cookie

ما از کوکی‌ها برای بهبود تجربه مرور شما استفاده می‌کنیم. با کلیک کردن بر روی «پذیرش همه»، شما با استفاده از کوکی‌ها موافقت می‌کنید.

avatar

My writings

Writing 7 x3 🤡

نمایش بیشتر
کشور مشخص نشده استانگلیسی186 302آموزش103 773
پست‌های تبلیغاتی
306
مشترکین
+224 ساعت
+37 روز
+6630 روز

در حال بارگیری داده...

معدل نمو المشتركين

در حال بارگیری داده...

ketti karochi har kun task 2 yomagan
نمایش همه...
👍 5 2
In the rapidly changing job market, there is a growing call for governments to prioritize funding for skills and vocational training over university education. While it's true that investing in practical skills can boost employability and promote equity, this should not be an either-or proposition. Instead, governments should adopt a balanced approach that fosters complementary pathways, recognizing the unique value that both vocational training and university education bring to the table. First and foremost, vocational training enhances the employability of individuals who may not have had access to formal education. While universities typically emphasize deep theoretical knowledge, vocational training equips individuals with the practical, hands-on experience that is immediately applicable in a variety of fields. Domains such as healthcare, engineering, information technology, and the trades require a skilled workforce with relevant experience. Investments in vocational training can quickly produce a workforce that can meet the immediate demands of these industries Secondly, an increased focus on practical skills would significantly improve accessibility and equity in education and employment. Vocational training programs are often considerably more affordable than university education, which, while important, can come with exorbitantly high tuition fees. By allocating resources to vocational training, governments can ensure that individuals from all socioeconomic backgrounds have access to job-applicable education and knowledge. Furthermore, vocational training is inclusive, offering diverse pathways to well-paying jobs for those who may not have had the opportunity to pursue a traditional academic route. This can be a powerful tool for reducing income inequality and creating more job opportunities across a wider range of fields In reality, this debate should not be framed as a binary choice between vocational training and university education. An ideal scenario would involve strategic investment by the government to foster a symbiotic relationship between the two. Some individuals thrive in practical work, such as becoming electricians, plumbers, or software developers, while others excel in professions that require extensive formal education, like doctors, lawyers, researchers, or professors. Both preferences are valid, and government resources should be allocated to both types of education to ensure a well-rounded workforce. Additionally, vocational training can lay a strong foundation for individuals who may later choose to pursue university education to enhance their career prospects and deepen their understanding of their chosen field.
نمایش همه...
Photo unavailableShow in Telegram
Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
نمایش همه...
👍 8👎 2 1
In some parts of the world, many famous people are regarded as ‘role models’ and they are having an increasing influence on the young. Is that a positive or negative development?
نمایش همه...
👍 6
gemini vashe zor yozarkan
نمایش همه...
👍 5
So Who Needs People? A growing chorus of voices echoes this sentiment, defying the age-old notion of humans as inherently social creatures. The solitary life, once a fringe choice, is becoming mainstream. Apartments designed for one, restaurants with solo seating, and a booming self-care industry all cater to the rising tide of singles. But why are more and more people embracing a life unburdened by the complexities of relationships? Some point to the relentless pace of modern life, where juggling careers, personal growth, and social obligations leaves little time for nurturing a partnership. Others cite the fear of vulnerability and the pain of past heartbreaks, choosing the safe haven of solitude over the stormy seas of romance. Economic factors also play a role, as the rising cost of living makes it difficult for some to afford the expenses of a shared household. But perhaps the most significant driver is the growing acceptance of diverse lifestyles, where being single is no longer seen as a deficiency, but as a valid and fulfilling choice. The stigma of the "lonely spinster" or the "eternal bachelor" is fading, replaced by a celebration of independence and self-discovery. The dance floor of life, once filled with the swirling colors of companionship, can transform into a solitary stage, where the spotlight shines only on one. The echoes of laughter and shared secrets may dwindle, replaced by the stark silence of an empty apartment. The milestones of life, the triumphs and tribulations, are no longer met with a loving embrace but with a solitary toast to oneself. The weight of decisions, once shared, now rests solely on one's shoulders, and the burden of everyday life can feel heavier without a partner to help carry it. The path less traveled, while exhilarating, can also be a lonely road, devoid of the warmth and camaraderie that human connection brings. The freedom of solitude may eventually morph into the shackles of isolation, leaving one yearning for the simple joy of shared experiences.
نمایش همه...
👍 4🤩 2🤡 2
The bar chart shows changes in the percentage of females who pursued higher education in five countries between 1980 and 2015. Overall, there was a notable increase in the percentage of women pursuing higher education in most of the five countries during this period. By 2015, far more women were pursuing formal education in the UK and US, while South Korea saw a significant increase in female participation. Australian and French women experienced a smaller increase compared to other countries, but still maintained a relatively high level of participation The UK, US, and South Korea saw significant increases in female participation rates in higher education. In 1980, approximately 35% and 39% of women in the UK and US were pursuing higher education, figures that grew by 20 percentage points to reach 55% and 59% respectively by 2015. South Korea followed a similar upward trend, albeit less pronounced, starting with the lowest percentage of female participation in tertiary education in 1980 at 15%. While this percentage doubled by 2015, reaching 30%, the country still maintained its lowest position on the chart. Australia and France saw less pronounced increases in female participation rates compared to other countries. Australia accounted for by far the highest proportion of females pursuing formal education, with 59% that then held steady by 2015. In France, the initial percentage of females was 50%, which then saw a slight increase to 52% by the end.
نمایش همه...
🔥 3
Photo unavailableShow in Telegram
gpt is mind blowing
نمایش همه...
🔥 6
Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country's police force or military force, such as the army, while others think women are not suitable for this kind of jobs. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
نمایش همه...
😁 8🤡 5