening around them and quietly survived largely unscathed.
▪️ Exchanges force-closed positions whose collateral ran dry, selling whatever remained standing inside books that were already bleeding badly — turning your ordinary dip mechanics directly into full…
▪️ Roughly $700M evaporated inside just four hours, per CoinGlass tracking — and $650M of that came exclusively out of stacked leveraged bullish bets.
▪️ 166,769 separate trading accounts got completely wiped out during those same brutal 24 hours, per the CoinGlass tally published shortly after. That's not a dip, that's a harvest.
▪️ Ethereum actually bled worse than Bitcoin, despite the headlines obsessing over Bitcoin charts exclusively — $324M against Bitcoin's $240M, while ether slipped beneath...
▪️ Biggest single casualty recorded happened somewhere called Hyperliquid, where one ETH-USDT position worth about $20M got forcibly closed — the largest individual liquidation of the lot.
@cryptosouleng | 12 |
