🦄 Startups & VCs (Web3, AI & SaaS)
Открыть в Telegram
Fundraising tips, investor insights & startup growth tactics for Web3, AI & SaaS founders. Deck reviews, VC databases, startup deals & perks, tokenomics tools & more → https://innmind.com/
Больше4 027
Подписчики
+924 часа
+777 дней
+25230 день
Архив постов
Applying to 20 accelerators and hearing nothing back?
Most founders do this because they’re using bad lists.
This is different.
113 real, active Web3 accelerators for 2026. Manually researched and structured so you can filter by what actually matters (region, focus area, funding, ecosystem, etc) and apply with better targeting.
https://innmind.com/downloads/web3-startup-accelerators-database-2026/
Worth it if you’re serious about raising this year.
🇪🇺 Everyone's staring at the US-China AI war… Meanwhile Europe quietly took the money.
Look at Q1 2026 numbers:
▪️ AI = 51% of ALL equity investment in Europe (Sifted)
▪️ €23.5B into EU AI in 2025, up from €17.7B (FT)
▪️ €1.4B in seed rounds in Q1 alone (Tech.eu)
Now look at where it went with top 10 pre-seed deals map 👆
Zero consumer chatbots. Zero "AI for everything." It's manufacturing, defense, airline ops, biotech, compliance, quant trading. AI that replaces expensive experts, not AI that entertains users.
And no single megafund is writing these checks. Sector specialists are: EF, Project A, Frst, Seraphim - plus Merantix just launched a €103M early-stage AI fund for Europe.
Translation for founders: US/China are fighting the model war. Europe is trying to win the application war - boring, regulated, B2B workflows that have to exist anyway. "Boring" here means durable.If you're building AI in Europe, keep in mind: → Vertical > horizontal → Industrial > consumer → Agents + operational data > demos 🔉 We track who's funding what in Europe. And use the datasets to match pre-seed & seed startups with most active relevant investors in PitchPop. DM us if you’re testing it now. P.S. Pre-seed founders in industrial AI, defense, compliance, or AI agents - make a startup profile on InnMind to get investors exposure.
📊 Paper ROI Can Be a Trap. Liquidity Tells the Real Story
Many Web3 founders and investors still evaluate presales using one number: Paper ROI.
Looks great on a spreadsheet. Looks much less impressive when only 10-20% of tokens unlock at TGE 👀
Here's the problem:
A $1,000 allocation bought at $0.05 and listed at $0.10 shows +100% Paper ROI.
Sounds like a win. But if only 20% unlocks at TGE:
✅ Paper value = $2,000
⚠️ Liquid value at TGE = $400
The allocation doubled on paper, yet only 40% of the original investment is actually accessible. This is why smart investors don't stop at ROI. They also check:
🔹 Liquid value at TGE
🔹 TGE-only break-even price
🔹 FDV at listing
🔹 Initial circulation
🔹 Vesting schedule and cliff periods
In today's market, where fundraising is harder and every dollar matters, founders can't afford to ignore tokenomics signals that investors analyze during due diligence.
A token sale isn't only about entry price. It's about understanding:
📌 How much capital is actually liquid
📌 How much valuation pressure exists after launch
📌 Whether the listing scenario is realistic
🔎 Quick diagnostic before joining a presale:
If most of the upside comes from tokens that stay locked for months, your actual risk may be very different from what the headline ROI suggests.
Understanding that difference takes 5 minutes and can save costly mistakes later.
🧮 AlphaMind's new article breaks down the difference between Paper ROI and Liquid ROI, with practical examples, break-even calculations, FDV analysis, and a free calculator to test your own scenarios.
👉 Read the full guide
💬 What metric do you check first before joining a token sale: ROI, FDV, unlocks, or vesting?
🔥 Zendesk Perk Just Got a Serious Upgrade
InnMind founders, this one hits different 🚀
You can now access $25,000 for free in Zendesk tools and build world-class customer support without draining your runway.
What’s new?
You’re getting the full Resolution Suite with AI Copilot + AI Agents included 🤖
That means faster replies, automated resolutions, and way less manual support work from your team.
Zendesk grows with you from day one to scale stage. No complex setup. No extra hires just to handle support.
Here’s what you get in one package👇
▪️ Up to 50 seats on Suite Professional
▪️ AI-powered replies and automation
▪️ 5 help centers for different products or regions
▪️ Full API access for custom workflows
▪️ No-code App Builder to streamline operations
💡 Why founders love it
You stay focused on product and growth while support runs in the background, smarter and faster.
Trusted by 50,000+ startups worldwide 🌍
👉 Claim your perk
Turn support into a growth engine ⚡️
Most X marketing reports are BS.
You've had this pitch from your marketing team or agency: "14M impressions, 5% engagement, +2,000 followers."
On paper, such KOL / crypto-Twitter deck looks great. Did it bring you one real user or investor?
NotPeople founders audited 9 X-distribution vendors. Result is depressive:
• The metrics every report leads with (impressions, engagement, followers) predict actual pipeline at r=0.14. Basically noise.
• The metrics nobody puts in the deck (age of the reply accounts, paced vs burst replies, on-topic %, whether Perplexity & Claude actually cite you) predict it at 0.71. ~5× the signal.
One question for your next marketing call:
👉 "What's our AI-citation share this month vs. baseline?"
Can't answer it = they're not measuring what compounds in 2026.
Read full breakdown + a 15-min checklist to audit any vendor report or contact NotPeople team here.
We share what keeps founders from burning money. More soon. 👇
🔥 Your AI Stack Is Probably Slowing You Down
Most founders won’t admit this, but it’s happening everywhere:
You add one AI tool → then another → then five more
And suddenly your “productivity stack” becomes chaos.
Tabs everywhere. Subscriptions piling up.
And somehow… things don’t move faster.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth 👇
💡 AI is not your advantage anymore
⚡ How you choose and use it is
The best startup teams right now are not chasing every new tool.
They’re building lean, focused systems that actually work.
What that looks like in practice:
• one place where your team thinks and operates
• one system that captures and learns from conversations
• one layer that automates repetitive work
• one engine for consistent content and distribution
• one way to truly understand user behavior.
Simple. But powerful.
Most founders overcomplicate this.
And pay for it with time, focus, and execution speed
We broke this down in our latest guide.
No hype. Just what actually works in real startup workflows
👉 Best AI Tools for Startups in 2026: What Is Actually Worth Using
Cut the noise. Build a stack that works 🚀
🔥 Where Web3, AI & Institutional Innovation Meet This Fall
Fresh events just landed in the InnMind Events Calendar — and we’re proud to support some of the most exciting gatherings across Web3, AI, regulation, and institutional blockchain adoption. 🌍
From crypto taxation and institutional digital assets to AI x Web3 convergence and women leading the AI revolution — these events bring together founders, investors, builders, and ecosystem leaders from around the world.
👉 Explore the full InnMind Events Calendar
Save the dates, grow your network, discover new opportunities, and connect with the people shaping the future of tech. 🔥
Crypto Tax Forum 2026
📅 September 9, 2026
The Crypto Tax Forum is the world’s first conference fully dedicated to crypto asset taxation and regulation in the metaverse. The event gathers experts from Interpol, OECD, EU institutions, tax authorities, Web3 companies, auditors, and legal professionals to discuss the future of crypto compliance, AML, and blockchain regulation. Attendees will also receive 10 CPE points, a Certificate of Attendance, and an NFT POAP. 🎓
🎟 Early bird tickets are available now
🎁 Use promo code to get 30% OFF: innmind30
European Blockchain Convention
📅 September 16–17, 2026
EBC12 returns to Barcelona as one of Europe’s leading institutional blockchain events, bringing together 6,000+ attendees from over 70 countries. Expect high-level discussions around digital asset infrastructure, tokenization, stablecoins, regulation, institutional capital allocation, and AI-driven financial systems. Major participants include BlackRock, Cardano, Bitwise, WisdomTree, Zodia Custody, Hilbert Capital, and many more. 🇪🇺
🎟 Tickets are now available
💡 Use code IM_15 to get 15% OFF your ticket
Web3 x AI Fusion Singapore
📅 October 6, 2026
Web3 x AI Fusion is a focused industry meetup exploring the practical convergence of artificial intelligence and decentralized technologies. The event is designed for founders, developers, AI engineers, investors, and builders working on next-generation infrastructure, decentralized AI systems, smart contract automation, and AI-powered dApps. Expect curated discussions, high-signal networking, and collaboration opportunities with innovators actively building at the intersection of AI and Web3. 🤖
EmpowHER in AI – Singapore
📅 October 6, 2026
EmpowHER in AI is a global initiative dedicated to empowering women leaders, founders, investors, and innovators shaping the future of artificial intelligence. The event combines networking, fireside chats, and panel discussions focused on inclusive innovation, leadership, AI adoption, and emerging technologies. It’s a great opportunity to connect with a high-quality community of entrepreneurs, VCs, AI professionals, and changemakers driving the next wave of innovation. 🌸
🌐 Don’t forget to check the InnMind Events Calendar regularly for more global Web3 and AI events, networking opportunities, pitch sessions, and ecosystem gatherings: InnMind Events Calendar
🚀 New Perks for Founders Who Want to Save Runway, Time & Nerves
Early-stage startups rarely lack tools. They lack budget, time, and operational focus.
That’s why we added 3 new perks to InnMind Perks Club👇
🧠 Zendesk for Startups
Get up to $25’000 in benefits FREE for 6 months to build world-class customer support without draining your runway.
▪️ AI Copilot + AI Agents included
▪️ Up to 50 seats
▪️ Automated customer support
▪️ Full API access
▪️ No-code workflow builder
Perfect for startups scaling support without hiring a huge team.
💸 Causo AI Fundraising Automation. 50% OFF for InnMind founders
Turn your pitch deck into AI-powered VC outreach:
Causo helps founders find relevant VC partners, create personalized outreach in their own voice, manage follow-ups directly from Gmail, and keep fundraising campaigns organized without endless spreadsheets.
Less spreadsheet chaos. More investor conversations.
🛡 LOT Network
FREE for startups under $25M revenue.
Join 6,100+ companies protected against patent trolls, including Coinbase, Meta, OpenSea, Circle & Ledger.
▪️ Reduce legal risks
▪️ Protect innovation
▪️ Strengthen your IP position
Feel free to claim the deals. Small teams win when they remove operational noise early 🧡
💰 Record AI Funding Is Hiding a Brutal Reality for Founders
Earlier, we shared a striking trend in the AI industry:
⚡️ OpenAI and Anthropic control 88% of AI-native revenue
☁️ Amazon, Microsoft, and Google own 63% of cloud infrastructure
🖥 NVIDIA supplies 94% of GPUs powering AI data centers
Now we’re seeing the same pattern in venture funding.
Q1 2026 hit a record-breaking $297B in global VC funding. AI captured around 80% of it.
Sounds bullish, right?
But here’s the catch 👇
Most of that capital is flowing into a tiny group of companies, while seed-stage founders are fighting for visibility, replies, and investor attention.
In our new article, we break down what is really happening inside AI pre-seed and seed rounds in 2026:
📉 Why seed deal count is shrinking
💰 Why bigger rounds go to fewer startups
🧠 Why “AI-powered” pitches get ignored
⚙️ What investors actually want to see now
🚀 And how founders can improve their fundraising narrative before burning more leads
If you’re raising in AI or AI x Web3, this article will save you weeks of guessing.
📖 Read the full article
🤔 What do you think about this concentration trend in AI?
Is it a natural market evolution… or are we heading toward an ecosystem controlled by a handful of players?
🧠 So what actually works? ☑️ Watch liquidity, not only price A 10% drop with real depth is manageable. A 5% drop with an empty book can be much more dangerous. ☑️ Defend key levels before panic starts Support is useful when it is prepared early. If the team only reacts after the chart is already broken, the market usually demands much more effort to repair. ☑️ Keep the spread under control Wide spreads make traders feel like the market has been abandoned. Tight spreads show that the pair is still active, watched, and managed. ☑️ Avoid fake walls Huge artificial buy walls may look comforting for a moment, but traders notice when they disappear. Real support should be layered, believable, and consistent. ☑️ Communicate early If there is market-wide volatility, an unlock event, campaign-related sell pressure, or any other expected pressure, explain it before people start building theories. ☑️ Adjust the strategy daily The market does not care what worked last week. Market making has to follow current conditions, not old assumptions. The difference between a correction and a death chart is not just the size of the drop. It is what happens underneath it. 🔹 Are buyers still showing up? 🔹 Is liquidity still present? 🔹 Does the order book still have structure? 🔹 Is the spread controlled? 🔹 Does the chart still feel alive? A healthy correction scares weak hands. A death chart makes everyone question the project. The teams that survive are not the ones that avoid every dip. Nobody avoids every dip in crypto. They are the ones that understand which dips are normal, and which ones need action before the market makes that decision for them 🙏This is the 5th edition of #MarketMakerInsider (c) Contributed by @KadirovIbragim from EasyMM, a market-maker, trusted by many founders on InnMind.
4️⃣ The order book usually warns you before the chart does By the time Telegram starts panicking, the order book has usually been showing the problem for hours or even days. Depth starts getting thinner ➡️ Buy support moves lower ➡️ Sell pressure gets heavier ➡️ Spread slowly opens up ➡️ Small trades start moving price more than they should. ❕ None of this looks dramatic at first, which is exactly why teams miss it. They check the chart, see that the price has not fully collapsed yet, and assume everything is under control. But underneath the chart, the market is already becoming easier to break. The chart is what everyone sees. The order book is where the damage usually starts. 5️⃣ Fake support makes things worse A lot of teams panic and try to “show strength” by placing one huge buy wall. It looks good for a screenshot. The community relaxes for a few minutes. People say support is strong. The founder feels like something has been done. But traders are not stupid. If that wall is too obvious, too close, or disappears the moment real sell pressure comes in, it creates more fear than confidence. ❕ Because now the market has seen the support was not really support. Real support should not feel like one oversized number placed there to calm people down. It should be layered, believable, and consistent enough that traders feel there is actual structure behind the price. A market does not need to look artificially defended. It needs to look tradable. 6️⃣ Communication can stop a dip from becoming a story Every red candle creates a question. Sometimes the answer is simple. The market is down ➡️︎ An unlock happened ➡️︎ A campaign brought in short-term users ➡️︎ A large holder exited ➡️︎ A liquidity adjustment is in progress. ❕ But if the team says nothing, the community will create its own explanation. And that explanation is almost always worse than reality. Silence makes every red candle feel heavier. It turns normal volatility into suspicion, and suspicion into panic. Good communication does not mean promising the price will recover. That would be wrong and usually sounds desperate. It means giving context before people start writing their own version of events. A calm explanation at the right time can save the team days of damage control later. 7️⃣ The strategy has to change with the market A launch strategy is not the same as a post-campaign strategy. A recovery strategy is not the same as a growth strategy. What worked when hype was strong may completely fail once the first wave of attention is gone. The same setup that looked fine during high demand can become dangerous when sellers start testing the book. ❕ That is why market making cannot be treated like something you set once and forget. The market changes every day, and the strategy has to adjust with it. Otherwise, the chart starts reacting to yesterday’s conditions while the market has already moved on.
Depth starts getting thinner ➡️︎ Buy support moves lower ➡️︎ Sell pressure gets heavier ➡️︎ Spread slowly opens up ➡️︎ Small trades start moving price more than they should. ❕ None of this looks dramatic at first, which is exactly why teams miss it. They check the chart, see that the price has not fully collapsed yet, and assume everything is under control. But underneath the chart, the market is already becoming easier to break. The chart is what everyone sees. The order book is where the damage usually starts.
🔎 Market-Maker Insider #5: Here’s How Market Makers Spot the Difference
InnMind partner EasyMM is back with another deep dive into the realities of crypto market making #MarketMakerInsider
Today’s long-read dives into one of the most dangerous situations for any crypto project: when a “normal correction” quietly turns into a death chart ☠️
Read carefully, save for later, and use these insights to build stronger market foundations for your project.
Market-Maker Insider #5 A healthy correction and a death chart can look almost the same at the beginning ⚠️ That is what makes it dangerous. Price drops 12%. Community gets nervous. Founder says it is just normal volatility. Market maker says nothing critical yet. Holders remind each other that crypto always moves like this. And sometimes they are right. No chart goes up forever. Even strong tokens pull back after launch hype, after campaigns, after unlocks, or simply because the wider market is having a bad day. The problem is that not every dip is just a dip. 💡 Some drops are the first sign that the market structure underneath the token is starting to break. And if the team only looks at the price, they usually notice it too late. Here is how to tell the difference 👇 1️⃣ A healthy correction still has buyers In a normal pullback, the price can fall, but there are still buyers waiting at reasonable levels. Maybe the token drops 10–15%. Maybe the chart looks ugly for a few hours. But when the price reaches previous support areas, limit orders are still there, the spread does not completely open up, and the market still has two-sided activity. That means the market is cooling down, not disappearing. ❕ A death chart feels different. Price drops and nobody really steps in. Buy orders keep moving lower. Every small sell pushes the token further down. The spread gets wider, the book gets thinner, and the chart starts moving in one direction only. At that point, the issue is no longer “normal volatility.” It is liquidity leaving the market. 2️⃣ Volume during the drop tells you more than the drop itself Most founders look at the percentage first ⬇️ Down 8%. Down 15%. Down 25%. But the better question is not only how much the token dropped. The better question is what kind of volume created that move. If price is falling with active, balanced volume, it can still be normal market rotation. Some holders take profit, some short-term buyers leave, and new buyers enter lower. It is not pleasant, but the market is still functioning. ❕If price is falling on thin volume, that is a much worse signal. It means the token does not need serious sell pressure to move down. A few moderate sells are enough to break levels, which tells traders that there is not much real liquidity behind the price. And if price is falling on heavy sell volume with no recovery candles after, that is another problem. It means supply is hitting the market faster than demand can absorb it. So the real question is not, “Why did price drop?”. The real question is, “Was there enough liquidity to handle the drop?” 3️⃣ A healthy correction respects structure Strong charts usually have levels. ▪️ Previous support. ▪️ Accumulation zones. ▪️ High-volume areas. ▪️ Psychological prices where buyers tend to appear. A normal correction can test those levels. It can even briefly break below them and recover. That happens all the time. ❕ But a death chart ignores structure completely. It cuts through every level like nothing is there. No reaction. No bounce. No real buyer interest. Every support becomes just another line on the chart that nobody defended. And once the community sees that, panic becomes much easier to justify. People stop thinking, “This is a discount.” They start thinking, “There is no floor.” That shift is dangerous, because after that the problem becomes emotional, not only technical. 4️⃣ The order book usually warns you before the chart does By the time Telegram starts panicking, the order book has usually been showing the problem for hours or even days.
🔎 The AI Seed Market in 2026 Is Not What It Looks Like
🔥 AI is breaking fundraising records, yet early-stage founders are facing more silence than ever.
We just broke down what’s really happening behind AI seed rounds in 2026, based on live deal data and founder sessions across InnMind and PitchPop.
Here’s the reality most “AI funding trends” miss:
💰 Capital is massive, but extremely concentrated
80% of VC money is going into AI, yet most of it flows to a handful of mega players
📉 Seed deal count is falling
Fewer startups are getting funded, but those who do raise larger checks at higher valuations
🧠 AI premium is not universal
It mostly applies when founders have a strong pedigree or real production traction
⚙️ Seed now looks like old Series A
Investors expect pilots, revenue signals, and real-world usage, not just demos
🚫 Generic AI startups are getting filtered out
“AI-powered” is no longer a positioning advantage without clear execution depth
This is not a broken market. It is a filtered one.
We put together 7 deeper patterns shaping AI seed deals in 2026 and what actually works for founders raising right now.
📖 Read the full breakdown here
If you are building in AI or Web3 AI, this is the signal check before your next raise.
👋 we’re cooking something spicy.
We went through 100+ pre-seed & seed AI raises in 2026 and pulled out the real patterns that are actually winning right now.
Here’s the tl;dr you won’t find anywhere else:
1️⃣ The “execution gap” is everywhere, & it’s the single biggest silent killer in 2026. Everyone claims they solve it. Almost nobody actually does.
2️⃣ Vertical AI is absolutely dominating. Legal, medical, and real-estate ops plays are closing rounds in half the time of generic horizontal agent platforms.
3️⃣ The unsexy but insanely valuable layer right now? Last-mile agent infrastructure: dedicated email for agents, specialized search, autonomous goal-tracking systems. Boring on the surface, printing money underneath.
4️⃣ In regulated verticals, “AI psychosis” (hallucinations in high-stakes environments) is creating real moats for the teams that actually fix it.
Right now, as I’m typing this, InnMind team is turning all of this into a proper deep dive blog with founder quotes, data breakdowns, and what it actually means for builders and investors.
Drop 🔥 if you’re keen to read the dive-in in our blog soon.
💀 12 Reasons Crypto VCs Don’t Reply (And It’s Not What You Think)
If investors are not responding to your Web3 pitch deck…
It doesn’t automatically mean the market is bad. And it doesn’t mean your idea is weak either.
Most of the time, your deck just triggered a fast “disqualify” signal.
Here are the most common blockers 👇
💡 The real takeaway:
Most fundraising problems are not about effort. They are about the misalignment between how founders pitch and how VCs actually filter deals.
🧠 Understand what investors really want to see and what makes them ignore a deck within minutes 👇
Web3 Fundraising Blockers: Why Crypto VCs Ignore Your Deck
💀 12 Reasons Crypto VCs Don’t Reply (And It’s Not What You Think)
If investors are not responding to your Web3 pitch deck…
It doesn’t automatically mean the market is bad. And it doesn’t mean your idea is weak either.
Most of the time, your deck just triggered a fast “disqualify” signal.
Here are the most common blockers 👇
🧩 1. Token without a real job
“If users can pay in stablecoins, why does this token exist?”
⚠️ 2. Wrong fundraising instrument
SAFE, SAFT, token round… if it’s unclear, investors disengage.
🔀 3. Broken value split
If equity wins and token loses (or vice versa), it creates confusion.
📉 4. Premature TGE
A token launch without clear demand = instant risk signal.
🎯 5. Incentivized traction ≠ real adoption
Airdrops and quests don’t equal retention.
💰 6. TVL without quality
$5M TVL means nothing without duration, churn, and real yield context.
⚖️ 7. Compliance hand-waving
“We are non-custodial” is not a legal strategy.
🚀 8. Fake mass adoption GTM
“Next billion users” without a real wedge = instant skepticism.
🧭 9. Weak investor fit
Sending decks to 50 random VCs kills momentum, not builds it.
🧾 10. Advisory disguised as capital
Not every “investor” is actually writing checks.
🧱 11. Crypto adjacency confusion
If you are an equity SaaS, don’t pitch like a token protocol.
🏷 12. Category stigma
Some narratives get filtered before the deck is even read.
💡 The real takeaway:
Most fundraising problems are not about effort. They are about the misalignment between how founders pitch and how VCs actually filter deals.
🧠 Understand what investors really want to see and what makes them ignore a deck within minutes 👇
Web3 Fundraising Blockers: Why Crypto VCs Ignore Your Deck
Founders only: be brutally honest. Multi-select if 2-3 hit. We're using this to shape what to build next for YOUR startup
Web3 VC isn't dead. It's just much harder to read.
We scraped 2026 deal data to feed into PitchPop's new Web3 fundraising benchmark. Here's what's actually happening:
Babylon — $15M (a16z)
Exponent — $5M (Multicoin)
Nava — $8.3M (Polychain + Archetype)
SimpleChain — $15M seed
UnblockPay — $4.5M (Prelude)
+ 30 more in Q1 alone (not counting those that don’t have verified lead & captable info).
Median seed round: $4–8M. Hot verticals: RWA infra, AI agents, stablecoin rails. Instrument: equity + token warrant (demand for token/SAFT deals is all time low).
If your raise isn't moving - it's probably not the market. It's the shape of your round, who you're targeting, or what investors hear first.
PitchPop now maps your Web3 raise against benchmark data, and tells you where the gap is, what VCs are backing similar companies & recommends outreach messages for better conversions to reply.
Start free diagnosis 👉 pitchpop.app/web3-fundraising
Уже доступно! Исследование Telegram 2025 — ключевые инсайты года 
