Based Squad

The nation has awakened, O Abbas

🗣 | Spotted on the train:

ممكن صورة؟!

💔

chatgpt supports jihad (struggle) for justice

Cv رئيس الجمهورية السوري الجديد

Is it permissible to believe that the Hell-Fire is not eternal? Or is this deviance? Or kufr? I asked this in a recent aqida test, and many overly confident Wahhabis in the replies said it is deviance and kufr without any doubt. The poor fools did not realize that this was the position of Ibn Taymiyya. One of the most basic Islamic beliefs is that hell is eternal and that those who reject Islam will be punished there forever. Many have argued that it is kufr to deny this eternality of Hell since it is mentioned explicitly in the Quran. However, a small number of scholars have questioned this belief. Among the most famous are Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim. Both figures hold that it is permissible (or even correct) to believe that Hell will eventually pass away (fana' al-nar) and that the punishment of polytheists will cease. In the view of fools like Jake, this would make Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim the ultimate "aqida liberals," because Ibn Taymiyya's position amounts to the idea that aqida ultimately does not matter for salvation. In other words, one can attain salvation from hell while explicitly rejecting tawhid, worshipping idols, and even making war on Islam, since the hell fire will not last forever. For their opinions, Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim have been subject to strong criticism form figures like al-Subki, al-San'ani and others. Indeed, those who oppose Wahhabism and Salafism (which is not the same as Wahhabism), frequently cite this matter as indication that both groups are heretical insofar as they claim to follow Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim. Reacting to this situation, Salafi scholars like al-Albani, Muqbil, and Fawzan have insisted that Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim simply made an error in their ijtihad regarding a matter of aqida. And this does not matter or make them guilty of heretical innovation, or decrease their status as Imams of Ahl al-Sunna. What great wisdom is there in such a viewpoint! What excellent tolerance for the great imams of our tradition! And how distant it is from some of the opinions on aqida found in the works attributed to the ninth century Ahl al-Hadith like al-Barbahari and Harb al-Kirmani! (although these works have a lot of material of questionable authenticity). Unfortunately many Wahhabis, and even many ordinary Salafis, have not read or understood Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim - let alone al-Albani or Muqbil or Bin Baz or Ibn Uthaymin. Some of the loudest are uneducated postmen, fitness trainers, samsung vendors, and ex-convicts and ex-crackheads who masquerade as alims or "tullab al-ilm." So they become confused if you point out basic facts about Ibn Taymiyya - e.g., that he believed in calling on jinn, or claimed a supernatural ability to see the future (e.g., reading victory over the Tatars off al-lawh al-mahfuz). They also become shocked when you tell them that figures like al-Albani, Muqbil, etc,, were quite tolerant of errors in aqida - at least from scholars they accept. For example, Jake, the loud ex-Quranist postman - thinks that ijtihad errors in aqida automatically make one an innovator, such that one should be attacked and denied a place within Ahl al-Sunna. Lest you think that I'm exaggerating, let me produce the exact quotes from al-Albani, Muqbil, and Fawzan. Since al-Albani's quote is the longest, I leave it for last. Shaykh Muqbil says: "My response to Imam al-Shawkani—may Allah have mercy on him—does not diminish his status, nor is he the first scholar to make an error. Indeed, Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and his student Ibn al-Qayyim also erred in their belief in the passing away of Hellfire (Fana’ al-Nar). "Imam al-San‘ani addressed this mistake in his book "Raf‘ al-Astar fi al-Radd ‘ala al-Qa'ilin bi Fana’ al-Nar", in which he refuted their position. "However, when a scholar makes a mistake, while also possessing immense virtues, his errors are overshadowed by his many merits. No scholar is immune from mistakes—every great scholar has had errors."

YT | DJPeachCobbler

Proving Prophethood of Muhammad (ﷺ): The miracle of Divine Revelation in the Qur’an (part 1) Prophecy in the Qur’an: Romans victory over the Persians Allah revealed Surah Ar-Rum (Makki Sura, what was revealed before Prophet's migration to Medina in 622 AD) - {Alif-Lãm-Mĩm (1) The Romans have been defeated (2) in a nearby land. Yet following their defeat, they will triumph (3) within three to nine years. The ˹whole˺ matter rests with Allah before and after ˹victory˺. And on that day the believers will rejoice (4) at the victory willed by Allah. He gives victory to whoever He wills. For He is the Almighty, Most Merciful. (5) ˹This is˺ the promise of Allah. ˹And˺ Allah never fails in His promise. But most people do not know. (6)} The above verse speaks of the Romans being defeated in a time close to its revelation, and then it made a prophecy that the Romans will triumph within the next three to nine years, and that Allah’s (swt) promise never fails. The following is a timeline of the events: Year 602 (20 BH): The start of the war between the Byzantines and the Persians Year 610 (12 BH) Heraclius becomes the Byzantine Emperor Year 613 (9 BH): Persians conquer Homs, Apamea and Damascus Year 614 (8 BH): Persians conquer Palestine and take the Holy Cross from Church of the Holy Sepulchre to the Capital of Persia (The first time the capital falls under the hands of non-Christians) Year 619 (3 BH): The fall of Alexandria on the hands of the Persians which led to a shortage of wheat in Constantinople, causing financial problems. Year 622: (The year of Hijra/Migration): The Roman Empire was on the brink of annihilation and had only Athena, the Isles in the Mediterranean sea, and a coastal strip in North of Africa. The morale of the Roman Empire was rapidly declining and internal struggles appeared which led to predictions of their complete defeat in no time, as the circumstances proved that it was almost impossible for the Roman Empire to win, and it is during these times that the Quranic verse was revealed, prophesying a victory for the Romans over the Persians, which was an unexpected prophecy and it put the Prophet (sawa) in a difficult position as if it goes wrong it disproves his entire message. Year 622 continued: (The year of Hijra): During this year Heraclius launched a counter-offensive against the Persians, he leaves Constantinople to face the Persians and wins against Shahrbaraz, which is the first victory against the Persians after a series of loses Year 624 (2 AH): Heraclius conquers modern-day Azerbaijan and destroys the largest Zoroastrian temple Year 627 (5 AH): Heraclius achieves a devastating victory in the battle of Nineveh against the Persian army Year 628 (6 AH): The war ends through the revolt of the Persian king’s son against his father and agreeing to a peace treaty with the Byzantines Edward Gibbon (1737 - 1794) comments on the Qur’anic prophecy in his book by saying the following: “At the time when this prediction is said to have been delivered, no prophecy could be more distant from its accomplishment, since the first twelve years of Heraclius announced the approaching dissolution of the empire.” Post credit: HakiNinth

+ Artworks by https://www.instagram.com/mohammed_afefa

☕️☕️

Legend. He's done it again.

🇱🇧🇮🇱⚡Lebanese guy casually flipping off an IDF Merkava IV tank like he's ordering coffee. Sometimes all it takes to fight occupation is one middle finger and zero fear. Subscribe to @MidEastInsights

💔🥀Condolences on the anniversary of the martyrdom of Imam Kazim (the seventh Imam) to all Shias and his followers. @shia313s