Mr. Waleed Algeap( English 4 All_ IELTS_ PTE _TOEFL _ LOCAL TOEFL _Methodology _ Literature _ Linguistics ) 📚
Открыть в Telegram
4 328
Подписчики
Нет данных24 часа
+87 дней
+6930 дней
Архив постов
Repost from Madleen Nabil | High School English
مراجعة شاملة لقواعد اللغة الإنجليزية للصف العاشر، مع خمسة نماذج تدريبية
الفتره الدراسية الأولى 2026-2027
Repost from Mir's IELTS
The line graph compares the proportion of employees who were absent from work for at least one day due to illness in five European countries between 1991 and 2001. Overall, the proportion of workers taking sick leave in France followed a downward trend, whereas the opposite was true of the other countries. The Netherlands recorded the highest figures for most of the period. Of particular note is that Sweden experienced the most pronounced increase, eventually overtaking France, while the UK and Germany showed relatively little overall change, with the latter consistently recording the lowest figures.
France was the only country in which illness-related absence became less common over the period. In 1991, approximately 5% of employees took sick leave, and this figure edged up slightly to 5.2% before gradually declining to 3% by 2001, causing France to lose its leading position.
Meanwhile, the Netherlands and Sweden experienced upward trends, albeit to varying degrees. The former, initially a close runner-up at approximately 4.8%, saw a modest increase to 5.5% the following year, thereby overtaking France to become the country with the highest proportion of employees taking sick leave. Although this figure subsequently fell to 4.2% midway through the period, it recovered to approximately 5.3% by the final year, remaining considerably higher than those of the other countries. Sweden also experienced a notable increase, although less pronounced. After remaining relatively stable at around 3% between 1991 and 1995, the figure rose steadily to 4.5% in 1999, surpassing France and placing Sweden second. Thereafter, the rate of increase slowed, with the proportion reaching 4.8% by 2001.
The UK and Germany, by contrast, followed broadly similar patterns. Both initially recorded considerably lower proportions than the other countries, at approximately 2.2% and 1.9%, respectively, with Germany registering the lowest figure on the chart. Despite some fluctuations during the intervening years, both countries ended the period at approximately their initial levels.
#Task1 #Mirwrites ✍️
Repost from Mir's IELTS
The table compares monetary donations to developing nations from three sources between 2006 and 2010. Overall, aid from all three sources rose over the period, with the US increasing most sharply and consistently dominating total contributions. Notably, The total nearly doubled.
In 2006, the contribution from the US constituted the majority (two-thirds) of the total, at $9.7B, roughly double the EU's 3.3 billion and other countries' 2.7 billion combined.
Thereafter, the US continued to provide the largest share, which peaked at around three-quarters of the total in 2009. Its donations also rose the most dramatically and consistently, in both absolute and relative terms: after a modest $0.8B rise in 2007, the figures increased by 3-4 billion annually, reaching a striking 22.7 billion by 2010, more than double its initial level.
Meanwhile, the EU and other countries followed almost identical patterns. EU figures rose to $3.8B, dipped by $0.1B, then recovered to $4billion, while those for other countries stayed about 0.5–0.7 billion lower, except in 2009, when a sharper dip widened the gap to $1.1B. The rankings therefore never changed: both groups remained far behind the US, and the gap grew more pronounced over time. On the whole, the total went up to $20.4B in 2008 before ending at $30B.
#Sample
TRANSLATION GRADE 12.pdf16.41 MB
TRANSLATION GRADE 11.pdf1.92 MB
TRANSLATION GRADE 10.pdf4.83 KB
📕📕ملفات الترجمة للمرحلة الثانوية 10 - 11 - 12 👇👇
دليل_معادلة_الشهادات.pdf1.38 MB
