Crest Learning UPSC

➡️RARE DISEASES IN INDIA – FUNDING GAPS & TREATMENT CONTINUITY 1️⃣ Why in News On Rare Diseases Day, concerns emerged that a large portion of funds under the National Policy for Rare Diseases (NPRD), 2021 remains underutilised, while nearly 2,000 patients await treatment. RTI data shows only ₹30.79 crore utilised from allocated funds. 2️⃣ What is the Issue? India adopted the NPRD (2021) to support treatment of life-threatening rare diseases. 👉Key Features • Financial support up to ₹50 lakh per patient. • Creation of Centres of Excellence (CoEs). • Focus on diseases amenable to one-time curative therapy. 👉Examples of Rare Diseases • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) – Requires gene therapy like Zolgensma (cost ~₹16 crore globally). • Lysosomal Storage Disorders (LSD) – Includes Gaucher disease; requires lifelong enzyme replacement therapy. • Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) – Progressive genetic disorder affecting growth and organs. These treatments are extremely expensive and often imported. 3️⃣ Key Challenges 1. Funding Cap Insufficiency ₹50 lakh support is inadequate for diseases like SMA where therapy costs crores annually. 2. Treatment Interruptions Example: Patients with Gaucher disease require continuous enzyme therapy; interruptions can cause irreversible organ damage. 3. Administrative Delays Approval delays at CoEs result in patients exhausting funding cap before full therapy completion. 4. Lack of National Registry Without a central rare disease registry, planning and budget allocation remain inaccurate. 5. Import Dependence India relies on multinational pharma companies for orphan drugs, inflating treatment costs. 4️⃣ Initiatives by Stakeholders 👉Government • NPRD 2021 policy framework. • 12+ Centres of Excellence across India (AIIMS, CMC Vellore, PGI Chandigarh etc.). • Provision of support through PM National Relief Fund. 👉Judiciary • Supreme Court interventions in cases demanding uninterrupted treatment for children with rare diseases. 👉Civil Society • Rare Disease India Foundation advocating pooled funding and transparency. 5️⃣ Impact 👉Human Cost Example: Several children with LSD have died after treatment discontinuation due to funding exhaustion. 👉Equity Issue High out-of-pocket expenditure contradicts the spirit of Universal Health Coverage (UHC). 👉Governance Gap Unspent funds despite urgent need indicate implementation inefficiency. 6️⃣ Way Forward • Move toward National Rare Disease Fund with pooled central + state contribution. • Encourage domestic manufacturing of orphan drugs under PLI schemes. • Develop India Rare Disease Registry for evidence-based planning. • Expand insurance coverage under Ayushman Bharat. • Promote indigenous gene therapy research (example: IIT & DBT collaborations). 7️⃣ Conclusion As Amartya Sen said, “Health is not just a medical issue but a matter of social justice.” Rare disease care must shift from episodic charity to structured, sustainable public health commitment. 👉Terminology Rare Disease – A disease affecting a small fraction of the population, often genetic and severe. Orphan Drugs – Medicines developed specifically for rare diseases; usually expensive due to limited demand. Centres of Excellence (CoEs) – Designated hospitals specialised in rare disease diagnosis and treatment. Lysosomal Storage Disorders (LSD) – Genetic enzyme deficiency disorders leading to toxic accumulation in cells.

➡️PROMOTION OF TRIBAL ARTS, MUSIC, CULTURE & COMMERCE 1️⃣ Why in News The Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) announced a series of events — including Tribes Art Fest, Living Roots Music Festival, and Bharat Tribes Fest 2026 — to promote tribal culture, enterprise development, and market access. 2️⃣ What is This Initiative? It is a coordinated national platform designed to: • Showcase tribal art, crafts, music, and traditions • Promote tribal entrepreneurship • Integrate tribal products into domestic and global value chains It builds on earlier initiatives like Aadi Mahotsav, organised through TRIFED. 👉Institutional Framework • MoTA – Nodal ministry for tribal welfare • TRIFED – Marketing body promoting tribal products under the “Tribes India” brand 👉Contextual Data • Scheduled Tribes constitute 8.6% of India’s population (Census 2011) • ST literacy rate: 59% (Census 2011) • Tribal communities have high dependence on forest-based livelihoods 3️⃣ Challenges 1. Market Exclusion Tribal artisans often lack direct access to organised retail markets, reducing income realisation. 2. Low Value Addition Most tribal products are sold as raw materials without branding or packaging. 3. Livelihood Vulnerability Dependence on seasonal Minor Forest Produce (MFP) makes incomes unstable. 4. Cultural Marginalisation Modernisation and migration weaken preservation of indigenous traditions. 4️⃣ Initiatives by Stakeholders 👉Government • Van Dhan Yojana (2018) – Organises tribal SHGs for value addition of forest produce. • MSP for Minor Forest Produce Scheme – Ensures remunerative prices for over 90 forest items. • Urban exhibitions and Tribal Business Conclaves for entrepreneurship promotion. • E-commerce integration through TRIFED platforms. 👉Community Participation • Formation of tribal SHGs and artisan clusters. • Skill training in branding and packaging. 5️⃣ Impact 👉Economic Empowerment Direct market linkages increase income and reduce middlemen exploitation. 👉Cultural Preservation Institutional recognition strengthens transmission of traditional knowledge. 👉Inclusive Growth Supports Article 46, which mandates promotion of economic interests of Scheduled Tribes. 6️⃣ Way Forward • Expand digital marketing via ONDC and global platforms. • Promote GI tagging of tribal art forms. • Strengthen skill development in design, branding, and exports. • Integrate with SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 8 (Decent Work). 7️⃣ Conclusion As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar observed, “Political democracy cannot last unless there lies at the base of it social democracy.” Promoting tribal culture through structured economic platforms transforms welfare into sustainable empowerment. 👉Terminology TRIFED – Tribal Cooperative Marketing Development Federation of India; a government body that markets tribal products nationally and internationally. Minor Forest Produce (MFP) – Non-timber forest products like honey, bamboo, lac, tendu leaves, etc., which form the livelihood base of many tribal communities. Value Chain Integration – Moving beyond raw production to processing, branding, and retail to increase income generation.

➡️RICE FORTIFICATION SCHEME – TEMPORARY SUSPENSION 1️⃣ Why in News The Union Government has temporarily discontinued rice fortification under PMGKAY and other welfare schemes, citing the need for a more effective delivery mechanism. Activists have welcomed the move, arguing that fortification is not a scientific solution to anaemia. 2️⃣ What is Rice Fortification? • Rice Fortification means adding micronutrients (Iron, Folic Acid, Vitamin B12) to rice to address hidden hunger. • Implemented through Fortified Rice Kernels (FRK) mixed with normal rice in a ratio of 1:100. • Part of the Food Fortification Strategy (2018) and scaled up under PMGKAY and PDS. • India aimed for 100% fortification of rice under PDS by 2024 (GoI target). 👉Why Fortification Was Introduced • NFHS-5 (2019-21): • 57% women (15–49 yrs) anaemic • 67% children (6–59 months) anaemic • India accounts for a large share of global anaemia burden (WHO data). 3️⃣ Challenges Identified 1. Shelf-Life & Stability Issues IIT Kharagpur study noted that moisture, temperature, and storage conditions reduce micronutrient stability in fortified rice during prolonged storage. 2. One-size-fits-all Approach Not all anaemia is due to iron deficiency; causes include Vitamin A deficiency, infections, genetic disorders (thalassemia, sickle cell). 3. Safety Concerns Excess iron consumption may affect individuals with conditions like hemochromatosis. 4. Monitoring & Quality Control Large-scale PDS distribution makes uniform nutrient mixing and monitoring difficult. 5. Cost Effectiveness Fortification increases procurement and blending costs; long-term sustainability questioned. 4️⃣ Initiatives by Stakeholders 👉Government • Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) set fortification standards. • Implemented through PDS, Mid-Day Meal (PM POSHAN), ICDS. • Conducted technical review based on IIT Kharagpur findings. • Clarified that foodgrain entitlements under PDS remain unaffected. 👉Judicial & Policy Oversight • Matter raised before Supreme Court by civil society groups questioning universal fortification. 👉Health Sector • Parallel anaemia control via Anaemia Mukt Bharat (2018) under POSHAN Abhiyaan. • Iron-Folic Acid supplementation for adolescents and pregnant women. 5️⃣ Impact of Suspension 👉Positive Aspects • Allows scientific reassessment of large-scale universal fortification. • Encourages targeted nutrition interventions rather than blanket policy. Concerns • May slow progress toward reducing high anaemia prevalence. • Policy uncertainty may affect long-term nutrition strategy. 6️⃣ Way Forward • Shift toward targeted fortification in high-burden districts instead of universal coverage. • Strengthen diet diversification (millets, pulses, green leafy vegetables). • Improve storage and supply chain monitoring before reimplementation. • Integrate fortification with Anaemia Mukt Bharat strategy and maternal health programmes. • Enhance screening to distinguish iron deficiency from other causes. Conclusion Rice fortification was introduced to combat India’s severe anaemia burden, but implementation challenges demand scientific calibration. The focus must shift from universal distribution to targeted, evidence-based nutrition policy.

➡️PROJECT CHEETAH – KUNO NATIONAL PARK 1️⃣ Why in News Nine cheetahs from Botswana were released into Kuno National Park (Madhya Pradesh) under Project Cheetah, taking India’s total cheetah population to 48. This is the third batch brought from Africa since 2022. 2️⃣ What is Project Cheetah? • Launched in 2022 to reintroduce cheetahs in India after they were declared extinct in 1952. • African cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) were chosen because Asiatic cheetahs are critically endangered in Iran. • It is the world’s first intercontinental large carnivore relocation programme. • Implemented by MoEFCC, NTCA, and Wildlife Institute of India (WII). • Main site: Kuno National Park (MP) – originally prepared for Asiatic lion relocation. 3️⃣ Major Challenges 1. High Mortality Around 21 cheetahs have died since 2022 due to infection, stress, and climatic adaptation issues. This raises questions about habitat suitability and management practices. 2. Habitat Constraints Cheetahs require open grasslands. In India, grasslands are often classified as “wastelands,” leading to poor protection. 3. Limited Genetic Base Small founder population increases risk of inbreeding in the long term. 4. Human-Wildlife Interface Some cheetahs move outside park boundaries, increasing risk of livestock conflict. 4️⃣ Initiatives Taken Government • Supreme Court allowed experimental introduction in 2020. • Radio collars for real-time monitoring. • Mandatory quarantine before release. • Identification of second habitat – Gandhi Sagar Wildlife Sanctuary (MP). Scientific Support • Continuous health monitoring by veterinary teams. • Ecological studies by WII. Community Participation • Creation of “Cheetah Mitras” – local volunteers for awareness and protection. 5️⃣ Impact • Brings focus to neglected grassland ecosystems. • Enhances India’s global conservation profile. • Potential eco-tourism and livelihood opportunities. • Strengthens institutional coordination in wildlife governance. 6️⃣ Way Forward • Develop multiple reintroduction sites to reduce ecological pressure. • Recognise grasslands as a distinct ecological category in policy. • Periodic genetic infusion to maintain diversity. • Stronger disease surveillance and habitat management. Conclusion Project Cheetah is not just species restoration; it is a test of India’s ecological planning capacity. Its success depends on scientific management and habitat reform.

Secure Critical Mineral Supply Chains Strategic partnerships for lithium, cobalt, and rare earth materials. 4. Increase Semiconductor R&D Investment Boost public-private research spending to reduce technological gaps. 5. Develop Skilled Workforce Establish semiconductor-focused technical institutes and industry-academia collaboration. 7️⃣ Conclusion The Micron ATMP plant marks a significant step toward technological self-reliance. However, true semiconductor sovereignty will require India to move beyond packaging into advanced fabrication and design leadership.

➡️MICRON ATMP PLANT & INDIA’S SEMICONDUCTOR STRATEGY 1️⃣ Why in News The Prime Minister inaugurated Micron Technology’s Assembly, Test, Marking & Packaging (ATMP) plant at Sanand, Gujarat. The project receives 50% capital support (₹22,516 crore) under the India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) and 20% support from the Gujarat government. 2️⃣ What is This ATMP (Assembly, Test, Marking & Packaging) It is the final stage of semiconductor manufacturing where fabricated wafers are assembled into finished chips ready for commercial use. India Semiconductor Mission (2021) A ₹76,000 crore central scheme (MeitY) to develop a full semiconductor ecosystem — including fabrication, packaging, design, and supply chain. Strategic Background • Global semiconductor market size: ~$600 billion (Semiconductor Industry Association, 2023) • India imports nearly 90% of semiconductor demand (MeitY estimates) • Chips are critical for AI, defence, telecom, EVs, and data centres 3️⃣ Challenges 1. Lack of Advanced Fabrication (Fab) India currently does not manufacture high-end chips (like 5nm or 3nm nodes); it only performs packaging. This keeps India dependent on Taiwan and South Korea for core chip production. 2. Extremely High Capital Requirement A single advanced semiconductor fabrication plant requires $10–20 billion investment, uninterrupted power, and large volumes of ultra-pure water — major infrastructure challenge. 3. Technology Dependence India depends on foreign companies for critical tools such as EUV lithography machines (ASML, Netherlands), limiting full technological autonomy. 4. Global Supply Chain Risk Semiconductor production depends on imported wafers and rare earth minerals; geopolitical tensions (US–China tech rivalry) can disrupt supplies. 5. Skill & R&D Gap India has strong chip design talent, but limited hands-on expertise in fabrication and materials engineering. 4️⃣ Initiatives by Stakeholders Government of India • India Semiconductor Mission (₹76,000 crore) – Provides up to 50% capital subsidy for semiconductor projects. • Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme – Incentivises electronics manufacturing growth. • Design Linked Incentive (DLI) Scheme – Supports Indian chip design startups. • iCET (India–US Initiative on Critical & Emerging Technology) – Strengthens semiconductor cooperation. State Government (Gujarat) • 20% additional capital subsidy to attract semiconductor investment. • Development of electronics manufacturing clusters in Sanand. Private Sector (Micron) • Will package advanced DRAM & NAND memory chips used in AI, data centres, and mobile devices. • Expected to produce tens of millions of chips initially and scale up to hundreds of millions. International Cooperation • Supply chain diversification efforts post-COVID and US-China tensions. • Alignment with global semiconductor resilience strategies. 5️⃣ Impact 1. Strengthens Strategic Autonomy Domestic semiconductor capability reduces dependence on East Asian supply chains, improving national resilience. 2. Boosts High-Tech Manufacturing Ecosystem Semiconductor plants attract allied industries such as precision engineering, chemicals, and electronics components. 3. Supports AI & Digital Economy Memory chips like DRAM and NAND are essential for AI computing, cloud storage, 5G networks, and advanced electronics. 4. Enhances National Security Semiconductors are critical for defence electronics, satellites, and secure communication systems. 5. Encourages FDI & Job Creation High capital investment (₹22,516 crore support) creates skilled employment and boosts India’s electronics value chain. 6. Positions India in Global Supply Chain Diversification India becomes an alternative manufacturing hub as companies reduce reliance on China and Taiwan. 6️⃣ Way Forward 1. Move Towards Full-Scale Fabrication (Fab) India must establish advanced semiconductor fabrication plants to climb the value chain. 2. Develop Indigenous Semiconductor Design Ecosystem Encourage Indian fabless chip companies to reduce dependence on foreign IP. 3.

1 march

➡️Green Bonds • Green Bonds – Debt instruments used exclusively to finance climate-friendly or environmentally sustainable projects (SEBI Green Debt Securities Guidelines, 2017; updated 2023). • Eligible Sectors – Renewable energy, clean transport, energy efficiency, sustainable water management. • Uniform Yield Allocation – Bonds allotted at same yield to all successful bidders (NSE EBP mechanism). • Credit Rating ‘AAA (Stable)’ – Highest safety rating by agencies like CARE & ICRA. • India’s Green Bond Issuance crossed $20+ billion cumulative (Climate Bonds Initiative 2023). • India among top emerging green bond markets (CBI Report). UPSC CSE Prelims 2020 With reference to the term ‘Green Bonds’, consider the following statements: 1. Green bonds are financial instruments issued to fund environmentally sustainable projects. 2. They are regulated in India by SEBI. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

INS Anjadip – Core Facts • INS Anjadip – Fourth indigenously designed & built Anti-Submarine Warfare Shallow Water Craft (ASW-SWC) commissioned by Indian Navy. • Builder – Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers (GRSE), Kolkata. • Length ~77 metres – Optimised for littoral (coastal) combat environment. • Primary Role – Detect, track & neutralise enemy submarines in coastal waters. • Equipped With – Shallow-water sonars, lightweight torpedoes, ASW rockets, Combat Management System (CMS).

➡️INS ANJADIP & INDIA’S ANTI-SUBMARINE WARFARE (ASW) CAPABILITy “Sea power is decisive for national power.” – Alfred Thayer Mahan. Commissioning of INS Anjadip strengthens India’s coastal anti-submarine shield amid rising undersea strategic competition in the Indian Ocean. 1. Importance of Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) • Underwater Threat Neutralisation – Submarines are stealth platforms posing strategic risk. • Protection of Sea Lines of Communication (SLOCs) – Ensures uninterrupted energy & trade flow. • Counter-PLAN Activity – Enhances surveillance against Chinese submarine forays. • Integrated Maritime Strategy – Complements P-8I aircraft & surface destroyers. 2. Littoral Warfare Significance • Shallow Water Operations – Coastal waters require specialised sonar systems. • Port & Harbour Security – Critical for safeguarding naval bases. • Low-Intensity Maritime Operations – Useful in grey-zone conflict scenarios. • Search & Rescue (SAR) – Dual-use maritime humanitarian capability. 3. Defence Indigenisation Impact • Domestic Shipbuilding Ecosystem – GRSE, Cochin Shipyard, Mazagon Dock synergy. • Technology Absorption – Indigenous sonar & CMS development. • Employment Multiplier – Shipbuilding sector supports MSMEs. • Export Potential – India emerging as naval platform exporter (MoD export data ₹21,000+ crore 2023-24). 4. Strategic Maritime Context • SAGAR Doctrine (2015) – Security and Growth for All in the Region. • Indo-Pacific Strategy Alignment – Enhances India’s regional balancing role. • Quad Maritime Cooperation – Shared focus on maritime domain awareness (MDA). • Indian Maritime Security Strategy (IMSS 2015) – Emphasises coastal & littoral security. 5. Challenges • Submarine Detection Complexity – Advances in stealth propulsion technologies. • Undersea Domain Awareness Gaps – Need for seabed sensors & AI-based monitoring. • Limited Indigenous Engine Capability – Dependency on foreign propulsion systems. • Budgetary Constraints – Capital-intensive naval modernisation. 6. Way Forward • Strengthen Integrated Undersea Surveillance Network – Expand seabed monitoring. • Boost Indigenous Propulsion Systems – Develop next-gen marine engines. • Enhance Jointness – Integrate Navy-Coast Guard intelligence grid. • Accelerate Naval Modernisation Roadmap – Align with 2030 maritime capability vision. CONCLUSION INS Anjadip represents not merely a vessel, but a strategic reinforcement of India’s coastal defence architecture and maritime self-reliance. UPSC CSE Prelims 2022 With reference to the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), consider the following statements: 1. It carries the majority of global oil trade. 2. It is central to India’s maritime security strategy. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Prelims 2021 Which one of the following pairs is correctly matched? (a) SAGAR – India’s maritime security doctrine (b) Quad – South Asian military alliance (c) ASEAN – Defence pact of Indo-Pacific (d) BIMSTEC – Nuclear disarmament forum UPSC CSE Mains 2017 (GS III – 15 Marks) Discuss the significance of India’s maritime security in the Indian Ocean Region. UPSC CSE Mains 2020 (GS III – 15 Marks) How is the Government of India protecting its defence manufacturing sector from external dependence? Discuss. UPSC CSE Mains 2022 (GS III – 10 Marks) Explain the strategic importance of the Indian Ocean Region for India’s security.

Cybercrime & Institutional Framework (India) • Information Technology Act, 2000 – Primary legislation governing cyber offences in India. • Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) – Established under MHA (2018) to tackle cybercrime. • CERT-In (Indian Computer Emergency Response Team) – Nodal agency for cybersecurity incident response (MeitY). • National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal – Centralised citizen reporting platform (MHA).

➡️INDIA–UK CYBERSECURITY COOPERATION & TRANSNATIONAL CRIME “Cybersecurity is not optional; it is foundational to national security.” India–UK cybercrime data sharing reflects the evolving nature of transnational digital threats requiring cooperative enforcement mechanisms. 1. Nature of Transnational Cybercrime • Borderless Crime – Digital offences operate across jurisdictions. • Call Centre Fraud Networks – India-UK coordination crucial due to diaspora links. • Modern Slavery & Trafficking Nexus – Cyber tools facilitate recruitment & exploitation (UNODC). • Diplomatic Security Concerns – Protection of embassies & dignitaries linked to internal security 2. Strategic Significance of India–UK Cooperation • Intelligence Sharing Mechanism – Real-time data exchange improves investigation speed. • Capacity Building & Forensics – Advanced UK cyber forensic expertise collaboration. • Extradition & Legal Assistance – Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) framework. • Countering Online Radicalisation – Joint monitoring of extremist digital networks. 3. Legal & Regulatory Dimensions • Data Protection Act 2023 (India) – Strengthens digital governance ecosystem. • IT (Intermediary Guidelines) Rules 2021 – Mandates compliance from digital platforms. • Extradition Treaty (1992 India-UK) – Enables criminal transfer subject to legal safeguards. • Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 – Balances privacy & enforcement. 4. Challenges • Data Sovereignty Issues – Cross-border data flow restrictions. • Jurisdictional Conflict – Different evidentiary standards & privacy laws. • Encryption & Dark Web Use – Limits law enforcement tracking. • Capacity Gap in State Police Forces – Need for specialised cyber units. 5. Way Forward • Sign Comprehensive Cybercrime Treaty under UN Framework – Multilateral standardisation. • Strengthen I4C-State Integration – Decentralised cyber response units. • AI-based Fraud Detection Systems – Proactive financial fraud prevention. • Dedicated Cyber Diplomacy Wing – For international digital governance negotiations. CONCLUSION Cybercrime has emerged as a core pillar of national security. Bilateral data-sharing frameworks like India–UK cooperation strengthen global resilience against digital threats. UPSC CSE Prelims 2020 In India, under cyber insurance for individuals, which of the following benefits are generally covered? 1. Cost of restoration of identity theft 2. Legal expenses in case of cyber harassment 3. Cost of data recovery Select the correct answer: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1, 2 and 3 (d) None UPSC CSE Prelims 2021 With reference to the IT Rules, 2021, consider the following statements: 1. They mandate social media intermediaries to appoint grievance officers. 2. They apply only to foreign social media platforms. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Mains 2016 (GS III – 12.5 Marks) Discuss the challenges posed by cybercrime in India and the measures needed to address them. UPSC CSE Mains 2019 (GS III – 15 Marks) What are the emerging challenges in cyber security? Discuss India’s preparedness. UPSC CSE Mains 2021 (GS III – 15 Marks) The increase in cybercrime in India calls for strong cyber security mechanisms. Examine.

➡️LCH PRACHAND & INDIGENISATION IN DEFENCE SECTOR “Self-reliance in defence is the foundation of strategic autonomy.” The President’s sortie in LCH Prachand symbolizes India’s advancing indigenous aerospace capability and strategic confidence. 1. Strategic Significance of LCH • High-Altitude Combat Edge – Only attack helicopter globally designed for sustained high-altitude operations (HAL claim). • Counter-China Posture – Enhances capability in LAC sectors. • Integrated Air-Land Warfare – Supports infantry & armoured units in mountainous terrain. • Reduced Import Dependence – Replaces reliance on foreign attack helicopters. 2. Indigenisation & Strategic Autonomy • Strategic Autonomy – Indigenous platforms reduce geopolitical vulnerability in supply chains. • Boost to Domestic Industry – MSMEs integrated into defence manufacturing supply chain. • Make in India (Defence) – Defence corridors in Uttar Pradesh & Tamil Nadu. • Technology Absorption – Indigenous avionics, composite materials & weapons integration. 3. Economic & Industrial Impact • Multiplier Effect – Defence manufacturing drives metallurgy, electronics & aerospace sectors. • Export Potential – India exporting to 85+ countries (MoD data). • FDI in Defence up to 74% (automatic route) – Enhances capital inflow. • Private Sector Participation – Tata, L&T, Bharat Forge increasing footprint. 4. Challenges • Engine Dependence – Critical aero-engine tech still imported. • R&D Expenditure – Defence R&D spending limited compared to global majors (SIPRI reports). • Procurement Delays – Bureaucratic procurement cycles affect scale-up. • Global Competition – US, Russia, Israel dominate attack helicopter exports. 5. Way Forward • Invest in Indigenous Engine Development – Kaveri engine revival & JV models. • Boost Defence R&D to >1% GDP – Long-term technological depth. • Encourage Joint Ventures – Technology transfer partnerships. • Strengthen Export Promotion Agency – Dedicated defence export facilitation. CONCLUSION LCH Prachand represents more than a combat platform—it signifies India’s journey toward strategic self-reliance and technological sovereignty. UPSC CSE Prelims 2023 With reference to the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas, consider the following statements: 1. It is developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited. 2. It is a fourth-generation multirole combat aircraft. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Prelims 2020 With reference to India’s defence production, consider the following statements: 1. The government has allowed 100% FDI in defence manufacturing under the automatic route. 2. India aims to achieve self-reliance in defence production. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Mains 2020 (GS III – 15 Marks) How is the Government of India protecting its defence manufacturing sector from external dependence? Discuss UPSC CSE Mains 2022 (GS III – 10 Marks) Discuss the importance of self-reliance in defence production for India’s strategic autonomy. UPSC CSE Mains 2023 (GS III – 15 Marks) Explain the role of indigenisation in strengthening India’s internal and external security.

Disease Basics • Meningococcal Disease – Caused by Neisseria meningitidis bacteria; leads to meningitis & septicemia (WHO). • Transmission – Spread via respiratory droplets & close contact, high risk in crowded settings (WHO Fact Sheet). • Incubation Period – Typically 2–10 days (WHO). • High-Risk Groups – Children, adolescents, military recruits, hostel residents (CDC & WHO).

➡️MENINGOCOCCAL DISEASE & PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE (MEGHALAYA CASE) “Strong surveillance is the backbone of epidemic preparedness.” – WHO Global Health Security Agenda. The Meghalaya response reflects the critical role of early detection and outbreak containment in infectious disease control. 1. Public Health Significance • Rapid Onset & High Mortality – Meningococcal infection can cause death within 24 hours (WHO). • Outbreak-Prone in Congregate Settings – Military camps & hostels are high-risk clusters. • Zoonotic Potential Absent – Human-to-human transmission only, simplifies containment strategy. • Global Burden – WHO estimates 1.2 million cases annually worldwide. 2. Importance of Disease Surveillance • Early Case Detection – IDSP enables real-time reporting at district level. • Contact Tracing Mechanism – Prevents secondary spread in close-contact groups. • Laboratory Confirmation – NCDC & VRDL network support microbial verification. • Risk Communication – Public advisories reduce panic & ensure compliance. 3. Institutional Framework in India • National Health Mission (NHM) – Strengthens State epidemiology capacity. • VRDL Network (ICMR) – 160+ labs for viral & bacterial diagnosis (ICMR data). • Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 – Legal basis for outbreak response measures. • National Disaster Management Guidelines (Biological Disasters 2008) – Defines outbreak response protocols. 4. Gaps & Challenges • Underreporting in Remote Areas – Northeast terrain complicates access. • Limited Adult Vaccination Coverage – Meningococcal vaccine not part of Universal Immunization Programme (UIP). • Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) – WHO flags emerging resistance patterns. • Health Infrastructure Deficit – India’s public health expenditure ~2.1% of GDP (Economic Survey 2023-24). 5. Way Forward • Strengthen Sentinel Surveillance in High-Risk Zones – Military & boarding institutions. • Inclusion of Targeted Vaccination Strategy – For outbreak-prone districts. • Digital Disease Dashboard Integration – Real-time reporting via IDSP portal. • Capacity Building in Northeast States – Lab & rapid response teams strengthening. CONCLUSION Localized outbreaks underline the importance of surveillance-led governance. Proactive epidemiological systems convert potential epidemics into manageable public health events. UPSC CSE Prelims 2017 With reference to the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP), consider the following statements: 1. It is a centrally sponsored scheme under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2. It aims at early detection and response to disease outbreaks. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Prelims 2020 With reference to the National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), consider the following statements: 1. It is under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2. It functions as the nodal agency for disease outbreak investigation. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Mains 2015 (GS II – 12.5 Marks) The quality of public health system determines the health outcomes of a country. Discuss in the Indian context. UPSC CSE Mains 2016 (GS II – 12.5 Marks) Discuss the challenges in strengthening public health infrastructure in India. UPSC CSE Mains 2020 (GS II – 15 Marks) Examine the role of public health surveillance in managing pandemics and biological disasters.

Women constitute ~48% of agricultural workforce – As per Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) 2022-23, MoSPI, indicating feminisation of agriculture. • 50–70% women farmers lack land titles – Highlighted by NABARD discussions & FAO gender land gap reports, affecting access to credit. • Women operational landholding share ~14% – As per Agricultural Census 2015-16 (MoA&FW), showing ownership gap. • SHGs under NRLM: 9+ crore women mobilised – DAY-NRLM data (MoRD), major rural institutional base. • Women’s contribution high in dairying – India world’s largest milk producer (230+ million tonnes, Economic Survey 2023-24).

➡️WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE: STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION OF RURAL ECONOMY Empowering women farmers is central to food security and rural prosperity.” – FAO. The feminisation of agriculture reflects both distress migration and structural opportunity in India’s rural transformation. 1. Feminisation of Agriculture • Male Migration to Non-Farm Sector – Leaves women managing farms (PLFS rural employment trends). • High Participation in Subsistence Farming – Concentrated in unpaid family labour. • Invisible Labour Problem – Women often categorised as ‘helpers’, not ‘farmers’ (Agricultural Census classification issue). • Impact on Productivity – FAO estimates closing gender gap can raise farm output by 20–30% globally. 2. Structural Constraints • Land Ownership Deficit (~14%) – Limits access to institutional credit (Agricultural Census 2015-16). • Limited Access to KCC & Crop Insurance – Linked to title ownership (PMFBY eligibility norms). • Technology Access Gap – Mechanisation tools often designed for male labour patterns. • Extension Services Bias – Krishi Vigyan Kendras outreach skewed towards male farmers (NABARD assessments). 3. Emerging Institutional Shifts • Women-led Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) – Over 10,000 FPO scheme under SFAC & MoA; increasing women participation. • Self Help Groups (SHGs) – 9+ crore women linked to microcredit (DAY-NRLM). • Dairy Cooperatives – Women major stakeholders in AMUL-type models. • Digital Agriculture Push – AgriStack initiative (MoA) may improve inclusion via digitised land & service records. 4. Economic Significance • Food Security Backbone – Women central to pulses, horticulture & dairy sectors. • Nutrition Linkages – Women farmers influence household food diversity (NFHS data on maternal nutrition). • Rural Value Chain Integration – Migration from primary production to agri-processing improves income. • SDG Linkages – SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) & SDG 5 (Gender Equality) interconnected (UNDP). 5. Way Forward • Joint Land Titling Policies – States to mandate spousal co-ownership. • Gender-Sensitive Extension Services – Customised mechanisation & training. • Direct Credit Access – Expand Kisan Credit Cards (KCC) for women SHG members. • Market Linkages via FPOs – Strengthen aggregation & value addition. CONCLUSION Women are no longer peripheral labour but central actors in rural transformation. Sustainable agricultural growth requires institutional recognition of women as primary farmers, not auxiliary workers. UPSC CSE Prelims 2017 The term ‘Feminisation of Agriculture’ refers to: (a) Increase in number of women employed in agriculture due to male migration (b) Increase in female literacy in rural areas (c) Increase in female ownership of land (d) Decrease in male labour force participation UPSC CSE Prelims 2018 With reference to the Self Help Groups (SHGs), consider the following statements: 1. SHGs have been established under the National Rural Livelihoods Mission. 2. SHGs provide microcredit support to rural women. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Mains 2013 (GS I – 10 Marks) Discuss the role of women in agriculture in India and the challenges faced by them. UPSC CSE Mains 2014 (GS III – 10 Marks) What are the main challenges faced by Indian agriculture? How can women’s participation improve agricultural productivity? UPSC CSE Mains 2019 (GS I – 15 Marks) “Empowering women is the key to control population growth.” Discuss in the context of rural India.

➡️FOREST RIGHTS ACT (FRA) RESTRUCTURING & PMU MODEL “The aim of the FRA is to undo historical injustice.” – Statement of Objects, FRA 2006. The move to replace FRA Cells with centralised Project Monitoring Units (PMUs) raises concerns about balancing administrative efficiency with rights-based decentralisation. 1. Significance of FRA • Historical Injustice Correction – Recognises pre-2005 occupation rights of forest dwellers (FRA Preamble). • Gram Sabha-Centric Model – Claim verification begins at village level; strengthens decentralised governance (Section 6, FRA). • Livelihood Security – Rights over Minor Forest Produce (MFP) enhance tribal income (TRIFED procurement data). • Conservation Synergy – CFR-linked forest areas show better community stewardship outcomes (MoEFCC reports). 2. Rationale Behind PMU (‘One-Stop’) Model • Administrative Convergence – Integrates FRA support, livelihood assistance, and MIS digitisation under one unit. • Cost Rationalisation – Ministry cited “increasing costs” of separate FRA cells (Official review statement). • Data & Record Digitisation – Enhances transparency in claim tracking (DAJGUA programme component). • Policy Coordination – Avoids fragmentation across welfare schemes. 3. Major Concerns • Dilution of Gram Sabha Primacy – Centralised PMUs may weaken community-led recognition process. • Low CFR Recognition – Collective forest governance still under-implemented (~10–15%, MoTA). • High Claim Rejections in Some States – NCST flagged procedural lapses in scrutiny. • Eviction Risk (Wildlife First Case, 2019, SC) – Highlighted vulnerability of rejected claimants. 4. Constitutional & Governance Dimensions • Fifth Schedule Safeguards – Governor has special responsibility in Scheduled Areas. • PESA Non-Compliance – Several States yet to fully operationalise Gram Sabha authority (MoTA reviews). • NCST Oversight Role – Constitutional body to monitor ST safeguards. • Conflict with Forest Conservation Act Amendments (2023) – Debate on diversion vs community rights balance. 5. Way Forward (High Weightage) • Strengthen Community Forest Rights (CFR) – Promote collective livelihood & conservation synergy. • Ensure PMUs as Facilitative, Not Substitutive – Preserve Gram Sabha authority. • Transparent Digital Dashboard – Public tracking of claim status. • Capacity Building of Tribal Institutions – Legal literacy & technical mapping support. CONCLUSION FRA is a rights-based corrective law, not merely a welfare scheme. Administrative reform must strengthen—not dilute—constitutional protections for Scheduled Tribes. UPSC CSE Prelims 2019 Consider the following statements about the Forest Rights Act, 2006: 1. It recognises and vests forest rights and occupation in forest land in forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers. 2. The Act provides for a Forest Rights Committee at the village level. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Prelims 2013 The Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA) is applicable to which of the following? (a) All Scheduled Areas in India (b) Only tribal areas of North-East India (c) All forest areas (d) Only Fifth Schedule areas UPSC CSE Prelims 2020 With reference to the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST), consider the following statements: 1. It is a constitutional body. 2. It monitors the implementation of safeguards for Scheduled Tribes. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Mains 2013 (GS II – 12.5 Marks) Discuss the role of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 in protecting the rights of tribal communities. UPSC CSE Mains 2014 (GS III – 10 Marks) How far has the Forest Rights Act, 2006 been successful in protecting the rights of tribal communities? UPSC CSE Mains 2017 (GS II – 15 Marks) The rights and safeguards provided to Scheduled Tribes are not adequately implemented. Examine the reasons and suggest measures.

The ICC can try individuals but not States. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

➡️INTERNATIONAL LAW: RESILIENCE OF A RULE-BASED ORDER “International law works not because it is enforced, but because it is accepted.” – Louis Henkin. Despite high-profile violations, international law continues to structure global conduct through dense norms, institutions and adjudication. 1. Stress on the Use-of-Force Norm • Article 2(4) Violations (Ukraine 2022) – UNGA Resolution ES-11 condemned aggression; shows breach yet reaffirmation of norm (UNGA Records). • Expanded Self-Defence Claims – Post-9/11 reinterpretations broaden Article 51 scope; raises legality concerns. • UNSC Paralysis – Repeated veto use undermines collective security enforcement (UN Veto Data). • Normative Persistence – States justify actions legally, indicating continued relevance (Constructivist IR Theory). 2. Judicialisation of International Relations • ICJ Provisional Measures – Increasing recourse in urgent conflicts; enhances rule-based adjudication (ICJ Annual Data). • ICC Arrest Warrants – Issued against sitting leaders (2023 cases); accountability beyond borders (ICC Reports). • Regional Human Rights Courts – European Court delivers 1,000+ judgments annually (Council of Europe Data). • Reputational Compliance – States comply to preserve trade access & diplomatic credibility (World Bank Governance Indicators correlation). 3. Expansion Beyond Security • Trade Governance (WTO) – Covers majority of global trade flows (98% – WTO). • Climate Governance (Paris Agreement) – Institutionalised Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). • Maritime Governance (UNCLOS) – Regulates EEZs covering 200 nautical miles; critical in Indo-Pacific disputes. • Human Rights Regime (ICCPR & ICESCR) – Near-universal ratification reinforces normative framework. 4. Structural Constraints • Enforcement Deficit – No supranational coercive authority; compliance relies on reciprocity. • Power Asymmetry – P5 privilege weakens sovereign equality principle. • Legal Fragmentation – 3,000+ multilateral treaties exist (UN Treaty Series), creating overlapping regimes. • Geopolitical Fragmentation – IMF (2023) warns economic fragmentation could reduce global GDP by up to 7%. 5. India’s Position • Sovereignty & Territorial Integrity Emphasis – Reiterated in UNGA speeches (MEA Statements). • UNCLOS Support in Indo-Pacific – Advocacy of Freedom of Navigation principle. • Global South Multilateralism – G20 Presidency 2023 theme: “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam.” • UNSC Reform Demand – Seeks expansion reflecting contemporary realities (G4 proposal). WAY FORWARD • UNSC Reform & Veto Restraint – Improve legitimacy of enforcement. • Strengthen Treaty Compliance Mechanisms – Link economic incentives to adherence. • Preventive Diplomacy – Early mediation before armed conflict. • Institutional Resilience – Deepen judicial capacity & multilateral cooperation. CONCLUSION International law evolves through crises rather than collapses. As Hedley Bull argued, even in anarchy, order survives through shared rules. UPSC CSE Prelims 2021 With reference to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), consider the following statements: 1. A coastal State has the right to establish the breadth of its territorial sea up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles. 2. Ships of all States, whether coastal or land-locked, enjoy the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 UPSC CSE Prelims 2014 Which of the following is/are the jurisdiction/jurisdictions of the International Court of Justice (ICJ)? 1. Disputes between States. 2. Disputes between individuals and States. 3. Advisory opinions on legal questions referred by authorized UN organs. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 UPSC CSE Prelims 2015 Consider the following statements regarding the International Criminal Court (ICC): 1. The ICC has jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. 2.