Election Data Analyzer

The EAC uses hand signed paper ballots when voting on a new executive director. What a concept. https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/6/Tally_Vote_Matter_Ballots_and_Certification_090519.pdf

Don't forget to join us on USEIP and become part of the EDA team. There is a background check required.https://useip.org/get-connected/

🔥 IMPORTANT 🔥 Listen carefully to Catherine's words in this video from last night when she was discussing the “10x bigger than the mules” story. “It involves enemies foreign and domestic…” "I mentioned earlier that the story that's coming forward involves a foreign government and it could rise to the level perceived to be an ACT OF WAR..." 👀 Keep praying for Gregg and Catherine

Thought this group might enjoy this article from a colleague here in Idaho... https://idahodispatch.com/op-ed-what-would-a-system-for-massive-election-fraud-look-like/

Want to send a Huge thank you Diana Friemann – Diana invited me to speak, received pressure from two members of the Olmsted MNGOP NOT to have me speak. She did not back down. The presentation on the machines and process has now been viewed 1,483 times on Rumble: "Machines in Minnesota - June 12, 2022" https://rumble.com/v18c88v-machines-in-minnesota-june-12-2022.html

First draft. Comments welcome.

NIST 1500 - Common Data Formats (CDF) for Elections– Funded by Democracy Fund https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmvUMw3V9oU This is worth a watch for a deep dive on NIST-1500. There is a lot of momentum behind this. I get the sense the entire Election Industry will be using it to design future technology. Democracy Fund pays for firm Roscoe Hilton LLC (hosting this webinar) to travel around and consult with local governments. CTCL and Google have their hands in the pot as well. Go to 39:18. Political geography database management. The NIST CDF has been adopted in Ohio. Rock the Vote is standardizing voter registration as is the DMVs across the country. The Ranked Choice Resource Center and DARPA are also using NIST-1500. https://www.rankedchoicevoting.org/

NIST 1500 - Common Data Formats (CDF) for Elections– Funded by Democracy Fund https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmvUMw3V9oU This is worth a watch for a deep dive on NIST-1500. There is a lot of momentum behind this. I get the sense the entire Election Industry will be using it to design future technology. Democracy Fund pays for firm Roscoe Hilton LLC (hosting this webinar) to travel around and consult with local governments. CTCL and Google have their hands in the pot as well. Go to 39:18. Political geography database management. The NIST CDF has been adopted in Ohio. Rock the Vote is standardizing voter registration as is the DMVs across the country. The Ranked Choice Resource Center and DARPA are also using NIST-1500. https://www.rankedchoicevoting.org/

Ben Adida – Voting Works Executive Director – start at 1:05:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmRk3rlbf7c Ben Adida Sep 30, 2020 - “Vote By Mail Fraud is much to do about nothing.” “No evidence of voter machine hacking.” Thanks Ben, do you still believe this after watching 2000Mules and reading the three forensic reports on Mesa County? What concerns me even more is Voting Works open-source project called Arlo which was incubated with Soros funds. https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/voting-works/ https://github.com/votingworks/arlo/graphs/contributors Arlo makes use of the NIST interoperability standard funded by Democracy Works never Trumper Pierre Omidyar that will connect via the internet, all aspects of our voting and reporting system. https://www.influencewatch.org/person/pierre-omidyar/ https://pages.nist.gov/CastVoteRecords/#17_0_2_4_78e0236_1389366195564_913164_2300 Back to Ben, in the video he condescendingly explains why manual vote counting is not possible. The “reporter” from Wired snarky attitude towards Trump with a wink and a nod is telling. She does not challenge that assertion. The bottom line is this, left leaning big money is taking over our elections by funneling dark money through 501(c)(3) organizations who are working with the NIST and promulgating standards that drive the development of the next generation of electronic voting equipment. Nobody is asking for less technology. Nobody is asking for more local control.

For CVR Geeks Only The brains behind the NIST Cast Vote Record standard seems to be Prometheus Computing. https://pages.nist.gov/CastVoteRecords/ https://pages.nist.gov/CastVoteRecords/#17_0_2_4_78e0236_1389366195564_913164_2300 Two of the three main github contributors work for Prometheus https://github.com/usnistgov/CastVoteRecords Prometheus https://www.prometheuscomputing.com/what-we-do -Developed UML model of the IEEE VSSC/1622 Common Data Format for Election Equipment Standard -Developed tools to generate a paper-based standard from the UML model -Developed tools to export the Standard’s data into XML schema and JSON formats

Want to Become an EAC Accredited Voting System Testing Laboratory (VSTL)? If a testing laboratory wants to become accredited by the EAC to test voting machines, it must do so under National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). This is a program run by NIST. https://www.nist.gov/nvlap Within NVLAP, there is a special program for voting system testing labs called VST LAP. https://www.nist.gov/nvlap/voting-system-testing-lap NVLAP will then conducts an audit of the test laboratory under the VST LAP program which defines that the following standards should be met. This audit typically takes 3 days. https://www.iso.org/ISO-IEC-17025-testing-and-calibration-laboratories.html https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/pml/wmd/labmetrology/nist-handbook-150.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/hb/2021/NIST.HB.150-22-2021.pdf https://www.eac.gov/about_the_eac/help_america_vote_act.aspx https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/TestingCertification/Voluntary_Voting_System_Guidelines_Version_2_0.pdf If the VSTL passes the audit they achieve an NVLAP accreditation from NIST. NIST then recommends the VSTL to EAC as an approved VSTL. EAC must formally approve the VSTL. At the moment, there are only 2 EAC approved VSTLs. SLI Compliance and Pro V&V https://www-s.nist.gov/niws/index.cfm?event=directory.results SLI Compliance Certification expires on Dec31st 2022. https://www-s.nist.gov/niws/index.cfm?event=directory.detail&labid=530&programId=23&csrfToken=67DCE2D14205DDA358013CDC28FEBB0C8847E1C6 Pro V&V expires on March 31 2023. https://www-s.nist.gov/niws/index.cfm?event=directory.detail&labid=700&programId=23&csrfToken=67DCE2D14205DDA358013CDC28FEBB0C8847E1C6 Now you know.

Look who is presenting VVSG in 2019 for the NIST? Kurt Sampsel of CTCL. What is a bias never Trump organization like CTCL doing infiltrating the NIST with respect to the Voluntary Voting System Guidance 2.0 drafts put together in 2019? https://www.nist.gov/video/vvsg-20-draft-requirements-part-2-updates-best-practices-and-new-technologies-voting-systems

The Democracy Fund 510(c)(3) Pierre Omidyar (French Born Iranian) Ties to NIST This takes some unpacking. The Democracy Fund supports the work of a firm called Hilton Roscoe LLC out of Ohio https://hiltonroscoe.com/ Hilton Roscoe runs a project called the Common Data Formats for Election Data https://hiltonroscoe.com/CDFResources The CDF is working to standardize data formats for all types election data, including for example CVR. For those of you who want to really dig into the details, here is the github link. https://github.com/usnistgov/CastVoteRecords The NISTs Special Publication 1500-103 is attempting to standardize all election related data https://pages.nist.gov/CastVoteRecords/ NIST is making use of the github design by Hilton Roscoe LLC for 1500-103. So bottom line is this, Big Tech Pierre Omidyar is funding NIST standards development that will be used for election machine manufacturers to count votes. Sound like a good idea?

Justifying Ballot Counting With Barcodes This expert author (who used to work for Sen Warren) describes different types of hacks that could be employed in a tabulator against a ballot to count incorrectly. The proposed solutions 1. The voter should look at the printed copy before submitting it and review the human readable choices because they cannot read the barcode. Huh? You have to be kidding. 2. Risk limiting audits. Ibid. 3. Use a different type of machine that uses Optical Character Recognition (OCR) that reads the characters next to the bubble that is filled in. ibid What about the DATABASE? Mesa County reports 1,2 & 3 have shown how hackable the databases are. This is still worth a read however. https://cdt.org/insights/do-ballot-barcodes-threaten-election-security/