ARYAH - Mountain of God

They were White.

"I AM A DISCIPLE OF THE ANOINTED JESUS AND I STAND BY AND STRIVE TO LIVE UNCOMPROMISINGLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF GOD AS FOUND AND DEMONSTRATED IN HIS ORIGINAL AUTOGRAPHS. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE PRESERVATION OF MY RACE AND ALL THAT GOD CREATED AND CALLED GOOD, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF GOD'S GOVERNMENT IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF MY ADAMIC ISRAELITE KINSMEN."

— BRUCE CAROLL PIERCE

"The ultimate objective of man should be self-sacrifice on behalf of his own people, to advance their cause and to edify their community...That is the essence of Christianity...Christianity is not found in ones mouth...Rather Christianity is found in one's actions. The man who spends his life...for the good of his own kindred that man is the ideal Christian even if he never professes Christ with his lips...The moral laws of God and a love for our kindred, that is all we need to be ideal Christians. All of the rituals...became superficial replacements for true Christianity, but none of them are actually Christian."

— William Finck of Christogenea, in The Role of Faith in a Successful Insurgency, Movement, or Community

CLARIFICATION POST (Part 2) Actual Point I Was Making:

Primary Thesis: The modern church is in such complete apostasy that even those who blaspheme God's name while practicing racial separation are closer to His Law than those who invoke His name while practicing race-mixing. This is a condemnation of the church. It is NOT an endorsement of Satanism/paganism/atheism. Secondary Thesis: The fact that every legitimate NS ideology, regardless of its religious framing, arrives at the same structural conclusions about race, Jews, social organisation, and eschatology, AKA "The Father's Will" is evidence that: 1. These truths are self-evident in creation (Romans 1:20) 2. God's Law is genetically encoded in our people (Isaiah 51:7) 3. Even in rebellion, Adamites cannot fully escape their nature This is an argument for Christian Identity's truth. Tertiary Thesis: From the parable of the Pharisee and Tax Collector (Luke 18), we learn that God justifies the humble sinner over the prideful hypocrite, therefore: — A secular racist who admits "I'm not a Christian" but advances The Father's Will — Is in a better position than a Judeo-Christian who says "Lord, Lord" but supports the destruction of his people Both need to repent, but the latter is further from the kingdom because he adds hypocrisy to his racial treason.

TLDR — I do not endorse NS Satanism/Paganism/Atheism in any form — I do not advocate turning a blind eye to the lies of NS Satanists/Pagans/Atheists — I believe NS Satanists/Pagans/Atheists must repent and strop rejecting the truth in unrighteous pride — The Law of God is written in Adamic DNA — This causes even rebellious Israelites to reconstruct its principles and by nature align themselves with The Will of the Father — Functional obedience is superior to mere lip service — Secular NS demonstrate the Law on their hearts. Judeo-Christians give lip service but violate it — This proves CI's theology while condemning the apostate church The parable was never meant to celebrate harlots, it was meant to shame Pharisees. My post was never meant to celebrate Satanists, it was meant to shame Judeo-Christians.

CLARIFICATION POST (1) (2) What I AM Saying:

1. Structural Analysis ≠ Moral Endorsement My chart comparing various NS religions was descriptive analysis. It was not prescriptive alliance-building. When a biologist identifies structural similarities between a wolf and a dog, he is not suggesting they should be treated identically or housed together. Similarly, identifying that Joy of Satan, Creativity, and Cosmotheism share the structural framework of CI (biological dualism, Jewish enemy identification, racial preservation goals, and apocalyptic eschatology) does not mean I endorse these movements or suggest cooperation with them. 2. The Parable Functions as Condemnation AND Recognition When Christ said "tax collectors and harlots enter the kingdom before you" He was: — Condemning the Pharisees for their hypocrisy. — Recognising that despised sinners who still did The Will of the Father were justified over the self-righteous who disobeyed I am making the exact same dual point: — Condemning Judeo-Christians who claim God's name while going against His will by supporting race-mixing and universalism — Recognising that non-Christian NS who practice racial separation are functionally closer to advancing The Father's Will than 99% of "Christians" This recognition does NOT mean harlots should remain harlots, or that tax collectors should continue extorting. 3. "Advancing the Will of the Father" ≠ "In Right Standing with the Father" A critical distinction that was apparently missed by many who have messaged me about this: — A pagan who practices racial separation and loves his brethren is doing The Will of the Father — However, he remains in rebellion by refusing to acknowledge Yahweh — He is like the "good soil with thorns", capable of fruit, but currently choked by pride and deception Romans 1 clearly states: Such people "suppress the truth in unrighteousness" and are "without excuse". They know God (evidenced by the fact they gravitate to loving their kinsmen and separating from the non-White races, in accordance with the Law written on their hearts) but reject Him in their pride. They must repent. 4. The Genetic Argument Explains Phenomenon, Doesn't Excuse Sin When I point out that the Law is written on the hearts of Israel (Jeremiah 31:33, Romans 2:14-15), I am explaining why we observe secular NS reconstructing (TRUE) Christian (i.e. CI) frameworks. This genetic reality does not excuse their blasphemy. It actually increases their guilt, because they demonstrate they know the truth but suppress it.

What I Am NOT Saying:

1. I Am NOT Advocating Tolerance of Satanism, Atheism, or Paganism When Christ ate with tax collectors, He was: — Calling them to repentance (not endorsing their behavior) — Ministering to the lost sheep of Israel (not forming political coalitions) — Demonstrating they were redeemable (because they were Adamic Israelites) We should recognise that secular NS are our kinsmen and, though rejecting him in their pride, advance the Will of The Father, not that we should turn a blind eye to their faleshood. 2. I Am NOT Claiming All Paths Lead to God The chart was designed to show that when you strip away religious framing, these ideologies reveal the same underlying racial worldview (The Will of the Father), which is actually evidence that: — God's Law is written on the Adamic heart (explaining the convergence) — Satan's tactics include mimicry (explaining the aesthetic inversion, 2 Corinthians 11:14) — The Spirit of Truth operates in their racial spirit (explaining why they can't escape it) This does not mean "all religions are equal". It means they are still Israelites who demonstrate the Law on their hearts while rebelling against its Author.

Extension The image above demonstrates the reality of this, showing how, when one strips away all aesthetic framing (theological-specific language, historical meta-narratives, etc.), the underlying structure, methods, aims, goals, and eschatology of the various faiths of modern National Socialism are identical. They all adhere to the "Universal Order" and advance the "Will of The Father", though only one professes His Holy Name. In the words of Christ, to those not advancing the Will of The Father, I have this much to say:

Assuredly, I say to you that Satanists and Pagans enter the kingdom of God before you.

@MountainOfGod

—Matthew 21:28-30—

"...A man had two sons, and having come forth to the first he said: ‘Son, go, today you must work in the vineyard.’ But he responding said ‘I do not want to’, however changing his line of conduct he went. Then coming forth to the other he spoke likewise. And responding he said “I shall, master’, yet he did not go. Who out of the two sons has done the will of the father?” They say “the first!" Jesus said to them, “Assuredly, I say to you that tax collectors and harlots enter the kingdom of God before you...

This passage serves as a typology of the conflict between secular-NS and Judeo-"Christians", specifically regarding the "will of the Father" as it pertains to racial preservation and the Law. "doing the will of the Father" is practical obedience to the Law, alone. Verbal profession is irrelevant. The highest Christian duties are to maintain the "kind after kind" creation of Yahweh (Leviticus 19:19), separate from those who are not "born from above" (2 Corinthians 6:17), and to "love your kinsman as yourself", which is the entire Law summarised (Galatians 5:14). The second son who says, "I shall", but does not go, is a type for the Judeo-"Christian". They claim to be "for God" and honour Him with their lips, but their "hearts are far from Him" because they consistently break His foundational commandments regarding racial separation. The first son who says, "I do not want to", but goes anyway, functions as a type for the secular-NS. They may claim to be "against God" because they perceive the corrupted, universalist church to be the true form of the religion, but by being "racists", they are doing the Father's will, whether they know it or not. However, many of these people have been exposed to the CI truth, yet reject it, and thus, though they do the will of the Father, they still "supress the truth in unrighteousness" for "that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them" and "they are without excuse. For even though they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God" and "Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the likeness of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures" (Romans 1). While the first son acts correctly, he needs to stop suppressing what he knows to be true in his unrighteous pride, repent, and realise the divine origin of his "genetic urging" (the Law of God, to love the brethren, written upon his heart (Jeremiah 31:33)). —Matthew 7:21—

Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter.

@MountainOfGod

—Deuteronomy 11:24—

Every place whereon the soles of your feet shall tread shall be yours.

—Deuteronomy 11:24—

Every place whereon the soles of your feet shall tread shall be yours.

Zionism is an ethnonationalist movement seeking to establish a Jewish ethnostate by colonizing Palestine. Now, as you’ve read the title, you may ask yourself “how the hell are these two words compatible?” Well they aren’t, Atleast using the definition we have mentioned. But if we look at it from a simple perspective, it’s just outright Jewish colonialism. We simply oppose Zionism because it ultimately benefits the kikes, “white Zionism” is the same principle, but applied to whites, it’s the Jewish colonialist mentality which we want to have. But we don’t abide by the bourgeoisie imperialism, the imperialism that only harvests the riches of the soil and gives it to the top 1%. Wherever the aryan man goes, that land has been promised to him by God and by the best men his race has produced. SIEGEKULTUR⚡️ SIMPLE X CHANNEL⚖️ THE BACKUP⚡️

Physical Descriptions of Israel 3rd Century Jesus Recently, a 3rd-century Christian fresco was discovered in an ancient burial chamber near Iznik, Turkey, the site of the old city of Nicaea. It shows Jesus as the “Good Shepherd,” surrounded by sheep, which was one of the earliest and most common symbolic depictions of Christ before the later Byzantine icon style developed. Archaeologists have described it as one of the best-preserved early images of Jesus ever found because much of the original colour and detail survived underground for centuries. The discovery gives us a rare look into how early Christians visually represented Jesus before Christianity became the dominant religion of the Roman Empire. It depicts him with clear Caucasoid features. It’s also worth noting that the pigment has likely faded over time and would’ve been lighter at the time it was created. Blut über alles. @Biospirituality ✝️

12 tribes. 12 apostles. 12 runes.

— Revelation 21:12

“And [the City of God] had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel”

@MountainOfGod White Europeans are the Israelites. The "jews" are not.

"As many as feared God...ran to Christ...For He said: 'Go ye to the sheep of the house of Israel, which have perished.' The Word of God...did righteously...redeem from [apostasy] His own property...not snatching away by stratagem the property of another, but taking possession of His own. This hand of God...has in the last times sought us out...winning back His own, and taking up the lost sheep upon His shoulders. He gathered from the ends of the earth...the children who were scattered abroad. Saith the Lord, I will gather Israel from all nations...Nations of those barbarians...[have] salvation written in their hearts by the Spirit. As the good olive, if neglected...does itself become a wild olive...The Church is the seed of Abraham...who will gather...those that shall be saved from all the nations. The Lord...has redeemed us...For the children of the desolate are more than of her which hath an husband."

— Irenaeus, Various Works. Christian Identity in the Church Fathers

Christian Identity in the Church Fathers Continuing my studies of some of the so-called ante-Nicene "Church Fathers", another who I have found to be highly palatable to Christian Identity, alongside Tertullian, is Irenaeus. Irenaeus was born to Christian parents around 130 AD, and later became the bishop of Lugdunum (Lyons) among the Keltæ of Gaul. He strongly emphasised the preservation of the Adamic archetype, the regathering of scattered Israel, and the destruction of the serpent's seed. Irenaeus can be read as supporting: — White Adamitism — Dual Seedline — The Israelite Identity of the so-called "Gentiles" — The Edomite/Canaanite Identity of the "Jews" The hermeneutics for each of these points are summarised very briefly below: — White Adamitism

Irenaeus repeatedly defines the visible apostolic Church within the White and (now) formerly White nations of the Graeco-Roman oikoumene: Germany, Spain, Gaul, Rome, the East, Egypt, Libya, the Central regions, and the Keltæ. These are the peoples among whom the "one and the same vivifying faith" and "unadulterated rule of truth" are preserved. Christ came to "sum up in Himself the ancient formation of Adam" and restore the "pristine nature of man." Those outside this restored order are repeatedly described as "animal", "irrational", "mere dumb animals", "waste water from a sink", and "nothing", while the Deluge itself was sent to preserve the Adamic archetype from corruption by the offspring of fallen angels.

— Dual Seedline

Irenaeus explicitly teaches that the apostate angel sowed "tares" among the wheat, and identifies those tares as "the children of the wicked one." Cain was "filled" with the spirit of the apostate angel, and "everyone of that race [of Cain[... was made like to the begetter [the apostate angel]." He repeatedly describes the wicked as "offspring of vipers", "sons and angels of the devil", "alienated from the womb", possessing "the likeness of a serpent." The antediluvian unions between angels and women produced an "infamous race of men" whom God destroyed to preserve the Adamic archetype, but who lived on through the seed of Ham.

— The Israelite Identity of the so-called "Gentiles"

Irenaeus presents Christ as coming specifically for the "lost sheep of the house of Israel" and for the purpose of "winning back His own." The believing nations of Europe — Germany, Gaul, Spain, and the Keltæ — are described as barbarians possessing the law written inwardly on their heart by the Spirit. Through the metaphor of the wild olive tree, Irenaeus argues that the "wild" branches are actually the original olive gone wild through neglect and paganism, later restored to their "pristine nature." Thus the Gentiles are interpreted as scattered Israelites regathered from the nations and restored to the inheritance of Jacob.

— The Edomite/Canaanite Identity of the "Jews"

Irenaeus links the corruption of Judaea to the Idumean Herod, who, to hide his lack of Israelite ancestry, "burned the registers" to conceal his ignoble Edomite ancestry. He interprets Jacob and Esau as two opposed nations existing together in Judaea, with the "elder nation" (Esau) rejecting Christ while the "younger nation" (Jacob) receives Him. The corrupt Jewish rulers are explicitly called "seed of Canaan, and not of Judah." The unbelieving Jews are further identified with Cain, the serpent seed, the "offspring of vipers", "rulers of Sodom", and "children of the wicked one."

While not every detail of his theology aligns perfectly with modern Christian Identity (as we would expect after 1900+ years), Irenaeus presents a worldview remarkably congruent with core Christian Identity distinctives, and is a clear patristic witness to its truth. Christian Identity is Apostolic, Patristic Christianity.

Christian Identity in the Church Fathers The "Jews" who rejected Christ as the Edomites and Seed of Canaan, according to Irenaeus

Irenaeus presents the Judaea of Christ's day as a divided and corrupted nation in which the true Judahite-Israelite remnant existed alongside an alien usurping population descended from Edom and Canaan. He traces the corruption of Judaea particularly through Herod the Great, whom he identifies as the son of "Antipater, an Idumean robber." According to Irenaeus: "Herod, knowing that the lineage of the Israelites contributed nothing to him...Burned the registers of their families...thinking that he would appear to be of noble birth if no one else could trace back his descent..." Thus the biological distinction between true Israelites and alien interlopers was obscured under the Idumean dynasty. Irenaeus interprets the prophecy concerning Jacob and Esau as referring to two opposed peoples existing together within Judaea itself: "Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people are in thy body... Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated." The "elder nation" (Esau) rejected Christ while the "younger nation" (Jacob) received Him. He explicitly states: "The younger nation received Him, Christ, the first-begotten, when the elder nation rejected Him." This younger nation becomes the Church, which is the restoration and regathering of the lost sheep of the house of Israel under Christ, while the elder corresponds to Esau/Edom and the unbelieving synagogue of Satan. The corrupt rulers and presbyters of the Jews are explicitly rebuked by Irenaeus using Daniel's condemnation: "O thou seed of Canaan, and not of Judah." This identification of the Jewish leadership as the "seed of Canaan", the nation Esau married into, is linked to the cursed posterity of Ham, whom Irenaeus elsewhere describes as remaining under a perpetual curse. Those who rejected Christ are also identified with Cain and the serpent seed. Irenaeus argues that the apostate angel "filled Cain with his spirit" and that Cain's descendants became "like to the begetter." The unbelieving Jews are called a "offsprings of vipers," "sons and angels of the devil," "rulers of Sodom," and "children of the wicked one." He further states that they are "alienated from the womb" and possess "the likeness of a serpent." Their rejection of Christ reveals their true lineage and nature. They are contrasted with the believing remnant — the "Israelite indeed in whom was no guile" — and with the Desposyni, the kinsmen of the Saviour according to the flesh, who preserved the true genealogies after Herod destroyed the public records. The true inheritance therefore passes not to the synagogue which rejected the King, but to the Church, the true "seed of Abraham" and restored House of Jacob. The unbelieving Jews become the "children of the kingdom" cast into outer darkness, while the faithful remnant inherit the promises. Thus, Irenaeus presents the conflict between Christ and the Jews not as a theological dispute, but as the manifestation of the ancient struggle between Jacob and Esau, the righteous seed and the seed of Canaan, the children of God and the children of the devil.

Christian Identity in the Church Fathers The "Gentiles" as the scattered, cast-off, formerly pagan but now reconciled Israelites according to Irenaeus

Irenaeus repeatedly interprets the calling of the "Gentiles" as the regathering of the scattered children of Israel and the restoration of the lost sheep who had perished among the nations. He explicitly cites Christ's commission: "Go ye to the sheep of the house of Israel, which have perished." For Irenaeus, Christ did not come to seize another people's inheritance "not snatching away by stratagem the property of another", but to "redeem from apostasy His own property" and to "win back His own", by "taking possession of His own in a righteous and gracious manner". He explains that the Lord came "seeking for that same sheep which had been lost" and "gathered from the ends of the earth into His Father's fold the children who were scattered abroad." He consistently identifies this gathering with the restoration of Jacob and Israel from dispersion: "I will gather Israel from all nations whither they have been driven... and they shall dwell in their own land, which I gave to my servant Jacob." The nations among whom Irenaeus himself ministered — Germany, Spain, Gaul, and the Keltæ — are described as "barbarians who believe in Christ" possessing "salvation written in their hearts by the Spirit." Irenaeus further describes these groups as "nations of those barbarians who believe in Christ" and who have the ancient law "written in their hearts", a status only possible of Israelites (Isaiah 51:7, Psalm 147:19-20), necessitating continuity between these believing nations and ancient Israel. Irenaeus further explains the condition of these peoples through the image of the wild olive tree: "For as the good olive, if neglected for a certain time, if left to grow wild and to run to wood, does itself become a wild olive... so men also, when they become careless... are rendered, by their own fault, unfruitful." Yet when grafted again through the Word: "They arrive at the pristine nature of man—that which was created after the image and likeness of God." Thus the "wild olive" is not a separate race, but the original olive grown wild through neglect, exile, and paganism. He understood the plain fact that both the cultivated and wild tree are genetically olives. The "Gentile" condition is merely the state of Israel in dispersion, having forgotten God during the "intermediate times" and fallen into the "deadly confusion of the Gentiles." The Church is therefore not a replacement for Israel, but IS "the seed of Abraham" itself, the restored “first synagogue”, the people inheriting the promises, composed of the scattered children now reconciled through Christ. Thus, for Irenaeus, the so-called "Gentiles" are not an unrelated people newly added to the covenant, but the lost sheep of Israel gathered again from the nations, restored to the "pristine nature of man" and to the ancient inheritance of Jacob, in fulfillment of the promise that God would: "gather Israel from all nations whither they have been driven."

Christian Identity in the Church Fathers The literal Serpent Seed and the “Race of Cain” according to Irenaeus

Irenaeus teaches that the apostate angel did not merely tempt mankind externally, but introduced corruption directly into the human race. He explains that after deceiving Eve, the devil “wrought a second” evil by “filling Cain with his spirit” and making him “a fratricide.” He then states: “And it came to pass that everyone of that race [the race of Cain] in successive generations was made like to the begetter [of that race, the apostate angel].” This language suggests not merely imitation, but the continuation of a distinct lineage “made like to the begetter,” namely the apostate angel who animated Cain. Irenaeus repeatedly employs agricultural and biological language regarding the children of the devil. He writes: “The enemy came, and sowed tares in the midst of the wheat.” He explicitly identifies these tares: “The tares are the children of the wicked one.” The devil is described as literally “sowing” (The use of the term "sowed" ( seminavit ) implies a literal semination) a rival race, into God’s field, which is “the world.” The “wheat” are the children of God; the “tares” are the offspring of the enemy, who are contrasted with the "righteous race of men" typified by Abel. If Cain were truly the son of Adam, he would have shared in the Adamic nature, which was "moulded by the hands of God" and capable of being "re-created". Instead, Cain represents a "different essence" that originates from the "enemy" who "stealthily sow[ed] the tares". Cain's fratricide was the first manifestation of a serpentine nature that was literally begotten by the "apostate angel" when he "took in hand to render [man] at enmity with God" through the literal semination of a rival lineage. Irenaeus further states: “Sinners are alienated from the womb; their anger is after the likeness of a serpent.” And concerning Christ’s enemies: “The Lord termed those whom He knew to be the offspring of men ‘a offspring of vipers.’” The serpent-nature is therefore linked not merely to behaviour, but to descent “from the womb.”. The word for offspring often translated as "generation" here (genimen) denotes a literal lineage or offspring. This serpent-line survives the Deluge through the cursed line of Ham and Canaan. Irenaeus explains: “For the Canaanites and Hittites and Peresites and Hivites and Amorites and Jebusites and Gergasites and Sodomites… are of the posterity of Ham, who have fallen under the curse; for the curse is of long duration over the ungodly.” He also records that before the Flood, “the angels that sinned had commingled with them,” producing “that most infamous race of men,” whom God destroyed in order to “preserve the archetype, the formation of Adam.” Thus humanity is divided between: — the Adamic race preserving the divine archetype — the "wicked seed" (semen nequam, literal semen) descended from the apostasy of the angels Irenaeus contrasts the spiritual Adamic man with the “animal” or “material” man who: — “receiveth not the things of the Spirit” — lives “after the manner of swine and of dogs” — is “irrational” — is “destined for fire” The Jews who rejected Christ are repeatedly associated with this serpent-line. Irenaeus calls them: — “offspring of vipers” — “rulers of Sodom” — “seed of Canaan” — “sons and angels of the devil” — “children of the wicked one” Meanwhile the righteous lineage is identified with: — Seth — Abraham — the patriarchs — the Church — those preserving the “ancient formation of Adam” Thus Irenaeus presents history as a struggle between two seeds: — the righteous Adamic line preserved by God — the serpent-race produced through the apostasy of angels and manifested historically in Cain, Canaan, and the enemies of Christ.

Christian Identity in the Church Fathers The extent and scope of Adamkind according to Irenaeus

Irenaeus repeatedly describes Christ as recapitulating or “summing up” the original formation of Adam within Himself. He states that Christ “summed up in Himself the ancient formation of Adam,” “commenced afresh the long line of human beings,” and restored the “Living Man” formed by the “Hands of God.” He also teaches that the Word became visible “to all” and that the new covenant was “diffused… over the whole world.” However, when Irenaeus concretely defines the visible Church preserving the apostolic faith and the “one and the same vivifying faith” over the whole world, he consistently confines it to the Graeco-Roman oikoumene and the nations of Western Eurasia. He specifically enumerates: — Germany — Spain (Iberia) — Gaul (the Keltæ/Celts) — The East — Egypt (Judahite dispersion in Egypt) — Libya — The “central regions of the world” (Palestine/Judaea) He writes: “For the Churches which have been planted in Germany do not believe or hand down anything different, nor do those in Spain, nor those in Gaul, nor those in the East, nor those in Egypt, nor those in Libya, nor those which have been established in the central regions of the world.” Rome is described as the supreme apostolic center with which “every Church should agree,” preserving “the tradition of the apostles” gathered “out of all the Churches.” This creates a framework in which the "complete man" is specifically associated with the Apostolic nations of the Roman world. Irenaeus defines the "perfect man" as: "the commingling and union of the soul receiving the Spirit of the Father, and the admixture of that fleshly nature which was moulded after the image of God." Irenaeus further identifies those who receive the Word and Spirit as arriving again at “the pristine nature of man—that which was created after the image and likeness of God.” The “complete man” is specifically defined as the union of flesh, soul, and spirit within the Church and under apostolic succession. Outside this Adamic sphere, Irenaeus describes alien nations as: — “waste water from a sink” — “the turning-weight of a balance” — “nothing” — “not men, mere dumb animals” — “irrational creatures” — “wild beasts” — or descendants of cursed and corrupted lines. He argues that those who reject the truth “divest themselves of the character of a human being,” becoming “simply a shadow of humanity.” Irenaeus also states that God destroyed the antediluvian world “in order that He might preserve the archetype, the formation of Adam,” after “the angels that sinned had commingled with them” and produced an “infamous race of men.” Irenaeus also explicitly connects several southern nations with the curse of Ham: "For the Canaanites and Hittites... and all the Egyptians and Libyans are of the posterity of Ham, who have fallen under the curse; for the curse is of long duration over the ungodly." Thus, in this reading, the true Adamic archetype survives historically and spiritually only among the nations of the Graeco-Roman Church preserving the apostolic preaching: the White or (now) formerly White peoples of the Roman world who retain the “pristine nature of man” and the “Living Man” formed by God.

Important note: the reason Tertullian critiqued the Cainite heretics was because they were gnostics who worshipped evil and the serpent, and believed that Cain was superior to Abel for being of serpentine descent. Any CI adherent would critique them for the same reasons. However, he never critiqued them for simply believing him to have been of serpentine descent, unlike some falsely claim (because as we can see here, he was clearly in agreement on that point).