Election Data Analyzer
Закрытый канал
Without election integrity we do not have a nation.
БольшеСтрана не указанаКатегория не указана
997
Подписчики
Нет данных24 часа
Нет данных7 дней
Нет данных30 дней
Архив постов
NGOs conspire with federal agencies against the American people. The DOJ is not the in-house counsel of the ACLU! This person claims the hires DOJ is making are highly partisan lawyers which is the reason why these agencies are focusing on the interest of the liberal NGOs and not the American people. Great interview would recommend listening. “Unprofessional and Unethical….”
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/key-senator-says-liberals-using-race-lawsuits-make-it-easier-commit
https://www.justice.gov/crt/voting-section
So much to do and so little time. I need some help with priorities. The most important topics for me on THIS channel right NOW are (multiple choice permitted)...
CPI Citizen’s Guide includes a lot of good information except they don’t recommend getting rid of the machines. I don’t know enough about CPI to support it, but, this list below had many good points about the rolls.
A suggested protocol for list maintenance should include:
• Purchase or acquire a current copy of the voter registration database in the county in a format that can be used by the list maintenance task force
• Require legal training for each person involved in the list maintenance project, to know what federal and state law allow and what state law requires for purposes of valid registrations, and what to avoid for purposes of legal action
• Learn the process used by local election office for removing invalid registrations: what evidence is needed and who can provide such evidence?
• Develop data on 2020 elections and any list maintenance actions taken by the local board in past two years
• Learn whether any additional voter roll cleanup is planned during 2022
• Identify data needed from 3d party sources: USPS data on vacant lots, voters who have moved, active voters who failed to vote in 2020 and how many elections those voters may have missed prior to 2020
• Identify process for confirmation of legal registration: whether voters have moved, or if the registrations are PO Boxes, commercial addresses or vacant lots
• Develop protocols for obtaining evidence: photos of commercial buildings? Vacant lots? Affidavits from current residents that registered voter no longer resides at address on registration list
• Develop process for multi-family residential units: transitory residences and confirming the legitimacy of current residents, compared to voter rolls
• What are the protocols of the local election office for sending / receiving confirmation of current information on the voter rolls
• Consider creating a Neighbors for America Plan: Develop pro-America materials that are NOT partisan and send letters with questions/surveys about issues, and where the residents stand on the issues, with return envelope for sending back surveys, requests to have someone register the person.
• Develop a database for following up with the respondents, to engage interested voters in the election integrity efforts.
• Catalogue responses, returned mail and follow up with calls, photos, affidavits, and meetings to engage those who are interested and document potential bad addresses
https://whoscounting.us/
NGO's are being used as stash houses for ballot stuffing. My number crunching for MI NGO Project substack is finally done, it was a bear. It will show MI as the most corrupt state of all. https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6305297926112#sp=show-clips
The NGO Project MI
Welcome to Champion, MI the receiver of a $5,000 grant from CTCL for safe election administration in 2020.
Population of 297
One of 100’s small rural MI towns that received grant money.
Why? (still plowing through MI data)
Repost from ElectionFraud20.org
Serious Dominion Software Anomaly Discovered in Tennessee, Despite Certification
News is coming out today about a Williamson County, Tennessee election report that describes how erroneous code was present on Dominion voting machines despite having passed through EAC “certification”.
Key quotes:
“On November 3, 2021, the EAC received a report from the Tennessee Secretary of State’s (TN SoS) office that they were planning an investigation into an anomaly observed in Williamson County, Tennessee during a municipal election held on October 26, 2021, regarding Dominion D-Suite 5.5-B ImageCast Precinct (ICP) tabulators. Reports from 7 of the 18 ICP tabulators used during the election did not match the number of ballots scanned. Subsequent tabulation on the jurisdiction’s ICC central count scanner provided the correct tally. The central count tabulation was confirmed via hand count of the paper ballot records on October 27, 2021.”
“Analysis of audit log information revealed entries that coincided with the anomaly; a security error “QR code signature mismatch” and a warning message “Ballot format or id is unrecognizable” indicating a QR code misread occurred. When these events were logged, the ballot was rejected.“
“Further analysis of the anomaly behavior showed that the scanners correctly tabulated all ballots until the anomaly was triggered. Following the anomaly, ballots successfully scanned and tabulated by the ICP were not reflected in the close poll reports on the affected ICP scanners.”
“On February 11, 2022, Dominion submitted a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to the EAC. The report indicates that erroneous code is present in the EAC certified D-Suite 5.5-B and D-Suite 5.5-C systems. The RCA report states that when the anomaly occurs, it’s due to a misread of the QR code. If the QR code misread affects a certain part of the QR code, the ICP scanner mistakenly interprets a bit in the code that marks the ballot as provisional. Once that misread happens, the provisional flag is not properly reset after that ballot’s voting session. The result is that every ballot scanned and tabulated by the machine after that misread is marked as provisional and thus, not included in the tabulator’s close poll report totals.”
The report does not appear to indicate how many ballots were affected by the anomaly.
Software bug? Or algorithmic manipulation?
How many other states and counties used this software configuration and did not audit their results to identify the anomaly?
Anyone else ready to go back to hand-counting ballots? Say NO to opaque, “black box” election machines.
Watch: Overview by @Canncon
Read: Gateway Pundit Report
Read: Official Report PDF
Hat tip: @KanekoaTheGreat
@ElectionFraud20_org
The Election Data Analyzer is now on Truth @ElectionDataAnalyzer. Just doing some research now on that platform. Not sure how I am going to use truth at this time, but I will use it eventually. More to come.
The NGO Project write up about MI is coming next, 500+ donations to local governments Why? We will dig into that.
Do the Opposite
If every instinct you have about elections is wrong, do the opposite.
Mail in ballots? Nope.
Election machines? Nope.
Dirty Rolls? Nope.
Do the exactly the opposite of what the experts want (and laugh at them while you are at it).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rag0Z1nTJOc
Repost from LadyDraza
The last 2 posts are linked. We HAVE to get the American people to understand that the machines are the optimizers. The machines are what allow the system to produce the 50.2% to 49.7% wins for the guy/gal you KNOW should have lost. If we do not address the dirty voter rolls and the MAIL-IN voting (still paper, right?), then they will not be able to optimize, but will just stuff the ballot box harder to ensure the win. Thus, Macron got 58.2%. Investigation of real person voters will reveal that there are a LOT of votes not from real people that pushed him to that point. We all are aware of that. The cheat requires all 3:
1) Exploded, inflated voter rolls
2) Mail-in voting to use the fake or identity theft voters
3) Machines to make it look plausible
Oh - and there is a 4th...Vote aggregation groups like Edison and Scytl to show you data that is fake but probable on the news in real-time so you don't question the results.
How long has this been goin' on
How long has this been goin' on
Well, if friends with their fancy persuasion
Don't admit that it's part of a scheme
But I can't help but have my suspicions
'Cause I ain't quite as dumb as I seem
And you said you was never intendin'
To break up our scene in this way
But there ain't any use in pretendin'
It could happen to us any day
How long has this been goin' on
How long has this been goin' on
Oh, your friends with their fancy persuasion
Don't admit that it's part of a scheme
But I can't help but have my suspicion
'Cause I ain't quite as dumb as I seem
Oh, you said you was never intending
To break up our scene in this way
But there ain't any use in pretendin'
It could happen to us any day
And how long has this been going on
How long has this been going on
How long
How long has this been going on
How long has this been going on
How long has this been going on
How long
How long has this been going on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAVl_IJV5eI
Repost from Mark Finchem
President Trump: “Every state should follow the lead of the Patriots in Arizona where yesterday Kari Lake & Mark Finchem filed a lawsuit to ban electronic voting machines & replace them with a transparent hand count”
I was reading a very important book today about freedom. I noticed the book was printed in China. How can I be certain that the book contains all the intended words? Why would a book that destroys communism at it's core be allowed to be printed in China by the CCP? Why would the CCP permit this? Is it a stretch to assume they permitted it so they could control the words and meaning by removing or slightly altering things in a manner that is almost impossible to notice? How do you know it is authentic?
Repost from Liberty Overwatch
Injunction to Prohibit Use of Voting Machines Filed by Arizona Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake and Senator Mark Finchem
Kari Lake, who is running for governor of Arizona, and Senator Mark Finchem, who is running for Arizona Secretary of State, filed “a civil rights action for declaratory and injunctive relief to prohibit the use of electronic voting machines in the State of Arizona in the upcoming 2022 Midterm Election, slated to be held on November 8, 2022.”
The complaint, submitted on Friday by attorneys Andrew Parker, Alan Dershowitz, and Kurt Olsen, lists Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, and the Pima County Board of Supervisors as Defendants.
The 55 page filing documents decades of evidence of election system vulnerabilities, knowledge of the security flaws by state and federal lawmakers, and the pathological lack of transparency by the voting machine companies. “For two decades, experts and policymakers from across the political spectrum have raised glaring failures with electronic voting systems. Indeed, just three months ago, a computer science expert in Curling v. Raffensperger, Case No. 1:17-cv-02989-AT (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Ga.), identified catastrophic failures in electronic voting machines used in sixteen states, including Arizona,” the petition began.
Not only are the machines catastrophically susceptible to hacking, the complaint notes that “only three companies collectively provide voting machines and software for 90% of all eligible voters in the United States.”
The technical management of our elections has been farmed out to this vendor triad. “Jurisdictions throughout the nation, including Arizona, have functionally outsourced all election operations to these private companies. In the upcoming Midterm Election, over three thousand counties across the United States will have delegated the governmental responsibility for programming and administering elections to private contractors,” the complaint continued.
“This includes all counties in Arizona, most of which have contracted with Dominion or ES&S to provide machines, software, and services for the Midterm Election. For example, in Defendant Maricopa County, officials do not possess credentials necessary to validate tabulator configurations and independently validate the voting system prior to an election. Dominion maintains those credentials.”
The Plaintiffs are seeking “an Order that Defendants collect and count votes through a constitutionally acceptable process, which relies on tried and true precepts that mandates integrity and transparency. This includes votes cast by hand on verifiable paper ballots that maintains voter anonymity; votes counted by human beings, not by machines; and votes counted with transparency, and in a fashion observable to the public.”
Read more | Lake Finchem Complaint
Related | KanekoaTheGreat Substack: 110 Articles on America’s Compromised Voting Machines
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
