Friendly Sperg

As it looks that my followers are largely anti-democracy, a thought: Even though the masses should not have collective say in state-level operations, the purpose of the state is still ultimately to serve the people by ensuring their collective wellbeing, both spiritually and materially, and an advantage of an openly autocratic state is direct accountability to those in power. Like historically with monarchs, if they weren't meeting the needs of the people, they were beheaded and replaced, and a downfall of a system like parliamentary-democracy is the distribution of responsibility across a never ending muddle of bureaucrats. "Who's head do you cut off in a democracy?" ect.

The irony of making these polls is not lost on me.

Leftists: "Racist jokes are never really jokes, they're indicative of real underlying bigotry" Also leftists:

Majority = most of = more likely than not Plurality = the largest share of = most likely Understanding the subtle, yet huge differences between these phrases is crucial to get people to be more vigilant of media and leftist lies.

"most likely" and "more likely than not" are two VERY different phrases. But because the difference isn't immediately noticeable, the media will take advantage of that to mislead people. If someone uses the first phrase to try and convince you of the second, they are trying to deceive you.

> Mentions the great replacement Should we mention that only 58% of births in 2020 were recorded as white British? No, let's just mention the fact that a recent shooter believed it. Clear which way they're trying to sway the reader.

You get shitlibs in the FBPE crowd who'd regard the Daily Mail as far right. When in reality they're just shitlibs themselves who know their audience. But at the end of the day they use the exact same tactics, like mentioning the Great Replacement and then immediately referencing a shooting to create that Cognitive link between the two.

French Survive the Jive

Photoshooped Stalin vs Real Stalin

I'd say this is evident of young people, especially women, wanting some form of label they can identify with that makes them feel different (ironic considering it's the most basic bitch thing you can do now) Most "bisexual" women under 30 haven't been with a woman in the past 5 years, likely never. In my personal experience a majority of teenage girls I've met aged around 18-19 or whatever have said that they're bisexuals.

Also, not to mention that kids now are raised without any identity or purpose, next to no children are raised religious, or to have a national identity, or to have any sense of belonging to a community whatsoever. But then they reach puberty and all of a sudden these nice friendly groups on the internet with their labels, flags, patches, symbols, and identities come along... Of course kids are going to be vulnerable to it. They've been provided with absolutely no other medium to form group based identities for their entire childhoods. And these leftist freaks will exploit that vulnerability and need for an identity, by pushing puberty blockers on them and given them a nice pretty colourful flag to wave representing "who they are".

This whole idea that there's more young people coming out as trannies just because "it's more accepted now" is fucking bullshit. 1. 13 year olds do not give a single shit about what is accepted, they dress, speak, and act like wankers constantly anyway so I doubt societal acceptance is behind why they all want to cut their tits off all of a sudden 2. It's not more accepted now, when I was younger I never heard a thing about trannies positive or negative, you'd just hear the occasional mention of crossdressers or ladyboys in Thailand. Now everyone hears about trannies constantly and tbh 90% of it is negative, and I'm talking about normal people on the street. Nobody likes trannies. 3. There is a clear massive correlation between leftist nonce influencers on TikTok, YouTube, Twitter, Reddit ect. And these young people now saying they're trans. It's not because it's "socially acceptable". It's because it's actively pushed in certain online communities that kids easily stumble across without their parents knowing. AKA, grooming.

New: https://stonetoss.com/comic/the-shepherd/

Found a big wasp hive

Why is this new Kenobi show trying to now say that Leia and Obi-Wan had a close personal bond 9 years before A New Hope where she gives little to no fuck that he's just been evaporated in front of her by Vader. Inb4 moral fagging "stop watching Star wars" stfu

Tbh I think the people dismissing the COVID lockdowns as "been and gone" and rubbing that in the faces of more conspiratorial people on the DR is maybe a bit premature. The precedent has been set now, the states of the world now know how receptible their citizens are to being lockdowns under certain circumstances like "public health emergencies" and the idea of those lockdowns is now largely normalised in most cultures now. Why are people assuming that won't be used by states in the future using different justifications, just because it wasn't an immediate transition from COVID lockdowns to other lockdowns?