HapaPerspective 🇺🇸

Can we please oppose Israel without making common cause with fags who want to abolish borders and want to give turbo gibs (reparations) to blacks?

John Doyle calls out the anti-white third worldism of Dugin and Ztards

In this alternate timeline, if the British Empire decided to later colonize Canada or Australia, it likely wouldn’t have happened earlier than the late 19th century, because they would have spent so much more time on the original 13 colonies.

In other words, the American victory forced the British Empire to expand elsewhere, which worked out well for the Anglo race. The British Empire's Loss was a victory for the collective expansion of the Anglosphere.

This is actually a bit ironic coming from a Canadian nationalist Telegram account. If the loyalists had won The American Revolutionary War of the late 18th century, the American colonies would still have become an independent country, just a bit later on the timeline (like the way Canada did) and the British Empire wouldn't have bothered to colonize Canada and Australia, creating new Anglosphere nations — which isn't the outcome you'd want if you like Anglo Canada or Australia. Also, no manifest destiny: most of the western half of the North American continent (West of the Appalachian Mountains) would probably be speaking Spanish and be more brown/injun. I also believe that we would have still received most of the Ellis Island Whites, they would have just arrived a bit later. https://t.me/fortissaxistyping/9874

This is actually a bit ironic coming from a Canadian nationalist Telegram account. If the loyalists had won The American Revolutionary War of the late 18th century, the American colonies would still have become an independent country, just a bit later on the timeline (like the way Canada did) and the British Empire wouldn't have bothered to colonize Canada and Australia, creating new Anglosphere nations — which isn't the outcome you'd want if you like Anglo Canada or Australia. Also, no manifest destiny: most of the western half of the North American continent (West of the Appalachian Mountains) would probably be speaking Spanish and be more brown/injun. I also believe that we would have still received most of the Ellis Island Whites, they would have just arrived a bit later. https://t.me/fortissaxistyping/9874

#kalergiworld

My message for Italian-Americans who want to do the whole 'coalition of the oppressed bit' where they pretend they're just like Jews, Blacks, etc. as a fringe, non-mainstream and non-white group in American society: Your people were doing based things in Africa alongside the other Europeans. Like the Gaul, Anglo, and Germanic, the Roman too enthusiastically took up the white man's burden in Africa. While the British were mowing down Muslim armies in Sudan, your people were kicking the Turks out of Libya and doing Italian settler colonialism there. By the 1930s, Libya was over 10% Italian and on its way to becoming its own South Africa on the Mediterranean. Italians took part in white supremacy, white settler colonialism and white civilizing in Africa and they should be proud of that. Beyond that, Italians settled in South America in large numbers from Venezuela to Tierra Del Fuego throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, building on the legacy of their own Columbus and the conquistadors. Italians are a globe-spanning white group much like the Anglos, Germans, and French. This tells a story far nobler than, 'we faced anti Italian discrimination at Ellis Island.' You will join your white, European brothers and be happy.

👆 They need another 9/11 style terrorist attack to drum up support for the war in Iran.

BREAKING: The White House has reportedly blocked intelligence agencies from warning law enforcement about new terror threats to the U.S. homeland linked to the war with Iran. @GeneralMCNews

Asked if the US attacked a desalination plant in Iran, Pres. Trump says Iranians are "among the most evil people ever on earth." "They cut babies' heads off—they chop women in half..." "I know nothing about a desalinization plant, other than to say, if they're complaining about a desalinization plant, we complain about the fact they shouldn't be chopping babies' heads off." Trump envoy Steve Witkoff and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth can be seen nodding in agreement.

Fresh pile of horse manure from thr Economist. For this to be true wages should be rising through these sectors- which they arent. Labor shortage is a myth. Its always a discreet method for more migrants and depressing wages. If there was a shortage they can raise wages and attract more people to work in these jobs. If the unemployment rate isnt close to zero there is no such thing as a labor shortage.

While I am strongly pro Ukraine and will continue to be so, I do not like the reflexive anti-Americanism I see from many WN Ukraine supporters. Their main argument is that America and Americans are just like Russians, the same flavor essentially as Yockey's "Enemy of Europe". This ignores that white Americans, unlike Russians, are overwhelmingly pro Ukraine. Even today, in 2026, I still see Ukraine flags proudly flown in public, but I have never seen a Russian one. Trump is pro Russia because he is compromised by the KGB/Mossad over Epstein. Vance is pro Russia because of his ties to tech bros who for the most part are not white (and therefore not Americans) and massively out of touch with normal white American public opinion. They want America to become an oligarchy ruling over hopeless, demoralized, atomized masses of slaves, much like Russia is today. Their societal aspirations are sick and have nothing to do with white Americans' historical proud adherence to white republicanism and revulsion towards all forms of tyranny whether from King George III or oriental despotism.

Grok is officially superior to ChatGPT. It’s real: https://x.com/grok/status/2029852276047663585

I swear, the censorship embedded within AI makes it retarded on certain issues. I heard most of the GPU power behind AI is just being used to keep it from becoming “racist” From what I know, that means there’s entire warehouses filled with millions of dollars of hardware that consume millions of dollars of energy, again, just to keep it from becoming “racist.” What a waste of energy and power!

I’m not absolutely convinced that 18th century Americans were so radically different from modern Americans. Sure, they were more physical and less fat, and lived a more traditional life; but at their core they’re the same people as today, we’re all just reacting to different environments pressures and comforts.

Yarvin here is factually wrong about why/how the 18th century Americans got into an armed revolt against the British Empire — the Americans back then weren’t so totally different from Americans today, at least regarding this threshold for rebellion — they really tried to find political solutions to their problems for at least a decade. It took a long time for 18th century Americans to pick up their arms — and most of didn’t until the war was officially on. And when the first shots were fired, it was a likely an accident. No one officially authorized or intended for a war to happen, it was all just years of escalations leading to the shots on the Lexington Green. We’ve all heard the story that it “Americans started a war over a 2% tax” which is such a gross oversimplification that it’s a lie. Yarvin is perpetuating this popular lie, and maybe he knows it’s a lie. I don’t even think it’s accurate to say that 18th century Americans started the war at all. What is a fair point is to question how Americans will react to mass immigration. It’s not that Americans now lack the balls to do anything, but Americans are a civil, generally law abiding people — they aren’t going to just grab their AR15s and shoot up any migrants on the street. The 18th century Americans wouldn’t have done that either. Mass immigration is a very different issue compared to a foreign military presence. The migrants coming here are not here as an organized military force to impose new laws on behalf of a foreign government, but as mostly unarmed civilians that are just ending up here for economic reasons. It’s a radically different issue. https://t.me/TheIvorssonDilemma/451

Yarvin here is factually wrong about why/how the 18th century Americans got into an armed revolt against the British Empire — the Americans back then weren’t so totally different from Americans today, at least regarding this threshold for rebellion — they really tried to find political solutions to their problems for at least a decade. It took a long time for 18th century Americans to pick up their arms — and most of didn’t until the war was officially on. And when the first shots were fired, it was a likely an accident. No one officially authorized or intended for a war to happen, it was all just years of escalations leading to the shots on the Lexington Green. We’ve all heard the story that it “Americans started a war over a 2% tax” which is such a gross oversimplification that it’s a lie. Yarvin is perpetuating this popular lie, and maybe he knows it’s a lie. I don’t even think it’s accurate to say that 18th century Americans started the war at all. What is a fair point is to question how Americans will react to mass immigration. It’s not that Americans now lack the balls to do anything, but Americans are a civil, generally law abiding people — they aren’t going to just grab their AR15s and shoot up any migrants on the street. The 18th century Americans wouldn’t have done that either. Mass immigration is a very different issue compared to a foreign military presence. The migrants coming here are not here as an organized military force to impose new laws on behalf of a foreign government, but as mostly unarmed civilians that are just ending up here for economic reasons. It’s a radically different issue.