will to code

The Roman Empire: A Legacy of Failure Barely lasted. If it was like Egyptian Civilization it would still be thriving! imagine that What did the Egyptians have that the Romans didn't? > Mythology... their Pharaohs were divine This is clearly a much better form of governance but thanks to the "logic", "reason" and "philosophy" left to us by the Graeco-Romans we will never take it seriously to become a free-thinker was and still is the ideal but we must become free-spirits and mythologize once more Can you imagine a system lasting for 3000 years Longevity is all that matters If Rome had Egypt's longevity all the great discoveries of the 18th/19th century would have happened 1000+ years ago. CAN YOU IMAGINE WHERE WE WOULD BE NOW. That is why I view Rome as an absolute failure

kimi 2.6 just dropped looks promising next to claude... but don't look at gemini it is a shamelessly benchmaxed model

A service that loans out tokens with interest Most ROI than any other asset for both parties involved This asset, a TOKEN, has agency If I got a loan for a million dollars I can't ask it anything. I have to do everything myself. But if I got 100 million tokens for Claude.... I can ask Claude to do stuff for me We need tokens more than we need money do you understand it now Nvidea is undervalued The whole of AI is undervalued China built itself up by creating banks and using loans Now imagine the same process... creating data centers and getting Tokens as Debt. This is a glimpse into the abundance that is coming If you fail to pay your Token dept then your provider is incentivezed to keep giving you loans until you succeed. Because at the end of the day, ITS ONLY ELECTRICITY!!!

We owe ALL of the acceleration in the realm of technology to just a handful of optimistic based GIGA CHAD founders of these two Research Labs > BELL LABS > XEROX PARK

Search and you shall Discover!

Makes you wonder are iterations even worth it... What is the point in winning battles if your gonna lose the war... There may be some wisdom in the stagnation of Apple products. The empire iterating on different kinds of swords losses to the one that has discovered bows and catapults > Discovery beats iteration

*meta has joined the chat

The pentagon really fumbled this one Not good when AGI is your supply chain risk lol

ggs

It costs $25 input $125 output 💀

"AGI HAS BEEN ACHIEVED INTERNALLY"

New open source drop!!!! > 6x cheaper than opus

German word for library: Bibliotek 🗿

AI is wayyyyyy under hyped I was one of the people on twitter saying gpt-5 will be AGI in the early days of gpt-4: which is now considered an unusable model by any standards At this moment, we are the bottle neck: Skill Issue If you look at nations, or groups of people in general, the consensus always happens—or rather, policies always get enacted—after the fact. No action is taken during a decline in birthrate. For a better example: when the birth rate goes from 4 to 3, nobody sounds the alarm. It’s only when it reaches 1 or a negative number that policies start to get passed and the general public agrees that their birthrate is declining. In the same way nobody is aware of the insane performance leap from gpt-4 to gpt-5.4 > You just need to extrapolate a bit to understand the situation we are in You have to ignore the consensus of "ai slop" and try to push these models to any limit you can imagine them having

Evolution is nature's way of finding product market fit

- Charles Darwin

Anthropic's research Post on X

I strongly believe smart context management would positively impact our AI workflows > You tell AI write some code > It writes code > Code has error > You tell it to fix the error > It fixes it But now that "fixing" is in the context and sitting there not contributing to anything. What we need is this: > It goes back to the earlier code it sent > Adds the fix there > Deletes the messages of you telling it to fix the code We don't know anything at this point. What if it just follows the pattern of making a mistake and you telling it to fix it. Or like Antrhopics recent research what if it just takes on the personality of a sloppy dev... What if there was an agent which goes through the context and makes sure that the LLM's 'personality' is competent. The context manager decides what the long and short term memory needs to be. Dynamic context. Kinda like us.

The hardest thing in the world is simple

We need to bring back blimps Its one of the most exciting modes of transport to come out of a dynamic era Think about all the advancements in AI and nano tech... Autonomy, Efficiency and very hard to crash... Its better than telling people to go on autonomous planes which are practically cruise missiles.

Karpathy is soooo right > How good is your planning? > How good is your short/long term memory? > How much do you care? Imagine creating a detailed memory palace on what you want to get done and constantly updating it... Literally GOD MODE (...also being able to recall past sessions 🫠) The landscape has completely changed Those niche skills matter more than anything now