HapaPerspective 🇺🇸

A lot of people in the movement have reasonably criticized Austin Metcalf’s dad for being a cuck on race, but then they called him a boomer. No, he’s Generation X. It seems people don’t understand what a boomer actually is and how old they really are (anyone born between 1946 and 1964). They just think anyone with gray hair and maybe a house is a boomer. Thats wrong. Don’t call someone a boomer unless they’re actually a boomer, otherwise the term will lose its true meaning.

If you make things just difficult enough they will leave.

This is what I’m talking about: the entire concept of “racism” goes and in hand with the idea that race is just skin color. It forces White people to reject reality — and it isn’t simply their fault, because they’re victims of linguistic brainwashing.

You need to look at winning hearts and minds like conquering physical territory from an enemy. The war isn’t just physical.

One of biggest obstacles preventing widespread acceptance of race realism (and thus White Nationalism) is that too many White people still believe that race is just skin color; and therefore “racism” is a real thing that’s also bad because it’s about hating other skin colors. The idea of “racism” itself helps to prop up this notion that race is just skin color, and if you say otherwise, you’re branded a hatemonger, and thus a racist! It’s like a childish feedback loop, or what some call a self-sealing belief system. “…Racism is bad, because race is just skin color. Anyone that disagrees just hates people because of their skin color, and hate is bad. Thus racism is bad…”

My basic message to normies: Race is NOT just skin color, diversity and multiracialism do NOT ever work, White people shouldn’t be a minority, and desegregation was a huge mistake.

JD Delay, a famous YouTuber, is a good example of how the average White normie thinks. He’ll wear a “White Boy Summer” shirt while criticizing ChudTheBuilder for being a “racist asshole.” Like I said, the entire concept of “racism” is irredeemably subversive. It is designed to control how people think about race, and at best, it’s always going to steer them toward civic nationalism and race-denial.

Riots aren’t anywhere near enough to fix this shit. https://t.me/pjwnews/12284

The other downside of having lots of anti-White White people around, is that it has a gaslighting effect on other, more ordinary White people that, on an intuitive level, notice that race is real and not just skin color. Without so many fanatical anti-White White people around, Whites are less afraid of being thought policed and gaslit. And it helps when the majority of anti-Whites are non-White, because then reality is more clear.

This idea that England or any other Western country is better off than America because it’s demographically Whiter is a reasonable but huge miscalculation. Many of your worst enemies will be other White people. Many of the most anti-White, fanatical ZOG-establishment order-followers will be other White people. Just look at the British police, they’re still mostly White.

Wear ceremonial Seaxes.

Imagine an English woman defending herself from a migrant rapist with a traditional Saxon Seax, and killing him. That would be kino as fuck.

If I were a Brit, I’d put together some Anglo-Saxon-Pagan religion that required people to carry knives (Saxes) like the Sikhs do. I think it would become very popular among Whites in Britain. The Saxons were named after the long knives they traditionally carried, so the tradition is already there.

GTA: UK h/t: Cognative Omission @AltSkull48

“If we aren’t allowed to carry knives, Sikhs shouldn’t be allowed to either” is the wrong mindset — just wanting the traitorous-government to apply the laws equally, and begging for greater equality. A better mindset: “We should be the ones carrying the weapons, guns included.”

So the real message here is that citizens having firearms is actually important for revolution and protecting sovereignty against a tyrannical, traitorous anti-White government. I couldn’t agree more! But what about training and experience with firearms? What’s unfortunate for any population that has to break into armories to gain access to arms is that, if they’re not shot dead on sight by the military — that would absolutely have armed guards around a military base or police station — whatever people snag from an armory might be the first guns they’ve ever touched. Think about what an uphill battle that is for people that don’t have the luxury of having a constitution that would protect their right to keep and bear arms.

Karmelo Anthony has been found guilty and is being sentenced to 35 years in prison. That’s better than I expected.

I can’t overstate how subversive the word racist actually is, I’m listening to right leaning YouTubers all saying “these anti-Whites are the real racists, that’s why they’re a problem!” If White Nationalists don’t understand how the term racism itself is entirely subversive and problematic, then White Nationalism will become a losers’ movement once again.

Another important aspect of this video is how the dissolution of militias facilitated the rise of a standing professional army (the US military) which is an essential characteristic of empire — the global US empire that so many of us despise. Historians in the future will look at point as the point at which the US became an empire.

This is an excellent video that’s answer the question “why do Americans have guns but do little with them, beyond personal self defense.” The Second Amendment is still critically important and essential, but it’s not enough. Unfortunately for some people, that answer is too nuanced and complex — a solution is rarely one thing in isolation, but rather multiple things in the right combination. https://youtu.be/ehlsJVREMSk?si=0