Peter Bernegger

Peru had 90% of its 27 million ballots counted the same day of their recent election - by hand. The City of Milwaukee took all day Nov 3rd 2020 into Nov 4th until 3:06am to count 269,500 absentee mail-in ballots. And they had high speed scanners. Peru: ~3,000,000 per hour Milwaukee: ~13,475 ballots per hour And, you can see with your own eyes the disaster (election fraud) happening in California now taking days/weeks to count way less than Peru's ballots. ~ Peter Bernegger

The way to stop election fraud is to criminally prosecute the bad actors stealing our elections. ~ Peter Bernegger

NEW REPORT: Wisconsin's official voter database now credits 3,379,178 people with voting in Nov 2020. Ballots cast: 3,308,331. 70,847 MORE voters than ballots. The election was decided by 20,682. Look on page 2 of how the total ballots cast number keeps changing over time, all for the SAME exact election!! Five page report at link, first 2 pages shown below. https://issuu.com/electionwatch/docs/hufton_files_report_june_4_2026_five_pages?fr=xKAE9_zMzMw Thank you to Steve Hufton for running the data. ~ Peter Bernegger

"Milwaukee Council OKs election legal counsel in wake of FBI inquiry" "Is the Milwaukee City Attorney's Office gearing up for a possible legal storm tied to the 2020 election? The answer: most likely." "With no public discussion, the city's Common Council unanimously voted June 2 in favor of authorizing the City Attorney to hire outside counsel for election-related needs." Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. What I'm hearing: people have flipped and are spilling the beans on the theft of elections taking place in the City of Milwaukee and the County of Milwaukee. 😎 Where are the 6 Wisconsin Election Commissioners' and Meagan Wolfe's bravado and faux talking points now? ~ Peter Bernegger

Texas Sec. of State Jane Nelson learned of my federal lawsuit against her on May 28th. Two days ago she resigned. I posted about this March 1st. ~ Peter Bernegger

Harry Wait was just sentenced: no jail time! This is great news as Harry exposed the corrupt Wisconsin Election Commission for THEM committing election fraud. For the corrupt Wisconsin Election Commission knowingly exposing each registered voter in Wisconsin - still till this day - of your voter accounts being able to be accessed on the Wisconsin Election Commission website MyVote. Like I'm doing here for Don Millis - one of the Wisconsin Election Commissioners. Where now I or anybody can change his name, change his address, order his absentee mail-in ballot and have it sent to an address of my choosing. This is how UTTERLY DUMB Don Millis and the other five Commissioners are. And DUMBER rep Vos as he created this horrific system. I brought up Millis account in 74 seconds by just using his name and birthdate. Now I can change whatever I want in Don Millis voter account with the state. And they thought they smarties, trying a feeble attempt to block the use of VPN's to their corrupt MyVote.wi.gov website. Well, these DUMBERERS forgot anyone can use certain techniques that mimic the real person's electronic signature. So 10,000 Chynese can be sitting in Chyna obtaining Wisconsin ballots!! Harry received three years probation - for exposing the fraud of the Wisconsin Election Commission - how about a big thank you to Harry to have the balls to expose the dumbest government officials! ~ Peter Bernegger

Most people have no idea what President Trump’s new election-mail Executive Order USPS rule actually does. 1. Plain English: it creates a chain-of-custody system for mail ballot envelopes in federal elections. 2. Not the vote, the envelope. 3. Under the proposed USPS rule, states using mail-in or absentee ballots for federal elections would have to use standardized ballot envelopes: -Official Election Mail logo -Automation-compatible design -Unique Intelligent Mail barcode -USPS review of envelope/barcode placement 4. That means the ballot envelope becomes trackable. 5. States or election mailers would also submit key data through a USPS portal: -Voter name -Voter address -Outbound envelope barcode -Return envelope barcode -Originating election office state 6. So officials can know: this ballot envelope was sent out, and this return envelope came back. 7. USPS would review outbound ballot mail before accepting it. -Is it in the right envelope? -Does it have the proper barcode? -Is it going to someone enrolled on that state’s mail- ballot participation list? 8. If not, the mailing goes back to the election mailer to fix. 9. The broader Executive Order also directs DHS + SSA to help create State Citizenship Lists using federal citizenship, naturalization, SSA, SAVE, and related data. 10. Those lists go to state election officials before federal elections. 11. Important: states still run voter registration. The federal list does not register anyone by itself. 12. Bottom line: this is not “tracking your vote.” 13. It tracks the envelope, creates a sent-vs-returned audit trail, helps flag discrepancies, preserves ballot-envelope records, and leaves states responsible for their voter rolls. 14. Chain of custody is not suppression. It is basic election accountability. 15. I used “proposed rule” because USPS has not finalized the rule yet. 16. The proposal says it applies to general, special, and runoff federal elections, not primaries or UOCAVA military/overseas ballots, and it requires unique barcodes on outbound and return envelopes. 17. The rule would require voter name/address plus outbound and return envelope barcode data through a USPS portal, with updates allowed until the last day ballots may be mailed under state law. 18. It also says USPS does not alter voter eligibility or manage state voter rolls. 19. The EO separately directs DHS/SSA to create State Citizenship Lists and directs DOJ enforcement and five-year preservation of participation records, excluding cast ballots. 20. There is one more thing it does, all I'll say is, watch out ballot mills. 😎 ~ Peter Bernegger

Foreign workers have received 52% of American jobs since 2007. The Fed. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) confirm this: foreigners accounted for 56% of labor force growth from 2007 to early 2025. "9 of every 10 new American jobs since pre-COVID went to someone born outside the country." See the BLS image backing this statement. "Foreign-born employment is growing 42x faster than native-born since 2019. FORTY-TWO TIMES." The March jobs report confirms it. And why are these numbers like this? Government policies = politicians and bureaucrats. Kick out all the illegal aliens and HB visa workers. ~ Peter Bernegger

Part 2 of 2: Wisconsin does not report total ballots cast for any election until 6 months afterwards!! My post above shows the total ballots cast for the same election (Nov. 3rd, 2020) keeps changing every time we purchase a new voter registration list from the Wis. Election Commission. In fact, the state's data shows total ballots cast changes for every election in Wisconsin! By big numbers also! See my April 29th 2026 post. The only way to obtain the number of total ballots cast for any election is to 1) wait until 45 days after the (federal) election and spend $12,500 to buy a list. Or, 2) wait six months for the Wis. Election Commission to report the total ballots cast to the federal Election Assistance Commission in DC. Chairwoman Ann Jacobs of the Wis. Election Commission doesn't even know this - she has stated in writing that the total ballots cast number is reported by the Election Commission. No it is not..... Not for 6 months after the election is over, and you have to get it from the federal government. Total ballots cast should be reported when the canvassing is over and the election is certified. Typically this is 7-10 days after the election, depending on which state you are in. Does your state report total ballots cast at the time they certify the elections (this is a different number than total votes cast)? ~ Peter Bernegger

The total ballots cast in a completed election should not keep changing. The Wisconsin Election Commission reported 3,308,331 ballots cast for the Nov. 2020 election to the federal EAC. But WEC’s own snapshots over time show totals swinging from -36,051 to +70,847 from that official number. It should be a straight line in the chart. Same election. Different totals. Repeatedly. Why? Thank you to Steve Hufton for data work. ~ Peter Bernegger

An "F" Liberty Score shows they are a Democrat. Info in chart from Conservative Review. ~ Peter Bernegger

She said that when she realized she forgot the drive, she called an employee to retrieve it. He found it still plugged into a tabulator and gave it to a Milwaukee Police officer for transport to the County Election Commission. The FBI’s Milwaukee probe seems to be part of a broader national investigation into the 2020 presidential election. FBI Director Kash Patel said last month that an investigation was ongoing and that there would be arrests “very soon.” Source for above: the Dan O'Donnell Show in the heartlandpost.com Mr. O'Donnell has a radio show on News/Talk 1130 WISN. ~ Peter Bernegger

The FBI has questioned a Milwaukee election worker who was assigned to Central Count on Election Night 2020, the woman told the Heartland Post exclusively. Two agents showed up at the woman’s home last week and interviewed her about an affidavit she swore in 2020 about witnessing secretive late-night ballot counts. “Last week Wednesday, two FBI agents knocked on my apartment door,” she said. “I spent almost an hour with them answering their questions and going through my affidavit.” The Heartland Post is not naming the woman, as she is a potential material witness in an ongoing federal investigation. That investigation, which includes FBI interviews with dozens of Milwaukee Police officers, is apparently focused on former Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall-Vogg. “The agents showed me a picture of [Woodall-Vogg] and asked me if I recognized her,” the election worker told The Heartland Post. “I told them I recognized her picture. I told them she was the head person at Central Count and trained a group of us for the ballot count.” The woman told The Heartland Post that Woodall-Vogg’s actions on Election Night were a primary focus of the agents’ questions. “They were very interested in what she was doing and saying that night,” the woman said. The agents also asked her about her the claims she made in a 2020 affidavit that election workers were counting absentee ballots long after it was announced that all ballots were counted and that the Election Night work was over. “At 10:30pm, someone announced over the loud speaker system that all the ballots were counted and we could call it a night,” the woman said. “Since I was being paid by the hour, I asked if there was anything I could help with. I went to the back of the room where this guy was reconciling the machine count with the hand count. We then bundled the ballots for shipment to where ever they were supposed to be stored.” She thought that this was the final batch of ballots that would need to be processed, but more kept coming in and were only being counted in remote areas of the ballroom floor that served as the Central Count facility at the Baird Center. “At midnight I took a break and walked around the ballroom,” the woman explained. “They had turned most of the lights off but at the far end of the room, there were bright lights on and people apparently working on ballots. I asked somebody what was going on, and the person said they got a late delivery of absentee ballots and were working on them. I went back to work on the ballots reconciling with the machine count. “At 2:30 am, I got ready to leave and I was surprised to see people still working on the intake of ballots. I signed out my time work hours and asked one of the guys standing around if they could walk me to my car.” The woman never alleged that what she saw was illegal, only suspicious and in apparent violation of the rules established for ballot counters. She decided to report her suspicions to poll observers and swore out an affidavit with a Republican attorney. That affidavit, she told the Heartland Post, was the primary focus of the FBI agents’ questions last week. She said she was not a target of their investigation and was not in any trouble, but that the agents wanted to know what went on at Central Count. The FBI is apparently conducting a widening investigation into the way Milwaukee officials handled the 2020 election. An agent attempted to interview the executive director of the Milwaukee County Election Commission last week and this week started scheduling interviews with Milwaukee Police officers. Those officer interviews appear to be centered on the actions of Woodall-Vogg, who left behind a flash drive containing tabulated vote totals at Central Count when she received a police escort to deliver the votes to the Milwaukee County Election Commission for final entry into the county’s vote count.

FBI to interview 30 City of Milwaukee Police Officers on topic of 2020 election. The Wisconsin Election Commission needs to be abolished, it has participated in the election fraud, not stopped it. What a disgrace the six Commissioners, Administrator Meagan Wolfe and the staff are - they failed to listen to citizens and instead acted like Kings and Queens. But now they are going to pay the price with the truth coming out. They made their choice to cover up, and again directly participate in election fraud, instead of doing the right thing. I wonder who else might be in the very hot seat, hmmm I just can't remember his name... ~ Peter Bernegger

A federal court in WI today denied the US DOJ their lawsuit seeking the statewide voter registration list. Below is what should be done now: I read the lawsuit, and then the court's order denying it. Here is where the US DOJ went wrong: The US DOJ had authority to investigate election-law compliance, but it used the wrong legal hook to force production of Wisconsin’s full unredacted voter database. They conflated HAVA maintenance duties with Title III production power. HAVA requires Wisconsin to maintain a computerized statewide list; DOJ used that as a reason to demand the list. But the claim they pled was a Civil Rights Act § 20703 production claim, not a standalone HAVA violation claim. The complaint’s requested relief was production of the full list “as required by 52 U.S.C. § 21083,” but the actual count was titled “Violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1960, 52 U.S.C. § 20703.” They asked for a current living database, not preserved election records. Title III’s structure is about retaining and preserving election-related records for 22 months after an election. DOJ asked for the current electronic SVRL with all fields, including sensitive identifiers. The court found that awkward because voter lists are continuously updated; HAVA itself requires regular additions, removals, and deduplication. The US DOJ relied too heavily on the phrase “sweeping.” DOJ quoted older Fifth Circuit cases saying Title III gives broad investigative power and a limited court role. But the court said even in a summary Title III proceeding, the judge still has to decide the threshold legal question: whether the requested material can be demanded under Title III at all. The US DOJ did not adequately bridge “registration record” to “entire unredacted voter list.” The court adopted the Benson/Fontes reasoning that § 20701 is aimed at records received from voters or outside sources, such as applications, registrations, and poll-tax records, not databases created and maintained by the state. Their request for personal information (PII) made the weakness sharper. Wisconsin had offered the publicly available voter list and refused the unredacted list because of state restrictions on elector PII. The US DOJ attached a proposed MOU to address privacy concerns, but the court never needed to reach the privacy issue because it found HAVA Title III did not apply in the first place. imo the US DOJ should have pled a direct HAVA enforcement claim under 52 U.S.C. §§ 21083 and 21111, supported by concrete facts showing Wisconsin’s voter-registration system was actually violating HAVA. Wisconsin is NVRA-exempt because of same-day/Election Day registration, but Wisconsin is not HAVA-exempt. HAVA independently requires a centralized statewide voter-registration list, unique voter identifiers, expedited entry of registration information, duplicate elimination, accuracy safeguards, and verification of driver’s-license/SSN4/unique-ID data. The US Attorney General may sue for injunctive relief to carry out those HAVA requirements. Therefore, a court-protected, field-limited production of the unredacted HAVA fields is necessary discovery or remedial relief in a live HAVA enforcement action - not a Title III demand for a “living” voter list. That would not guarantee a win, but it would be a stronger route. There is more, but you get the gist. ~ Peter Bernegger

People who have access to the WI voter registration database listed below. Surprise ending. -Prashant Adepu - Synergy Consortium -Kamalakar Pasikanti - Synergy Consortium, and        Vennsys LLC -Anil Patel - -Mohideen Kader - Synergy Consortium -Jigar Patel - Synergy Consortium -Narender Yelgapuri - Beechwood Computing Ltd -RajKiran Chiluvuri - Beechwood Computing Ltd -Mahadeo Matre - Beechwood Computer Ltd -Brian Neis - Velocity Computing Corp. -Narender Yelgapuri - Velocity Computing Corp. From Beechwood Computing's website: "a full-service, offshore-based IT service provider." Surprise: none of the above people had a criminal background check. I believe many to be H-1B visa workers. Bonus Surprise: corrupt Robin Vos's old college buddy Anthony Supanich owns Synergy Consortium Services company. Supanich has a $30 million dollar contract to supply cheap IT to the state of Wisconsin. Supanich's office is shown in the image. He is bringing in foreigners who then have access to the WisVote database - in fact all databases of the State because the dumbells put all on the same 50 computer servers, located in Dane County and part in Waukesha County. So our voter registrations are in the same system as the DNR, as the DMV, as the Dept. of Ag and so forth. Triple surprise: Beechwood company is really out of Chennai, India. This is the brilliance of our corrupt Meagan Wolfe, Administrator of the Wis. Elections Commission. Sources: Wis. Election Commission, Wis. Dept. of Administration. Sworn oath testimony, and public records requests of May 2023. ~ Peter Bernegger

785,928 deceased registrants are on the new voter registration list obtained from the Wisconsin Election Commission this week. Yes they can vote, because what you need is a 1) name, 2) address, 3) voter ID number, 4) and be in the system where these "Inactives" can be flipped to "Actives", given new names/addresses, and even moved around to different jurisdictions. With Microsoft SQL a person with access could flip 50,000 Inactives to Actives in 2-3 seconds. Did you know the programmers with Admin access to the WisVote database have not had criminal background checks? Source: Deputy Administrator Robert Kehoe's sworn testimony I took. Beware the words "Inactives" and "Actives" are completely made up by the Wisconsin Election Commission. The correct term is Elector. And you either are an Elector or you're not. ➡️No computers in our elections! ~ Peter Bernegger

I took the sworn deposition of Claire Woodall-Vogg, the former election clerk for the City of Milwaukee. Surprise ending! See the email from her to Omar Sheikh, bringing him into her Room 501 election office at City Hall starting on Aug. 9th 2020. Omar stayed there through Dec. 15th 2020. He slept in a back, hidden room. Workers could hear him snoring. Omar worked for The Elections Group. The Elections Group has their office in the former Obama campaign office in Chicago. Omar used to be a Deputy Election Clerk for Cook County, IL. Everyone knows how corrupt Cook County is,  it's the county that spawned the infectious disease known as Barack Hussein Obama. Claire testified Omar Sheikh was in the back conference room of the main election office Room 501 at City Hall, printing ballots. They used two ES&S Ballot on Demand machines. Printing went on for 2 weeks before Nov. 3rd 2020. Omar did this along with with Claire, former deputy clerk Kimberly Zapata, deputy clerk Jonathan Zuniga, former election clerk Neil Albrecht. Omar also rewrote the City's election manual - making it easier to fraudulently process/count absentee ballots. The Elections Group embedded Omar in the City of Milwaukee for the 2020 election, but they also embedded one of their people in each of the other key swing states. One of those was the extremely corrupt Ryan Macias, who was running around in Maricopa County Arizona and Fulton County Georgia. Surprise: please look at the email with the red redactions in it. Look who shows up Jan. 2nd 2021 in Georgia elections: Omar Sheikh. Look who sent the email. The FBI has an open criminal investigation in Wisconsin into the 2020 election. Sources: NBC news, MJS newspaper. ~ Peter Bernegger