Bekhruz's vision
The stories of a young man with BIG dreams walking through the path of knowledge @bexruzt1 Content: • IELTS • SAT • Dark humor • Personal experience • and all that jazz - est: 2023 May 3rd
نمایش بیشتر765
مشترکین
+1424 ساعت
+147 روز
-2330 روز
- مشترکین
- پوشش پست
- ER - نسبت تعامل
در حال بارگیری داده...
معدل نمو المشتركين
در حال بارگیری داده...
Repost from He thinks 💭
to change, you need desire, not Mondays, the beginning of a new month or year.
❤ 7❤🔥 6🔥 5💯 5👍 2🎃 2🌚 1🤝 1
There is a view that helping all people around the globe is impracticable. Therefore, governing bodies have to focus on their citizens in their own country. While this can be attributed to public discontent, I believe economically developed countries should fulfill their moral obligations by lending a helping hand to other nations, provided that they are capable of doing so.
Admittedly, funding foreign countries would seem unfair to the local population. True, the majority of countries complain about the problems they have, say, adequate medical care, affordable housing, and quality education. When countries direct their funds to help others, where the issues are echoed, this naturally brings about public dissatisfaction, leading to other serious problems. For instance, my country – Uzbekistan – faces a number of challenges regarding healthcare, economic development, and education, leaving no room for supporting other countries financially. Even developed countries – the USA – has sent millions of dollars to Ukraine and Israel while joblessness and homelessness rates were at their peaks, leading to an overwhelmingly negative public reaction.
Despite this, developed and developing countries should take aiding other nations in need into close consideration since needy countries are not able to tackle the issues single-handedly. Last year’s natural disasters in Turkey can be a good case in point. After a series of earthquakes, thousands, if not millions, of people were evacuated and injured, and their shelters were demolished, resulting in an overall loss of property. Fortunately, countries all over the world gave a helping hand by providing supplies, helping to build infrastructure, and providing healthcare and education. This, by extension, assisted in regaining stability and proved the fact that helping each other in times of need holds promise, irrespective of the country’s economic background.
In summary, granted, public concern over the government's help is justifiable, yet this does not mean that they must stop helping each other since countries that are in need depend on international aid.
318 words
#task2✅
⚡ 5❤🔥 3❤ 2🔥 2🌚 2🤩 1👻 1🎃 1🆒 1
In summary, granted, public concern over the government's help is justifiable, yet this does not mean that they must stop helping each other since countries that are in need depend on international aid.
318 words
#task2✅
There is a view that helping all people around the globe is impracticable. Therefore, governing bodies have to focus on their citizens in their own country. While this can be attributed to public discontent, I believe economically developed countries should fulfill their moral obligations by lending a helping hand to other nations, provided that they are capable of doing so.
Admittedly, funding foreign countries would seem unfair to the local population. True, the majority of countries complain about the problems they have, say, adequate medical care, affordable housing, and quality education. When countries direct their funds to help others, where the issues are echoed, this naturally brings about public dissatisfaction, leading to other serious problems. For instance, my country – Uzbekistan – faces a number of challenges regarding healthcare, economic development, and education, leaving no room for supporting other countries financially. Even developed countries – the USA – has sent millions of dollars to Ukraine and Israel while joblessness and homelessness rates were at their peaks, leading to an overwhelmingly negative public reaction.
Despite this, developed and developing countries should take aiding other nations in need into close consideration since needy countries are not able to tackle the issues single-handedly. Last year’s natural disasters in Turkey can be a good case in point. After a series of earthquakes, thousands, if not millions, of people were evacuated and injured, and their shelters were demolished, resulting in an overall loss of property. Fortunately, countries all over the world gave a helping hand by providing supplies, helping to build infrastructure, and providing healthcare and education. This, by extension, assisted in regaining stability and proved the fact that helping each other in times of need holds promise, irrespective of the country’s economic background.
In summary, granted, public concern over the government's help is justifiable, yet this does not mean that they must stop helping each other since countries that are in need depend on international aid.
There is a view that helping all people around the globe is impracticable. Therefore, governing bodies have to focus on their citizens in their own country. While this can be attributed to public discontent, I believe economically developed countries should fulfill their moral obligations by lending a helping hand to other nations, provided that they are capable of doing so.
Admittedly, funding foreign countries would seem unfair to the local population. True, the majority of countries complain about the problems they have, say, adequate medical care, affordable housing, and quality education. When countries direct their funds to help others, where the issues are echoed, this naturally brings about public dissatisfaction, leading to other serious problems. For instance, my country – Uzbekistan – faces a number of challenges regarding healthcare, economic development, and education, leaving no room for supporting other countries financially. Even developed countries – the USA – has sent millions of dollars to Ukraine and Israel while joblessness and homelessness rates were at their peaks, leading to an overwhelmingly negative public reaction.
Despite this, developed and developing countries should take aiding other nations in need into close consideration since needy countries are not able to tackle the issues single-handedly. Last year’s natural disasters in Turkey can be a good case in point. After a series of earthquakes, thousands, if not millions, of people were evacuated and injured, and their shelters were demolished, resulting in an overall loss of property. Fortunately, countries all over the world gave a helping hand by providing supplies, helping to build infrastructure, and providing healthcare and education. This, by extension, assisted in regaining stability and proved the fact that helping each other in times of need holds promise, irrespective of the country’s economic background.
It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should focus on their people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
⚡ 3❤🔥 2❤ 2🔥 1
У тебя новое анонимное сообщение!
Birinchi tuxum paydo bo’lganmi yoki tovuq?
↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
☠️
😁 8🤔 1🆒 1
00:16
Video unavailableShow in Telegram
Night dose of motivation
1990069164_An_gsu92441cH9ri3SEy_S2ECn30MYXQaTEKZNowjZqJcQE_iOre.mp42.01 MB
⚡ 5🔥 3❤🔥 2❤ 2👍 1
یک طرح متفاوت انتخاب کنید
طرح فعلی شما تنها برای 5 کانال تجزیه و تحلیل را مجاز می کند. برای بیشتر، لطفا یک طرح دیگر انتخاب کنید.