HapaPerspective 🇺🇸

This is an excellent video that’s answer the question “why do Americans have guns but do little with them, beyond personal self defense.” The Second Amendment is still critically important and essential, but it’s not enough. Unfortunately for some people, that answer is too nuanced and complex — a solution is rarely one thing in isolation, but rather multiple things in the right combination. https://youtu.be/ehlsJVREMSk?si=0

In other words, much like with the McMichael’s in the Ahmaud Arbery case, Karmelo Anthony’s legal situation appears similar in that his self-defense claim fell apart, for somewhat similar reasons, and this time the races were reversed. Every murderer on the planet could claim they killed their victim in self-defense, if being the aggressor or the one that provoked the encounter wasn’t a negative factor in the legal standard for self-defense.

More people should be paying attention to the Karmelo Anthony case that is going on right now, not just for the obvious reasons related to race, but more so because it’s enlightening regarding the legal standards for self-defense. Karmelo’s defense and his supporters have been trying to claim that he defended himself against Metcalf (the White murder victim) but of course that turned out to be bullshit. His claim to self-defense fell apart because he provoked the encounter — he was the initial aggressor— which parallels the legal situation with Travis and Gregory McMichael in the Ahmad Arbery case from 2020. A lot of folks in the Dissident Right ignorantly claimed that the McMichael’s defended themselves and that their conviction was somehow proof that you can’t legally defend yourself if you’re White — well, no, you legally can’t be the aggressor if you’re going to claim self-defense afterwards. That’s why I’m pointing out that Karmelo Anthony’s legal situation is very similar to the McMichael’s. And funny enough, negroes are also claiming that they aren’t legally allowed to defend themselves against White people. The point is, you need to understand the laws in your area: what constitutes self-defense. There is legally a thin line between self-defense and murder, and that line is very thin if you don’t understand how the legal system makes that determination. For legal self-defense, some good basic rules to follow: never be the aggressor, never provoke the encounter, and never chase or entrap someone that is no longer an immediate threat to you or anyone else.

This checks out. It’s the Asian parent that would admit this to their hapa kid. They typically have no moral qualms regarding race realism.

If what normies think didn’t matter, then who owns the media also wouldn’t matter. But clearly it does. Getting normies on our side and understanding our message matters, because you always benefit from having a larger base of support. Having more people on your side exponentially increases your ability to influence politics and get into power.

What normies think is actually quite relevant to power, otherwise why would these “elites” (often Jews) spend billions of dollars every day trying to influence normies? Why would Elon Musk buy Twitter? Why does TikTok matter to them so much? Even after investing billions, it doesn’t always work out well for them, but they will just spend even more money trying to influence normies. Yes, what normies think does matter. Even if your argument is that normies don’t think, whatever is inside their head still matters a lot! People are spending billions on a daily basis to make sure they control what is inside normies skulls. If it didn’t matter, the ruling class (Jews) wouldn’t care about the media at all. They’re not investing in media just to make money, they want to shape what the masses think, and they are willing to risk their fortunes to do that.

A big part of the normie problem is that most people don’t contemplate how their own vocabulary shapes, limits and directs their ability to think about and process reality. But Jews intuitively grasp that language is a form of magic that can be used against other races; especially against a race that operates off of abstract ideas and moral principles (White people).

You’re not going to convince White normies that some racism is good, natural and necessary just because you’re a looksmaxxer or whatever nonsense you think would work. You’re the one trying to rewrite the definition of a word that’s deeply embedded and at the core of their current reality. The only thing that works is getting them to question and doubt that racism itself is a legitimate concept.

I’m seeing more stuff like this sentiment (read til the end) and as I’ve predicted, White Rights are the next big wave of anti-racism. And more critically. I’m also predicting that most White Nationalists will have minimal ability to confront this issue and turn it around, because as a movement we haven’t yet dealt with the reality that most White people automatically think racism is something inherently evil, without exception. The only difference now is that a new wave of anti-racists are going to focused on combating racism against White people — and perhaps by extension, combating racism against Jews. These people won’t understand you when you say “Yes I’m racist! Racism is good!” Because they’re invested in fighting against anti-White-racism, because “racism = bad.” And they won’t change their mind on this just because you’re a 6 foot tall Chad with a great jawline and trad family or whatever optics you think gives you the ability to make people do a 180 on their entire world view and instantly agree that “racism is cool now.” That shit doesn’t work in the real world with 95% of White people. Yes, I’m saying it: touch grass motherfuckers. White Nationalism needs to figure this out before they lose this communication game again.

No, this policy would apply after we kick out the non-Whites. I’m talking about White people that hate America for whatever reason — we pay them to leave. The pajeets are mostly very recent immigrants that have no legitimate claim to this country. Most of them probably aren’t even legally citizens.

Once you get rid of the illegal immigrants and strengthen the borders, paying people (who are already legal citizens) to leave your country and revoke their citizenship has got to be one of the ultimate Nationalist policies. Because then, eventually, you’re left with only the people that really want to be in your country and part of your nation, and aren’t going to quit it all for a lump sum of cash. I think a lot of the communist/antifa types would certainly leave for the right amount of money.

I’m not talking about White people that leave the country for reasons unrelated to how they feel about America. I can understand if an American becomes a permanent resident or citizen of another country for work or love, and being near helpful in-laws, or some other reason like that. I feel no joy in seeing them leave. I’m talking about people that hate America and what it’s all about — those are the people that I want to leave. We should even pay them to leave.

I’m not talking about White people that leave the country for reasons unrelated to how they feel about America. I can understand if an American becomes a permanent resident or citizen of another country for work or love, and being near helpful in-laws, or some other reason like that. I feel no joy in seeing them leave. I’m talking about people that hate America and what it’s all about — those are the people that I want to leave. We should even pay them to leave.

Of course I want all non-Whites to leave, but some of the White people too, the ones that want to leave because “America is too racist!” or “I don’t like all the guns here.” Yes, please get out, you are not an asset.

All the people that want to leave America are making America better by leaving. Including some of the White people that want to leave. Good riddance!

More people need to leave.

Goodnight gamers

Some people in the DR want to make a big issue out of Henry Nowak being an English citizen of Polish descent, as if that really matters. He wasn’t fully English, but he was still a White guy that was murdered by a brownoid.

At the recent BRICS economic forum, the CEO of Gazprom-Media Holding and former head of roskomnadzor Alexandr Zharov (Jew) described the ПИДОР position on Non-White migration:

We are ready to welcome guests, and we welcome them with all our heart. And even if a guest is not very pleasant, we will tolerate him.

Right now, I think Australian White Nationalists have the best chance of a peaceful political path at victory, and that’s a great thing if it happens. It hasn’t been easy for them, and it won’t be easy going forward. But I’m very optimistic with Australia. That being said, I doubt a peaceful path to victory is as likely for other Western countries. In this case of America, it’s too big, too important to the Jews, and there’s too many people here that would literally declare war on us.