Crypto Rug Muncher

تاریخ	رشد مشترکین	اشارات	کانال‌ها
21 ژوئیه	0
20 ژوئیه	0
19 ژوئیه	0
18 ژوئیه	0
17 ژوئیه	0
16 ژوئیه	0
15 ژوئیه	+1
14 ژوئیه	+2
13 ژوئیه	+1
12 ژوئیه	+1
11 ژوئیه	+1
10 ژوئیه	0
09 ژوئیه	0
08 ژوئیه	0
07 ژوئیه	0
06 ژوئیه	+1
05 ژوئیه	+2
04 ژوئیه	0
03 ژوئیه	0
02 ژوئیه	0
01 ژوئیه	+1

پست‌های کانال

Not dead, just on holiday in a place that’s made me care more about real life than the crypto market and the daily shenanigans of scammers and their endless scams that I usually talk about here. Taking a break was good for me, and honestly, we should all do this from time to time if we’re heavy into social media daily. Back to the regularly scheduled scams soon.

2	What’s funny about this, if it’s true, is that Eric "Thank me later" Trump probably sold right at the bottom, just hours before his dad temporarily scam-pumped the market by caving on tariffs. You know tons of other insiders probably made bank off that information. So why didn’t they clue Eric in? https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1909782070618210423	3 042
3	The meme market feels a bit better these days. There are probably more daily runners on Solana now than back during the peak of scam season a few months ago. I’m not saying these projects are gonna last (given the macro outlook and how most memes usually end), but it’s nice to see investors coming back and not getting insta-rugged by some ridiculous bundler. If it stays like this, more people might actually want to jump back in. At the end of the day, punters need to at least think they’ve got a shot at winning at the casino if you want them to play.	2 737
4	I'm not sure why the Trump supporters are celebrating right now. He turned off the tariffs for 90 days and the market pumped as a result. This wasn't some masterful gambit, it was placing a pause on bad policy the president created.	2 188
5	+1 Presidential shilling.	1 952
6	We've got a Pump fun dev as president.	2 086
7	The whole idea of cryptocurrency—or at least its founding principles—has essentially been abandoned at this point. A large portion of all Bitcoin is now controlled by a corporate entity under Saylor and MicroStrategy, and more will inevitably be controlled by them year after year. In other areas of crypto, decentralization often willingly gives way to centralization in the name of convenience. Large corporate entities are leveraging their lobbying arms to cozy up to governments, aiming to control and dominate the industry. The entire space has morphed into something entirely different from the ideals it was conceived upon, and most people involved don’t seem to care—as long as "number go up." If we’re really going to be into crypto, though, we should probably be a bit more rigid in our ideology and actively oppose those who seek to erode the founding principles of why we are all here. Just my take.	1 461
8	+2 I want to give credit where it’s due—a shoutout to @Rugcheckxyz for actually improving their product in recent months. I’ve been critical of this site in the past for not doing enough to detect rugs or bundlers, beyond simply labeling the LP as locked or not, whether a contract was mutable, etc. But that has all changed in 2025. Rugcheck now attempts to identify bundled projects, insider networks, and even draws a Bubblemaps-like visualization that maps the connections between insider wallets. Overall, it’s a major improvement and now a tool that genuinely has the ability to check for rugs as they happen. As with any tool—especially one in beta—we shouldn’t rely on it 100%. Additional research should always be done to get a more detailed analysis before making any investment decisions. Even more impressive for Rugcheck is that they haven’t launched a scam token to fund these improvements. So far, this utility project is doing it right, and that’s another positive aspect worth highlighting—especially compared to what’s going on with the competition right now. Good stuff—and it feels great to make a post about a project that’s been around for a while and is still improving and evolving with the times.	1 143
9	I still don’t think the markets have fully digested just how monumental of a colossal fuck-up the tariffs are. Backtracking would spark an instant reversal, but that would also mean quietly admitting they got it all wrong. I expect them to reverse course—or at least pause—sooner rather than later, as Trump still needs the House and Senate if he doesn’t want to face a third impeachment trial. Maybe the pressure hasn’t mounted enough yet, but it will continue to build until a change in course is eventually made. This is legacy-killing bad policy, and I’m sure there are some close to the president who are beginning to recognize that.	901
10	+1 I totally missed this when it happened, but apparently Kraken enjoys a good meme scam now too. Are the Winklevoss boys the only ones running an exchange who haven’t gone this route yet? $Ghibli	1 131
11	Alright, I’ve had a few students sign up and take my Rugpull Rehab class despite these market conditions, so I’m going to plug it again. You can now take this course for around $100 (depending on the price of Solana), compared to people happily paying $200+ just a few months ago. If you want to join the group course, it’s only about $50. I’m keeping prices low out of respect for market conditions and to show that I’m not only doing these lessons for the money—I genuinely enjoy teaching this content and interacting with the community. For the group course this week, I’ll be offering a single session at 10 AM Central Time (US) on Sunday. I’ve updated the course content to reflect current market conditions and events, so many of the case studies cover things that have happened recently in the space. All courses are taught live via Google Meet, and all students will receive a recording of the lesson and the course content after the session is complete. Take advantage of the market decline and learn how to spot and avoid crypto scams on the cheap, as well as how to protect your crypto assets no matter the market conditions. DM @CryptoRugMunch on X or Telegram to book your lesson today.	960
12	+2 One more look at $RFC - Retard Finder Coin. When I reviewed this project last week, I noted that about 30% of the supply was bundled, and these bundled wallets were noticeable among the top 100 wallets on Solscan. I have since gone back and checked and I am still seeing many of these wallets in the top 100 today. Since when I first looked at this project, Elon Musk has replied to a tweet by @IfindRetards, the creator of this token, and the price has surged to over $50 million in market cap. So, is it a good buy now? Let’s dive in: GMGN Analysis: The platform identifies a significant number of transfer wallets in the project, which suggests insider activity. However, GMGN only flags 0.3% of holders as insiders—something I believe isn’t accurate. Axium Analysis: Axium labels 36% of holders as insiders, with some of these wallets scattered throughout the top 50 holders. The Bubblemap also shows a noticeable degree of association between top wallets, further indicating insider connections. My Take: This project could run temporarily depending on how much Elon continues to engage with this account. However, the long-term outlook isn’t great. In my opinion, it's unlikely that larger exchanges will list a token named Retard Finder Coin. Not saying it’s impossible, but it doesn’t seem likely. Additionally, we’ve seen the hype around Elon-related tokens fade quickly as he shifts focus to the next thing. I would expect the same thing to happen here. CA: C3DwDjT17gDvvCYC2nsdGHxDHVmQRdhKfpAdqQ29pump Check out $RFC on GMGN: https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/v0Nh9x5i_C3DwDjT17gDvvCYC2nsdGHxDHVmQRdhKfpAdqQ29pump Check out $RFC on Axiom: https://axiom.trade/meme/D6Rgz1JG2syjsTXGaSAZ39cLffWL4TfabEAAnJHGRrZC Join GMGN using my ref link below: https://gmgn.ai/referral/v0Nh9x5i?chain=sol Join Axiom using my ref link: https://axiom.trade/@crm	912
13	Folks, you don’t need to run a 90% bundler to pull off a rug pull—a clean 10% clipped at the right time would do the trick. There’s no magic number for how much the team and insiders should control. The reality is, the more supply that can be saved from snipers, the better. But once that supply is gathered, transparency becomes the real issue—and no one in the meme space wants to operate transparently. If projects were just honest about the supply they held and clearly outlined what it was going to be used for, supply control wouldn’t be such a big deal. The reason it’s such a red flag is because no one wants to be transparent about it. Change how projects are run, and people’s perceptions about the issue will change too. Bundles aren’t always bad—but they are when those bundles are just being used to nuke the price instead of developing the project.	751
14	I know the crypto crowd doesn’t always appreciate it when I talk trash about Trump, and I’ve definitely taken a hit to my follower count as a result. That said, I’ll keep going as long as his policies affect the market I cover. To those who disagree with me but stick around—hats off to you. I know it’s hard to move beyond our information bubbles, and I recognize that the content I post now isn’t always the same rug pull content I used to focus on. I’m trying to find a balance between these two ideas. While I won’t change the content I post here, I’ll be a bit more mindful of those of you who are exclusively here for the ruggy rugs and will make an effort to cover those more regularly moving forward, while covering politics a bit more sparingly when they aren’t obliterating the market I focus on. I read the comments on all my posts—even if you disagree with me—so thank you for sticking around and sharing your views. The community of people that follow me here regularly takes me outside my own information bubble as well. I think that’s something we all need these days.	758
15	The person who wrote this is a meme coin scammer who has used her community as exit liquidity dozens of times over the past year in projects where she was given free allocations. She is the very definition of an insider and will be back to scamming as soon as it becomes profitable again.	698
16	Guys, I think this almost makes up for the multiple trillions wiped from the market in the last few days, don't you? https://x.com/DeItaone/status/1909703630816764250	739
17	My biggest mistake this cycle wasn’t necessarily mistiming my exit—it was coming back for more, even though deep down I knew the market was probably toast. I only reallocated a small portion of my gains back into the market, but I still took some unnecessary hits in March that I eventually capitulated on. Sometimes, the best move is to sit on your hands and do nothing once you’ve made your play. That said, this is still preferable to holding many of my tokens to dust, like I did back in 2021. There are always improvements to be made and lessons to learn with each cycle we survive.	714
18	In my opinion—and this probably goes against what many in the space think—if you’re an anti-scam project and you launch a token, you’re becoming part of the problem. There are already enough tokens performing horribly as it is, and launching another one only adds to the mess. While there’s clearly a demand for projects like this, developers need to be more creative in figuring out how to make them profitable. The easiest solution—securing funds by launching a token—comes with the highest reputational cost. Focus on better solutions to make these projects sustainable as well as profitable, and the need for a token would quickly be forgotten. Do better. If you claim to be anti-scam, then be about that life—or don’t bother at all.	716
19	Without diving too much into the tokenomics of $REMUS, I think this chart serves as a solid reminder for anyone in the trenches right now. Market conditions are obviously not great, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t coins out there performing. That said, if you happen to catch a project like this, make sure to pay yourself. When should you pay yourself? When you feel you’ve made a reasonable amount of money on whatever dogshit you’ve invested in. Don’t get overly greedy here—you’re trading hot garbage. Pay yourself. There’s no need to aim for a 100x because, realistically, it’s not going to happen. If you don’t sell, someone else will—and they’ll be dumping on your head. Be a dumper, not a dumpee.	748
20	+2 Alright folks, I’m back with some additional analysis on $titcoin, a token that has somehow managed to outlast most of the garbage in the market. The last time I looked into this project, I noted a large number of fresh wallets (as GMGN pointed out) involved with the token, and that this number was increasing—which I found to be suspicious. For this analysis, I’m using Axiom Pro. The platform identifies at least 31% of the holders as "insiders" in the project. It also highlights a significant number of "insider" and "bundler" wallets within the top 100 holders. Interestingly, the Bubblemaps don’t look as bad as the data Axiom Pro provides. However, there is a single cluster holding about 7% of the supply, and that’s the most concerning part for me. All in all, it seems likely that this project has a good number of insiders propping up the price. Once these wallets start dumping, it’s game over. That said, I’m still somewhat impressed that this hasn’t rugged yet, especially considering the conditions in the rest of the market. I guess we shall see. Check out $titcoin on Axiom Pro: https://axiom.trade/meme/4qQM2x2pfhU3ToscAqkQxTfhTm7DmJe8LGWU9kvqeNH4 Join Axiom Pro using my ref link to analyze tokens before you buy: https://axiom.trade/@crm	986

مشاهده همه پست‌ها