Уже доступно! Исследование Telegram 2025 — ключевые инсайты года 
LAW Notes Llb Notes Judiciary Notes
Открыть в Telegram
Law Notes Available here English & Hindi. Contact @Avanishbly
Больше📈 Аналитический обзор Telegram-канала LAW Notes Llb Notes Judiciary Notes
Канал LAW Notes Llb Notes Judiciary Notes (@law_notes_llb_notes) языкового сегмента Английский является активным участником. Сейчас сообщество объединяет 22 687 подписчиков, занимая 8 714 место в категории Образование и 18 717 место в регионе Индия.
📊 Показатели аудитории и динамика
С момента создания невідомо проект демонстрирует стремительный рост, собрав аудиторию из 22 687 подписчиков.
Согласно последним данным от 28 июня, 2026, канал показывает стабильную активность. За последние 30 дней изменение числа участников составило -158, а за последние 24 часа — -2, при этом общий охват остаётся высоким.
- Статус верификации: Не верифицирован
- Уровень вовлечённости (ER): Средний показатель вовлечённости аудитории составляет 2.35%. В первые 24 часа после публикации контент обычно набирает 0.78% реакций от общего числа подписчиков.
- Охват публикаций: В среднем каждый пост получает 534 просмотров. В течение первых суток публикация набирает 177 просмотров.
- Реакции и взаимодействия: Аудитория активно поддерживает контент: среднее количество реакций на один пост — 1.
- Тематические интересы: Контент сосредоточен на ключевых темах, таких как judiciary, judge, supreme, act, upsc.
📝 Описание и контентная политика
Автор описывает ресурс как площадку для выражения субъективного мнения:
“Law Notes Available here English & Hindi.
Contact @Avanishbly”
Благодаря высокой частоте обновлений (последние данные получены 29 июня, 2026) канал поддерживает актуальность и высокий уровень охвата публикаций. Аналитика показывает, что аудитория активно взаимодействует с контентом, что делает его важной точкой влияния в категории Образование.
22 687
Подписчики
-224 часа
-267 дней
-15830 день
Архив постов
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
*🛡️First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951*
*💎Key Additions*
*♟️Article 15(4)*
Allowed the State to make special provisions for SEBCs, SCs, and STs.
*♟️Context* Added after the Champakam Dorairajan Case (1951) invalidated Madras's education reservation policy due to lack of constitutional backing.
*💎Article 31A, Article 31B & 9th Schedule*
*♟️Purpose* Protected land reform laws from judicial review, ensuring they couldn’t be invalidated for violating Fundamental Rights. *♟️Impact* Addressed challenges to land reforms, laying the foundation for the Basic Structure Doctrine and balancing Rights and Directive Principles.
*💎Key Changes*
♟️Article 19(2) & (6): Added grounds to restrict freedom of speech and expression, including Public Order, Friendly Relations with Foreign States, and Incitement to an Offence.
*💎Unique Context*
♟️Enacted by the Constituent Assembly, functioning as a provisional Parliament before the first Lok Sabha elections in 1952.
*💎Significance*
♟️Strengthened social justice by empowering the State to support marginalized communities.
♟️Facilitated agrarian reforms, ensuring smoother implementation of land redistribution policies.
♟️The First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951 showcased the Constitution's adaptability, setting precedents for balancing rights and directive principles.
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
*🛡️A Secular State*
♟️The Constitution of India stands for a Secular State. Hence, it does not uphold any particular religion as the official religion of the Indian State.
♟️The following provisions of the Constitution reveal the secular character of the Indian State:
♟️The term ‘secular’ was added to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976.
♟️The Preamble secures to all citizens of India liberty of belief,Faith and worship.
♟️The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or equal protection of the laws (Article 14).
♟️The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on the ground of religion (Article 15).
♟️Equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters of public employment (Article 16).
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Which one of the following objectives is not embodied in the Preamble to the Constitution of India ?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Union Home Minister is the Chairman of?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
With reference to 73rd amendment act of the constitution, a Gram Sabha is a body consisting of?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Which one of the following expenditure is not charged on the Consolidated Fund of India?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Prior to the completion of tenure, the Lok Sabha can be dissolved?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
In an Indian democratic setup, the Judiciary is?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
"The pocket of the Indian President is bigger than that of American President." Which among the following statements justifies the remark?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
What is correct about the powers of Zila Panchayats of Scheduled Areas?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
According to the Constitution of India the term ‘District Judge’ shall not include?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Regarding the distribution of powers between Center and Dtate, which of the following statement is incorrect?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
The Government of India Act of 1919 clearly defined. ?
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Which of the following terms feature in the Preamble to Indian Constitution?
1. Secular 2. Fraternity 3. Communism 4. Equality 5. Inclusive Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
*🛡️Directive Principles Of State policy DPSP*
♟️The constitution of India aims to establish not only political democracy but also socioeconomic justice to the people to establish a welfare state.
♟️These provisions are given in Part IV of Indian Constitution.
♟️Directive Principles of state policy are in the form of instructions to the governments at the centre as well as states.
♟️Though these principles are non justiciable, they are fundamental in the governance of the country.
♟️The idea of the Directive Principles of State Policy has been taken from the
Irish Republic .
♟️The Directive Principles of State policy were incorporated in our constitution in order to provide economic justice and to avoid concentration of wealth in the hands of few people.
♟️The constitution covers from Article 36 to 51 as Directive Principles of State
Policy.
♟️They are unique blend of socialistic, liberal, democratic and Gandhian Principles.
♟️They describe as the ‘conscience of the constitution’.
♟️In the “State of Tamil Nadu etc. Vs L.Abu Kavur Bai” case in 1984 , the Supreme court held that although directive principles of State Policy are not enforceable, yet the court should not avoid them.
🔥 BIHAR APO 2026 – AB SABSE BADI TAIYAARI! 🔥
🚀 Sbse Best Team | Sbse Comprehensive Batch | Sbse Sasta 🚀
Agar Bihar APO 2026 nikalna hai to ab delay nahi –
Aaj se hi taiyaari shuru karo! 💯
✅ Prelims + Mains + Interview – All in One Batch
✅ All Law Subjects + All GK Subjects
✅ Live Classes + Recorded Support
✅ English + Hindi Medium
✅ 20+ Mock Tests + Complete Study Material
✅ By Pawan Varshney Sir (Former Bihar A.P.O.)
💸 Quality bhi… Price bhi!
👉 Sabse best, sabse sasta comprehensive batch – sirf ₹4,999/-
📢 Batch START ho chuka hai!
Race me aage rehna hai to abhi join karo,
kyunki jo pehle shuru karta hai wahi jeet ta hai! 🏆
📲 Scan QR / Join Now
https://pathc.on-app.in/app/oc/784067/pathc?utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=student-course-referral&utm_campaign=course-overview
👨⚖️ Bihar APO 2026 ka dream – ab bilkul real banega,
Paathshala Classes ke saath! 💪🔥
👉 Late mat karo… Aaj se taiyaari, kal selection! 🚀
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
*♟️Qualification Of Judges*
♟️A person to be appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court should have the following qualifications:-
✔️He should be a citizen of India.
✔️a) He should have been a judge of a High Court (or high courts in succession) for five years; or (b) He should have been an advocate of a High Court (or High Courts in succession) for ten years; or (c) He should be a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the president.
♟️From the above, it is clear that the Constitution has not prescribed a minimum age for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court.
