HapaPerspective 🇺🇸

I sometimes wonder about how much the non-White problem and the Jewish problem are actually downstream from Feminism and the Boomer generation.

I sometimes wonder to what degree the non-White problem and the Jewish problem are downstream from Feminism and the Boomer generation.

Yet again, it was the Boomers that opened the gates to our you-know-who enemies and rolled out the red carpet for the spiritual-poison. The boomers ate it up en masse, like filthy pigs fighting over rotten scraps poured into their troughs. The quote below is from a conversation I had with ChatGpt's Ai, because I'm not an absolute expert on the history of feminism.

Baby Boomers were the generation that did the most to bring modern feminism into the cultural mainstream. Second-wave feminism began in the 1960s and many of its early leaders—such as Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem—were actually from older generations. But Boomers came of age during the movement and adopted many of its ideas on a massive scale, helping normalize them in universities, workplaces, media, politics, and family life. (National Women’s History Museum) Pew Research found a clear generational shift: Baby Boomers were significantly more liberal about women’s roles than the generations preceding them. Later generations became even more socially egalitarian, but the Boomer generation was pivotal in turning ideas that had once been associated with feminist activism into mainstream Western social norms. (Pew Research Center) Sources: Pew Research Center; National Women’s History Museum.

This is basically most all of the boomers I grew up around. They were cookie-cutter shitlib and “centrist” boomer kumbaya-clowns. https://t.me/gramscianradio/9213

The final nail in the coffin for feminism and gender equality should be the fact that no one can name a single civilization that thrived (or even survived at all) that gave women (rather than a single, occasional queen) an equal share in political decision-making and responsibility. Sure, some civilizations gave some high-status women property rights and wealth, but that’s not the same thing we’ve been discussing around here. Some feminist and gender egalitarian weasels will try to argue that high-status women always had some influence on the political course of every major civilization, but that influence was always a very indirect and feminine kind of influence—as a group, women were never directly involved in the actual decision-making, management, defense and general leadership of any civilization. They were never treated as equal to men with regard to their responsibilities. There are individual exceptions—rare “female warriors” and powerful queens here and there—but as a group, women did not have equal representation in any traditionally male occupations crucial to the survival of civilization. Only until very recently, Western civilization has always been patriarchal. It was all entirely built under patriarchy. The decline of the West (of White nations) has absolutely correlated with every increase in female enfranchisement and “gender equality.”

In other words, even under a total feminist gynecocracy where women just have it all, they will still demand that men do the heavy lifting, and they won’t give weak, low status men much of a chance to breed with them. Women still want men that are stronger, more dominant and generally superior to them. Patriarchy is what women actually want.

Feminism and gender equality are all ultimately just a giant shit test. If White men fail to pass this civilizational shit test—by reinstating a White patriarchy—White women will continue collectively hen pecking White men and Western civilization until it’s fully conquered by non-White men (Islam).

Feminism and gender equality are all ultimately just a giant shit test. If White men can pass the shit test—by reinstating a White patriarchy—White women will continue collectively hen pecking White men and Western civilization until it’s fully conquered by non-White men (Islam).

If you really think about it, most women actually want to live under a patriarchy. All the feminist “independent, strong, you-go-girl” propaganda doesn’t exactly inspire women to accept marrying a man who is generally emotional, weak, cowardly, submissive, and useless. Women will always want a man who is stronger than they are, not just physically stronger, but overall stronger in will and character—more dominant. They want a man that can protect them and take care of them. Status is another factor that overlaps with this: women typically want to date a man that’s in some way has higher social status—not necessarily higher financial status, but that is one aspect of status. At the bare minimum, women expect men to pull their own weight in any relationship. In theory, strong independent women should not care about meeting strong men who can take care of themselves, but they still do! If you increase the social status and power of women (relative to the average man) or convince them that they are just as strong as a man (and they believe it), the end result is a situation where most women feel that they can’t find a man who is “good enough” for them. This has already resulted in fewer marriages, more “incels” and thus lower birth rates.

Another issue with women is that they’re more likely to suffer from Stockholm Syndrome, which is another reason why they shouldn’t have any political power or suffrage. They will collectively bend the knee and even support any group that’s abusing them, with the subconscious goal of buying survival through compliance and appeasement. That’s why you’ll see “strong” liberal feminist female politicians voluntarily wearing hijabs in Muslim spaces.

One great use case for AI is fixing conservatard memes.

Almost half of the population doesn’t even want to vote. Organization constantly have to remind people to get out and vote, and they tell them who and what to vote for. This is doubly true for women. One way to have a more functional republic is to make it illegal for organizations to pressure people into voting. The decision to vote must be a pure and genuine choice made by the individual going to the ballot box, uncorrupted by any organizations.

There’s a big debate going on in this channel’s chatroom regarding whether or not women should have suffrage (the right to vote). The fact is, with the right wording, most women would willingly give up their own right to vote. 🗳️

When White Nationalists finally have power, they need to debank the hell out of our enemies. Hopefully they’ll have the balls to shut off their utilities too: no electricity or water for communists, illegal immigrants and anti-Whites. They’ll all hopefully self-deport after that. https://t.me/JackEltis/427

When I'm near Chinese people, I can feel my life force and vrill being drained from my body. They are just so weird and have negative charisma that I lose my motivation by association.

Reminder: Europeans overwhelmingly descend from the Medieval middle and upper classes, not the peasantry. The former outbred the latter by a significant margin. As higher status positions were of limited availability, the excess children of more successful people faced downward social mobility. The lower classes, who had sub-replacement fertility levels, were constantly demographically replaced for hundreds of years. This breeding pattern continued until the turn of the 19th century. From ~1800 to ~1880, there was little difference in net fertility by wealth/class, and after ~1880, higher wealth/class became negatively associated with fertility. The vast majority of your ACTUAL ancestors were not peasants. See: A Farewell to Alms by Gregory Clark

Not listening to classical music is brown coded